Paw Patrol: Motorbike rider issued eye-watering fine after cops pulled her over for travelling with her pet dog
The woman who was fitted with full safety gear and the dog - who had none - were stopped on the Sunshine Coast last weekend.
Bodycam video of the interaction showed the officer appeared to be amused and chuckled at the unusual passenger, but that didn't stop him from applying to full force of the law.
'Officers from the Sunshine Coast Highway Patrol were conducting routine patrols along Alexandra Parade in Alexandra Headland around 2pm on May 17, when they intercepted the rider,' Queensland Police said.
'What caught their attention wasn't just the bike, but the furry companion perched in front of the handlebars.'
The rider, a 35-year-old woman from Maroochydore, was issued a $376 traffic infringement notice for 'riding with an animal between the arms'.
Senior Sergeant Shane Panoho from Sunshine Coast Highway Patrol said while officers understand the strong bond people share with their pets, safety is paramount.
'We know how attached some people are to their pets, but it's best to apply a paws-off approach when it comes to our roads,' he said.
According to police, the woman had purchased a special harness online designed to secure small pets to the chest.
In the video, the woman can heard saying she bought it from Temu.
Authorities warned that such setups, while seemingly convenient, could have dangerous consequences.
'The rider had purchased the harness online and did not think through the safety implications, particularly if the dog was to react to other road users, pedestrians or animals,' Senior Sergeant Panoho explained.
'This could place the rider and her pooch in harm's way or put other motorists at risk,' he added.
'Although the dog seemed to be comfortable on the bike, we urge riders to practice safe and responsible behaviour on our roads.'
Queensland Police have warned all motorists to ensure any animals are restrained in a way that does not interfere with the rider's control of the vehicle or obstruct their view of the road.
Queensland road rules require drivers and riders to have proper control at all times, something that is difficult with a pet in close proximity to the handlebars.
Police say while the sight may have amused some bystanders, it could have ended in tragedy if the dog had become startled or caused a distraction.
Last year, a Sydney driver was slammed on social media for driving on a 110 kilometre an hour road, with their pet dog in the back of the truck.
'Can somebody driving at 110km/h on a highway keep the dog in an open boot?' a driver who spotted the pooch asked Reddit.
Hundreds of commenters were divided on the issue, noting the potential danger if the dog jumped out or the car had to stop suddenly or swerve.
Motorists in NSW must ensure pets are safely restrained if travelling in the back of a ute.
Drivers can be hit with fines and a possible jail sentence if they do not take measures to ensure the pet is safe.
'Consider safely restraining your dog in the cabin of your ute or open vehicle with a safety-belt restraint as this is generally safer, especially in the case of an accident,' the RSPCA advises.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
Political censors have cynically hijacked vital child protections
Britons woke up last week to discover that their firehose of digital smut had been strangled, albeit temporarily for consenting adults. Undeniably, the introduction of age verification regulations does mark a huge change in our relationship with the internet, hitherto a pornographic free-for-all. It may feel like a shock to find a third party inserting itself between you and a website, apparently demanding to know who you are, but it shouldn't be a surprise: it's eight years since the UK Government published its online harms green paper under Theresa May, and The Telegraph launched its Duty of Care campaign the following year. After much wrangling, the result was the 2023 Online Safety Act. In March, the first part of went into effect, placing new obligations on platforms to remove content that is legal, but harmful to children: suicide advice, eating disorders or dangerous stunt challenges. The second phase went into force last week, requiring age checks for pornography sites. 