
Fare evasion on the Tube hits highest for six years as Sir Sadiq Khan faces more criticism over 'Lawless London'
Transport for London (TfL) prosecuted 3,691 people on the Tube in 2024-25, which is the highest level for six years.
Inspectors also issued 13,118 penalty fare notices (PFNs) - which cost £100 or £50 if paid within 21 days - and 850 written warnings.
However, those caught are likely to represent only a small proportion of fare dodgers, with critics claiming the issue has reached 'horrific' levels.
Prosecutions also remain lower than 2018-19, when there were 4,919. This year there have been 3,044 prosecutions on the Overground.
The issue was thrust into the spotlight when the Tory shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick filmed himself being threatened when he tried to challenge people who were going through barriers without paying.
Speaking from Stratford station in East London, he said such behaviour was 'chipping away at society' - as he called on the authorities to go after lawbreakers.
Susan Hall, the leader of the City Hall Conservatives, told Sir Sadiq Khan earlier this month that fare dodging had reached 'horrific' levels and called for tougher penalties for serial offenders.
Anger has also focused on TikTok influencers who have been sharing videos showing Tube passengers who illegally 'bump' through the station ticket barriers.
Young men are filming themselves laughing and joking with each other as they push through the wide-aisle gates in videos liked by hundreds of thousands of viewers.
In one clip posted by rapper Stepz, real name Samuel Agyei, he claims that Transport for London (TfL) have 'upgraded the barriers' but still pushes his way through.
Another video by a Tiktoker called Tenton, who has 70,000 followers, sees him push through the barriers and ask: 'Mandem, at what age are we gonna stop bumping train?'
He says: 'It's getting silly guys because I'm almost finished uni and I'm still bumping train.'
As a staff member walks past, he tells them: 'Sorry, you didn't hear that.'
Tenton continues: 'Realistically at what age are we gonna stop? When we got grey hairs we're not gonna be bumping train. Do you get it guys? I think the threshold is 25.'
A third video by user CFCRocky7 features a man showing women how to push through the barrier at Stratford, with the caption: 'Saving NPCs [non-player characters] from extortionate train fares @Transport for London.'
In another video posted by Parafactual, a series of commuters are shown at East Ham walking through the barriers without paying, following customers who do touch out.
Similar videos have also appeared on other social media sites such as Instagram.
Siwan Hayward, TfL's director of security, policing and enforcement, said: 'The overwhelming majority of our customers pay the correct fare, however there is a minority who do attempt to travel without a valid ticket which is a criminal offence.
'Fare evasion is unacceptable. That is why we are strengthening our capability to deter and detect fare evaders, including expanding our team of professional investigators to target the most prolific fare evaders across the network.
'This builds on the work of our team of more than 500 uniformed officers already deployed across the network to deal with fare evasion and other anti-social behaviour, keeping staff and customers safe.'
An estimated 3.4 per cent of passengers did not pay fares between April and December 2024 – and they face a fine of £100 if caught, although this is halved if paid within a fortnight
Ms Hayward added: 'Fare evasion is not a victimless crime. It robs Londoners of vital investment in a safe, frequent and reliable transport network and we are committed to reducing the current rate of fare evasion to 1.5 per cent by 2030.'
TikTok told MailOnline it has removed videos which violate its community guidelines around criminal behaviour, and has also blocked associated hashtags and search terms related to this.
The social media firm's guidelines state that it does not allow content which promotes or provides instructions on how to commit criminal activities that may harm people or property.
