
Homeland Security Kristi Noem got $80K from dark money group, but hid it from federal disclosure forms
When
Kristi Noem
was chosen by US President Donald Trump to be the head of
Homeland Security
, people started to look more closely at her finances. But new tax records show that she made a colossal amount of money in secret from a
dark money
nonprofit as the former governor of South Dakota and never reported it on federal disclosure forms. This situation raises a lot of ethical questions.
She secretly accepted a cut of the money she raised for a nonprofit that supports her political career in 2023, while she was serving as governor of South Dakota. According to experts, she most likely violated ethical standards by failing to disclose this income on her federal disclosure forms.
ALSO READ: Dear Mr Japan? Trump's tariff letter opener sparks mockery and memes on social media
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Is It Possible to Get a Flatter Tummy After 50—And How?
Lulutox
Undo
Why wasn't the $80K disclosed publicly?
The nonprofit transferred funds to a personal business of Noem's that had just been founded in Delaware, in what experts called a very unusual arrangement. That year, the $80,000 payment was a substantial increase over her approximately $130,000 government salary, as per a report by ProPublica.
The $80,000 payment was then not made public by Noem. The original source of the funding is still unknown because the nonprofit is a so-called dark money organization, which is exempt from disclosing the identities of its donors, as per a report by ProPublica.
Live Events
Noem was required to publish a thorough accounting of her assets and revenue streams starting in 2023 after President Donald Trump appointed her as his secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.
ProPublica was informed by experts that Noem's personal embezzlement of funds from political donors was concerning. The
American Resolve Policy Fund
, a nonprofit organization, claimed in a filing that the $80,000 was a payment for fundraising. According to the group, Noem generated hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Could this break any ethics or state laws?
It is unremarkable for a politician to solicit funds for nonprofits and other organizations that advance their campaigns or objectives. Experts indicated that it is atypical for a politician to retain a portion of the funds for personal use.
'If contributors to these nonprofits not only influence an elected official's political prospects but also directly furnish their income, that is unprecedented and troubling,' stated Daniel Weiner, a former Federal Election Commission attorney who currently directs the Brennan Center's campaign finance initiatives.
Lee Schoenbeck, a seasoned Republican politician and lawyer who served as the state Senate's leader until recently, speculated that Noem's outside income might have violated South Dakota law. The governor and other high-ranking officials are required by law to dedicate themselves entirely to their official duties.
Details of the payment were found by ProPublica in the American Resolve Policy Fund's annual tax form. The American Resolve Policy Fund is a part of a network of political organizations that support Noem and her agenda.
What has Noem's lawyer said in her defense?
Trevor Stanley, Noem's attorney, stated that the Office of Government Ethics had examined and approved her financial information pertaining to this organization and that Noem complied with the law in both letter and spirit. Follow-up inquiries concerning whether the ethics office knew about the $80,000 payment and whether Noem fully disclosed all of her income on easily accessible public documents were not answered by Stanley.
What else has Kristi Noem come under fire for financially?
Noem has come under fire for using public funds to pay for travel to Houston, Canada, and Paris. Despite being one of Trump's least wealthy Cabinet members, her personal spending patterns have drawn notice.
FAQs
What's up with Noem's $80,000 payment?
She obtained it from a nonprofit involved in political fundraising but did not include it in required federal
financial disclosure forms
. According to experts, this most likely violates ethical standards.
Did Kristi Noem admit to owning the LLC that received payment?
Yes, but only for her Cabinet confirmation. Until then, the LLC, which she formed while still governor, had never been made public.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Centre notifies scheme for Prime Minister's awards for excellence in public administration
The Centre on Tuesday notified the scheme for the Prime Minister 's awards for Excellence in Public Administration 2025, a Personnel Ministry statement said. A web portal for registration and submission of nominations on the PM's awards will be formally launched from October 2 and nominations can be submitted thereafter, it added. According to the statement, the awards scheme was notified to promote greater efforts for holistic development of India, with focus on saturation approach, collation of data or documentary evidence and focussing on good governance and qualitative aspects with respect to the implementation of 11 priority sector schemes which will be evaluated collectively under the scheme. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dieses Gemüse lindert Nervenschmerzen effektiv! Leonexin Komplex Mehr erfahren Undo Under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi , the communication said, the entire concept and format of the PM's excellence award has undergone a revolutionary change since 2014. The objective of the scheme is to encourage constructive competition, innovation, replication and institutionalisation of best practices, it added. Live Events The emphasis was stated to be on good governance, qualitative achievement and last mile connectivity, rather than on achievement of quantitative targets. This year's award scheme aims to recognise the performance of the district collector through targeted individual beneficiaries and implementation with a saturation approach. "With this focus, the applications for awards would be evaluated on three parameters, good governance, qualitative and quantitative," the statement said. It is expected that all the districts participate in this scheme of Prime Minister's awards for excellence in public administration 2025, it said. For 2025, the scheme for Prime Minister's awards aims to recognise the contribution of civil servants under three categories. Category I is for holistic development of districts under 11 priority sector programmes. Under this category, five awards would be conferred, the statement said. Category II is for aspirational blocks programme and under this, five awards would be conferred, it said. In category III meant for innovations for central ministries/departments, states and districts, six awards would be conferred. The period of consideration is April 1 2022 to September 30, 2025 for the category I (holistic development of districts) and April 1, 2023 to September 30, 2025 for category II (aspirational blocks programme) and category III (innovations), according to the statement. The evaluation process would include Short-listing of districts/organisations by screening committee (first and second stage), evaluation by expert committee and empowered committee, it said. Prime Minister's approval will be taken on the recommendations of the empowered committee for the awards, the statement said. The PM's awards, 2025 will consist of a trophy, scroll and an incentive of Rs 20 lakh to the awarded district/organisation to be utilised for implementation of project/programme or bridging resources gaps in any area of public welfare, it added.


New Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Musk criticises Trump's 'big beautiful bill' again, hints at launching new party
Elon Musk on Saturday doubled down on his distaste for President Donald Trump's sprawling tax and spending cuts bill, arguing the legislation that Republican senators are scrambling to pass would kill jobs and bog down burgeoning industries. He also hinted at starting a new party called the 'America party' as an alternative to Democrat and Republican parties


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Saying I love you isn't sexual harassment': Bombay HC draws the line; clears man in Pocso case
This is a representational AI image (Pic credit: Lexica) NEW DELHI: Bombay high court's Nagpur bench, while quashing conviction of a man under POSCO case, said that saying 'I love you' is only an expression of feeling and does not in itself amount to "sexual intent. " A bench of justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke acquitted a 35-year-old man accused of molesting a teenage girl in 2015. While hearing the case, the bench in its order said that any sexual act includes inappropriate touching, forcible disrobing, indecent gestures or remarks made with the intention to insult the modesty of a woman. Earlier, a sessions court in Nagpur convicted the man under Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act in 2017. The bench had also sentenced him to three years' imprisonment. The man was accused of accosting the 17-year-old girl while she was on her way home from school. The complaint mentioned that the man held her hands and said, "I love you." The teenager went home and told her father, and a FIR was lodged. The HC, while quashing the man's conviction, said that no circumstance indicated that his intention was to establish sexual contact with the girl. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo "Words expressed 'I love you' would not by themselves amount to sexual intent as contemplated by the legislature," the court said. "There should be something more to suggest that the real intention behind saying 'I love you' was to drag the angle of sex," the HC added. The case doesn't fall under the purview of molestation or sexual harassment, it further noted. "If somebody says that he is in love with another person or expresses his feelings, that in itself would not amount to an intent showing some sort of sexual intention," the order said.