Outcome over output: Move away from hustle culture to ensure long-term success
In North America, corporate culture can often glorify overworking and hyper-productivity, expecting employees to be available and connected at all times.
However, recent data from a variety of parties including Mental Health Research Canada shows Canadian employees are growing tired of the 'rise-and-grind,' with more than two-thirds (69 per cent) of professionals reporting burnout symptoms. While hustle culture might yield short-term business gains, it is unsustainable and can damage a company's ability to attract and retain talent in the long run.
Rather than driving employees to the edge of exhaustion, leaders can promote lasting growth by prioritizing purpose over immediate results and fostering a culture where employees feel a sense of fulfilment from their work.
Sounds easy right? Not exactly. Meaningful implementation requires a commitment to seeking, understanding and acting upon the concerns, needs and ideas from your team.
At Ricoh, striking the right balance between driving productivity and fostering purpose in the workplace starts with a culture that permeates all aspects of our business – one that recognizes the need for both flexibility and accountability. According to our employee engagement survey, that approach is working, with scores having steadily increased over the past few years.
The more you give, the more you get
Our new digital workplace has created the opportunity to curate a unique work experience. Traditional 9-5 schedules have given way to greater flexibility, and with it, a greater need for self-discipline. We are better able to focus on things that are meaningful both within and outside of our jobs and we've found that providing some leeway can mitigate burnout and cultivate loyalty. According to a recent Ricoh survey, the 2024 North American Workplace Fulfillment Gap Index, 88 per cent of Canadians said openness to new and better ways of working is important to their decision to stay in their role or at their current company.
Fulfilment has an equal impact on retention, according to the same survey, with 84 per cent indicating that feeling fulfilled at work is a main deciding factor as to whether they stay with a company. However significantly fewer (14 per cent) report feeling completely fulfilled at work.
Why is that? The onset of a hybrid distributed workforce has made it more difficult to build and maintain a common culture, to regularly engage with one another and collaborate from different locations. Burnout can stem not just from an always-on workforce, but from the roadblocks to connection and collaboration. It is crucial for leaders to engage their teams consistently and provide the tools that allow them to easily engage with one another.
Lead the charge and unplug
Another approach I encourage is unplugging and that starts from the top down. Setting boundaries between work and personal life is core to fostering wellbeing. When work-life boundaries are blurred, people experience an increase in emotional exhaustion and declining happiness.
How do we unplug with phones always on us at home and at the office?
I encourage leaders of each business unit to set the tone that's right for each team – perhaps it's a 'no-reply' expectation past working hours and weekends or offboarding projects before an employee takes a vacation so they can fully turn off while on a break. This allows them to enjoy their time away from the office and focus on recharging during much needed rest time.
It's important to recognize that what's happening outside of the workplace can also be overwhelming. Many people are struggling to comprehend what's happening in the world today. Things can feel as though they are out of our control, leading to emotional burnout. As leaders, we have the power to set the example and make well-being equally important to business outcomes. There are times to 'hustle' or step up and times to rest. Flexible, hybrid workplaces thrives when we all understand and abide by the personal and business priorities that drive that give and take.
By fostering a culture that values purpose, rest and boundaries, companies can create an environment where employees thrive – not just survive. The shift away from hustle culture isn't just about improving work-life balance; it's about ensuring long-term health for both individuals and organizations.
This column is part of Globe Careers' Leadership Lab series, where executives and experts share their views and advice about the world of work. Find all Leadership Lab stories at tgam.ca/leadershiplab and guidelines for how to contribute to the column here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
42 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Why Are These 3 High-Yield Dividend King Stocks Near 52-Week Lows While the S&P 500 Just Hit an All-Time High?
The S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) closed out the first half of the year at an all-time high -- a remarkable recovery considering how beaten down the index was in April. But not all stocks are enjoying the rebound. Dividend-paying stocks PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP), Kimberly-Clark (NASDAQ: KMB), and Target (NYSE: TGT) have lost value over the last three years because they aren't consistently growing their earnings and consumer spending is under pressure. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » However, these companies are Dividend Kings -- meaning they have paid and raised their payouts for over 50 consecutive years. Here's why Pepsi, Kimberly-Clark, and Target are excellent choices for folks looking to boost their passive income. Challenges are mounting for consumer-facing companies Investing is more about expectations than past performance. So the market can grow intolerant of companies that undergo multiyear periods of slowing or negative growth. That's certainly been the case for Pepsi, Kimberly-Clark, and Target. PEP Revenue (TTM) data by YCharts As the chart shows, all three companies are experiencing slow or negative sales growth, and their stock prices are falling accordingly. PepsiCo owns a variety of beverage and snack brands -- from flagship Pepsi to Gatorade, Mountain Dew, Tropicana, Frito-Lay snack brands like Lay's, Cheetos, Doritos, and Quaker Oats products. The diverse lineup helps make Pepsi a stable stalwart, but the company is seeing intense backlash from consumers who are drained from years of price increases. Pepsi has made some acquisitions focused on healthier snacks and meal replacements to diversify its product lineup. And the company is revamping marketing and packaging efforts to cater to consumers. Still, Pepsi doesn't expect these efforts to offset near-term headwinds, so its guidance is fairly weak. Kimberly-Clark makes paper-based professional products and has consumer brands such as Kleenex, Cottonelle, Viva, and Scott. It also offers a variety of adult care, baby and child care, and feminine care products. But the company is in a similar boat to Pepsi. Demand is flatlining, pressuring Kimberly-Clark's growth rate and margins. A multiyear strategy to reorganize the company has yet to produce tangible results. Target's issues are even more severe. Despite promotions and exclusive product offerings, the company is struggling to boost in-store foot traffic. Target also mismanaged its inventory and