US Congressman Joe Wilson Officially Introduces Bill to Designate Polisario as Terrorist Group
Marrakech – Republican Congressman Joe Wilson, alongside Democratic Representative Jimmy Panetta, has submitted a bipartisan bill to the US Congress seeking to classify the Polisario Front as a foreign terrorist group.
The congressman formally submitted the legislation titled 'Polisario Front Terrorist Designation Act' to the House of Representatives on June 24. It now sits before both the Foreign Affairs and Justice Committees for thorough examination.
Wilson revealed the initiative through his X account, labeling the Polisario as 'a Marxist militia backed by Iran, Hezbollah and Russia providing Iran a strategic outpost in Africa and destabilizing the Kingdom of Morocco, a US ally for 248 years.'
The congressman, who fulfilled a promise he had repeated many times, expressed gratification at introducing this cross-party legislation with Rep. Jimmy Panetta to brand the Polisario as a foreign terrorist organization.
The comprehensive bill directly implicates the separatist movement in extensive arms and drug trafficking networks throughout the Sahel region, deliberate violations of established ceasefire agreements with Morocco, and calculated attacks targeting Moroccan civilians in Saharan border territories.
The legislation meticulously documents connections between the Polisario and various extremist organizations operating in the region, bolstered by support from Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia – relationships that pose direct threats to regional and international stability.
The Polisario is a Marxist militia backed by Iran, Hezbollah and Russia providing Iran a strategic outpost in Africa and destabilizing the Kingdom of Morocco, a U.S. ally for 248 years.
Grateful to introduce bipartisan legislation with @RepJimmyPanetta to designate the Polisario… pic.twitter.com/ESQjgwefLo
— Joe Wilson (@RepJoeWilson) June 26, 2025
Should this bill receive approval, it would trigger a fundamental shift in American foreign policy regarding North Africa, as Washington considers Morocco's position vital for international security frameworks.
The legislation would expose the Polisario Front to stringent sanctions, severe economic restrictions, and complete diplomatic isolation, effectively categorizing it alongside notorious terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, ISIS, and FARC.
US under Trump's leadership propels push for final resolution of the Sahara dispute
This decisive congressional action follows only two months after Washington's firm reaffirmation of support for Morocco's sovereignty over the Western Sahara.
During an April 8 meeting in Washington, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita that the United States unequivocally recognizes Morocco's sovereignty over its southern provinces and backs the autonomy proposal 'as the only basis for a just and lasting solution to the dispute.'
The statement dealt a heavy blow to the Cold War relic narrative and its chief sponsor, Algeria, which had mocked Trump's initial recognition as 'just a tweet,' only to watch it solidify even further under the second Trump administration, leaving no doubt about Washington's unwavering commitment.
The State Department subsequently reinforced this position in an official diplomatic communiqué, stating: 'The United States would contribute to any progress toward achieving this goal.'
Observers described the declaration as a pivotal moment that closed the door on any illusions of a reversal. With Trump back in power, Washington's endorsement has shifted from symbolic recognition to an institutional pillar of US foreign policy, and is now pushing decisively to resolve the decades-long fabricated Western Sahara dispute.
A Spanish think tank report published by Instituto Coordenadas de Gobernanza y Economía Aplicada on June 11 noted that this firm American stance, coupled with pressure on Algeria to dismantle the Tindouf camps, marks the beginning of the end for the separatist narrative.
This momentum could draw a definitive close to one of Africa's most unnecessarily prolonged and politically manufactured territorial falsehoods, long sustained by external agendas rather than historical legitimacy.
A resolute ally who honored his word
Wilson has consistently criticized external support for the Polisario Front. During a public session of Congress in January, he directly accused several nations of enabling the separatist group: 'War criminal Putin, Iran, and Cuba are actively destabilizing West Africa by supporting the Polisario Front, a threat to the Kingdom of Morocco,' Wilson declared, while powerfully reaffirming Morocco's role as a steadfast and indispensable American ally.
In the same address, he reminded colleagues that 'President Donald Trump stood with Morocco, recognizing Western Sahara as Moroccan,' and noted his role as chair of the US-Morocco Caucus.
He also denounced, at the time, Algeria's provocative hosting of 'terrorist-designated Kurdish separatists to meet with Polisario militia in Tindouf,' specifically referencing the 'notorious PKK and YPG' visit to the camps.
Wilson had repeatedly telegraphed his intentions regarding this legislation and consistently vowed to hold those enabling the separatists accountable.
Following his April 9 meeting with Bourita, Wilson wrote , 'Grateful to meet with Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita to discuss our long-standing partnership and commitment to peace in the region, including the stability of Western Sahara from Polisario terrorists. The U.S. stands with Morocco for peace.'
Just two days later, he confirmed on X: 'I will introduce legislation to designate the Polisario as terrorists. Iran & Putin are gaining a foothold in Africa via Polisario. Connect the dots: axis of aggression.'
