Utah's time change bill hits roadblock on Senate Committee
H.B. 120 – otherwise known as '' – was brought before the Senate Business and Labor Committee, which voted 7-1 to table the bill indefinitely. This means, for the time being, Utahns can still expect to adjust their clocks forward and back an hour twice a year.
Dutch Bros has a new menu item that's only available in Utah (and one other state)
The bill was originally introduced by Rep. Joseph Elison (R-Hurricane) and co-sponsored by Sen. Dan McCay (R-Riverton). Under H.B. 120, Utah would permanently adopt Mountain Standard Time as its time of choice until the federal government allows for permanent daylight time – which Utah would then adopt.
Utah has already passed a bill that would see the state switch to permanent Daylight Saving Time should enough surrounding states agree to the change and the federal government allow it. The surrounding state threshold has been met, meaning Utah is only waiting for permission from the federal government.
Father-son duo survives night in Utah wilderness after finding 'miracle' backpack
H.B. 120 unanimously passed through the House Government Operations Committee before earning the House's approval behind a 52 to 23 vote. However, Senate lawmakers seemed to prefer letting the federal government make the final decision.
'I do think when we make this change, we should do it with some other states,' explained Sen. Todd Weiler (R-Woods Cross). 'We are a peculiar people, but I don't know that we want to be extra peculiar with our international airport and our surrounding states by standing out with a different timezone.'
Sen. Scott Sandall (R-Brigham City) said the time change would also put Utah on a different time than Idaho for eight months of the year, complicating interstate commerce for his constituents in Box Elder County.
Rep. Elison, however, argued that his bill is the only opportunity Utah has to stop changing the clocks now – something Hawaii and Arizona have already done.
'Bottom line is we can let this thing die, which it sounds like it will, or we can punt the ball to the federal government and hope that they take the lead,' said Rep. Elison. 'I'd rather take the lead in Utah personally, but I'm OK with the will of the body.'
The Senate Business and Labor Committee's decision to table the bill makes it unlikely lawmakers will take up the issue again this year. This means it is effectively back in the hands of the federal government to decide whether or not to end the clock change and what time we'd observe moving forward.
Yeonseung Kim contributed to this report.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
Texas GOP eyes redistricting, Dems poised to hit back. What to know.
At Trump's urging, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has requested lawmakers potentially redraw the state's electoral map. Opponents warn it could backfire. WASHINGTON − Texas state lawmakers head back to work on July 21 with a 30-day special session that's set to be dominated by a controversial redistricting effort pushed by President Donald Trump. If Trump gets his way, Republicans could acquire new U.S. House seats in Texas, potentially saving their paper-thin majority in next year's midterm elections. "Just a very simple redrawing, we pick up five seats," Trump told reporters on July 15. Some Republicans worry it's not so simple. Red districts, red lines Gov. Greg Abbott has requested, at the White House's urging, that the legislature consider redrawing lines for a handful of Texas' 38 congressional districts, giving Republicans the chance to flip seats red in the upcoming 2026 midterm elections. The prospect is raising Democratic hackles inside and out of the Lone Star State. In California, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is threatening to fight fire with fire. Former congressman and serial Texas candidate Beto O'Rourke has advised Democrats to do just that. Republicans are treading carefully, amid warnings that the controversial move – lumping reliably red voters into Democratic districts in order to shift election outcomes – could come with the unintended consequence of endangering incumbents in formerly safe districts. Here's what to know about the potential redistricting effort as the Texas legislature's summer session gets underway. Trump team urges redraw The New York Times reported in June that Trump's political team was nudging state leaders to shift district boundaries to favor Republicans in contests up to five House seats. A district redraw in the middle of the decade is rare – typically states make those changes at the beginning of each decade, when new Census data becomes available. But Republicans are staring down the barrel of historical precedent, in which the party that does not hold the White House often has the advantage in midterm congressional elections. Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, already has the tricky task of navigating a narrow eight-seat majority, three of which are expected to be filled by Democrats in special elections later this year. Chance of a backfire Republicans currently control 25 of the state's 38 congressional districts. Democrats have long salivated at the prospect of turning Texas blue. And now, they argue, any aggressive gerrymandering that squeezes Republican voters into neighboring districts could backfire and put the red districts they left at risk of a Democratic pick up. 'Texas Republicans are likely going to continue to act like political punks and bend the knee to Donald Trump's extreme agenda,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-New York, said at a news conference July 15. 'In doing so, they will jeopardize their own electoral careers.' Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Texas, said in June that the House Texas delegation was working to 'be on the same page' about potential drawbacks of a 2026 redraw. 'We assured each other, you need to bone up. We need to have a conversation,' Sessions told reporters. 'We need to think about what those impacts would be on the entire delegation.' Blue states weigh in Democrats have started drawing up a potential response, if Texas Republicans go through with their redistricting, the Texas Tribune reported. Newsom suggested in a July 16 press conference that his state could play hardball and change its electoral map to favor Democrats. 'We can act holier than thou,' Newsom said. 'We can sit on the sidelines, talk about the way the world should be. Or we can recognize the existential nature that is this moment.' Figures from other Democratic stronghold states have weighed in with similar tit-for-tat proposals in recent days. 'Let me just simply say the maps in New York are not as fair as they could be,' Jeffries told CNN. Texas Democrats could protest Texas Democrats have limited tools to block Republicans from plowing through with Trump's plan. Democrats could choose to leave the state during the special session, breaking the necessary quorum and bringing legislative operations to a standstill. Texas Democrats employed this approach in 2021, to protest new voting restrictions. After 38 days, enough representatives had trickled back into the state to restore quorum, and Republicans were able to see their measure through. Contributing: Corpus Christi Caller-Times
