Israel says it struck Hamas member in Syria
The attack comes after the Israeli army said on Tuesday that it hit weapons belonging to Syria's new government in retaliation for the launch of two projectiles towards Israel, the first attack from the Syrian side since the country's new leadership came to power last year.
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said he held Syria's President Ahmad Al Shara responsible for the earlier attack, while Syria's government said reports of shelling aimed at Israel were unverified and stressed that Syria does not pose a threat. 'We believe that there are many parties that may seek to destabilise the region to achieve their own interests,' the Syrian Foreign Ministry said.
A little-known group named the Martyr Muhammad Deif Brigades – an apparent reference to a Hamas military leader who was killed in an Israeli strike in 2024 – reportedly claimed responsibility for the previous shelling. Mr Al Shara, a former Al Qaeda affiliate, has sought to portray himself as a moderate leader over the past six months since he led a rebel offensive that toppled Syria's long-time dictator Bashar Al Assad.
Israel and Syria have recently engaged in direct talks to calm tensions, marking a significant development in ties between two states that have been on opposing sides of conflicts in the Middle East for decades. The US has called for a 'non-aggression agreement'.
Israel has nonetheless pushed further into southern Syria over the past six months and has waged a campaign of aerial bombardment. It has said the strikes are aimed at countering threats from Iran and its proxies, particularly Hezbollah.
Syria and Israel have technically been at war since 1948. The most notable event in that time was when Israel seized the Golan Heights from Syria in 1967 and carried out hundreds of strikes and several incursions. Israel says its latest strikes are aimed at stopping advanced weapons reaching Syria's new authorities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
37 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Academics fear Columbia University's deal with Trump has wider ramifications
The US government intends to fine several universities it accuses of failing to stop antisemitism on campus in exchange for federal funding freezes to be lifted, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday. The strategy would see Harvard, Cornell, Duke, Northwestern and Brown universities targeted, according to a White House official, with Harvard being the main focus. All of the universities are currently in talks with President Donald Trump's administration over accusations by a federal task force committee that they have allowed antisemitism to fester on their campuses. The move comes after the administration successfully extracted $200m from Columbia to settle allegations that it violated Title VI by failing to address harassment of Jewish students, in exchange for restoring its federal grants. Now, the administration is looking to widen the net to other institutions and reportedly hopes to garner much more money from Harvard, which has an endowment of $53.2bn. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Critics believe the agreement with Columbia sets a dangerous precedent, and that these tactics can be used to change the academic landscape. Former Columbia University law professor Katherine Franke said that Columbia bent over backwards to appease the government by implementing the agreement in advance for months. This included adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism, circumventing its senate to change the University Judicial Board rules/composition, and creating a new provostial position to monitor certain departments. Columbia University to pay $220m, undertake major reforms in bid to restore federal funding Read More » "It's an unusual tactic in normal times, to implement the terms of a settlement voluntarily before the full agreement is reached," she said. "But these are not normal times, and Columbia has shown itself more than willing to bend a knee to the Trump administration in the hopes that doing so will make things less bad." Harvard University has put up more of a fight and is currently suing the Trump administration in federal court, with one lawsuit claiming that the administration's freezing of more than $2bn in federal research money is illegal. Harvard is also being penalised by being cut off from future grants. Franke warned that the agreement was a slippery slope and that the government would weaponise the spectre of antisemitism to dismantle the institution. "This agreement is not the end of the story… it is merely the start of the next phase of the administration's campaign to use Columbia as an example for other universities. They won't let up, and the 'agreement' gives them all the power to keep weaponising the specter of antisemitism to dismantle a world-class university." Undermining the fightback Columbia's agreement with the Trump administration is also being seen as a move that undermines the fightback from Harvard and students and activists on campuses. A student, who wished to be anonymous and is a member of the pro-Palestine group Students for Justice in Palestine at Wesleyan College in Georgia, said: "What Harvard has done, at least legally, to combat the Trump administration is now being undercut by Colombia's capitulation. I think that it bodes very poorly for the climate of student activism in the coming year." 'The bottom line is ultimately more important than the purported mandate or principle of learning, freedom of thought and expression' - Kourouss Esmaili, scholar at Tufts Kouross Esmaeli, a visiting scholar at Tufts University in the Department of Studies in Race, Colonialism and Diaspora, said that plans to control universities expose the corporate nature of universities. "The bottom line is ultimately more important than the purported mandate or principle of learning, freedom of thought and expression," Esmaeli said. In an email he sent to Middle East Eye, he wrote: "The administration's use of federal funds to intimidate and transform higher education into an acquiescence factory is a serious compromise of our basic values and rights. "The people in charge of the corporate universities will continue to bend the knee to their sovereign in the name of saving their institution. But hopefully this is exposing the universities' complicity not only in the genocide in Palestine, but the larger American capitalist interests." Esmaeli says that the events demonstrate why universities have been so resistant to divest from Israel, a key demand from pro-Palestine protesters, and the US military-industrial complex.