The congressman has maintained unwavering determination, vowing on May 22: 'The legislation is coming soon,' while adding the pointed assurance that 'Trump will fix it.'
Proof that eradicates all ambiguity surrounding the Polisario's true nature
Multiple prestigious American think tanks have assembled overwhelming evidence supporting the terrorist designation. The Hudson Institute's comprehensive analysis has shattered the Polisario's self-portrayal as a liberation movement, instead revealing it as 'a destabilizing militia' steeped in arms smuggling and youth indoctrination, while 'aligning itself with the strategic agendas of Iran, Russia, and China.'
The report, authored by Zineb Riboua, meticulously documents how the Polisario's activities 'go far beyond the standard for a terror designation.'
According to the Hudson Institute's analysis, the Polisario Front conclusively meets all three statutory criteria for designation as a Foreign Terrorist Organization under US law.
Most alarmingly, the institute confirms the separatist group 'receives drones from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) through transfers facilitated by the Algerian regime' and 'smuggles arms to jihadist insurgencies that threaten American forces across the Sahel.'
The report specifically highlights the case of Adnan Abu Walid al-Sahrawi, who reportedly held a role in the Polisario before becoming the emir of the Islamic State in the Greater Sahara (ISGS). Under his leadership, ISGS carried out numerous attacks across the Sahel, including a 2017 ambush in Niger that killed four US soldiers.
This trajectory 'underscores how militant ecosystems in the region overlap and evolve' and demonstrates that 'the Polisario's political infrastructure in Tindouf has long facilitated radicalization, trafficking, and terrorist mobilization.'
In a landmark May 21 analysis for The Daily Signal titled 'Why the US Must Confront Terror Proxy Polisario Front,' Robert Greenway, director of the Allison Center for National Security, and Amine Ghoulidi, visiting fellow at the Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy, presented devastating evidence of the group's terrorist activities.
'Today, Polisario fighters field Iranian-type drones, share desert corridors with Russian proxies' supply convoys, and tax smuggling routes that feed Sahel jihadists. All this takes place within missile range of the Strait of Gibraltar, one of the world's most critical maritime choke points,' they write.
The experts remind Washington of a troubling precedent: 'In 1988, Polisario missiles brought down two U.S. Agency for International Development aircraft, killing five Americans—and the U.S. failed to respond with sanctions.'
The analysts warn that since the 2020 unilateral withdrawal from the UN-brokered ceasefire, Polisario has declared the Western Sahara a 'zone of war,' resumed rocket attacks along Morocco's defensive berm, and explicitly warned that 'foreign consulates, airlines, and companies were 'legitimate targets.''
Their analysis identifies the three pillars supporting Polisario's operations: 'Iranian military assistance, a growing Russian influence network, and a mature trans-Sahel illicit economy that overlaps with jihadist financing streams.'
The authors note that Algeria's sanctuary allows Polisario to 'stockpile ordnance, experiment with new systems, and cultivate external sponsors at minimal risk,' while maintaining a force of roughly 8,000 fighters with potential to mobilize up to 40,000 – 'a manpower pool that Polisario commanders can draw on and which jihadist recruiters have already probed.'
The National Interest published a comprehensive analysis on June 9, stressing that more countries are adopting Morocco's security approach to safeguard its southern provinces and prevent the region from becoming home to a 'jihadist government.'
The publication stated, 'The Polisario has, in recent years, aligned itself with some of the most radical actors in the region,' recalling how Tindouf has become a breeding ground for 'jihadist recruitment and a nexus for extremist networks operating across the Sahel.'
The Washington Post has published explosive revelations documenting hundreds of Polisario mercenaries dispatched by Iran to fight alongside the Syrian regime.
In its April 12 edition, the newspaper stated: 'Iran has trained fighters from the Polisario Front, a rebel group based in Algeria that is fighting for Western Sahara's independence from Morocco. Hundreds of these fighters are currently detained by the new Syrian security forces.'
The report cited direct testimony from these security forces and Western diplomats stationed in the region, providing incontrovertible confirmation of long-standing Moroccan assertions regarding the dangerous nexus between Iran, Hezbollah, and the Polisario, facilitated through Algerian channels.
The proposed legislation would impose crippling consequences on the Polisario terror group, including complete asset freezes, absolute prohibition of financial or political interactions with its supporters, and implementation of targeted sanctions.
This designation would also significantly complicate diplomatic relations with Algeria, the primary state sponsor and sanctuary provider for the violent separatist movement.
Mounting evidence and a surging global consensus are isolating the Polisario. With the UK joining the US, France, and Spain in recognizing Moroccan sovereignty, over 120 nations now back the Autonomy Plan as the only credible path to end the conflict.