Between October and December last year, TikTok claims to have proactively removed 97.1 per cent of content which violated its violence and criminal behaviour policies before it was reported to the firm.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Gun-toting migrant who called for the 'death of all Jews' is back behind bars after breaching licence conditions
A 'Hamas-supporting' illegal Channel migrant who was released early from jail is back behind bars after breaching his licence conditions, The Mail on Sunday can reveal. Palestinian Abu Wadee was sent back to prison within days of his release under Labour's scheme to ease pressure on the overcrowded prison estate. The 33-year-old was initially jailed for nine months at Canterbury Crown Court in May after he was convicted over his illegal arrival in the UK on a dinghy, which he had live-streamed on TikTok. He admitted one count of attempting to enter the UK without leave or valid entry clearance when he arrived on the crowded inflatable on March 6. Wadee was arrested by immigration enforcement officers at an asylum hotel in Manchester, three days after he arrived in the UK, after the MoS uncovered a stream of online anti-Semitic vitriol in which he called for the 'death to all Jews'. Wadee, also known as Mosab Abdulkarim Al-Gassas, is believed to be from the city of Khan Yunis in Gaza. Images on social media show him taking part in running battles with the Israel Defence Forces. He was released from prison in June after serving around three months, including time spent in custody awaiting his plea hearing. Sources confirmed Wadee was recalled to prison early last month for breaching his licence conditions. He will now serve the remainder of his nine-month sentence behind bars. It is not known what prompted his recall to jail. A 12-month jail term usually triggers automatic removal from the UK, so a court will have to decide whether to deport Wadee. But he would likely have to be sent to one of the European countries he previously passed through on his journey to the UK, rather than his homeland due to the conflict with Israel making it a warzone. He has lodged an asylum application in the UK, having previously made similar applications in Greece, Belgium and Germany before crossing the Channel. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'This shameful episode lays bare a double Labour failure. 'Firstly, their failure to control our borders is allowing people like this hateful extremist into our country. 'And then Labour's early release scheme is allowing dangerous criminals to roam our streets and put the public at risk.' Wadee is just one of 25,000 migrants to have arrived in the UK in small boats so far this year.


Sky News
6 minutes ago
- Sky News
Lucy Hargreaves was shot dead in 2005 - her home set on fire. A suspect in her murder is still at large
Britain's most-wanted fugitive is still on the run - exactly 20 years after the fatal shooting of a young mother of three. Kevin Parle is a suspect in the murder of Lucy Hargreaves, 22, who was shot dead at her home in Liverpool before the house was set on fire on 3 August 2005. Since then, after many appeals for information, there has been no confirmed sighting, word or trace of him. Two decades on, Ms Hargreaves' family have had no justice. Two young men prosecuted for her murder had charges dropped when a judge ruled there was insufficient evidence against them. In a statement marking the anniversary of her death, they said: "The way we lost Lucy is not something families can ever truly come to terms with - it is still incredibly difficult and painful to think about. "Over the past 20 years, people will have talked with family and friends. A number of people were contacted by males using a phone that was stolen along with a vehicle used in Lucy's murder. "We appeal directly to them to please come forward. Now is the time." Three men burst into Lucy's home 20 years ago today, shot her dead as she slept on a sofa, and set alight the duvet she'd been sleeping under. It's believed the gang were looking for her boyfriend Gary Campbell, who was upstairs. He fled from a window with their two-year-old daughter and then tried in vain to save Ms Hargreaves. Mr Campbell had allegedly been a passenger in a stolen car that had hit and killed a young boy 12 years earlier, supposedly the motive for the shooting. He denied he was in the car at the time. Howard Rubbery, head of the Serious Crime Review Unit at Merseyside Police said: "The family remain absolutely devastated by Lucy's death. "It's important to note Lucy is an absolutely innocent victim. She's not from a family of criminality. She wasn't involved in criminality. "The hunt for Kevin Parle is very much on, and we ask anybody with information, anybody who is close to Parle and knows where he is, to please come forward. "There were three males responsible for this offence and we are looking for justice for Lucy's family in relation to all three. "I do believe that there are people out there who have yet to speak to the police, even though it's 20 years on, who hold information that's absolutely vital to our investigation." Police believe Parle, now in his 40s, fled to Spain where he hid among the vast expat community with criminal help. Several years later, I tracked his movements to a holiday complex near Torrevieja, where staff convinced me he had stayed there for several weeks. 