'Companies have effectively been treating all users as if they're adults, leaving children potentially exposed to porn and other types of harmful content,' wrote Melanie Dawes, Ofcom's chief executive, in January. The UK is not an outlier in its desire to keep children safe, either. Texas and three other US states require age verification for adult material, and so will Australia. But critics of the law have warned of consequences for free expression from the start, and over-zealous interpretations quickly became apparent. X, previously Twitter, has already put material behind the age gate, with Benjamin Jones, director of case management at the Free Speech Union – of which I am a member – identifying a number of posts which were worryingly censored for unverified users. Some supported calls for single-sex spaces for women. One by Wuhan lab researcher Billy Bostickson (a pseudonym) fell foul too; it was part of a thread on the use of bamboo RNA in vaccines. Several posts in a thread discussing Richard the Lionheart were gated, which merely contained a reference to the crusades. Most troublingly, a post linking to a live stream of police arrests at a demonstration at a migrant hotel in Leeds was also taken down. All these bans appear to have been the work of an over-zealous algorithm. Some saw this coming. Baroness Claire Fox has written of her dismay at realising how outnumbered speech advocates were when she was in a room as the only free speech advocate, alongside dozens of groups all requesting some clause or addition. 'Only two of us [peers] consistently opposed the bill – myself and Lord Daniel Moylan. I was shocked that so many from the free speech camp of peers were silent,' Fox tells me. 'It became a Christmas tree bill with lots of other things put in it,' said Kemi Badenoch as she campaigned for the Conservative leadership last year. She also predicted 'it will go after people who aren't doing anything wrong'. That hasn't quite happened yet, but long overdue moves to enforce accountability on giant, transnational platforms, and better protect children unfortunately coincided with a renewed desire to control political speech. The good state must take an active role in removing inflammatory speech, the United Nations declared in its 2021 paper Our Common Agenda. It re-emphasised the point last year. William Perrin, one of the architects of Ofcom's approach to regulating online platforms, who was not involved in drafting the legislation, recently posted a paper for the think tank Demos called Epistemic Security 2029: Protecting the UK's information supply chains and strengthening discourse for the next political era. It explicitly calls for the policing of social media platforms. One gets the sense that as long as populists are rising, the impulse to censor will be irresistible to their political opponents. By controlling our discourse, they can control democracy. 'We have an establishment that is innately hostile to Free Speech,' Jones of the Free Speech Union tells me. There is very much wrong with this. Against a backdrop of widespread concern about street crime, shoplifting and rampant fraud, the energy devoted by police to what we say online is confounding, from enthusiasm for the category of 'non-crime hate incidents' to the creation of a special monitoring unit. The implicit idea seems to be that if we stop talking about something the underlying problem will go away. With Britain a tinderbox, and a long summer ahead, this seems a brave moment to test the proposition. It is understandable why age verification and clumsy algorithms sow suspicion of the system itself. In reality, however, online anonymity was always illusory. Your broadband operator has always known who you are and which sites you visit. So has the shady VPN provider. Google collected your pornography browsing history even while you were browsing in 'incognito' mode, for which it was sued, agreeing later to delete billions of records in a settlement. What our alarm reflects is a wholesale loss of trust in the Government. Ofcom points to polling showing the Online Safety Act is widely supported. It is highly regrettable that a bien-pensant blob has cynically hijacked child protection law to ensure it has a media landscape more in keeping with its views. But there's plenty of blame to go around. One lesson of the Online Safety Act is that free-speech advocates also needed a plausible child protection plan. They never came up with one – and were duly steamrollered. The consequences for Britain may be profound.