hasn't tapped into e-commerce and delivery options nearly as well as peers like Walmart. Whereas Pepsi and Kimberly-Clark sell everyday-use products, Target's product mix is more discretionary in nature -- which has backfired as consumers look for value. Stable and growing payouts Although all three companies are far from the top of their game, they are all still highly profitable. They aren't turnaround stories in dire straits. The payout ratio and free cash flow (FCF) per share compared to the dividend per share are useful metrics for gauging dividend affordability. The payout ratio is a company's earnings per share divided by the dividend per share -- with 50% to 75% generally considered a healthy range. But stable companies in non-cyclical sectors can be on the higher end of that range. As you can see in the following chart, Pepsi, Kimberly-Clark, and Target all have good payout ratios. PEP Payout Ratio data by YCharts Pepsi is earning roughly the same FCF as its dividend, but Kimberly-Clark and Target are generating boatloads more FCF than dividends -- illustrating dividend affordability. Heavily discounted valuations All three companies have seen their valuations fall considerably since they have continued to generate strong earnings, but their stock prices are down. PEP PE Ratio (10y Median) data by YCharts To be fair, when a company is producing below its historical growth rate and not living up to investor expectations, it arguably deserves to trade at a discount. However, all three companies are now down considerably from their average valuations. Pepsi's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is now under 20 even though it has historically been a premium-priced stock relative to the market. Similarly, investors tend to give Kimberly-Clark a slightly premium valuation given its stable and reliable dividend and recession-resistant business model. But now, the company is trading at its lowest valuation in years. Like most retailers, Target typically trades at a discount to the S&P 500. But its valuation is so cheap, the stock's P/E ratio is within striking distance of hitting single digits. Three Dividend Kings that have fallen far enough Pepsi, Kimberly-Clark, and Target stand out as excellent values, especially for patient investors looking to boost their passive income streams. Not only do these companies have exceptional track records of growing their payouts, but they can also afford their dividends thanks to strong earnings. What's more, all three companies have high yields -- Pepsi at 4.3%, Kimberly-Clark at 3.9%, and Target at 4.5%. Short-term-minded investors are making a mistake by dumping these stocks just because their results haven't been great lately. Long-term investors who can filter out the noise are getting the chance to buy these names at compelling valuations. Should you invest $1,000 in PepsiCo right now? Before you buy stock in PepsiCo, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and PepsiCo wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $697,627!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $939,655!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,045% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to178%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 Daniel Foelber has positions in PepsiCo. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Target and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals: A 7.9 Score and Room for Growth
Explore the exciting world of Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: KNSA) with our expert analysts in this Motley Fool Scoreboard episode. Check out the video below to gain valuable insights into market trends and potential investment opportunities! *Stock prices used were the prices of May 28, 2025. The video was published on Jul. 2, 2025. Should you invest $1,000 in Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International right now? Before you buy stock in Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, consider this: Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $697,627!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $939,655!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,045% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to178%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 Anand Chokkavelu, CFA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Karl Thiel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Keith Speights has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International, Plc. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Sask. residents embrace Flixbus
The flixbus picking up riders at Kahkewistahaw Gas and Convenience. (Hallee Mandryk / CTV News) Many Saskatchewan residents are already taking advantage of a new bus service in the province. 'This is wonderful. I got the ticket, was easy. Booked online; reserved the seat, and it's affordable,' Gloria Swoboda, a bus rider said. Flixbus has been active in Canada, and other countries, for several years. The company has recently added trips between North Battleford, Saskatoon and Regina to their schedule. Tickets range from $30 to $60 one way, depending on the destination. Several bus riders shared that it's a more cost effective way to travel than buying a plane ticket. 'Instead of paying $300 for a flight last minute, $60 for five hours, it's worth last minute trips, there's no need to think about a big budget expense. So it makes it quick and easy,' said Joseph Harvey, another rider who spoke to CTV News in Saskatoon. 'A plane ticket, it was going to cost about $500. That just wasn't feasible right now,' Michelle Brady said. Brady says the bus service will be a useful as a way to visit her long distance partner. 'Being on a budget, we're both students, my partner and I, so having this affordable option was actually really awesome.' Since the closure of the Saskatchewan Transit Company (STC) in 2017, Swoboda shared that getting around can be challenging for those who cannot drive, or prefer not to. 'I don't want to drive. I'm a senior, 75, so I don't want to really drive that long distance in case something goes wrong with the vehicle,' Swoboda said. 'In Canada, the families are so spread out now. It's not like 50 years ago when everybody got married in the same area and stayed,' Swoboda said. Swoboda says she has children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren throughout Canada, and she'll be using the new bus service to visit family. With a significant distance between most Canadian cities, a bus service provides an accessible and affordable way for people to connect with one another. 'I'm from BC, so like being out here, obviously it's a little bit on the more rural side of things. To be able to explore ... other parts of Canada this quick is definitely beneficial,' Harvey said. Brady added that visiting other Canadian cities is an opportunity not all Canadians have. 'Connecting cities is important. As a Canadian, I want to be able to go across Canada. So by having different forms of transportation to allow me to do that, I think is a really great thing,' she said. After witnessing the closure of the STC, Swoboda is hopeful the demand will keep this new service active in the province for many years to come. 'I hope both busses survive, that there's enough people going to be using them. Don't forget we saved the planet,' Swoboda said.