British men collect world relay golds 28 years late
Britain's men's 4x400m relay team were presented with their gold medals from the 1997 World Championships at London's Diamond League meeting on Saturday (July 19, 2025) having been elevated from silver after the belated disqualification of the U.S. team.
The U.S. were stripped of the title won in Athens when Antonio Pettigrew confessed in 2008 to doping between 1997 and 2003. The U.S also lost their 2000 Olympic title.
A laborious process of investigation, appeal and reallocation followed, culminating in Saturday's presentation by World Athletics President Seb Coe to Roger Black, Iwan Thomas, Jamie Baulch, Mark Richardson and Mark Hylton (who ran in the heats).
The former athletes were giving a rousing welcome by the 60,000 sellout crowd, who then stood for a very belated national anthem.
"We're proud to be able to give these athletes their moment in front of a home crowd. It's a chance to recognise not just their talent, but the values they stood for. This medal means even more because of how long they've waited for it," said Cherry Alexander, UK Athletics' strategic lead for major events.
Pettigrew was found dead at the age of 42 in 2010 in his locked car in the United States, with an autopsy report saying he died by suicide after an overdose.
Earlier on Saturday, the British government confirmed its support for bids to host the 2029 World Athletics Championships, last held in London in 2017 in a regularly sold-out Olympic Stadium.
"Bringing the World Athletics Championships to the UK would be a moment of great national pride, building on our global reputation for hosting memorable sporting events that showcase the very best talent," Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement.
"Hosting these championships would not only unlock opportunities for UK athletes but it would inspire the next generation to get involved and pursue their ambitions.
The U.K. will also bid for the 2029 World Para Athletics championships, with a plan to hold events outside London.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
Satwiksairaj Rankireddy/Chirag Shetty March Into China Open Semi-Finals; Unnati Hooda's Dream Run Ends
Indian badminton stars Satwiksairaj Rankireddy and Chirag Shetty continued their fine form on the global circuit, storming into the semifinals of the China Open with a commanding victory on Friday. However, the day brought mixed emotions for Indian fans as teenage sensation Unnati Hooda's fairy-tale run came to an end in the women's singles quarterfinals. Satwik and Chirag, the world No. 3 men's doubles pair, outplayed Malaysia's Ong Yew Sin and Teo Ee Yi in straight games, winning 21-18, 21-14 in just 40 minutes. The Indian duo, who have been one of the most consistent doubles teams this season, showcased their trademark aggressive play and seamless coordination throughout the match. With this victory, they improved their head-to-head record against the Malaysian duo to 7-3. The first game saw Satwik-Chirag race to an early lead, but Sin and Yi staged a brief comeback to close the gap. However, the Indians maintained their composure and clinched the game 21-18. In the second game, both pairs were neck-and-neck until 15-14 before Satwik and Chirag shifted gears, winning six consecutive points to seal the contest. This marks their fourth semifinal appearance of the year, and they will next face world No. 2 Aaron Chia and Soh Wooi Yik of Malaysia in what promises to be a high-voltage clash. On the other hand, 17-year-old Unnati Hooda's incredible journey in the tournament ended at the hands of Japan's world No. 4 Akane Yamaguchi. Unnati, who had stunned two-time Olympic medalist PV Sindhu in the pre-quarterfinals, went down 16-21, 12-21 in just 33 minutes. Despite her spirited effort, Unnati struggled to maintain momentum against Yamaguchi's relentless pace and precise shot-making. While she kept things close in the opening game, a series of quick points for Yamaguchi tilted the balance. The second game followed a similar pattern, with Yamaguchi's experience proving too much for the young Indian. With Unnati's exit, India's singles challenge in the tournament comes to an end. However, all eyes are now on Satwik and Chirag as they look to bring home another prestigious title.
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
IOA Athletes Commission eyes fresh start
New Delhi: With the Indian Olympic Association getting back to business, the defunct Athletes Commission (AC) is also showing signs of revival. IOA Athletes Commission vice-chairpersonSharath Kamal. (AP) The IOA AC, headed by MC Mary Kom, was formed with much fanfare to become the voice of athletes in federations but there was hardly any activity in the past 18 months as the turmoil within the IOA took centrestage. The AC, which has some of India's most decorated athletes, will now reach out to federations to name their athletes' representatives. AC vice-chairperson Sharath Kamal said their first task is to ask National Sports Federations to forward names of two athletes who can liaison with them. 'One thing on the agenda is to try and activate as many as AC with different NSFs. If any federation doesn't not have an athletes commission yet, they can at least give us two representatives who can communicate with IOA AC,' Sharath told HT. 'We also had discussions on beginning athlete centric programmes that's been part of the Olympic movement. We will clearly have a pathway on how we go about in coming years,' said the table tennis star. IOA AC will be looking to put up systems in place to provide mental health support to athletes and career-transition guidances. It has also charted a campaign to be launched on Aug 29 -- the National Sports Day -- to take sport to the masses. India's elite athletes, Olympians and retired sports persons will be engaged in the drive. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) puts a lot of emphasis on having an active athletes commission in every National Olympic Committee so that their voices can be heard. The AC, therefore, is considered a crucial link between the athletes, federations and the Olympic movement to ensure that the athletes viewpoint remains at the heart of every decision. Every IOC commission has athletes committee representation. The IOA will also have to ensure that its athletes committee members are included in its panels so that they can bring out the perspective of athletes. To run its various programmes, the AC would need financial grants. The IOA finances were in freeze due to the tussle. However, it is now hoping to get the grants from IOA and the clearances from the executive council to avail the grants from IOC and Olympic Council of Asia. Winter Olympic legend Shiva Keshavan, who is member of the IOA AC and also the vice-chair of the Athletes Committee in the OCA, says that it is important for the athletes' voice to be taken on board at all levels as the key stakeholders of the Olympic movement. 'An active athletes commission is required to ensure that decision making remains athlete centric, I'm glad to see immediate steps being taken in this regard' Shiva told HT. 'As athlete representatives, we also have a duty towards peers with much to do to improve the athlete experience, including setting up safeguarding policies, anti-doping education, career transition pathways and much more.' The commission is like a support system for the athletes. It provides support to athletes with their physical and mental well-being, enhances safeguarding measures, protects athletes rights to clean and fair competition among other key objectives. IOC Athletes' Commission (AC) recently hosted the International Athletes' Forum (IAF) in Lausanne in June. Sharath represented ITTF while Keshavan came from OCA. India's (IOA) AC was also represented by Rani Rampal and Om Prakash Singh Karhana. 'I have learned a lot at ITTF and at the IOC athletes forum,' said Sharath. 'As a player we only looked at the technical part. Now I am having a completely different view, on how the sport can grow, on the business of sports, on athletes development etc,' said Sharath.
