Ex Taiwan Soldier Sentenced To Two Years In Prison After Spying For China
Beijing claims the self-ruled island as part of its territory and has threatened to use force to bring it under its control.
The two sides have been spying on each other for decades, but experts say the threat to Taiwan is greater given the risk of a Chinese invasion.
The defendant, identified by his family name Chen, was convicted of violating the Criminal Code of the Armed Forces for passing the documents for a payment of NT$80,000 ($2,700), the court said in a statement.
It did not identify Chen's rank or what kind of information was leaked.
In February 2023, Chen obtained electronic files of military secret-level documents from a classmate under the pretext of "preparing for supervision by his superiors", printed them out and took them out of the camp.
Chen then used his smartphone to photograph the files and sent them to a man he met on the messaging app Line in 2022 when he applied for a loan, the court said.
"He handed over our country's military secrets in exchange for money, which seriously damaged national security," it added.
The court added that Chen received a lenient sentence because he confessed and showed remorse during the investigation and trial.
Local newspaper Liberty Times reported that Chen was a former Marines sergeant addicted to online gaming and owed huge debts.
He can appeal the ruling.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
33 minutes ago
- India Today
Calling spouse dark not abetment: Court frees man 30 years after wife's suicide
Nearly three decades after being convicted for abetting his wife's suicide, a man has been acquitted by the Bombay High Court, which ruled that domestic quarrels, including remarks about complexion and threats of a second marriage, do not constitute criminal harassment under the judgment was delivered by Justice S M Modak, who was hearing an appeal filed in 1998 by a then 23-year-old shepherd from Satara district. advertisementThe man had been sentenced to five years in prison by a Sessions Court in Satara for offences under Sections 498A (cruelty to a married woman) and 306 (abetment of suicide) of the Indian Penal Code. The case dated back to January 1995, when the man's wife died by suicide after jumping into a well. Prior to her death, she had reportedly told her parents that she was being harassed by her husband and to the prosecution, the husband had taunted the woman over her dark complexion, said he did not like her, and threatened to marry another woman, while her father-in-law criticised her cooking and expressed dissatisfaction with the food she the High Court found that these incidents amounted to domestic discord, not criminal conduct."They can be said to be quarrels arising out of matrimonial life. They are domestic quarrels. It cannot be said to be of such a high degree so as to compel the woman to commit suicide. So, an offence under Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code is not made out," said the Court said that while there was evidence of tension and disagreements within the household, they did not meet the legal threshold required to prove cruelty or abetment of suicide.'The legislature contemplates that every dispute, quarrel or altercation arising from matrimonial life are not criminal offences. It will take colour of criminal law only when there are no alternatives for the wife but to put an end to her life because of the harassment," the bench bench further said, 'There was harassment, but it was not of that kind of harassment due to which criminal law can be set in motion.'Noting that the prosecution had failed to establish a direct link between the alleged harassment and the woman's act of suicide, the court held that the trial court had overlooked fundamental legal principles. 'The Judge has forgotten the basic principles and ingredients of the Sections,' the High Court said, setting aside the conviction and ordering the appellant's release.- EndsMust Watch
Hindustan Times
35 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Who is Heston James? TikTok influencer arrested for viral pranks disrupting businesses
Police have arrested Heston Cobb, an Arizona based influencer, for disrupting local businesses through a series of pranks. Heston Cobb was arrested at his home on July 23.(X/@MAGAgeddon) Authorities said businesses in Tempe, Arizona, reported numerous instances of groups of men who entered their stores dressed as employees and then refused to leave when asked. Probing these incidents, cops found them linked to viral prank videos uploaded to social media by Cobb, who enjoys a 1.6 million-strong following on TikTok, People reported. Who is Heston Cobb? Heston Cobb or Heston James, as he's known to his followers, is a TikTok influencer. He was arrested at his home on July 23. Cobb was booked on one count of burglary, two counts of criminal impersonation, five counts of disorderly conduct and five counts of criminal trespass. Also Read | TikTok will go dark in US without Chinese approval of sale deal, says Howard Lutnick If Cobb gets the maximum punishment under Arizona law, he could be looking at up to nine years in jail and a fine of $315,000. What viral prank was Heston Cobb playing? Cobb, in a series of videos, from March to May, could be seen shrieking in various stores, then pretending not to know where the screams came from, when approached by staff. On July 4, he posted a TikTok video, where he claims to be an employee of a car mechanic shop. He says he's 'from corporate' and has gotten 'multiple complaints'. Then, a van full of men in jumpsuits enter the place of business and begin operating on cars there. 'These videos are definitely not pranks. They are crossing the line from something that's fun and playful into criminal territory. They're breaking laws,' Tempe Police Officer Jessica Ells said to AZFamily, adding, 'They are going into these businesses and impersonating the employees. That actually is a felony charge.' Pep Boys, Hyland Auto Repair, Big Brand Tire & Service, Jiffy Lube and Chipotle were among businesses impacted by Cobb's pranks. 'Hopefully this will put pressure on Instagram, YouTube, and all of the other platforms to really look at what people are posting,' Hyland Auto owner told the publication.
India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
CBI takes over probe into assault on Army Colonel in Patiala over parking dispute
The Punjab-Haryana has granted the investigation into the assault of Army Colonel Pushpinder Singh Bath and his son, Rajinder, to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).The incident, which occurred on March 21, 2025, at Harbhans Dhaba near Rajindra Hospital in Patiala, has now become a high-profile case following public outrage and intervention by the Punjab and Haryana High CBI registered the case and began its probe after receiving orders from the High Court. The agency has taken over the investigation from Patiala Police and filed a fresh FIR in the In March, Colonel Bath alleged that 12 Punjab Police personnel assaulted him and his son during a parking dispute outside a dhaba in Patiala. According to the Colonel, four inspectors and their armed subordinates attacked them without provocation, seized his ID card and mobile phone, and threatened him with a "fake encounter". The entire sequence of events, which was caught on CCTV, left Colonel Bath with a broken arm and his son with a head the incident, the Colonel's family approached Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann and met with Union Ministers and the Punjab Police DGP. However, the family claims that justice has still not been Punjab Police initially failed to act promptly. It was only after eight days, when the incident gained traction on social media and news outlets, that an FIR was lodged. In response to growing public pressure, twelve policemen were suspended. However, both the victim's family and the public demanded a fair and impartial investigation into the Punjab and Haryana High Court had also rejected the anticipatory bail plea of Punjab Police Inspector Ronnie Singh Salh, one of the key accused in the assault the four police inspectors involved, Salh was the only one who applied for bail in the High Court, which was rejected on Friday. The other three inspectors - Harjinder Dhillon, Harry Boparai and Shaminder Singh - are also implicated in both the assault case and a separate encounter case in Patiala. They are currently on the run and could be arrested under the FIR, having been fugitives for the past two months.- EndsMust Watch
