'Extremely disturbing': High levels of heavy metals at Monterey estuary after lithium battery site fire
Scientists at San José State University recorded a dramatic increase in nickel, manganese and cobalt — materials used in lithium ion batteries — in soil samples at the Elkhorn Slough Reserve after the recent fire at the nearby Moss Landing Power Plant.
The toxic metals threaten to upset the delicate ecosystem at the Elkhorn Slough, which is the state's second-largest estuary and plays a key role in sequestering carbon emissions and protecting the coastline from sea level rise, said Ivano Aiello, chair of the university's Moss Landing Marine Laboratories.
Aiello, who has monitored environmental conditions at the slough for more than a decade, said he was shocked by the results.
The concentration of nickel, manganese and cobalt measured on the surface of the soil is hundreds to thousands of times as much as the levels in the surface soil prior to the fire or compared with levels measured deeper in the soil.
"I was wondering whether there was anything associated with this fire that could have been impacted," said Aiello. "I didn't know I was going find such a high concentration of those metals."
On Tuesday, Monterey County Supervisor Glenn Church called the findings "extremely disturbing" and said he was worried about what future data would reveal regarding the consequences of the unprecedented blaze. The fire ignited Jan. 16, burned for five days and ultimately destroyed an estimated 80% of the batteries inside the building, which is on the coast about 18 miles north of the city of Monterey.
Assemblymember Dawn Addis (D-Morro Bay) said in a statement Monday that she was "deeply concerned" about the concentration of heavy metals in "one of our most cherished and fragile ecosystems."
"These concentrations are directly linked to the battery energy storage fire," she said.
Read more: 'Horrifying' fire at California lithium battery plant sparks calls for new clean energy rules
The battery storage site is owned by Texas-based Vistra Energy. A spokesperson said Tuesday that the company was aware of San José State's data and would work with local health agencies to determine next steps. Vistra is also completing its own investigation into the fire and environmental monitoring around the plant, the spokesperson said.
The Elkhorn Slough Reserve was closed to the public from Jan. 17 to Jan. 21 while it and residential areas near the power plant were under evacuation orders due to the fire. It is now open to visitors.
Initial air quality monitoring from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency determined that there was no public health risk posed by levels of particulate matter and hydrogen fluoride gas released during the fire. Hydrogen fluoride is a highly toxic gas produced by lithium ion battery fires that can cause severe respiratory damage as well as skin and eye burns.
The EPA did not plan to conduct soil or water testing, which is instead being carried out by local and state health agencies.
The Monterey County Health Department said Monday it was grateful for the testing conducted by Aiello's team and planned to present preliminary results from its own soil and water samples later this week.
The department said it was working with the California Department of Public Health, the California Environmental Protection Agency and state epidemiologists to "evaluate the research, assess any potential health concerns, and determine the appropriate steps moving forward."
San José State's soil samples suggest there could be long-term environmental and health effects from the toxic blaze, said Aiello.
His lab is now in "emergency mode" trying to collect data and understand how the heavy metals might affect the ecosystem. Scientists have collected soil samples from more than 100 locations within a two-mile radius of the plant since Jan. 22.
"There's a layer of heavy metals now on the soil, and I don't know what's going to happen. Is it going to be washed away? Is it going to penetrate to the groundwater? Is it going to concentrate and bioaccumulate?" he said. "We need to learn that before we can actually understand the implications."
The Elkhorn Slough is home to more than 700 species of plants, animals and marine life, including endangered and threatened species such as the southern sea otter, the Santa Cruz long-toed salamander and the California brown pelican.
Its marshlands store large amounts of carbon, helping to mitigate climate change. The estuary also helps prevent coastal erosion and absorb the effects of sea level rise.
Read more: California's federal lands are hemorrhaging carbon dioxide. Wildfires are largely to blame
Supervisor Church has said the fire raises the question of whether the plant should be located near an environmentally sensitive area. He and fellow board members passed a resolution last week asking that the battery storage facility remain offline until a thorough investigation could be completed and new safety measures implemented.
In the aftermath of the blaze, Assemblymember Addis introduced new legislation that would require that local government be given a say in the permitting process for battery or energy storage facilities, and establish a buffer to keep such sites a set distance away from schools, hospitals and natural habitats.
"True climate solutions must benefit — not harm — our communities and natural environment," she said in a statement. "We have to continue to fight for the inclusion of community voice and proper siting of battery energy storage facilities."
The American Clean Power Assn. has opposed her proposal, Assembly Bill 303, saying it puts overly onerous restrictions on the clean energy industry.
"The best way to promote safety across the state of California is the universal adoption and enforcement of the latest version of the national fire protection standard for battery energy storage," ACP-California Executive Director Alex Jackson said in a statement. "This proposal misses the mark. Its sprawling restrictions would make it harder to keep the lights on in California."
