1724919650-0%2FUntitled-design-(5)1724919650-0.png&w=3840&q=100)
Kundi ramps up efforts for political shift in K-P
The move is part of a larger plan greenlit by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who had reportedly handed Kundi the reins to orchestrate a political shake-up in the province.
The reserved seats ruling has given the federal coalition a foot in the door of the K-P Assembly, fueling speculation that a no-confidence push may not be far off.
Within government ranks, there's growing consensus that the PTI's decade-long grip on Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa has run its course and that recent developments have further exposed its inability to ensure public safety.
Amid this backdrop, Governor Kundi met with PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari on Friday to take stock of the evolving political and security landscape.
During the meeting, the governor briefed Bilawal on recent developments, including his engagement with lawmakers from coalition parties and the implications of the reserved seats allocation.
The deteriorating law and order situation, especially in the southern districts of K-P, featured prominently in their discussions.
Kundi apprised the PPP chairman of growing security concerns and the administrative hurdles being faced in the province.
He also provided a detailed account of the recent human tragedy in Swat, where flash floods claimed several lives, and criticised the provincial government's response as grossly inadequate.
Referring to relief activities, the governor said, "As per your directions, I visited the affected families in Daska and Rustam, Mardan".
Al Jazeera interview
Former foreign minister and PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, in an interview with Al Jazeera, warned that India's increasingly aggressive anti-Pakistan narrative posed a threat not only to Pakistan but to India itself.
He argued that New Delhi was attempting to globalise a hostile ideology that risked destabilising the region. "This new ideology is dangerous for both the Pakistani and Indian people," he said.
Rejecting accusations of Pakistan's involvement in terror incidents across the border, Bilawal added, "Pakistan was not involved in the terrorist attacks in India".
He said that the country was itself facing rising incidents of terrorism on a daily basis.
Hafiz Saeed, Masood Azhar
Bilawal also signalled Islamabad's openness to consider extraditing Laskhar-e-Taiba (LeT) chief Hafiz Saeed and Jaish-e-Muhammad (JeM) chief Masood Azhar, provided that India cooperates in facilitating judicial proceedings.
"As part of a comprehensive dialogue with Pakistan, where terrorism is one of the issues that we discuss, I am sure Pakistan would not be opposed to any of these things."
According to Pakistan's National Counter Terrorism Authority (NACTA), both LeT and JeM are banned organisations. Saeed is currently serving a 33-year sentence in Pakistan for terror financing, while Azhar has also been proscribed by authorities.
Bilawal elaborated that existing legal action against the two individuals has so far focused on charges filed within Pakistan's jurisdiction.
However, he noted that prosecuting them on cross-border terrorism allegations remained a challenge due to India's reluctance to follow through on basic procedural requirements.
"India is refusing to comply with certain basic elements that require that conviction to take place," he explained.
"It's important — to present evidence within these courts, for people to come over from India to testify, to put up with whatever the counter-accusations will be. If India is willing to be cooperative in that process, I am sure there will be no hurdle in extraditing any individual of concern."
The PPP leader also pushed back strongly against India's posturing on cross-border terrorism, characterising it as a dangerous shift in regional norms.
"The new normal or the new abnormal that India would like to impose in the subcontinent — is that any terrorist attack within India means war with Pakistan," Bilawal said.
"This does not serve the interests of Pakistan, and it does not serve the interests of India."
He went on to warn that this escalatory logic placed the fate of nearly two billion people in the hands of non-state actors.
"Two nuclear-armed countries have got to the point that they have reduced the threshold for military conflict — to this level, which in effect means that we leave the destiny of 1.7 billion people not in the hands of the Pakistani or Indian government, but to nameless, faceless non-state actors."
When asked specifically about the current status of Saeed and Azhar, Bilawal clarified: "It is factually not correct that Hafiz Saeed is a free man; he is in the custody of the Pakistani state."
He added that Azhar's whereabouts remain unclear but stressed that Islamabad believes he is outside the country. "It is our belief that he is in Afghanistan," he said.
