logo
From Democracy to Dictatorship: Trump's Disturbing Imitation of Putin

From Democracy to Dictatorship: Trump's Disturbing Imitation of Putin

Ya Libnan21-03-2025
File photo of President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Helsinki in 2018. 'Never before has an American president played such a subservient role to a Russian leader,' former president Joe Biden was quoted as saying on December 20, 2020 . Trump sides with Putin against FBI at Helsinki summit
By Vlad Green
Since his return to the White House, President Donald Trump has undertaken a series of actions that bear a striking resemblance to the authoritarian practices of Russian President Vladimir Putin. From consolidating power to suppressing dissent, reshaping federal agencies, and even altering the aesthetics of the Oval Office, Trump's leadership appears to be following a playbook that prioritizes personal dominance over democratic norms. This pattern raises significant concerns about the future of American governance and the nation's role as a global democratic leader.
A gold coaster reading 'TRUMP' sits on the table in front of US President Donald Trump in the Oval Office © Mandel NGAN / AFP/File
Recent reports suggest that the Oval Office under Trump's vision is undergoing a transformation reminiscent of Putin's obsession with gold-plated extravagance. The White House's iconic workspace, traditionally a symbol of American democracy and leadership, is reportedly being adorned with gold fixtures, mirroring Putin's infamous superyacht, where even the toilet paper holders are gold-plated. This gaudy display is more than just a matter of personal taste; it is a reflection of an authoritarian mindset that glorifies excess and personal grandeur over the principles of governance and public service.
Inside Putin's $700 million yacht.
US President Donald Trump recently hung a portrait of his expansionist predecessor James Polk, seen on the lower right © Mandel NGAN / AFP/File
One of the hallmarks of Putin's regime has been the centralization of authority and the marginalization of opposition. Similarly, President Trump has moved swiftly to assert control over various facets of the federal government. Notably, he signed an executive order bringing independent agencies under White House oversight, effectively expanding presidential influence over bodies traditionally insulated from political pressure. Additionally, Trump has initiated mass terminations of federal employees, with reports indicating that tens of thousands of individuals have been dismissed, raising alarms about the politicization of the civil service.
In a move reminiscent of autocratic tendencies to suppress minority representation, President Trump issued Executive Order 14173, titled 'Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity.' This order prohibits private organizations from implementing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) programs for jobs created through federal contracts. Critics argue that this action undermines efforts to promote workplace diversity and equality, further isolating marginalized groups from professional opportunities.
President Trump's actions have also extended to weakening institutional checks and balances. He has dismissed inspectors general and other watchdog officials, prompting concerns about reduced oversight and accountability within the federal government. Such measures parallel Putin's systematic dismantling of democratic institutions in Russia, consolidating power by eliminating independent scrutiny.
Trump's foreign policy maneuvers further reflect an alignment with Putin's interests. His administration's approach to international conflicts and alliances often appears to favor Russian geopolitical strategies, raising questions about the United States' commitment to its traditional democratic allies. By undermining NATO and weakening global partnerships, Trump is emboldening authoritarian regimes while distancing the U.S. from its historical role as a defender of democracy.
The perceived camaraderie between Trump and Putin has not gone unnoticed in popular culture. Satirical commentaries and late-night shows have lampooned their relationship, highlighting concerns about Trump's admiration for authoritarian figures. Public discourse increasingly questions whether Trump's leadership is veering away from democratic values and toward a more autocratic style of governance.
The parallels between President Trump's recent actions and President Putin's authoritarian practices are cause for concern among proponents of democratic governance. The erosion of institutional checks, suppression of diversity initiatives, consolidation of power, and even the aesthetic transformation of the Oval Office suggest a shift towards autocratic rule. As these developments unfold, it is imperative for Americans to remain vigilant in safeguarding the democratic principles that underpin the United States.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress approves Trump's $9 billion cut to public broadcasting and foreign aid
Congress approves Trump's $9 billion cut to public broadcasting and foreign aid