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
Washington Commanders shouldn't let Trump bully them in nickname battle
It's time to put it in all-caps. WE ARE THE COMMANDERS. Go ahead, Josh Harris. C'mon, Roger Goodell. With a new NFL season kicking off as training camps open – and even more notably, with the Commander-in-Chief wrapping his roll back the clock nonsense with a threat to thwart efforts to build a new stadium for Washington's cherished football team – it's a perfect time to double down on values. So, Donald Trump wants the NFL franchise to reinstate the racial slur as its name? Somebody – and especially Harris, the franchise's owner, and Goodell, the league's commissioner – needs to set the record straight. Publicly. Again. Just because. More: DC locals on Trump's attempt to force Commanders' name change: Stay in your 'own lane' If you're proud to be called the Washington Commanders and dedicated to moving forward with the name that was instituted in 2022, just say so. Instead, as of Monday afternoon, the NFL and Commanders have given us crickets. What a shame. When contacted on Monday by USA TODAY Sports, the Commanders had no comment or statement regarding the remarks Trump posted on social media. The NFL did not respond to a request for a response. Trump also suggested that the Cleveland Guardians go back to their former name and quite nobly, the team had a quick response and reiterated how excited it is to continue building its brand as the Guardians. No confusion there. By contrast, the Commanders (and the NFL) have dropped the ball by hiding in silence. Sure, the issue has played out over decades and Harris, who purchased the franchise from Dan Snyder in 2023 for a record price of $6.05 billion, has repeatedly stated that the old name – the 'R-word' – isn't coming back. And no, every time an individual or group demands that they revert back, there's no need to respond. This, however, is a different circumstance that begs for a statement from a franchise that has reinvigorated its fan base with the promise of quality football on top of a new generation of leadership. The don't-dignify-the-insult-with-a-response option doesn't cut it here, given the grandstand that reignited the topic. Never mind that it's highly questionable, if not doubtful, that Trump could block efforts by the team and D.C. City Council to seal the deal for the proposed $4 billion stadium on the grounds of RFK Stadium. He declared, 'I may put a restriction on them if they don't change the name back.' Perception: You've been punked by the playground bully. Given the journey of the Commanders and the NFL to change from the previous name and previous ownership regime to restore the value of a signature franchise, there's something to be said for standing their ground on principle. In other words, letting it slide looks rather weak. More: Commanders, Guardians name changes were years in the making: Timeline of key events The team deserves for the preseason buzz to focus on expectations attached to the second NFL season with phenomenal quarterback Jayden Daniels, not on whether Trump will try to muck up a deal for a new stadium based on an issue that has come and gone. Oh, the stench of politics. The Commanders and the NFL are better off with Trump in their corner, with the league's tentpole draft coming to D.C. in 2027 fueling momentum for a new stadium that projects for a 2030 completion. By not responding publicly to Trump on the name-change issue, though, the Commanders and NFL have seemingly chosen to try not ticking off the bully who has chosen to scream in your face. Sad. Then again, this line-in-the-sand stuff from Trump was destined to happen at some point for the NFL. During his last term, Trump disparaged the league – including its owners and players – over the national anthem protests. His venom appealed to his base, predictably, yet also forced the NFL to react. This doesn't compare to the anthem protests, but some of the same racial insensitivity exists. And it's no surprise that in targeting the NFL again, Trump is stooping so low to dangle the bait. Which is exactly why, as a matter of principle. the Commanders and the NFL need to double down on their convictions. Follow Jarrett Bell on social media: On X: @JarrettBell On Bluesky:
Politico
6 hours ago
- Politico
GOP megabill's final score: $3.4T in red ink and 10 million kicked off health insurance, CBO says
The package President Donald Trump signed on July 4 would grow the deficit over the next 10 years, Congress' nonpartisan scorekeeper predicts. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) react as they arrive for a signing ceremony for a budget reconciliation bill for President Trump's legislative agenda at the U.S. Capitol July 3, 2025. (Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images) | AP By Jennifer Scholtes Robert King and Benjamin Guggenheim 07/21/2025 02:32 PM EDT Congress' nonpartisan scorekeeper released its final prediction Monday for how President Donald Trump's signature legislative achievement will grow the national debt and affect U.S. households. Over the next decade, the megabill Trump signed on July 4 would increase the federal deficit by $3.4 trillion and cause 10 million people to lose health insurance, the Congressional Budget Office forecasts. While the newly enacted legislation would save more than $1 trillion by cutting federal spending on health care — with the majority coming from Medicaid — CBO predicts that the package's costs will far outweigh its savings. The bulk of the red ink from the package comes from the GOP's permanent extension of Trump's 2017 tax cuts. The analysis finds that the Senate Finance Committee, which has jurisdiction over tax policy, enacted policies that would decrease the incoming federal cash flow from taxes by a total of $4.5 trillion. That sum includes the cost of tax cuts Republicans added during Senate floor debate of the package.