"If and when the Indian government shares information that he is on Pakistani soil, we will be more than happy to arrest him."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
27 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Dalai Lama at 90: succession will not be dictated by China
Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama arrives for his visit to the Tibet Institute Rikon in Rikon, Switzerland September 21, 2018. PHOTO: REUTERS The spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhists, the Dalai Lama, turns 90 on Sunday after a week of celebrations by followers during which he riled China again and spoke about his hope to live beyond 130 and reincarnate after dying. The Nobel laureate is regarded as one of the world's most influential religious leaders, with a following that extends well beyond Buddhism, but not by Beijing which calls him a separatist and has sought to bring the faith under its control. Fleeing his native Tibet in 1959 in the wake of a failed uprising against Chinese rule, the 14th Dalai Lama along with hundreds of thousands of Tibetans took shelter in India and has since advocated for a peaceful "Middle Way" to seek autonomy and religious freedom for Tibetan people. Thousands of followers from around the world, celebrities, and officials from the United States and India, will attend his birthday celebrations in Dharamshala, the small Indian town in the foothills of the Himalayas where the Dalai Lama lives. During the celebrations, which will include cultural performances and remarks by long-time follower and Hollywood star Richard Gere as well as federal Indian ministers, the Dalai Lama is scheduled to deliver a speech. The preceding week of celebrations was particularly important for Tibetan Buddhists as the Dalai Lama had previously mentioned that he would speak about his succession at his 90th birthday. On Wednesday, he allayed their concerns about the future of the institution of the Dalai Lama by saying that he would reincarnate as the leader of the faith upon his death and that his non-profit institution, the Gaden Phodrang Trust, had the sole authority to recognise his successor. China has said that the succession will have to be approved by its leaders. The United States, which is seeking to counter the rise of China, has called on Beijing to cease what it describes as interference in the succession of the Dalai Lama and other Tibetan Buddhist lamas.
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Can uniform law survive a plural society?
Pakistan's parliament has passed the eagerly awaited Islamabad Capital Territory Child Marriage Restraint Act, 2025 restricting marriage below 18 years of age, meanwhile, the Council of Islamic Ideology and conservative parties have challenged the bill publically and in the Federal Sharia Court. Similar developments are seen in neighbouring India, which endangers the enforcement of rights in a completely different way. India's Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is a bill pending in the Indian national assembly (Lok Sabha) which has long been a constitutional aspiration to standardise religious groups' personal laws in India. A version of it has been already passed in the Uttarakhand state assembly in 2024. Nevertheless, passing it is proving legally and politically difficult. At stake are not only questions of legal consistency and gender justice, but also deeper concerns about religious freedom, state overreach, and democratic erosion. In India, personal laws for Muslims, Christians, Jews and Parsis exist separately from the Hindu Code which governs personal laws for Buddhists, Hindus, Jains and Sikhs. Naturally, laws governing marriage and inheritance comply with religious edicts of these groups. This has occasionally brought conflict between state and religion – with the Indian Supreme Court's rulings nudging the country toward a UCC. An oft cited ruling is Shah Bano v Muhammad Ahmad Khan where a Muslim woman was given the right to marital support against Islamic custom. Essentially this allowed the state to interject in the personal matters of this Muslim couple to provide them protection, although later a law was passed to circumvent it – this was a cause for anxiety for minorities and aggravation for the majority who felt discriminated against for their own customs. Proponents of the UCC suggest that it would streamline and simplify personal laws across various spheres such as marriage, succession, guardianship and inheritance. The UCC is also popular with groups vying for gender equality, suggesting that UCC would protect women in cases of inheritance and ensure children are supported in cases of marriage dissolution or wedlock. Religious rights groups have argued that any such bill would intrude on the Freedom of Religion of citizens, especially the Muslim minority. Individuals are also concerned about the effects of eroding democratic institutions and breaking away from the secular tradition of India. Uttarakhand became the first state in India's modern history to enact a UCC. Its version sets minimum marriage ages, standardises divorce and inheritance rules, and, controversially, mandates registration of live-in relationships. Supporters argue that the law protects women and strengthens legal clarity. But petitions have already been filed challenging the law's constitutionality, and activists fear it could open the door to surveillance and moral policing. Several BJP-led states — including Gujarat, Assam, Telangana, and Uttar Pradesh — intend to follow suit. Gujarat formed a high-level committee to draft its own version of a UCC, with assurances that the drafting process would include public consultation. Khalid Anwar, a member of the legislative council and the BJP-ally Janata Dal party, spoke to the media, stating that 