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Two Dallas-Based Businesses Earn Spot On Coveted ‘TIME100 Most Influential Companies'
Two Dallas-based businesses have earned a spot on the 'TIME100 Most Influential Companies 2025' list. Colossal Biosciences and LTK were both included on the coveted list, but for very different reasons. This year's TIME100 marks the fifth year the publication has highlighted companies across six categories: Leaders, Innovators, Disrupters, Titans, Pioneers, and Impact Award recipients. Earlier this year, The Dallas Express reported that Colossal Biosciences wowed the world when it announced it brought back the dire wolf from extinction using state-of-the-art technology. The groundbreaking biotechnology firm also holds the distinction of being the first company based in Texas to be valued at more than $10 billion. TIME Magazine noted that animals long thought lost to history 'are getting a second chance, thanks to Dallas-based Colossal Biosciences.' And it is not just extinct animals that Colossal Biosciences is aiming to revive. 'Just as important, the company is using similar technology to help protect the red wolf, the Asian elephant, and other species currently clinging to life,' the profile said. LTK, a tech platform focused on helping creators and brands monetize content via shoppable links, was also recognized on the prestigious list. The app, co-founded by Amber Venz Box, is considered the largest influencer marketing platform in the world when measured by revenue. 'LTK's bread and butter is its own shopping app, revamped this year to be more video-focused. It connects 40 million plus shoppers—including 38% of U.S. Gen Z and millennial women—each month to more than 8,000 retailers, who rake in more than $5 billion in annual sales through the platform,' read the profile on the Dallas-based phenomenon. According to the company, hundreds of creators have earned $1 million or more through LTK. While it is no longer based in Dallas, another company with roots in the city was also included on TIME's 100 Most Influential Companies of 2025. Poppi, now based in Austin, is the low-sugar soda that skyrocketed to popularity in recent years. In fact, the Dallas-born soda brand was sold to beverage behemoth PepsiCo, Inc. earlier this year for nearly $2 billion.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
FEMA's flood maps often miss dangerous flash flood risks, leaving homeowners unprepared
The deadly flash flooding in Texas on July 4, 2025, and destructive flash floods a week later in states including New Mexico, Vermont and Iowa are raising questions about the nation's flood maps and their ability to ensure that communities and homeowners can prepare for rising risks. The U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency's flood maps are intended to be the nation's primary tool for identifying flood risks. Originally developed in the 1970s to support the National Flood Insurance Program, these maps, known as Flood Insurance Rate Maps, or FIRMs, are used to determine where flood insurance is required for federally backed mortgages, to inform local building codes and land-use decisions, and to guide flood plain management strategies. In theory, the maps enable homeowners, businesses and local officials to understand their flood risk and take appropriate steps to prepare and mitigate potential losses. But while FEMA has improved the accuracy and accessibility of the maps over time with better data, digital tools and community input, the maps still don't capture everything – including the changing climate. There are areas of the country that flood, some regularly, that don't show up on the maps as at risk. I study flood-risk mapping as a university-based researcher and at First Street, an organization created to quantify and communicate climate risk. In a 2023 assessment using newly modeled flood zones with climate-adjusted precipitation records, we found that more than twice as many properties across the country were at risk of a 100-year flood than the FEMA maps identified. Even in places where the FEMA maps identified a flood risk, we found that the federal mapping process, its overreliance on historical data, and political influence over the updating of maps can lead to maps that don't fully represent an area's risk. FEMA's maps are essential tools for identifying flood risks, but they have significant gaps that limit their effectiveness. One major limitation is that they don't consider flooding driven by intense bursts of rain. The maps primarily focus on river channels and coastal flooding, largely excluding the risk of flash flooding, particularly along smaller waterways such as streams, creeks and tributaries. This limitation has become more important in recent years due to climate change. Rising global temperatures can result in more frequent extreme downpours, leaving more areas vulnerable to flooding, yet unmapped by FEMA. For example, when flooding from Hurricane Helene hit unmapped areas around Asheville, North Carolina, in 2024, it caused a huge amount of uninsured damage to properties. Even in areas that are mapped, like the Camp Mystic site in Kerr County, Texas, that was hit by a deadly flash flood on July 4, 2025, the maps may underestimate their risk because of a reliance on historic data and outdated risk assessments. Additionally, FEMA's mapping process is often shaped by political pressures. Local governments and developers sometimes fight to avoid high-risk designations to avoid insurance mandates or restrictions on development, leading to maps that may understate actual risks and leave residents unaware of their true exposure. An example is New York City's appeal of a 2015 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps update. The delay in resolving the city's concerns has left it with maps that are roughly 20 years old, and the current mapping project is tied up in legal red tape. On average, it takes five to seven years to develop and implement a new FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map. As a result, many maps across the U.S. are significantly out of date, often failing to reflect current land use, urban development or evolving flood risks from extreme weather. This delay directly affects building codes and infrastructure planning, as local governments rely on these maps to guide construction standards, development approvals and flood mitigation projects. Ultimately, outdated maps can lead to underestimating flood risks and allowing vulnerable structures to be built in areas that face growing flood threats. New advances in satellite imaging, rainfall modeling and high-resolution lidar, which is