World Service must be fully state-funded to counter disinformation, say BBC bosses
Amid concerns about the scale of state-backed content after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, senior BBC figures believe it is 'undeniable' that the government should shoulder the costs of championing 'western values' via the financially strained World Service.
There have been concerns from within the BBC that Russian and Chinese state media are spending an 'eyewatering' £8bn a year, compared with the World Service's £400m budget.
'They're doing it for a reason,' said a BBC source. 'The views and opinions of nations around the world strategically matter. It's only the BBC that has the global reach to actually do something about this. We believe in western values and they are under attack.'
There is also evidence that Russia has been targeting former World Service audiences where budget cuts have forced the BBC to retreat. When the BBC's Arabic radio service withdrew from Lebanon, its radio frequency was taken over by the state-owned Russian Sputnik Radio.
Figures inside the BBC also think it is unfair that licence fee-payers in the UK pay for content delivered to audiences overseas.
The push to hand the costs of the World Service back to the government is an early skirmish in what are set to be lengthy negotiations over its remit and funding as part of the corporation's charter renewal process. Those talks are scheduled to run until 2027.
Jonathan Munro, the global director of BBC News, said: 'The BBC World Service is a uniquely valuable asset that provides trusted independent and impartial news to audiences around the world.
'As press freedom drastically reduces, disinformation thrives and state-backed media advance aggressively, its role is increasingly important. We need a sustainable, long term funding solution that enables the World Service to meet these global challenges and invest in services for the future.'
Before 2014, the government held sole responsibility for funding the World Service, an international news service available on radio, television and online that provides news and analysis around the world in more than 40 languages. However, as part of the cost-cutting measures pursued by the coalition government from 2010, the costs of providing the service were loaded on to the corporation itself.
Under the latest funding settlement, about two-thirds of the costs of the World Service come from the licence fee, with the rest made up from government grants.
Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, said recently that she believed the World Service's funding model was unsustainable. She said that with the 'challenges in the world being so great', successive governments have had to step in with additional funding to safeguard it.
The World Service has already had to make cuts this year as the BBC struggles with the two-year freeze in the licence fee. It was announced in January that 130 jobs would go as part of plans to save about £6m. It included cuts to BBC Monitoring, which analyses news from media around the world.
While BBC bosses think they have a strong case, persuading the Treasury to find the extra money is a tall order. The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has left herself little room for manoeuvre after ruling out any more large tax increases and her self-imposed fiscal rules significantly restrict her spending options.
Meanwhile, she has already had to accommodate Keir Starmer's decision to increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027 – worth an additional £6bn a year – by slashing international aid. The prime minister announced the move before his meeting with Donald Trump in Washington last month.
Government sources said that all issues relating to the BBC's funding would be examined as part of the charter renewal process. They also said the last spending review included 31% increase in the World Service's government funding for 2025-26, to £137m. The figure was £20m less than the BBC had asked for during negotiations.