Daily Mirror
11 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Temu shoppers warned of 'high risk' illegal products being sold on site
The European Commission say there is a "high risk" that EU consumers could come across illegal products being sold on the shopping giant's website Online shopping platform Temu has come under fire from the European Commission for not doing enough to assess the risks of illegal products being sold, potentially breaching new EU digital services laws. The commission made an announcement on July 28, highlighting a "high risk" for EU consumers to encounter illegal goods on the shopping platform's website. Specifically a mystery shopping exercise conducted by the commission revealed that consumers browsing Temu were highly likely to come across non-compliant items, including baby toys and small electronics. This revelation is part of an investigation into the retail behemoth as per the Digital Services Act (DSA), which is new legislation governing online content throughout the European Union. The DSA requires companies running online platforms like e-commerce sites to assess the likelihood of consumers encountering hazardous or illegal goods and to take action to mitigate the risk. The commission pointed out that, according to a risk assessment carried out by Temu, owned by PDD Holdings, in October, 2024, the findings were "inaccurate" and "relying on general industry information rather than on specific details about its own marketplace". Henna Virkkunen, executive Vice President for 'tech sovereignty, security and democracy', has issued a stark warning: "We shop online because we trust that products sold in our Single Market are safe and comply with our rules". "In our preliminary view, Temu is far from assessing risks for its users at the standards required by the Digital Services Act. Consumers' safety online is not negotiable in the EU – our laws, including the Digital Services Act, are the foundation for a better protection online and a safer and fairer digital Single Market for all Europeans," reported MyLondon. Although the report targets EU residents, there have been numerous instances of consumers elsewhere receiving incorrect or potentially dangerous items from online marketplaces like Temu. The Mirror highlighted the plight of a Texan who ordered a dog toy online but was sent packs of Sacred Lotus seeds instead, which are considered a biohazard in some US regions. The company could face fines of up to six percent of its annual global turnover if the commission finds its risk assessment doesn't meet DSA standards. The commission also disclosed that it would continue to scrutinise the firm for other possible breaches of the DSA, such as using addictive design features and a lack of transparency about its algorithms. The EU is striving to address what it views as an influx of cheap and potentially hazardous goods from China flooding the single market. Authorities also issued a formal warning to Shein in May, stating that the company's marketing practices violated EU consumer protection laws.
Daily Mail
11 hours ago
- Daily Mail
One of Australia's oldest and most elite private schools costing upwards of $45,000 a year is rocked by scandal involving principal
The headmaster of one of Sydney 's most elite private schools has taken leave amid allegations he struck a student on the back of the head. Rumours of The King's School headmaster, Tony George, being incredibly blunt and cynical about 'victimhood' began shortly after he took on the top job in July 2017. However, those whispers of authoritarianism around the campus in Parramatta, western Sydney, took a new tone following an alleged incident in the last week of Term Two. Sources close to the school claimed the headmaster struck the back of a senior student's head during discussions in a biblical studies class at the historic Futter Hall. The description of the severity of the assault drastically differs, with some likening it to a 'clip' to the ears while others alleged Mr George descended from the stage to 'hit' the teenager. With students resuming classes for Term Three this week, the school sent a letter to parents informing them it was investigating the alleged incident. In the meantime, Mr George has taken a two-week leave after contracting shingles. The letter, seen by Daily Mail Australia, reassured parents 'the wellbeing of our students and the integrity of our learning environment are of paramount importance'. 'The school is aware of concerns regarding an interaction that occurred during a lecture attended by approximately 100 students and staff,' it read. 'The matter is being reviewed in accordance with the school's established procedures.' The King's School is one of Australia's oldest private schools, having been built in 1831. Fees at the institution start at almost $30,000 for kindergarteners and $47,000 for Year 12 students. Costs are significantly higher for children boarding at the school. Mr George has found himself in headlines several times over the years. Last year he drew attention for his response to negative media coverage of the attitude shown in Australia's elite private schools. 'Toxic masculinity has become a memetic cliché of progressive extremism,' he said. 'Unfortunately, genuine critical reflection and action has given way to movements of cancel culture. 'For example, 'wokeness', initially a call for heightened awareness and sensitivity to social and racial injustices, has evolved into a broader social movement of complaint and victimhood.' Mr George was also the centre of a financial scandal in 2022 after business class flights to London for he and his wife were covered by the school. The pair, alongside the school's deputy and his wife, flew to attend the world's most prestigious rowing event, the Henley Royal Regatta, where students competed. The King's School receives substantial funding from the government on top of its million-dollar profits. In 2024 alone, the school reported a surplus of $4million. In later 2022, the Department of Education launched an audit of King's following concerns it was misusing taxpayer money. The reports stemmed from the school council approving a request from the headmaster to build a plunge pool at his on-site residence. King's was ordered to stop construction of the pool after the government investigation determined it to be an improper use of the school's money. The school has since submitted plans for a $170million campus development. Construction includes a new science and technology building, nine staff townhouses and performing arts centre for primary students. King's also has 'concept plans' for a sports pavilion, new boarding and day boy houses, and an entrance through land owned by Tara Anglican School for Girls.
