Homeowner ordered to tear down £180,000 bungalow he built in in his back garden without planning permission says ruling will put him on the streets
Mark Jones, 55, replaced an old garage in his back garden with a two-bedroom 'granny flat', hooking up the electricity, water and internet to his house in March 2019.
Taking six months to complete, the 83-square-metre brick annex features a kitchen diner, two bedrooms, alongside a bathroom and storeroom.
However, Mr Jones did not apply for planning permission, arguing that he 'thought it was fine' due to the building's size and the utilities being connected to the main house.
Despite submitting a retrospective planning application, Birmingham City Council ordered that the ' alien ' building must be teared down in 2021.
Following an unsuccessful second application, he has now been ordered to demolish the bungalow by the end of the month or face possible legal action.
Sharing his heartbreak at the council's decision, the father-of-two fears that he will 'probably be on the streets' if the demolition takes place.
He said: 'The bungalow was within the permitted development rights and could have habitable rooms.
'It was meant for my father and reliant on the main house. There are several properties nearby with two story buildings in their gardens so I thought it was fine.
'It started at £60,000 but it didn't have a kitchen so I added one on the plans.'
Birmingham City Council's objection to the bungalow came after several neighbours submitted complaints about its 'over-intensive' size.
Other complaints included concerns over parking, privacy for neighbours and light coming from the new bungalow.
The white-washed bungalow features its own gravel drive and patio seating area. Its water and electrics are connected to the main house, a three-bedroom property worth around £355,000.
Mr Jones, an IT engineer, had initially hoped that his unwell father, Tony, 71, would live in the property in Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands.
However, Tony tragically died of bowel cancer just a few months later. Mr Jones then moved into the bungalow after him and his wife divorced.
Mr Jones, who insists there is 'no public interest' in the bungalow being removed, argued that the council are 'bullying him' by removing a 'perfectly reasonable' property.
Slamming the 'ridiculous' decision, he said: 'You look at other houses on the street and I can't see why we wouldn't get permission for it. For an area with a housing shortage, it's ridiculous.
'Loads of people have done this. If I tear it down I've got nowhere else to go so I'll probably be on the streets.'
Adding that the bungalow as 'never meant to be a separate building', he said: 'It doesn't have its own water, internet, council tax or waste. It is still part of the main house. I should've waited for planning permission but people can see why I haven't.
'I was in a hurry to get my dad moved in. When you look at Google maps and see all the buildings in the gardens, you can see why I thought it was safe.'
'From the street or a neighbour's garden, you wouldn't see anything. You can't see into windows. There was a garage there before.'
Mr Jones has now applied for a new permitted development certificate application with the council.
However, even if it is granted, he will still have to tear down the original bungalow and build it again to comply with the council's rules.
A spokeswoman for Birmingham City Council said: 'Mr Jones is currently in breach of the enforcement notice that was served to him in 2021, and we have given him ample time to comply with the notice by the end of June 2025.
'A decision will be made imminently on the lawful development certificate that Mr Jones has submitted, and a case officer will then be in contact with him to advise further.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
5 minutes ago
- The Sun
The 7 most common neighbour disputes that knock £26k off your home's value – and why all parents need to listen up
FROM nuisance noise to hedge wars and building work, neighbour niggles can be costly – unless handled carefully. 'If a dispute is affecting your quality of life, it's important to take the appropriate steps to resolve matters,' says Daniel McAfee, head of legal operations at Lawhive. 7 'But try not to go nuclear too quickly. From a legal perspective, the burden of proof is likely to be with you, as most of these issues fall under civil law, meaning you also need to fund your case. 'And it can impact on the value of your property, as you need to declare any complaints you have pursued through the courts when you come to sell.' Experts estimate it could cause a ten percent price reduction – £26,500 based on the UK average house price, or £56,700 in London. Here, Daniel explains your rights in seven common disputes and how best to resolve them… FENCE FALL-OUTS These simple structures can trigger a host of disagreements, from placement and permitted height to maintenance costs. 'The rule of thumb is, your side of the fence is your side – it should define the boundary and therefore you can paint your own side however you like,' says Daniel. 'Difficulties arise when, for example, it falls down and there is a dispute over the cost or the position of the new one. 'Maybe one person refuses to pay their share or they believe it has moved and taken more of their land.' The first step is to find out if the fence was jointly owned to start with. 'Check the title plans for both properties, which set the boundary line and whether it is a 'party wall fence' with joint ownership,' says our expert. I'm being forced to tear down my loft conversion - my neighbours call it a 'monstrosity' but I'm going to fight back If the fence is a shared responsibility and one side refuses to pay their share, you can make a civil claim to recover costs. TREE AND HEDGE WARS 7 The general rule is that branches must stay within your legal boundary. If they stray over, your neighbour is entitled to cut them back to the borderline. 