Sharjah 24
2 hours ago
- Sharjah 24
Guterres warns of ‘immoral humanitarian crisis' in Gaza
No justification for the scale of destruction In a video address to Amnesty International's Global Assembly in Prague, Czech Republic, Guterres acknowledged the attacks launched by Hamas on October 7, 2023, but stressed: 'There is no justification for the explosion of death and destruction that has unfolded since then.' He described the magnitude of the crisis as surpassing anything the international community has witnessed in recent times. Alarm over global indifference Guterres voiced deep concern over the international community's lack of response, stating: 'I cannot explain the level of indifference and paralysis we are seeing – a complete lack of compassion, truth and humanity.' Gaza's civilian suffering in full view of the world The Secretary-General highlighted the dire conditions in Gaza, where civilians and UN staff alike face extreme hunger. 'Their unimaginable hardship has left them numb and exhausted to the point that they can no longer tell whether they are alive or dead,' he said. He spoke movingly of children in Gaza who reportedly express a wish to go to heaven, believing they may at least find food there. Over 1,000 killed seeking food Citing United Nations data, Guterres noted that since May 27, more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed while trying to obtain food. 'These people were not killed in combat, but in a desperate effort to secure basic sustenance amid mass starvation,' he added. Call for ceasefire and humanitarian access Guterres reiterated the urgent need for an immediate and lasting ceasefire, the unconditional release of all hostages, and unimpeded humanitarian access to all parts of Gaza. He affirmed the UN's readiness to scale up humanitarian operations during any truce, as was done during previous ceasefires. A broader global battle for human rights In his address, Guterres warned that powerful forces are working against the principles of human rights and international law, including efforts to undermine the International Criminal Court. 'We are in a global battle for human dignity, for human rights, for justice and multilateralism,' he declared. He called attention to rising repressive tactics and the growing manipulation of digital spaces by authoritarian regimes. A call to action: Uphold rights and demand justice Guterres urged nations to uphold human rights universally and without exception, even when it is politically inconvenient. He concluded by calling for legal accountability, climate justice, and resistance to disinformation and digital manipulation. 'We must build on the hard-won gains, including the recent advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice,' he said.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Suspending negotiations can be 'normal procedure' in complex Gaza ceasefire talks, mediators say
The Arab mediators between the US and Israel on one side, and Hamas on the other, have said that it is "normal procedure" to suspend negotiations for a time in order to carry out consultations. The joint statement from Qatar and Egypt on Friday came a day after the Israeli and US delegations withdrew from Doha, where Gaza ceasefire talks were being held. The US envoy in particular even suggested he would seek "alternative options" to this particular diplomatic route. Hamas officials said they were "surprised" by that reaction. "The State of Qatar and the Arab Republic of Egypt affirm the continuation of their intensive efforts in the mediation file of Gaza Strip, aiming to reach an agreement that brings an end to the war, alleviates the humanitarian suffering in the enclave, ensures the protection of civilians, and facilitates the exchange of detainees and prisoners," the joint statement said. "The two countries indicate that some progress has been achieved during the most recent intensive round of negotiations, which lasted for three weeks. They affirm that the suspension of negotiations with a view to holding consultations before resuming dialogue once again is a normal procedure within the context of these complex negotiations," Egypt and Qatar noted. "The two states call for refraining from being swayed by leaks circulated by certain media outlets in attempts to undermine these efforts and influence the course of the negotiation process. They emphasize that such leaks do not reflect reality and originate from parties uninformed about the progress of the negotiations," the statement warned.
