logo
John Austin: ‘America First' means an America diminished

John Austin: ‘America First' means an America diminished

Chicago Tribune07-04-2025
The United States, as a strong and growing young country, broke out of its isolationist tendencies in the First World War, coming to the aid of allies in Europe and providing the push that ended its horrors.
Stung by the violence and death of so many in World War I, many Americans sought to once again retreat from the world and messy conflicts in Europe. In the 1930s, the America First Committee and its rallying cry — most prominently voiced by Charles Lindbergh — embraced isolationism and organized hundreds of thousands to resist the U.S. becoming involved in a second looming European war while voicing sympathy and even admiration for Adolf Hitler and the emerging Nazi Party in Germany.
But as the U.S. watched Germany's vice tighten around Great Britain and then was stunned by the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin Roosevelt nudged and then rallied America once again to step into the fray with all its force.
Roosevelt tapped Gen. George Marshall to direct the war effort. He then turned to Gen. Dwight Eisenhower to organize the great Allied invasion when its time came. Together they managed, not without some frustration and difficulty, the cat-herding of Allied nations and their leaders seeking to liberate Europe from fascism and its concomitant genocide.
After this war, the U.S. did not go home but stayed engaged. The Marshall Plan rebuilt economies ravaged by war and proved to residents of shattered European cities and villages that democracy delivers. More than just lifting the boot of fascism, the U.S.-led capitalist and democratic system delivered much more in the way of economic opportunity as well as freedom of thought and expression than the alternative communist model on offer to Europeans by the Soviets — which many at the time found attractive.
The U.S. did not make demands on war-weary countries. In fact, the Marshall Plan was offered to all, including the Soviets! (Who refused.) More than noble charity, this investment paid off in spades for the U.S. It delivered for the U.S. a family of eager partners in protecting our own national security. It built up fast-growing economies that both served and were sold to by U.S. businesses expanding across the globe, bringing unprecedented prosperity to all sides. The U.S. first organized the United Nations, and then the great NATO alliance, a partnership that kept the peace in Europe — until Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
It also made America in the eyes of the world the 'shining city on a hill,' first pictured by Puritan John Winthrop and later echoed by President Ronald Reagan when facing down the Soviet Union during the Cold War. The U.S. became a nation with tremendous moral authority and soft power in the world, to match its unprecedented economic and military might.
Through these efforts, the U.S. came to be the undisputed leader of the world's family of nations, committed to fundamental values upon which our country and our alliances were built: democracy, freedom, self-determination and protection of civil rights.
Now, as current U.S. leadership questions the benefits of an alliance with Europe, slaps on tariffs and attempts to bully friend and foe alike and expresses surprising admiration and solidarity with neo-Nazis in Europe and dictators such as Vladimir Putin, the U.S. risks losing its role as the leader of the free world. And its moral authority — already compromised by ill-considered escapades such as the invasion of Iraq. With President Donald Trump's insane trade war, America stands to lose its access to global markets and eager customers for its businesses and farmers, and lose well-paying jobs at home.
This looks like the opposite of the Marshall Plan, when the U.S. helped the world bake an ever-growing economic pie, which delivered to America a giant slice. Today's 'America First' agenda and accompanying tariffs and transactional diplomacy will inevitably lead to the U.S. enjoying a bigger piece but of a shriveled global economic pie.
But most damaging to the U.S. and its place in the world is our current leaders' apparent embrace of a 'values-free' foreign policy — a 'might makes right' approach. Attending the now-infamous Munich Security Conference, I was impressed by the articulateness of Finland's former prime minister, Sanna Marin. She noted that the so-called rules-based order created by the Allies after World War II was more one of shared values than 'rules,' the values giving rise to freedom of expression, freedom to work and travel as you want, and the protection of human and civil rights, including women's rights.
Trump's America First is an abdication of American leadership in the world. The U.S. should again join leaders in the European Union, the United Kingdom and others in the Americas, Africa and Asia who share these values to lead the international coalition that stands up to the authoritarian axis — and successfully contains it— just as they did, with U.S. help, during the Cold War.
Fortunately, there are more leaders who believe strongly in an international order built on and informed by freedom, transparency, self-determination and rule of law than there are might-makes-right authoritarians. Now is the time for these nations to unite in common purpose.
A truly great nation would lead them, not join the other side.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran nuclear effort set back 1 to 2 years by bombings, Pentagon says
Iran nuclear effort set back 1 to 2 years by bombings, Pentagon says

Boston Globe

time17 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Iran nuclear effort set back 1 to 2 years by bombings, Pentagon says

'What we've seen, almost, in fact, just universally among our allies, is them congratulating the United States, the president, the secretary of defense, on that bold operation, and the idea that American action in Iran has set the conditions for global stability,' he said. Advertisement Iran's president, meanwhile, has enacted a law to suspend cooperation with the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, Iranian state media reported Wednesday, in a move that will shut out international inspectors from overseeing the country's contested nuclear program. American B-2 bombers hit two Iranian nuclear sites with massive 'bunker buster' bombs last month, as Trump joined Israel's bombing campaign in Iran. The Air Force dropped 12 of the massive GBU-57 bombs on the Fordo nuclear site and two on the nuclear site at Natanz. Trump has since declared a ceasefire and said that he was pursuing diplomacy with Tehran. The issue of how far back the American and Israeli bombing campaign put the Iran nuclear program became almost an instant matter of contention, after Trump announced in the immediate aftermath of the American strikes that the bombs had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program. Advertisement Intelligence assessments since then, including ones by the Pentagon and the American intelligence community, have been more cautious. A preliminary assessment by the Defense Intelligence Agency that was widely reported on last week estimated that the strikes set back the Iranian nuclear program by only a few months. The CIA director said later in the week that the Iranian program had been severely damaged, and the U.S. intelligence agencies were continuing to assess the strike. Parnell was not presenting a formal Defense Department battle damage assessment Wednesday. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Secretary last week echoed Trump's language, and said, according to a White House statement, that 'based on everything we have seen -- and I've seen it all -- our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons.' But Gen. Dan Caine, the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has used more careful language, saying that 'initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction.' This article originally appeared in

