India's equity benchmarks little changed ahead of Fed decision; tariff worries linger
The Nifty 50 rose 0.14% to 24,855.05 points and the BSE Sensex gained 0.18% to 81,481.86.
Nine of the 16 major sectors advanced. Infrastructure major Larsen & Toubro climbed about 5%, and was the biggest percentage gainer on Nifty 50, after its 30% jump in first-quarter profit came above estimates.
"US tariffs and earnings visibility for second half of fiscal 2026 are the key factors currently. Until clarity emerges on these two, the market is unlikely to swing sharply in either direction," said Arun Malhotra, fund manager at CapGrow Capital.
US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that a trade deal with India was yet to be finalised and warned of possible higher tariffs ahead of an August 1 deadline to seal an agreement.
Investors are also waiting for Fed's policy decision later today. The US central bank is expected to hold rates but the focus will be on Chair Jerome Powell's comments on the economic and inflation outlook amid a prolonged wait for rate cuts.
Higher US interest rates make emerging market equities such as India less attractive for foreign investors, who have been on a selling spree in India this month.
The broader mid-caps and small-caps fell 0.1% and 0.5%, respectively.
Among individual stocks, Tata Motors fell 3.5% as news reports of its plans to buy Italian truck maker Iveco for $4.5 billion raised concerns over a potential strain to its balance sheet.
GNG Electronics made a stellar debut on exchanges, with shares jumping 40.7%.
Workplace solutions provider Indiqube Spaces closed 8% lower in its first trading session.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
8 minutes ago
- Hans India
Parliament must condemn Trump blabber
US President Donald Trump has launched a scathing attack on India, calling its economy "dead" and imposing a 25 pr cent tariff on its imports, effective from August 1. Trump expressed displeasure with India's purchase of oil and defence equipment from Russia, stating that India has "always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia" and is Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China. He said that maybe India will buy oil from Pakistan someday, which further strained the already tense relationship between the two neighbours. The Indian Parliament should condemn Trump's statement in one voice, as his remarks have sparked concern and added fuel to the escalating tensions between the US and India. Ganti Venkata Sudhir, Secunderabad Modi's foreign policy dealt Trump blow US President Donald Trump's announcement to impose a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods has dealt a severe blow to the Indian economy. Citing India's trade ties with Russia and high tariffs as reasons, this decision is set to disrupt Indian exports, particularly in critical sectors like pharmaceuticals and textiles. The move has sparked widespread criticism of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's foreign policy, which has failed to avert the crisis. Despite Modi's much-touted close relationship with Trump, the lack of progress in securing a favourable trade agreement highlights a perceived leadership shortfall. Urgent measures are needed to safeguard India's economic interests. Srinivaas Goud Muddam, Hyderabad
Mint
8 minutes ago
- Mint
Buy or sell: Ganesh Dongre of Anand Rathi recommends three stocks to buy on Monday - 4 August 2025
Buy or sell: The Indian equity markets witnessed notable profit booking this week, with the Nifty 50 closing at 24,565, registering a weekly decline of 0.90%. The index broke decisively below its recent consolidation range of 24,800–25,200, a zone it had maintained over the previous week. Friday's heavy sell-off was particularly significant, driven by concerns over a potentially weak earnings season and an unexpected imposition of steep tariffs by the Trump administration. Additionally, market sentiment was impacted by the U.S. Federal Reserve's decision on July 30 to keep the key short-term interest rate unchanged at 4.25%–4.50% for the fifth consecutive time, despite growing pressure from President Donald Trump to reduce borrowing costs. From a technical standpoint, a sustained close below the 24,800–25,200 range has reinforced bearish sentiment, potentially opening the path for a further decline toward the 24,300 levels in the near term. A breach below 24,800 suggests a short-term pause or minor correction within the broader uptrend. The overall trend, however, remains bearish in the short term as long as the Nifty trades below the 25,000–25,200 mark. The 24,800–25,000 zone now emerges as a critical resistance area, supported by the highest Call Open Interest (OI). On the downside, 24,200 and 24,500 are key support levels, backed by significant Put OI. A sustained move above 25,200 would be essential to confirm the resumption of bullish momentum. The Bank Nifty also closed the week on a weaker note at 55,617, continuing to exhibit signs of weakness. The index now faces immediate resistance in the 56,500–57,000 zone, with a decisive breakout above this range potentially triggering a fresh uptrend. On the downside, the 55,000 level is expected to attract buying interest and acts as a crucial support level for the index. On a broader timeframe, both the Nifty and Bank Nifty closed the week below their respective monthly support levels—23,800 for Nifty and 56,000 for Bank Nifty—indicating a continuation of the prevailing short-term bearish sentiment. For the week ahead, key levels to watch include support at 24,200–24,300 and resistance at 25,200 for the Nifty, while Bank Nifty holds support between 55,000–55,500 and faces resistance at 57,000. Traders are advised to remain cautious and closely monitor global cues and geopolitical developments, which may influence short-term market direction. While the broader trend remains cautiously optimistic, a breakout above the identified resistance levels will be essential to confirm the resumption of upward momentum. Buy National Aluminium Co at ₹ 178-180; Stop Loss at ₹ 174; Target Price of ₹ 188. Buy Central Depository Services (India) at ₹ 1470-1480; Stop Loss at ₹ 1430; Target Price of ₹ 1540. Buy Marico at ₹ 705-710; Stop Loss at ₹ 685; Target Price of ₹ 735. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts, experts and broking companies, not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decision.