'Huge value to organised crime' Former Scotland Yard detective Peter Bleksley, who recently spent four years on a personal hunt for Parle, also visited the complex and said: "He was bold and he was brash and he had a girlfriend at one point. "The police actually should have captured him there, but they were too late." He claimed he nearly caught up with Parle at a villa elsewhere in Spain, but spooked him into disappearing again. Mr Bleksley hosted an award-winning podcast and wrote a book in which he chronicled his manhunt. He said: "Kevin Parle has remained hidden because he is funded, protected, looked after and of huge value to global, serious and organised crime." Parle can't be hard to spot - he's well-built, 6ft 5in tall, red-haired with a face scar and, originally at least, has a Liverpool accent. Of course, he might be dead. Mr Bleksley said: "I can think of many reasons why certain criminals would want to get rid of Kevin Parle because he could, in terms of evidence about the cases that he's wanted for, should he flip and become a witness for the Crown, be highly damaging for a lot of very tasty criminals." Parle is also wanted in connection with the murder of 16-year-old Liam Kelly, who was shot dead over an alleged £200 debt in June 2004, a year before Lucy's death. Parle was arrested and questioned, but then freed on bail. There have been reports of the fugitive in Australia and Dubai, but nothing to corroborate any of them. If he's alive and if no one is prepared to shop him, what might lead to his capture? "I think when he has a fallout with those who have guarded him, funded him, fed him, put a roof over his head and all of that, maybe even paid for his plastic surgery that could have altered his appearance," Mr Bleksley said. "When he finally has a fallout, when he's no longer of use, then perhaps that will be the day that somebody goes, Peter, he's here."


Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'Lucy Letby regularly wept in my arms, asking:"Why are they doing this to me? I've done nothing wrong"': Colleague's TV revelation as dramatic new picture shows nurse at her friend's wedding after police relaxed bail conditions
Lucy Letby wept repeatedly in the arms of a close colleague as she tried to cope with allegations that she was harming babies in her care, a powerful TV documentary will reveal tonight. She had been banned from nursing and sidelined in a backroom job after hospital consultants suggested she was 'purposely harming babies'. At the time, one senior nurse expressed shock at the claims, saying Letby's clinical practice as a neonatal nurse was 'second to none'. She was often accused of being cold and unfeeling during her trial for murder. But she was in fact devastated by the accusations against her, according to Karen Rees, former head of urgent care nursing at the Countess of Chester Hospital where she worked. The bitter, tearful scenes followed suggestions made by consultants at the hospital that Letby was doing harm. 'She was broken, cried regularly in my arms and in my office, and her mantra to me was, 'Why are they doing this to me? I've done nothing wrong',' said Ms Rees. The show also reveals another friend was so sure of her innocence that she sought permission from the authorities to invite Letby to her wedding while she was on bail. Letby was convicted in 2023 of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others. She was sentenced to die in prison. But since then there has been a growing clamour among expert doctors, scientists and statistics experts, who say her trial was unfair, that there are serious doubts about prosecution evidence and that the case should be reopened. Tonight's programme describes how the nurse had believed she had good working relationships with the consultants who denounced her. She was devastated that they thought what they thought. Ms Rees, in her first TV interview, revealed she was given the task of breaking the bad news to Letby that she was being removed from the job she was trained for – the care of newborns – and confined to a humiliating desk job in a back office. Letby had to pretend to colleagues that this was her choice. Ms Rees said: 'I was told just to say that concerns had been raised, and that this was seen as a neutral act. 'She was not being accused of anything at this point. But it seemed safer to take her off clinical practice to protect herself as well as babies on that neonatal unit.' As she was led away from the unit where she had worked, Letby did not even question the decision. 'She was just looking at me,' added Ms Rees. 'I then had to walk her across the hospital grounds. I was the only one making conversation. She wasn't asking me why. She wasn't crying. She was just shocked.' But, said Ms Rees, she cried a lot later. Eventually, after police became involved, Letby was prescribed antidepressants which often suppress moods and emotions. She told her trial in May 2023 she was still taking them and that she had considered suicide at the time she was removed from her job. Ms Rees recalled how Letby once told her: 'You're the only person that hasn't asked me, 'Have I purposely harmed anybody?'