Read also: Is this the end of the Polisario?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
2 hours ago
- Morocco World
Sahrawi NGOs Condemn Polisario Attack on Es-Smara, UN Mission Launches Field Investigation
Rabat – A coalition of Sahrawi NGOs has strongly condemned the recent projectile attack near the southern Moroccan city of Es-Smara, calling it a 'hostile act' and a grave violation of Morocco's sovereignty and international law. The incident, which caused panic among residents but resulted in no casualties, is widely believed to be the latest in a series of attacks carried out by the Polisario Front. The explosions occurred in an uninhabited area a few kilometers outside the city, close to a MINURSO camp. Images and videos shared online showed debris from the projectiles scattered in the area. The United Nations Mission in the Sahara (MINURSO) visited the impact sites on Friday evening to conduct an on-the-ground assessment, according to local reports. The field visit, conducted in coordination with members of Morocco's Royal Armed Forces, aimed to assess the damage and collect data for a detailed report that will be submitted to UN Secretary-General António Guterres. In a statement released after the incident, the coalition of Sahrawi NGOs expressed deep concern over what it described as the Polisario Front's continued breach of the UN-brokered ceasefire agreement. It accused the group of intentionally targeting areas close to civilians in a desperate attempt to destabilize the region and spread fear. Algeria under scrutiny The coalition said local authorities recovered explosive shells near the urban center of Es-Smara, warning that such acts were aimed at harming civilians and striking at Morocco's territorial integrity. The attack 'signals an intentional targeting of a civilian urban environment in order to impose a new, unstable reality in the region,' the group said, adding that Algeria's support and silence made it complicit in the escalation. The statement blamed Algeria for allowing a non-state armed group to operate from its territory and carry out attacks against Morocco. According to the coalition, Algeria's failure to control its borders and prevent such escalations makes it fully responsible for the ongoing military provocations. It also warned that this incident reflects a pattern of indiscriminate violence and deliberate targeting of populated areas, contradicting Polisario's claims that it only strikes military sites. 'This, it argues, constitutes a breach of international law, norms, and conventions, and must be met with an appropriate international response.' The NGO coalition reiterated its solidarity with the residents of Es-Smara and called on the UN Security Council to act swiftly to preserve peace and stability in the region. It urged Algeria to support peaceful dialogue and UN-led efforts to find a political solution to the conflict, instead of backing armed provocations. This latest incident comes less than two years after a similar attack in Es-Smara in 2023, which killed one person and injured three others. In that case, Morocco's UN ambassador Omar Hilale stated that the blasts struck civilian neighborhoods and noted that the Polisario had issued a statement indirectly taking responsibility. 'There were no military installations at any of the sites,' Hilale said in a press conference after the incident, adding that 'targeting civilians is a terrorist act under international law, and those responsible will not go unpunished.' Hilale also emphasized that those behind the attacks, as well as those who arm and support them, must be held accountable. He specifically referred to Algeria, which has been hosting, financing, and fully backing the Polisario for decades. Polisario faces US pressure Meanwhile, in the United States, a bipartisan effort is underway to designate the Polisario Front as a foreign terrorist organization. US Republican Senator Joe Wilson and Democratic Representative Jimmy Panetta recently introduced the bill, which cites the group's attacks on civilians and its renewed armed activities following the collapse of the 2020 ceasefire. Wilson described Polisario as a 'Marxist militia backed by Iran, Hezbollah and Russia providing Iran a strategic outpost in Africa and destabilizing the Kingdom of Morocco, a US ally for 248 years.' The legislation cites the Polisario's indiscriminate attacks on civilians and its rearmament after the collapse of the 2020 ceasefire. Lawmakers from both parties argue that this designation would enable enhanced sanctions, travel bans, and financial restrictions against the group. The bill reflects growing US concerns over renewed violence, especially following the ceasefire ending in late 2020. Meanwhile, Morocco's Autonomy Plan for Western Sahara has been gaining significant diplomatic backing recently. Rabat's comprehensive plan currently receives support from at least 113 countries, and the momentum is quickly growing. In 2020, the US officially recognized Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara and expressed support for the Autonomy Plan, with American officials recently reiterating this stance. In addition, France positively shifted tone in July 2024, labeling Morocco's 2007 autonomy proposal 'the only basis' for a just, lasting, UN-compliant settlement On June 1 this year, the United Kingdom became the third permanent UN Security Council member, after the US and France, to endorse Morocco's autonomy plan, calling it 'the most credible, viable and pragmatic' path forward. Tags: AlgeriaEs SmaraPolisarioSaharaWestern sahara
Ya Biladi
4 hours ago
- Ya Biladi
What a U.S. terrorist designation could mean for the Polisario Front