similar to radar but uses light, make it possible to create faster, more accurate flood maps that capture risks from extreme rainfall and flash flooding. However, fully integrating these tools requires significant federal investment. Congress controls FEMA's mapping budget and sets the legal framework for how maps are created. For years, updating the flood maps has been an unpopular topic among many publicly elected officials, because new flood designations can trigger stricter building codes, higher insurance costs and development restrictions. In recent years, the rise of climate risk analytics models and private flood risk data have allowed the real estate, finance and insurance industries to rely less on FEMA's maps. These new models incorporate forward-looking climate data, including projections of extreme rainfall, sea-level rise and changing storm patterns – factors FEMA's maps generally exclude. Real estate portals like Zillow, Redfin, and now provide property-level flood risk scores that consider both historical flooding and future climate projections. The models they use identify risks for many properties that FEMA maps don't, highlighting hidden vulnerabilities in communities across the United States. Research shows that the availability, and accessibility, of climate data on these sites has started driving property-buying decisions that increasingly take climate change into account. As homebuyers understand more about a property's flood risks, that may shift the desirability of some locations over time. Those shifts will have implications for property valuations, community tax-revenue assessments, population migration patterns and a slew of other considerations. However, while these may feel like changes being brought on by new data, the risk was already there. What is changing is people's awareness. The federal government has an important role to play in ensuring that accurate risk assessments are available to communities and Americans everywhere. As better tools and models evolve for assessing risk evolve, FEMA's risk maps need to evolve, too. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Jeremy Porter, City University of New York Read more: Why Texas Hill Country, where a devastating flood killed more than 120 people, is one of the deadliest places in the US for flash flooding Why it can be hard to warn people about dangers like floods – communication researchers explain the role of human behavior The aftermath of floods, hurricanes and other disasters can be hardest on older rural Americans – here's how families and neighbors can help Jeremy Porter has nothing to disclose.
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
A Bay Area fault that could produce a major earthquake is not where scientists thought it was
The Bay Area's Concord Fault — which is capable of unleashing a major earthquake — isn't where scientists thought it was. The fault runs for about 20 miles through Walnut Creek and Concord, from North Gate Road near Mount Diablo north to Suisun Bay. A previously unknown 4.4-mile stretch, or strand, of the fault is actively moving about a tenth of an inch per year as it runs beneath residential neighborhoods in the Ygnacio Valley. 'Many of the people we have spoken to have noted their houses and yards being deformed, water lines being broken and other effects of the creep,' Jessie Vermeer, a geologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, said by email. Vermeer and colleagues reported the new path in a study published July 2. The scientists documented that the southern half of the Concord Fault is one-tenth to three-tenths of a mile west of where researchers previously mapped it. 'By identifying the new strand of the Concord Fault we can use it to refine our earthquake magnitude and timing calculations,' Vermeer said. The California Geological Survey could classify the new strand as an active fault zone, a designation that affects construction of new buildings, property values and real estate transactions. The findings could also help guide preparations ahead of big quakes. 'Cities, utility companies with underground lines, road repair agencies (and) even homeowners, can understand better where to expect damage, to plan for it financially, or to try and mitigate it altogether,' author Austin Elliott, who led the research as a geologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, said by email. The Concord Fault can produce earthquakes of 6.7 magnitude or higher, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. A magnitude 5.4 quake on the fault caused widespread damage across the Bay Area in 1955. The southern portion of the Concord Fault was previously mapped along the edge of Lime Ridge, which extends from the southern edge of Concord to Mount Diablo. The newly identified strand runs beneath residential neighborhoods; it even runs right through Valle Verde Elementary School in Walnut Creek. In the study, the researchers describe slow and steady movement of tectonic plates, known as creeping, along the newly defined southern segment; this behavior had previously been reported only on the northern half of the Concord Fault. As the Concord Fault creeps, it can deform structures, break water lines and cause other damage for people living along the fault line, explained Andrew Alden, an Oakland-based geologist and writer, who wasn't part of the new research. 'Having a precise location (for the fault) is really important for emergency response,' Alden said. The analysis 'is important for understanding the seismic hazards that the fault poses,' Wendy Bohon, branch chief of seismic hazards and earthquake engineering with the California Geological Survey, said by email. 'The more we understand the seismic hazard of an area, the better job we can do at decreasing the seismic risk and increasing the resilience of California communities,' said Bohon, who wasn't part of the new study. Scientists have known since the 1970s that the northern half of the Concord fault is steadily creeping. This northern section stretches from Concord, alongside Mount Diablo High School and Buchanan Field Airport, through Acme Landfill in Martinez. The southern half of the fault, however, hadn't been conclusively mapped. In the new study, the authors defined the trace of the southern Concord Fault by identifying and measuring offsets in curbs and sidewalks in the area. 'Some faults break quickly, causing large earthquakes, and some move slowly, creeping along without causing shaking. Other faults do a combination of these two things,' Bohon said. The authors say that the new findings raise the question of whether there are other active strands of the Concord Fault.