Economic Times
8 minutes ago
- Economic Times
US penalty risk on Russian oil may add USD 9-11 billion to India's import bill
India's annual oil import bill could rise by USD 9-11 billion if the country is compelled to move away from Russian crude in response to US threats of additional tariffs or penalties on Indian exports, analysts said. India, the world's third-largest oil consumer and importer, has reaped significant benefits by swiftly substituting market-priced oil with discounted Russian crude following Western sanctions on Moscow after its invasion of Ukraine in February oil, which accounted for less than 0.2 per cent of India's imports before the war, now makes up 35-40 per cent of the country's crude intake, helping reduce overall energy import costs, keep retail fuel prices in check, and contain inflation. The influx of discounted Russian crude also enabled India to refine the oil and export petroleum products, including to countries that have imposed sanctions on direct imports from Russia. The twin strategy of Indian oil companies is posting record profits. This is, however, now under threat after US President Donald Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian oil and weapons. The 25 per cent tariff has since been notified but the penalty is yet to be specified. Coming within days of the European Union banning imports of refined products derived from Russian-origin crude, this presents a double whammy for Indian refiners. Sumit Ritolia, Lead Research Analyst (Refining & Modeling) at global real-time data and analytics provider Kpler termed this as "a squeeze from both ends". EU sanctions - effective from January 2026 - may force Indian refiners to segment crude intake on one side, and on the other, the US tariff threat raises the possibility of secondary sanctions that would directly hit the shipping, insurance, and financing lifelines underpinning India's Russian oil trade. "Together, these measures sharply curtail India's crude procurement flexibility, raise compliance risk, and introduce significant cost uncertainty," he said. Last fiscal, India spent over USD 137 billion on import of crude oil, which is refined into fuels like petrol and diesel. For refiners like Reliance Industries Ltd and Nayara Energy - who collectively account for a bulk (more than 50 per cent in 2025) of the 1.7-2.0 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian crude imports into India - the challenge is acute. While Nayara is backed by Russian oil giant Rosneft and has been sanctioned by the EU last month, Reliance has been a big fuel exporter to Europe. As one of the world's largest diesel exporters - and with total refined product exports to Europe averaging around 200,000 bpd in 2024 and 185,000 bpd so far in 2025 - Reliance has extensively utilised discounted Russian crude to boost refining margins over the past two years, according to Kpler. "The introduction of strict origin-tracking requirements now compels Reliance to either curtail its intake of Russian feedstock, potentially affecting cost competitiveness, or reroute Russian-linked products to non-EU markets," Ritolia said. However, Reliance's dual-refinery structure - a domestic-focused unit and an export-oriented complex - offers strategic flexibility. It can allocate non-Russian crude to its export-oriented refinery and continue meeting EU compliance standards, while processing Russian barrels at the domestic unit for other markets. Although redirecting diesel exports to Southeast Asia, Africa, or Latin America is operationally feasible, such a shift would involve narrower margins, longer voyage times, and increased demand variability, making it commercially less optimal, he said. Kpler data shows a notable decline in India's Russian crude imports in July (1.8 million bpd versus 2.1 million bpd in June), aligning with seasonal refinery maintenance and weaker monsoon-driven demand. However, the drop is more pronounced among state-run refiners, likely reflecting heightened compliance sensitivity amid mounting geopolitical risk. Private refiners, who account for over 50 per cent of Russian crude intake, have also begun reducing exposure, with fresh procurement diversification underway this week as concerns over US sanctions intensify. Ritolia said replacing Russian crude isn't plug-and-play. The Middle East is the logical fallback, but has constraints - contractual lock-in, pricing rigidity, and a mismatch in crude quality that affects product yield and refinery configuration. "The risk here is not just supply but profitability. Refiners will face higher feedstock costs, and in the case of complex units optimized for (Russian) Urals-like blends, even margins will be under pressure," he said. On the future course, Kpler believes India's complex private refiners - backed by robust trading arms and flexible configurations - are expected to pivot toward non-Russian barrels from the Middle East, West Africa, Latin America, or even the US, where economics permits. This shift, while operationally feasible, will be gradual and strategically aligned with evolving regulatory frameworks, contract structures, and margin dynamics. However, replacing Russian barrels in full is no easy feat - logistically daunting, economically painful, and geopolitically fraught. Supply substitution may be feasible on paper, but remains fraught in practice. "Financially, the implications are massive. Assuming a USD 5 per barrel discount lost across 1.8 million bpd, India could see its import bill swell by USD 9-11 billion annually. If global flat prices rise further due to reduced Russian availability, the cost could be higher," it said. This would increase fiscal strain, particularly if the government steps in to stabilize retail fuel prices. The cascading impact on inflation, currency, and monetary policy would be difficult to ignore.