DR The bipartisan bill introduced by Representatives Joe Wilson (Republican) and Jimmy Panetta (Democrat) seeks to designate the Polisario Front as a « foreign terrorist organization » (FTO). However, even if the bill passes, the designation would not be automatic: under U.S. law, the final decision rests with the Secretary of State, who acts on advice from the Treasury Department and the Department of Justice (8 U.S.C. § 1189). To persuade Congress—and ultimately Secretary of State Marco Rubio—Joe Wilson emphasizes the Polisario's ties to Hezbollah and Iran. He could also highlight threats of terrorist attacks against foreign interests in Western Sahara by leaders of the separatist movement. If the «Polisario Front Terrorist Designation Act» succeeds and the State Department officially labels the Polisario as an FTO, here are four key consequences to expect: Implications of the FTO designation in the United States Asset freeze: The Treasury could block any funds controlled by the Polisario within U.S. jurisdiction. This freeze would be targeted; a global blockade would require an additional designation as a «Specially Designated Global Terrorist» (SDGT) by OFAC. In practice, many non-U.S. banks would likely halt processing dollar payments to avoid risks. Prosecution for «material support»: Anyone in the U.S. providing material assistance could face up to 20 years in prison (18 U.S.C. § 2339B). However, humanitarian licenses could still be granted, as has been done for groups like the Houthis, ensuring vital aid reaches civilians. Visas and border controls: Members and supporters would be legally inadmissible under INA § 212. Diplomatic exemptions might apply for UN personnel, but access to the U.S. would become the exception rather than the rule. Polisario's credibility and finances under pressure Loss of «liberation movement» aura: The FTO label would legally equate the Polisario with groups like Hezbollah or the PKK, seriously undermining its third-worldist narrative. Fundraising challenges: American payment platforms would sever ties, and European banks would adopt a strict cautionary stance. Non-dollar channels such as cryptocurrencies or Asian banks might persist unless secondary sanctions are imposed. NGOs under scrutiny: Humanitarian organizations would need OFAC licenses to operate in the Tindouf camps. Any advocacy or training involving the Polisario would become legally risky. Algeria in a delicate spot No automatic «State Sponsor of Terrorism» label: That designation requires clear, repeated support for attacks targeting U.S. interests. «Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act» law leverage: If Algeria pursues significant new Russian arms deals, CAATSA sanctions could be triggered, but this would be a highly political and conditional decision. Narrative costs: Supporting a group officially labeled as terrorist would damage Algeria's position, especially since some Sahel countries accuse it of backing terrorist groups in the region. Possible mitigation: Algeria might push for the disarmament of Polisario militias to ease international pressure. Multilateral repercussions: shifting from «decolonization» to «security» At the UN Security Council: The U.S. could push to add counter-terrorism to MINURSO's mandate during its next renewal. This would require a new resolution and must avoid a Russian or Chinese veto. Within the African Union: Some member states concerned about their image might distance themselves from the SADR, potentially leading to a formal suspension if 36 countries support amending the AU's founding charter. Bilateral relations: Hesitant countries would have a stronger rationale to openly back Morocco's autonomy plan. In short, if Washington finally brands the Polisario Front as an FTO, it would shine a spotlight on the alliances behind the Polisario—making them more visible, and more politically costly for countries like Algeria and South Africa to support.
Ya Biladi
4 hours ago
- Ya Biladi
Six Moroccans acquitted of terrorism but still detained in Somalia plead to return home
Six Moroccan nationals, currently held in Garowe Prison in Somalia's Puntland region, have issued a desperate appeal to the Moroccan authorities, urging immediate intervention to end their prolonged detention, despite a final court ruling declaring them innocent of terrorism-related charges. The six young men had traveled to Somalia in hopes of building a better professional future, but instead found themselves caught up in a serious case that led to military court proceedings and initial death sentences. However, the charges were later dropped after it was proven they had been misled by individuals suspected of ties to extremist groups. In a voice message shared by Moroccan newspaper al3omk, one of the detainees described a humanitarian ordeal that extends far beyond their legal nightmare. «We survive on one meal a day, barely edible… we have to wash it with water just to be able to eat it», he said, adding that detention conditions are «catastrophic», with no access to clean drinking water and constant psychological pressure. The detainees stressed that they never entered Somalia with the intent to join any organization. Rather, they were lured by fellow Moroccans with promises of legitimate economic opportunities in a developing region. Upon realizing the deception, and finding themselves in an area known for ISIS activity, they attempted to flee and voluntarily surrendered to the authorities, only to face imprisonment instead of protection. Although their innocence was confirmed by a final court ruling over 18 months ago and a deportation order was issued, they remain behind bars. Puntland authorities attribute the delay in their release to a lack of coordination with the Moroccan government, insisting that their freedom hinges on Morocco's willingness to receive its citizens. The detainees' families had previously submitted a formal complaint to Morocco's Ministry of Foreign Affairs on May 19, expressing deep frustration over their sons' continued imprisonment and calling for urgent diplomatic action to end their ordeal.