'We will never allow the UCC to be implemented in Bihar.' At the same time, opposition-ruled states like Kerala and West Bengal have rejected the UCC on the grounds that it would infringe on religious freedom and fail to accommodate local cultural diversity. In 2023, Kerala's legislative assembly passed a resolution opposing the proposed UCC, criticising the lack of public consultation. At the heart of the UCC debate is a question of uniformity versus pluralism. The legal foundations of state-level UCCs remain unsettled. Although the Supreme Court of India has occasionally given opinion in favour of a common civil code, legal scholars warn that multiple state-level UCCs may violate the spirit of Article 44 which envisions a uniform civil code for all citizens. This also invites questions about territoriality of the UCC, Article 245 of the constitution restricts states from making laws about the whole of India. India's Muslim leadership, rights activists, and tribal representatives argue that the UCC could be selectively enforced or used as a pretext for surveillance and control. Due to the registration requirements, vulnerable segments will be hesitant to accept the UCC. The targeting of practices such as polygamy and triple talaq, they argue, reinforces stereotypes about Muslim communities while sparing similar customs among tribal or Hindu populations. Critics note that polygamy is banned under the UCC for Muslims, yet Adivasi communities, who also practice polygamy, would be exempt. The BJP has positioned the UCC as a tool for gender equality, as a protector of women's rights. However, critics argue that these reforms are selectively framed and politically motivated. They point to a broader pattern of neglect and active hostility toward the Muslim community, casting doubt on the sincerity of the BJP's gender justice rhetoric. While some welcome the UCC's promise of equal rights in inheritance and marriage, many argue that reforms must empower women to choose — whether that means adhering to religious tradition or entering civil unions. Activists such as Adv Dr Shalu Nigam have called for a more inclusive approach that does not impose uniformity from above but rather expands the choices for marriage laws available to women across communities. The Uniform Civil Code in theory, offers a pathway toward standardising personal law and enhancing gender equality. In practice, its rollout has exposed the legal, political, and social complexities that must be examined. For India, the road is uncertain. The fragmented approach —where BJP-led states adopt state-level UCCs while opposition-ruled or minority-heavy states resist — raises difficult constitutional questions. The risk is not merely legal inconsistency, but broader social and political polarisation. By touching on personal matters, the UCC has already caused national debates on secularism, federalism, and minority rights. For Pakistanis, the UCC is a familiar echo. Questions of minority rights, majoritarian nationalism, and state overreach resonate deeply in a region where religion and politics often intertwine. Pakistan has been long criticised for its human rights record however the recent legislation to stop child marriages are encouraging and show the government's inclination towards protecting the rights of women. In India, the UCC represents both promise and peril: it could be a vehicle for greater legal equality or a flashpoint for division and unrest. Its success depends on whether it can be implemented without alienating vast segments of the population. The US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has flagged concerns about India's treatment of minorities, including the UCC. Moreover, religious freedom and democratic governance remain key pillars of India's soft power abroad —and the UCC being used to hinder human rights may complicate India's reputation as a leader internationally. The success of the UCC project will depend on legislative momentum, whether it can be implemented in a way that safeguards constitutional rights and respects India's pluralistic fabric. Without inclusivity, legal clarity, and social consensus, the law risks becoming a symbol of division. For both India and its democratic partners, the question is not just whether the UCC can be passed but whether it can be made just. A common civil code may promise equality, but in India, many — especially Muslims — see its implementation under the BJP as politically motivated. In Pakistan, orthodox forces openly block reforms in the name of faith. Though the dynamics differ, both countries reveal how personal law remains a battleground where religion, politics, and rights collide. As India moves forward with the UCC and Pakistan stalls on its own reforms, the region shows that legal equality cannot be achieved through legislation alone. It requires trust — and trust, once lost, is hard to legislate back. Sachal Jacob is a PhD candidate at the Georgia State University who has worked with various human rights platforms. He can be reached at sachaljacob95@ All facts and information are the sole responsibility of the author
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Students of tomorrow — a teacher's thoughts