When judges get lawless, pushing Jews to quit and other commentary
When judges get lawless, pushing Jews to quit and other commentary

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

When judges get lawless, pushing Jews to quit and other commentary

Courts watch: When Judges Get Lawless Despite repeated Supreme Court warnings against nationwide injunctions, obstinate district-court judges kept insisting upon their right to 'micro-manage' the executive branch, fumes The Federalist's Margo Cleveland. That created a 'consequence-free environment' where 'incorrigible' judges could serve 'ideology' rather than real justice. Judges are doubling down on their unconstitutional demands, with one just last week entering 'an order at odds with a Supreme Court decision only hours old.' At this point, 'one must wonder what would happen if Trump decided he's done following the lawless orders of the district courts.' Will these judges realize in time that 'their own lawlessness is destroying the reputation of the courts'? Hate beat: Pushing Jews To Quit 'When institutions make life uncomfortable for Jews, there is usually a simple reason for it: Those with influence within the institution want fewer Jews hanging around,' argues Commentary's Seth Mandel. 'The British Medical Association's descent into an unhealthy fixation' on Palestinians and no 'other oppressed minority' sure looks intended to drive out Jewish members. And 'North Carolina's Democratic Party executive committee' just 'passed a resolution accusing Israel of 'genocide' and calling for the US to institute a defense embargo against the Jewish state,' culminating a prolonged push to make the party 'even more hostile to Jewish members.' As 'these 'symbolic' tactics proliferate,' realize they're 'not actually focused on Israel' but on finding 'ways to make Jews feel uncomfortable.' Foreign desk: Euro's Green Debacle 'Europe's latest meltdown over environmental policy' is 'entertaining,' quips The Wall Street Journal's editorial board. A new EU 'rule would force companies to hire consultants to vet claims about environmental friendliness that firms slap on their packaging and marketing.' 'An uproar kicked off last month' when European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's spokesman 'suggested she might drop the proposal.' Left-wingers in the European Parliament 'are furious that she might abandon a green policy they like.' Her U-turn 'could open the door to a no-confidence motion against her.' 'Many European voters and most businesses probably would cheer, or at worst shrug, if Ms. von der Leyen dropped the green rule.' 'Yet climate piety is so deeply ingrained in Europe's political class that many struggle to read the electoral winds,' proving 'this episode is European dysfunction in a nutshell.' Democrat: Good Riddance to Randi Weingarten Now that American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten has resigned from the Democratic National Committee, party leaders should 'lock the door behind her as she makes her way out,' snarks Ben Austin at The Hill. 'Weingarten was a key architect of the disastrous Biden-Harris pandemic school closures,' which erased 'two decades of learning progress' for school children and also eliminated 'Democrats' massive electoral advantage' on the education issue. On school choice, she 'gaslit' Democrats into opposing GOP initiatives as she tried 'to make sure there is no choice of any kind.' 'The party that invented public charter schools under Bill Clinton, then scaled them under Barack Obama, can't even say 'charter school.' ' Democrats were once 'the party of public education because they had the courage to fight for it.' 'That courage is needed again.' Economists: Things Are Great Populists right and left have united in 'doomsaying' over a 'zero-sum grievance' culture, grumble Clifford S. Asness & Michael R. Strain at The Free Press. Both sides fret that 'the game is rigged, the system is broken, everything is awful, and life was better decades ago.' In fact, 'there has never been a better time to be alive than the present day.' Consider 'the undeniable reality of today's extreme broad-based prosperity and human flourishing' worldwide. 'Wages for typical American workers have never been higher,' the rate of violent crime 'has been cut in half' and 'personal consumption is at a record level.' Beware: 'The news business relies on outraging you.' While our country isn't problem-free, we have it 'pretty, pretty good.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

Minister reveals Kanye West banned from Australia over ‘Heil Hitler' song
Minister reveals Kanye West banned from Australia over ‘Heil Hitler' song

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Minister reveals Kanye West banned from Australia over ‘Heil Hitler' song

Kanye West was banned from Australia over his new song, 'Heil Hitler', Australian immigration minister Tony Burke has revealed. The song, released in May 2025, contained antisemitic lyrics praising the Nazi German leader, Adolf Hitler and even sampled a speech Hitler gave in 1935. Burke appeared in an interview on Australia's ABC network on Tuesday (1 July), revealing after the song was released, immigration officials investigated West's visa status. A decision was taken to cancel the rapper's visa. Burke said: "He's made a lot of offensive comments my officials looked at again once he released the Heil Hitler song, and he no longer has a valid visa in Australia.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store