A spokesperson for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said: 'The government highly values the BBC World Service, which reaches a global audience of 320 million, and remains the world's most trusted international news service.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
6 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Thousands flee as fighting between Thailand and Cambodia continues
Tens of thousands of people sought refuge on Friday as border fighting between Thailand and Cambodia entered a second day, heightening fears of a broader conflict. The UN Security Council is scheduled to hold an emergency meeting on the crisis later on Friday in New York, while Malaysia, which chairs a regional bloc that includes both countries, called for an end to hostilities and offered to mediate. Advertisement The Health Ministry on Friday said more than 58,000 have fled from villages to temporary shelters in four affected Thai border provinces, while Cambodian authorities said more than 4,000 people have evacuated from areas near the border. The fighting has killed at least 14 people in Thailand, while Cambodia confirmed its first fatality on Friday. A woman fleeing the fighting holds her cat as she shelters at an evacuation centre in Surin province, Thailand (Sakchai Lalit/AP) Tensions over a disputed border area erupted into fighting after a land mine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers on Wednesday. The Thai military reported clashes early on Friday in multiple areas, including along the border at Chong Bok and Phu Makhuea in Thailand's Ubon Ratchathani province; at Phanom Dong Rak in Surin province; and near the ancient Ta Muen Thom temple. Advertisement Associated Press reporters near the border could hear the sounds of artillery from early morning hours. The Thai army said Cambodian forces had used heavy artillery and Russian-made BM-21 rocket launchers, prompting what Thai officials described as 'appropriate supporting fire' in return. Thailand said one soldier and 13 civilians were killed, including children, while 15 soldiers and 30 civilians were wounded. Cambodia's chief official in Oddar Meanchey province, General Khov Ly, said a man died instantly on Thursday after a Thai rocket hit a Buddhist pagoda where he was hiding. Advertisement At least four civilians were also wounded in Thursday's fighting there. As the fighting intensified, villagers on both sides have been caught in the crossfire, leading many to flee. About 600 people took shelter at a gymnasium in a university in Surin, Thailand, about 50 miles from the border. Evacuees sat in groups, on mats and blankets, and queued for food and drinks. Across the border in Cambodia, villages on the outskirts of Oddar Meanchey province were largely deserted. Homes stood locked, while chickens and dogs roamed outside. Advertisement Some villagers earlier dug holes to create makeshift underground bunkers, covering them with wood, tarpaulin and zinc sheets to shield themselves from shelling. Families with children were seen packing their belongings on home-made tractors to evacuate, though a few men refused to leave.
Reuters
6 minutes ago
- Reuters
Thailand, Cambodia exchange heavy artillery as fighting expands for second day
SURIN, Thailand, July 25 (Reuters) - Thailand and Cambodia exchanged heavy artillery fire for a second day on Friday as their worst fighting in over a decade intensified and spread to new areas, despite international calls for a ceasefire. At least 16 people have been killed and tens of thousands displaced in the escalating border battle. Both sides have blamed each other for starting the conflict and on Friday ratcheted up the rhetoric, with Thailand accusing Cambodia of deliberately targeting civilians and Cambodia alleging Thailand was using cluster munitions, a controversial and widely condemned ordnance. Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai said Cambodia had launched attacks on multiple fronts and Thailand was defending its territory. "The current situation involves acts of intrusion and aggression that are causing harm to the people's lives. The situation has intensified and could escalate into a state of war. At present, it's a confrontation involving heavy weapons," he told reporters. Fighting re-erupted before dawn, with clashes reported in 12 locations, up from six on Thursday, according to Thailand's military, which accused Cambodia of using artillery and Russian-made BM-21 rocket systems to target areas that included schools and hospitals. "These barbaric acts have senselessly claimed lives and inflicted injuries upon numerous innocent civilians," the Thai military said in a statement. It described Cambodia's bombardment as "appalling attacks", putting the blame squarely on the Phnom Penh government, which it said was being led by Hun Sen, the influential former premier of nearly four decades and father of current Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet. "The deliberate targeting of civilians is a war crime, and those responsible must be brought to justice," the Thai military added. The fighting started early on Thursday, quickly escalating from small arms fire to heavy shelling in multiple areas 210 km (130 miles) apart along a frontier where sovereignty has been disputed for more than a century. The trigger was Thailand's recalling of its ambassador