Nahar Net

time33 minutes ago

  • Nahar Net

Congress approves Trump's $9 billion cut to public broadcasting and foreign aid

The House gave final approval to President Donald Trump's request to claw back about $9 billion for public broadcasting and foreign aid early Friday as Republicans intensified their efforts to target institutions and programs they view as bloated or out of step with their agenda. The vote marked the first time in decades that a president has successfully submitted such a rescissions request to Congress, and the White House suggested it won't be the last. Some Republicans were uncomfortable with the cuts, yet supported them anyway, wary of crossing Trump or upsetting his agenda. The House passed the bill by a vote of 216-213. It now goes to Trump for his signature. "We need to get back to fiscal sanity and this is an important step," said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. Opponents voiced concerns not only about the programs targeted, but about Congress ceding its spending powers to the executive branch as investments approved on a bipartisan basis were being subsequently canceled on party-line votes. They said previous rescission efforts had at least some bipartisan buy-in and described the Republican package as unprecedented. No Democrats supported the measure when it passed the Senate, 51-48, in the early morning hours Thursday. Final passage in the House was delayed for several hours as Republicans wrestled with their response to Democrats' push for a vote on the release of Jeffrey Epstein files. The package cancels about $1.1 billion for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and nearly $8 billion for a variety of foreign aid programs, many designed to help countries where drought, disease and political unrest endure. The effort to claw back a sliver of federal spending came just weeks after Republicans also muscled through Trump's tax and spending cut bill without any Democratic support. The Congressional Budget Office has projected that measure will increase the U.S. debt by about $3.3 trillion over the coming decade. "No one is buying the the notion that Republicans are actually trying to improve wasteful spending," said Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries. A heavy blow to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting The cancellation of $1.1 billion for the CPB represents the full amount it is due to receive during the next two budget years. The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense. The corporation distributes more than two-thirds of the money to more than 1,500 locally operated public television and radio stations, with much of the remainder assigned to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service to support national programming. Democrats were unsuccessful in restoring the funding in the Senate. Lawmakers with large rural constituencies voiced particular concern about what the cuts to public broadcasting could mean for some local public stations in their state. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said the stations are "not just your news — it is your tsunami alert, it is your landslide alert, it is your volcano alert." As the Senate debated the bill Tuesday, a 7.3 magnitude earthquake struck off the remote Alaska Peninsula, triggering tsunami warnings on local public broadcasting stations that advised people to get to higher ground. Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said he secured a deal from the White House that some money administered by the Interior Department would be repurposed to subsidize Native American public radio stations in about a dozen states. But Kate Riley, president and CEO of America's Public Television Stations, a network of locally owned and operated stations, said that deal was "at best a short-term, half-measure that will still result in cuts and reduced service at the stations it purports to save." Inside the cuts to foreign aid Among the foreign aid cuts are $800 million for a program that provides emergency shelter, water and family reunification for refugees and $496 million to provide food, water and health care for countries hit by natural disasters and conflicts. There also is a $4.15 billion cut for programs that aim to boost economies and democratic institutions in developing nations. Democrats argued that the Republican administration's animus toward foreign aid programs would hurt America's standing in the world and create a vacuum for China to fill. "This is not an America first bill. It's a China first bill because of the void that's being created all across the world," Jeffries said. The White House argued that many of the cuts would incentivize other nations to step up and do more to respond to humanitarian crises and that the rescissions best served the American taxpayer. "The money that we're clawing back in this rescissions package is the people's money. We ought not to forget that," said Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., chair of the House Rules Committee. After objections from several Republicans, Senate GOP leaders took out a $400 million cut to PEPFAR, a politically popular program to combat HIV/AIDS that is credited with saving millions of lives since its creation under Republican President George W. Bush. Looking ahead to future spending fights Democrats say the bill upends a legislative process that typically requires lawmakers from both parties to work together to fund the nation's priorities. Triggered by the official rescissions request from the White House, the legislation only needed a simple majority vote to advance in the Senate instead of the 60 votes usually required to break a filibuster. That meant Republicans could use their 53-47 majority to pass it along party lines. Two Republican senators, Murkowski and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, joined with Democrats in voting against the bill, though a few other Republicans also raised concerns about the process. "Let's not make a habit of this," said Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker of Mississippi, who voted for the bill but said he was wary that the White House wasn't providing enough information on what exactly will be cut. Russ Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, said the imminent successful passage of the rescissions shows "enthusiasm" for getting the nation's fiscal situation under control. "We're happy to go to great lengths to get this thing done," he said during a breakfast with reporters hosted by the Christian Science Monitor. In response to questions about the relatively small size of the cuts -- $9 billion -- Vought said that was because "I knew it would be hard" to pass in Congress. Vought said another rescissions package is 'likely to come soon."