Having taught sociology for fourteen years at the high school level in Pakistan, I have found many of my students to be lacking in three areas in particular; originality of thought, lack of analytical output in the class and indifference to the value of the social sciences. The three problems identified above are not only restricted to the private sector of primary and high school education in Pakistan but are more acute in the country's public schools and colleges. Our students need to be inspired by teachers themselves to come up with original ideas and innovative thoughts. While having classroom discussions with them on a variety of issues from rising divorce rates in Pakistani society to the qualitative input which might be of use in designing a research outlay for a school project, I have found many of them to be restricted in their thinking and consequently, in their effort put into the particular task. This can be due to, amongst other factors, the years of social conditioning by both their families and households and the society that they witness. To counter this, a teacher must know that students in the vital age group of 10-16 must not be held back in their creative and valuable contributions to class discussions. The administrative hierarchy of educational administrators should realise this too. At the same time, students must realise that it is important to not only be novel in the presentation of an idea to the class but that it should also be analytically worthy of thoughtful reflection. For that, they will have to forget stereotypical images, centred on class, gender, racial and ethnic divisions and preconceived (and untrue) notions of what it means to be a human in relationship to the society around us in the modern/postmodern world of today. This is the task that teachers of today need to be well aware of, if they want to guide the original minds of tomorrow. Beautiful minds such as Stephen Hawkings, John Nash and Sayyed Hossein Nasr of today and Leo Tolstoy, Faiz Ahmad Faiz and Rabindranath Tagore of yesteryears need to be taken on board to build a 'collective conscience' for the world of tomorrow. Poets such as Hu Shi, Yosano Akiko, Goethe, Wordsworth and Iqbal must be read and reread if we are to succeed in this huge task in front of us. Shakespeare must be contextualised in the Pakistani society around us if the country's students of today are to build bridges of understanding and humanity with the world of tomorrow. In this world, knowledge should not have a 'price tag' and it must be imparted for the intrinsic good it entails. They should be made to understand how curiosity, guided in the right direction, leads to an inquisitive mindset, which knows no boundaries at all, when it comes to reaching the frontiers of information. This yearning for knowledge must be nurtured and respected both within and outside the country's classrooms. Lastly, the need for us to understand the value of social sciences and social scientists for today's Pakistan. Social sciences need to be emphasised as very important if the Pakistani state and its future (the students of today) are to take head-on the challenges that afflict the nation and the obscure mindset of its citizens today. Social sciences such as economics, sociology and liberal arts subjects such as historiography have built nations. Unfortunately, Pakistani academia has yet to realise the full potential of an education in social sciences. Our students need to be liberated from the conventional paradigm of a sciences-commerce duality and need to be made to understand the primacy of social sciences in today's world. As AI transforms the education sector today, social sciences offer a huge insider view of the changes that will be wrought on the education sector both within and outside the classroom. It offers us a window into the view that society will be massively impacted by the new information age and in order to succeed in this information age, students will have to decouple themselves from conventional ideas of classroom education. Social sciences are bound to offer careers of tomorrow ranging from research, academia and the changing face of government and public policy. And the human will stand at the primal chord of these massive societal fissures. Appropriate would it be that Pakistani students recognise the potential of this huge transformation. Lastly, ethics will be a fundamental part of this new scope of education. Pakistani parents, teachers and the students themselves should be made to remember this valuable lesson. It means that education and the process of imparting it in Pakistan must have an ethical angle too. Ethics and morality do play an important part in all didactic goals and this aspect of education can no longer be ignored, especially in the age of AI. If it is considered, then education should be imparted in a value-free way (perfection over here cannot be reached) since all positive philosophy, interactionist experiments and laboratory products need to be associated with the 'Ultimate Good', that is, the pursuit of education for its intrinsic worth. Ethics and morality infused with humanism will go a long way to answer the gripping questions that are bound to emerge in the society of tomorrow. In this discourse, education cannot be constrained from ethics and a humanistic pedagogy. For instance, taking just one cue of the question of what knowledge is, in the future will involve a lot of ethical dilemmas and queries. There needs to be given a global perspective to education in Pakistan today. If it is not granted, then historiography will remain scribe versions of actual history, geography will continue to ignore significant monuments of interest to the geologist of the future and the social sciences will miss out on the things that need to be 'taught' in a classroom environment. The coming world of education will ask us fundamental questions of what knowledge is, how should it be pursued and what it means to be a knowledgeable human. AI will transform the education sector and the world beyond education to a huge degree. In this sense, our students need to be made aware of the challenges of tomorrow and the innovative and engaging ways to overcome them. It is an age of knowledge. And knowledge will remain powerful in this age. Taimur Arbab is a teacher of Sociology and a writer based in Karachi All facts and information are the sole responsibility of the author