to Phnom Penh and expulsion of Cambodia's envoy on Wednesday, in response to a second Thai soldier losing a limb to a landmine that Bangkok alleged had been laid recently by rival troops. Cambodia has dismissed that as baseless. Cambodia's defence ministry and its government's landmine authority condemned what they said was Thailand's use of a large amount of cluster munitions, calling it a violation of international law. The foreign ministry of Thailand, which is not among the more than 100 signatories to the Convention on Cluster Munitions, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Reuters journalists in Thailand's Surin province saw a Thai military convoy that included about a dozen trucks, armoured vehicles and tanks cut across provincial roads ringed by paddy fields as it moved toward the border. Intermittent bursts of explosions could be heard amid a heavy presence of armed troops. Soldiers marshalled traffic on a rural road along which artillery guns were being loaded and fired in succession, emitting orange flashes followed by loud explosions and grey smoke. More than 130,000 people have been evacuated from conflict areas in Thailand, where the death toll rose to 15 as of early Friday, 14 of those civilians, according to the health ministry. It said 46 people were wounded, including 15 soldiers. More evacuees arrived at shelters in Surin province, fleeing their homes after hearing the booms of shelling. "We heard very loud explosions, so we came here. We were so scared," said Aung Ying Yong, 67, wiping away her tears with a towel. "So many people are in trouble because of this war ... we are very sad that we have to live like this." Cambodia's national government has provided no details on casualties or evacuations and did not respond to requests for comment on Friday. An official from Cambodia's Oddar Meanchey province said one civilian had been killed and five wounded, with 1,500 families evacuated. Thailand had on Thursday mobilised an F-16 fighter jet in a rare combat deployment, which carried out an air strike on a Cambodian military target, among measures Cambodia called "reckless and brutal military aggression" in its appeal for the United Nations Security Council to address the issue. Thailand's use of an F-16 underlines its military advantage over Cambodia, which has no fighter aircraft and significantly less defence hardware and personnel. The United States, a long-time treaty ally of Thailand, called for an immediate cessation of hostilities, as did Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, the chair of the regional bloc ASEAN, who said he had spoken to leaders of both countries and urged them to find a peaceful way out. "I welcome the positive signals and willingness shown by both Bangkok and Phnom Penh to consider this path forward," he said on social media. But Thailand's foreign ministry said on Friday it has rejected mediation efforts from third countries after offers to facilitate dialogue from the United States, China and Malaysia, "We stand by our position that bilateral mechanism is the best way out," foreign ministry spokesperson Nikorndej Balankura told Reuters in an interview.
Times
6 minutes ago
- Times
How China may save us all — Xi's power play to end emissions
In the year to March 2024, China emitted a staggering amount of carbon. Twelve billion tonnes. It was more than the rest of Asia combined. Twice that of the United States. Just slightly less than Britain belched out through the entire reign of Queen Victoria. In the year that followed, China also released a staggering amount of carbon. The total was easily equivalent to a coal power plant running continuously since the Norman conquest. But that year's staggering amount was in one very crucial aspect unexpected: it was, just, smaller than 2023's staggering amount. This might in turn end up being the most staggering statistic of the year. Because for the first time, analysis suggests China's energy use has increased but its carbon emissions have not. 'We are seeing the beginning of a decoupling,' said Ma Jun, from the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs, a non-profit Chinese research organisation. 'The deployment of solar is massive.' Ever since much of the world pledged to aim for net-zero carbon emissions, ever since the economies of Europe set out to do something unprecedented in the history of humanity — move from a dense and easy source of energy to a diffuse, difficult and variable source — there has been a niggling argument facing environmentalists. What is the point of doing this, sceptics would ask, when China is adding more emissions in a year than entire countries? What can Britain do, when China's carbon footprint is about 30 times as big and getting bigger? Now, though, it is not getting bigger. It is, as one environmentalist put it, the end of the 'But China' argument. But is it? 'There are lots of environmentalists saying, 'I told you so,'' said Sir Dieter Helm, a professor of economics at Oxford University. ''It's all working,' they say. 'Isn't it wonderful the Chinese have turned the tide, and are building all these renewables and are going to peak their emissions?'' Indeed it is, he said, compared with the alternative — but we should also look closely at what is going to happen to the many dozens of coal plants they are still building. 