Clashes at West Bank march against settler outpost
Clashes at West Bank march against settler outpost

Nahar Net

time35 minutes ago

  • Nahar Net

Clashes at West Bank march against settler outpost

Palestinians and the Israeli army clashed on Friday during a march in a village in the northern occupied West Bank against a newly established Israeli settlement outpost. "We came to this area to express our protest and say: 'this land is ours, not yours'", Ghassan Bazour, head of Raba's village council, told AFP. While all Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal under international law, only outposts such as the one established overnight in Raba are also prohibited under Israeli law. An AFP journalist at the scene reported that a group of men holding Palestinian flags and those of Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas' Fatah party walked from Raba towards a nearby hill on top of which settlers had established the outpost. After conducting the Muslim Friday prayer at the base of the hill, people continued towards the outpost, until Israeli soldiers arrived on the scene and dispersed the crowd with tear gas, the journalist said. The army did not respond to an AFP request for comment on Friday's events in Raba. The Palestinian Red Crescent reported that its teams had provided support to 13 people suffering from tear gas inhalation. Village council chief Bazour said that settlers had originally taken over the hill's high ground to establish an outpost and deny Palestinians access to nearby agricultural lands. "There is now a settler outpost here (which) will continue to devour the land and empty these areas", Muayad Shaaban, head of the Palestinian Authority's Colonization and Wall Resistance Commission, told AFP. Despite it being dispersed by the army, Shaaban was enthusiastic about Friday's march, given that violence in recent years has made all protests against settlers dangerous for Palestinians. "This model of resistance must be applied throughout the West Bank. I call for massive marches... to stop this aggression, this terrorism", he said. Violence in the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since 1967, has soared since the Hamas attack of October 2023 triggered the Gaza war. Since October 7, 2023, Israeli troops or settlers have killed at least 956 Palestinians, including many militants, according to health ministry figures. Over the same period, at least 36 Israelis, including soldiers, have been killed in Palestinian attacks or during Israeli military operations, according to official figures.

Brazil's former President Bolsonaro ordered to wear an electronic ankle monitor
Brazil's former President Bolsonaro ordered to wear an electronic ankle monitor

Nahar Net

time35 minutes ago

  • Nahar Net

Brazil's former President Bolsonaro ordered to wear an electronic ankle monitor

by Naharnet Newsdesk 18 July 2025, 16:57 Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro has been ordered to wear an ankle monitor, his press office said on Friday. The development came as federal police conducted searches at his home and his party's headquarters in Brasília, according to people familiar with the court order. Local media reported that Bolsonaro is also barred from using social media or contacting other individuals under investigation by the Supreme Federal Court, including his son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, a Brazilian lawmaker who currently lives in the United States and is known for his close ties to U.S. President Donald Trump. A police statement said that officers in Brasília carried out "two search and seizure warrants, in addition to precautionary measures other than arrest, in compliance with a decision by the Supreme Court." The statement did not name Bolsonaro. Bolsonaro is currently on trial at the Supreme Court accused of leading an alleged attempt to stage a coup to overturn the 2022 election in which he was defeated by left-wing president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Live aerial footage from local broadcasters showed federal police vehicles outside Bolsonaro's residence in Brasília. Congressman Sóstenes Cavalcante, the leader of Bolsonaro's party in the lower house, told The Associated Press that officers also searched Bolsonaro's office at the party's headquarters. He described the operation as "another chapter in the persecution of conservatives and right-wing figures" in Brazil. A lawyer for Bolsonaro did not immediately respond to a request for comment. On Tuesday, Brazil's Prosecutor-General Paulo Gonet said in a report to the Supreme Court that the "evidence is clear: the defendant acted systematically, throughout his mandate and after his defeat at the polls, to incite insurrection and the destabilization of the democratic rule of law." Bolsonaro has described the trial on X as a "witch hunt," echoing a term used by Trump when he came to his South American ally's defense last week. Last week, Trump imposed a 50% import tax on Brazil, directly tying the tariffs to Bolsonaro's trial. The U.S. president has hosted the former Brazilian president at his Mar-a-Lago resort when both were in power in 2020. Trump compared the Brazilian's situation to his own. On Tuesday, speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump repeated the claim that the trial is a "witch hunt."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store