'It comes down to whose property the root originates from, as that establishes ownership,' says Daniel. 'But there are environmental factors and some trees have legal protection. I'd recommend getting a tree surgeon or other expert to check before you chop.' If next door's overgrown conifer is throwing shade on your sunbathing spot, there's little you can do. 'There's no right to light outside, but there is one inside your property,' Daniel says. 'You'd need a specialist survey to prove the obstruction is resulting in a more than 50 per cent reduction into a habitable area of the home, like the living room or kitchen. 'But beware – these reports can cost between £200 and £350, maybe more. And you may need to seek a civil injunction to have the tree cut down.' Hedges can also cause headaches and action can be taken if they meet certain criteria, such as being more than 2m tall. But councils cannot order the removal or cutting of hedges to below 2m. PARKING PAINS 7 Nothing sends the local WhatsApp group into meltdown like inconsiderate parking. If you only have on-street parking, there's no rule that says you are entitled to a spot outside your front door. But you can take steps to ensure no one blocks your drive. 'Contact the council to get a stripe painted on the highway to indicate this, which also makes it subject to local enforcement policies,' says Daniel. 'My clients that do this say it has been successful – and it's free.' You must also call the council if neighbours are blocking pavements with their vehicles, but it can take effort to make them act. 'Take photos, get other residents to complain and write to your MP,' he suggests. CLASHES OVER KIDS 7 The sound of children running about outside can be divisive, with some happy to hear their laughter and others finding their high spirits intrusive. Daniel says there are two areas that govern this. The first is civil law, as defined by the council, who can deal with any infringements. 'There might be rules to ensure noise is kept to a minimum at certain times of day,' Daniel explains. Anything that strays into anti-social behaviour, like vandalism and violence, is potentially a criminal matter. 'Don't be deterred if the police, council or social housing landlord don't act initially,' he says. 'If you make three reports in six months, you can ask to trigger an Anti-social Behaviour Review (ABR), which is independent.' SNOOPING SUSPICIONS 7 Feeling like someone is snooping over the fence is unsettling, but privacy rules can be complicated. 'Everyone has the right to quiet enjoyment of their property,' says Daniel. 'But you'd need to have evidence of an interference with that, or a breach of privacy. For example, a telescope looking directly into your bedroom is pretty clear. But other things are not.' Increased use of CCTV and Ring doorbell cameras could mean you are unintentionally in breach too. 'It comes down to common sense and talking to people,' he says. 'You have to prove they are actively trying to do this.' It also comes down to appreciating the privacy – or lack of – that comes with your particular property. 'If you don't like being overlooked, a terraced house might not be for you.' KEEP THE NOISE DOWN 7 From rowdy parties to vacuuming at unsocial hours, noise intrusion can have a huge impact. 'Most rules around noise disturbance are set by your council, setting out unacceptable decibels or time restrictions, depending on what type of area you live in,' says Daniel. It needs to count as a statutory nuisance for councils to investigate, which means it must either unreasonably and substantially interfere with the use or enjoyment of a home or other premises, or injure health, or be likely to injure health. 'If there is a breach, the council can take action and serve an abatement notice, but you may also need to ask the courts for a civil injunction for a persistent problem. 'It sounds easy, but the evidence thresholds you need to attain are high, often requiring a reliable audio meter and well-timed council visits. 'This is when things like CCTV can be a big help to build a case.' BUILDING BOTHER 7 Home renovations can trigger all sorts of gripes, from an extension being too big to the noise and dust created. It is a good idea to forewarn neighbours about any disruption, so they can be prepared. Builders will be aware of local rules on what times construction can take place and should comply. 'If they don't, council enforcement can step in, but be aware that you can also be liable for action, as you are employing them,' Daniel warns. If you suspect a neighbour's extension is in breach of planning permission, contact the planning office in the first instance. 'Councils have a range of measures available, including ordering the construction to be taken down or altered,' says Daniel. 'But they have discretion to not act or invite a retrospective application.' FYI When one or both neighbours is a tenant, complaints need to be made to the owners of the properties involved. 'This could be a private landlord, housing association or the council,' says Daniel. 'If you are the tenant, your landlord owes you a duty of care as part of your contract with them. They are obliged to take action in your interest and if they fail to do this, you may need to take action against them. 'Likewise, if the neighbour causing the problem is renting, you should direct your dispute to their landlord, as they could be breaching the terms of their lease.'