'If China's emissions plateau at the current level, that's a climate disaster. That's not a great success. That is horrendous.' In terms of emissions per capita, China is still less than the US — but comfortably exceeds the EU and UK. There are two narratives about China and net zero. For the first, go to the Northern Shaanxi Mine. There, in China's biggest coalmine, a mountain's worth of carbon has been pulled out of a scarred, dusty, black hellscape. It is still being pulled out. Last year, China started construction of 94 gigawatts of coal-fuelled power plants. To put that in scale, it is enough to power Britain's grid twice over. In this first narrative, while the West frets about wind turbines and veganism, here trucks the size of houses shift dirty fuel for a superpower still going all in on coal. For the second narrative, go to the Kubuqi desert of Inner Mongolia, China. There, across an area the size of New York, all you can see is solar panels. They sit, silent, turning sunshine on worthless ground into valuable clean energy to be sent south. Last year, China had 500GW of wind and solar projects under construction. While the West argues about the cost of renewables, in this narrative China is building more than the rest of the world combined. It is monopolising silicon and lithium. It is electrifying everything it can electrify. Cars. Industry. Trains. It is winning the next great industrial revolution: to become the world's first electrostate. Which narrative is true? Both. It is indeed building a coal station a week — give or take. But its biggest bet by far is on renewables. The proximal reason its emissions are falling, despite coal capacity going up, is in part because of something else entirely. Construction is falling too. A real estate crash means less carbon-intensive cement is being poured into the foundations of apartment blocks. But, there is hope this is more than a blip. Ma said it would be wrong to view the coal plants as a traditional part of the grid. 'China is going through a very difficult, but crucial, transition,' he said. 'How we adapt to a high penetration of renewable energy is a new challenge.' As Britain knows, when it is cloudy and the wind does not blow, you need a backup. Batteries and other storage are not ready at scale yet. This is why, in the UK, we still have so many gas plants — which a lot of the time sit unused. 'So, yes, there are more coal plants, but we can see quite rapid reduction of coal generation hours,' Ma said. 'We are paying a high price for energy security — building all this redundancy.' Can we believe the statistics, about those generation levels — and emissions in general? They are compiled from official sources, by Lauri Myllyvirta, from Finland's Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air. Rich Collett-White, from Carbon Tracker Initiative, a think tank that analyses the energy transition, said that while there were always questions about how much we can trust Chinese statistics, he and other analysts thought the trajectory made sense. He said: 'A lot of the data that's out there is based on customs, and tracking commodity flows. That's fairly straightforward to verify, and I think would be quite difficult to fake.' It also fits with their policies. That Chinese emissions would peak around now should not be a surprise. It is exactly what President Xi promised. The country pledged to start reducing emissions before 2030, and reach net zero by 2060. Some observers expect the Chinese leader to announce a new target for 2035 at the UN general assembly in September. Richard Folland, also from Carbon Tracker, said that we often ignored this in the UK debates. He added: 'The approach the Chinese government take on targets is that they tend to underpromise and overdeliver.' For him, being five years ahead of schedule makes sense. 'It is important. It is a pivotal moment when China starts bending that curve downwards.' Is this job done, then? Globally, said Helm, the situation is dire. The concentration of CO₂ in the atmosphere — ultimately the only statistic that matters, and the only one you can absolutely trust — keeps on going up regardless. But, he conceded, 'this is better than if China was going the other way'. And for Ma there is a message too to the rest of the world. He said: 'Now is a very important moment. We hope there will be recognition that actions are being made in China.' If, sometimes, the rest of the world has used supposed Chinese inaction as an argument for their own inaction, he said, the reverse would not be true. He added: 'We will keep on doing this by ourselves. But if there's a chance to work together, with those who care about this issue, hopefully we can.' Change will not be fast. Over the next year, China will once again emit a staggering amount of carbon. Of every three carbon dioxide molecules put into the atmosphere, one will be Chinese. There is, critics point out, enough coal power being built that that could easily remain unchanged. Yet there is another China too. In the deserts of Inner Mongolia, endless solar farms catch the light. Stand on the shoreline of the Yellow Sea, and the sunrise that once scattered red in the air pollution glows red on the spinning blades of turbines. It is the biggest bet by far that a different kind of power is possible, and with it a riposte in steel and silicon to the argument, 'But China …'.