.' She said: 'The reason why I never asked her is that I never thought she had. No. I didn't, I don't believe it.' Her revelations are one of several dramatic moments in the documentary Lucy Letby: Beyond Reasonable Doubt? to be shown on ITV this evening. Also interviewed for the show is Dawn – who did not wish her surname to be used. She is a close childhood friend of Letby who has stood by her despite her conviction and is convinced of her innocence. The programme reveals she is so sure that Letby is blameless that she invited the accused nurse to attend her wedding while she was on bail. Dawn also undermines claims that scribbled notes found in Letby's house were any sort of confession. She reveals that, at sixth form college together, both trained in peer-support counselling and learned of a common method to deal with anxieties – to write down your worst fears and feelings. 'If you're feeling overwhelmed, you write down everything that's going through your mind,' she said. And this is what Letby did when undergoing counselling arranged for her by the hospital. Dawn recalled her reaction when she learned her friend was being accused: 'I watched it all unfold and every step of the way I couldn't believe it.' In her darkest moments she wondered if Letby had perhaps inadvertently caused harm, because she was newly-qualified and under heavy pressure. But that was the limit of what she could believe. Dawn was at work when she heard the guilty verdicts and said she could not take them in. 'I sat there dumbfounded for a while, not really knowing how to process what I was hearing. I didn't think it was real. I immediately switched to thinking what happens next? This can't be it, she can't just spend the rest of her life in prison. I'm living a life that Lucy should be living beside me. 'We should both be having families. We'd both bought our houses, and we were looking forward to the next chapter of our lives – and then all this happens. There's so much guilt that I'm living a life that Lucy should also be living.' The striking loyalty of a lifelong friend and a senior colleague are not the only elements of the programme, produced by Anouk Curry, which will shake the beliefs of many in Letby's guilt. It also provides a devastating counter to prosecution claims that babies on the unit were poisoned with insulin. Many on the prosecution side viewed this as the nearest they had to a 'smoking gun' in a trial which lacked any hard evidence. The 'immuno-assay' test used to make this claim was useless for the purpose, according to Matt Johl, an American expert in chemistry and forensic science. 'That kind of test was never meant to put somebody in prison,' he said. 'You would not strip a gold medal from an international athlete on an immuno-assay test. 'It's not good enough for drug testing pilots, or anyone who has mandatory testing. If it's not good enough to fire them, how can it be good enough to put someone in prison?' It also probes the strange contradictions among witnesses. Dr Dewi Evans changed his mind about how Letby was supposed to have killed, when the facts failed to back up his original theory. And Dr Ravi Jayaram did huge damage to Letby's case with his account of her allegedly failing to act to help a sick baby. It was even wrongly claimed she was caught 'virtually red-handed' in this incident. Dr Jayaram's version of events was exploded in an email which surfaced long after the trial. Letby's new barrister Mark McDonald (pictured) is shown in the documentary being questioned outside the CCRC offices in Birmingham by the Daily Mail's Liz Hull, who has covered the case from the beginning Yet he had said in a TV interview that the incident was 'etched on my memory and would live in my nightmares forever'. The programme is aired as the Crown Prosecution Service considers the possibility of fresh charges against Letby. The case has been put before the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which has the power to order an appeal – the courts have so far refused to hear one. Letby's new barrister Mark McDonald is shown in the documentary being questioned outside the CCRC offices in Birmingham by the Daily Mail's Liz Hull, who has covered the case from the beginning. Mr McDonald admits to camera that, despite the involvement of some of the most distinguished doctors in the world, who say no crime was committed, an appeal may yet be refused on a technicality – that the objections to the guilty verdict could have been raised at the original trial, so it was not the court's fault that things went wrong. He asks: 'If they dismiss this evidence, to say 'Well, it could have been called at trial... she's innocent but we are not going to take any notice of it because they could have done that, so we will let an innocent person stay in prison' – well, what is the logic of that?' Professor Neena Modi, a leading expert in the care of newborn babies, concludes: 'It's been deeply disturbing that one can have such a high profile and tremendously important trial that seems to have been conducted with so many flaws.' l Lucy Letby: Beyond Reasonable Doubt? is on ITV1 at 10.20pm