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Cricket diplomacy can serve India in the neighbourhood
Broadly, soft power is utilisation of a country's cultural strengths as opposed to being coercive to influence and prevail over other nations. More commonly, the arts, entertainment, language and institutions have been components of cultural diplomacy. But sports, too, plays a role, from the extravaganza of the Olympic Games and football World Cups to the Wimbledon championships. In the early 1970s, ping-pong diplomacy broke the ice between the US and China. Cricket diplomacy has occasionally been employed by India and Pakistan as confidence-building measures. Today, the game has bestowed India with a valuable soft power ingredient. In 1928, India, despite being under British rule, stunned the world by lifting the gold medal in hockey in the Amsterdam Olympiad. Other than Mahatma Gandhi's non-violent freedom struggle, no facet of India in that period made an impact on the international community as Jaipal Singh's team's triumph did. Thereafter, India completing a hat-trick of golds in the 1936 Berlin Olympics rather jolted the German dictator, Adolf Hitler, whose world view was of white Aryans constituting a superior race. To his dismay, India thrashed Germany 8-1 in the final. In short, independent India inherited hockey as an instrument of soft power. People worldwide would yearn to witness the Indians' dribbling skills. Fast forward to Mexico 1968: India earned neither a gold nor a silver in hockey for the first time in 40 years. In contrast, three years later, India caught the imagination of the cricketing world by notching back-to-back Test series victories in the West Indies and England. Then, India's unexpected triumph in the 1983 World Cup pitchforked cricket as its new soft power implement. The win instigated the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to reach out to the Pakistan Cricket Board to jointly stage the next such event in 1987 — after England had monopolised hosting rights for the first three competitions. The Indo-Pak collaboration conjured a financial package neither England nor Australia could match. India's friendship with other stakeholder countries ensured decisive support for the bid. As cricket burgeoned in popularity in India and the footprint of television simultaneously expanded, Indian corporates started bankrolling broadcasts. This, in turn, created an opening for the BCCI to demand licence fees undreamt of before from broadcasters. Progressively, India became cricket's financial powerhouse. Today, BCCI's monetary stranglehold over cricket is such that not merely other cricket boards, but also the International Cricket Council (ICC), are at its mercy as in no other sporting discipline. India, contrary to Brazil in soccer, have never been undisputed champions of the game, indeed are yet to win the most prestigious World Test Championship; but BCCI unequivocally controls the sport. India as a team are the darling of BCCI's counterparts, because they fill their coffers with bountiful revenue from digital and TV networks, advertisers and sponsors. But they are not always popular with host cricket lovers, as they perceive BCCI to be a bully and as having inequitably captured the ICC. BCCI was party to ICC's decision to award this year's Champions Trophy tournament to Pakistan. Therefore, India's refusal to play in that country was not only a breach of its commitment, but an infringement of the ICC rules applied in the 1996 and 2003 World Cups, namely forfeiture of points for abstentions, which Australia and England suffered. India also derived unfair benefit from playing at a solitary venue and by summoning spinner Varun Chakravarthy as a replacement in their squad to suit the consistent conditions. ICC allowed the special dispensation. A majority of the participating sides permitted this for pecuniary gains; but it did not please the non-Indian public — thereby impairing India's potential goodwill. It is also opportunistic to meet Pakistan in over-limit World Cups, but not in the World Test Championship. The powers-that-be in India are understandably displeased with Pakistan. So, the principled approach would be to have no links with them at all. In 1974, India preferred to default against South Africa instead of playing against them in the Davis Cup final because of its apartheid regime. The BCCI's muscle is best channelled towards magnanimity, consequently in winning hearts and minds; not arm-twisting and seeking undue conveniences in the field. India can capitalise diplomatically on the robust following the Indian Premier League enjoys in England, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, the West Indies and South Asia, many of whose cricketers figure in the tourney. In 1987, with the anti-India General Zia-ul-Haq holding the reins in Pakistan, India's ties with it were unsatisfactory. But BCCI seeking PCB's cooperation helped to temporarily soften Pakistani people's wariness towards India. Therefore, South Block could consider lifting its long-standing ban on Pakistani cricketers partaking in the IPL. This year, Bangladeshi cricketers were also de facto debarred. Lifting the barrier would encourage people-to-people friendliness. The Indian government's anger with its neighbouring counterparts to its west and east and their proxies need not spill over into punishing individual cricketers. Pakistani and Bangladeshi cricketers crossing swords with the world's best in franchise Twenty20 would likely delight and suitably melt cricket fans in Pakistan and Bangladesh. Ashis Ray is a journalist and author of The Trial That Shook Britain. The views expressed are personal.