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rise in people living alone in UK driven entirely by over-65s
A rise in the number of people living alone in the UK in the past decade has been entirely driven by an increase in older people residing on their own. In 2024, there were an estimated 4.3 million people aged over 65 living alone, up from 3.5 million in 2014, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said. This age group accounted for just over half (51.1%) of all people living alone last year, compared with 45.5% in 2014. The statistics body said: ' People aged 65 years or over accounted in full for the increase in people living alone in 2024 compared with 2014.' There were around 4.1 million people aged under 65 years old living alone in both 2014 and 2024, the ONS said, adding that the 'increasing proportions of people living alone in older age groups reflects an ageing population'. A higher proportion of women aged 65 or over in households lived alone (40.9%) than men of the same age (27%), which the ONS said is partly because of women having a higher life expectancy than men. The latest data from the ONS estimated there were 8.4 million people living alone in the UK in 2024, up 11% from 7.6 million in 2014. Meanwhile, the proportion of young adults in the UK living with their parents has grown by almost 10% in a decade. Young men – aged between 20 and 34 years old – were more likely to be at home with their parents than women in the same age group in 2024, according to the ONS. There were an estimated 3.6 million people in this age group in a family with their parent or parents in 2024, up 9.9% from 3.3 million in 2014, the ONS said. While a third (33.7%) of men in this age group lived with parents, this compared to less than a quarter (22.1%) of women. The ONS said more young adults living with their parents at older ages is part of a 'trend of adults reaching milestones later in life' and may be 'explained by a number of factors including increased housing costs'. The latest statistics also showed that lone-parent families were less likely to contain dependent children in 2024 – 62.5%, down from just over two thirds or 66.1% in 2014. The proportion of lone parents who are fathers has grown, from 13.1% a decade ago, to 16.7% last year. While married couples still made up the largest proportion of families in the latest estimates, this has decreased to 65.1% last year from 67.1% in 2014. The ONS said this was down to more couples living together without getting married.
The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Young men in UK more likely to live with parents than women
Young men are more likely to live at home with their parents than women of the same age, with a third of 20-34-year-old men in the UK now living in their parental home. Data released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed 33.7% of men aged 20-34 lived with parents in 2024, compared with less than a quarter (22.1%) of women the same age. In total, the number of young people aged 20-34 living with their parents has risen by 10% over the past decade, from 3.3 million in 2014 to 3.6 million in 2024. The ONS said this was 'part of trend of adults reaching milestones later in life', and could be 'explained by a number of factors including increased housing costs'. This reflects a trend seen across Europe, where data from an EU agency showed the proportion of 25- to-34-year-olds in employment living in their parental home had risen from 24% to 27% between 2017 and 2022. The data also showed a rise in the number of people living alone in the UK in the past decade has been driven by an increase in older people aged over 65. In 2024, there were an estimated 4.3 million people aged over 65 living alone, up from 3.5 million in 2014. The increase means that half of all people living alone in the UK were aged 65 years or over in 2024. The ONS said this 'reflects an ageing population' and there was a higher proportion of women over 65 years living alone (40.9%) than men of the same age (27.0%), because of higher life expectancy for women. The data estimated there were 8.4 million people living alone in the UK in 2024, up 11% from 7.6 million in 2014. The data on families and household types in the UK also showed that the proportion of lone parents who are fathers has grown, from 13.1% a decade ago, to 16.7% last year. While married couples still made up the largest proportion of families in the latest estimates, this has decreased to 65.1% last year from 67.1% in 2014. The ONS said this was down to more couples living together without getting married.
