The solar battery rebate has arrived – here's how to steer clear of scammers
It reminded me of 2008. I was working at the CSIRO and watching the solar boom take off thanks to the new $8,000 solar rebate for 1kW of panels. Consumers were excited, but most had no idea what they were buying or who to trust.
The rebate triggered an influx of dodgy operators who would whack 1kW of cheap, nasty panels on your roof paired with a rubbish inverter, charge $500 total and still make a profit.
Sometimes they charged $0 and threw in a Myer voucher to seal the deal. Yes, they'd pay you to go solar. It was the wild west. Those cheap 1kW systems were sometimes ineffective, often dangerously installed and dumped in landfills way too soon.
Sixteen years later, it's happening again. The approximately $350 a kilowatt hour battery rebate has triggered a rush. I've already seen ads offering 46 kWh of battery storage 'FREE' when you buy solar.
Get Guardian Australia environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as an email
They've clearly found a way to get batteries from wholesalers for less than the rebate. Personally, I wouldn't go near these deals.
Batteries are serious gear. They store huge amounts of energy. They need proper installation and careful configuration. Most importantly, when feed-in tariffs shift (as they constantly do), you need a relationship with your installer to update how the battery works with the grid to maximise your savings.
So here's my advice, based on 16 years watching what happens when rebates attract cowboys:
Sign up to Clear Air Australia
Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis
after newsletter promotion
Choose well-known brands. Be extremely wary of mystery batteries that popped up yesterday and cost half as much as anything else.
Use a local installer with a solid track record – someone who has been around and will still be around when you need them.
Read the 1-star reviews. They often reveal the stuff that really matters: ghosting customers, shoddy work, or warranty nightmares.
Slow down. The rebate isn't vanishing tomorrow. Yes, it reduces on Jan 1 but things are mad right now. You might get a better result waiting a few months.
Think about sizing. A battery that's too small will frustrate you, and one that's too big may never fill. For most households (unless you're planning to gamble on Amber), 15-20 kWh is the sweet spot.
Check your solar capacity. There's no point having a giant battery you can't fill. If you want to reduce your reliance on your electricity retailer, ensure your solar is up to the job.
Reward good installers. If the crew that did your original solar were great and they sell the battery you want, go back to them. If not, get multiple quotes.
This rebate could help thousands of households get batteries that work well, and more than pay for themselves over at least the next 15 years. But only if those households choose carefully. Don't let history repeat itself.
Finn Peacock is the founder of solarquotes.com.au
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Major blow for 'border breacher' owner of Chapel Street bar as it collapses owing over $800,000
A once-popular cocktail bar on Melbourne 's iconic Chapel Street has closed its doors for good after it went bust owing more than $800,000 to creditors. Morris Jones, founded by restaurateur Hayden Burbank, officially entered insolvency on June 26 with Justin Howlett of SMB Advisory appointed as administrator. Morris Jones had announced its closure in March, calling the decision 'heartbreaking.' 'The hospitality industry is facing unprecedented challenges and it has become incredibly difficult to sustain business in this current climate,' the statement read. 'We are all deeply saddened by this situation. We would like to take this opportunity to thank all our loyal customers for their love and support over the journey.' Burbank, who rose to prominence for both his hospitality ventures and his public controversies, stepped back from daily operations in November 2021, resigning as a director of Bambou Restaurant Pty Ltd, the company behind the venue. His mother, Antoinette Burbank, is listed as the current director, while Hayden remains the sole shareholder. The collapse follows a string of challenges for Burbank, who in 2021 was given a suspended six-month jail sentence in Western Australia after faking documents to illegally travel to Perth during a Covid lockdown to watch the AFL Grand Final. Burbank is also known for his relationship with Married At First Sight star Belinda Vickers. The couple announced their engagement in February 2024. Their relationship blossomed after he spent 90 days behind bars at WA's maximum-security Hakea prison, which earned him the jailhouse nickname of 'border breacher'. Hayden described his experience at one of Australia's toughest jails as 'the ultimate game of Survivor'. 'You have to form alliances and not do anything stupid and get through each day by day,' he told the Saturday Herald Sun in March 2022. 'They are the longest days of your life. I'm not built for jail. Nobody is built for jail.' Hayden added he shared a cell with one of the prison's top dogs, a bikie, who would wake him up each morning and taunt: 'Border breacher, border breacher'. The restaurateur hosted a farewell party at the closed-down venue, which reportedly upset former staff who alleged they were owed unpaid wages. Financial records reveal the company owes $62,589 to the Australian Tax Office (ATO) and $8,681 in WorkCover liabilities. Several suppliers are also out of pocket, including Cambridge Cellars ($9,992), MRC Builders ($160,458), Hosp Management ($16,251), Moorabbin Marble & Granite ($15,675), Saunders Events ($15,739), and Kresta Blinds ($8,528). In addition to suppliers, several private investors are listed among the creditors. These include Andrew Murphy, owed $58,400, Brad Putzier, owed $60,000, and Daniel Barlow, owed $69,600. Despite Burbank taking a step back from day-to-day operations in 2021, he is listed as the only employee owed money from the company, with claims totalling $59,711 in unpaid wages and $30,289 in long service leave. The collapse follows a number of other Melbourne venues including Asian fusion restaurants Kekou and Klae. The venues in the inner-city suburb of Richmond entered liquidation earlier this year. The businesses had debts exceeding $1.3million, including an estimated $50,000 in unclaimed vouchers and $400,000 owed to the ATO.
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Controversial 'top performing' Ray White real estate agent Josh Tesolin finally comes clean with a staggering admission
One of Australia's most divisive real estate agents has finally broken his silence after Daily Mail Australia revealed that he and his agency were being investigated by NSW Fair Trading for underquoting and complaints. Josh Tesolin, who made headlines in 2021 after he made $7million in commissions at just 26 years old, addressed the investigation publicly for the first time in a podcast interview with fellow agent Adrian Bo that was released on May 28. Tesolin, who is the owner and principal of Ray White Quakers Hill in Sydney 's northwest, said the investigation had been 'going on for three years, now'. 'What are we being investigated for? Fair Trading came in, asked for files, we complied with the regulator,' Tesolin continued. 'Anything the regulator has asked, whether it be 500 files... three files... we have completely complied with the regulator at every single stage.' Tesolin also took the opportunity to lash his critics, telling Bo they were simply jealous of his success. 'As you know Adrian... tall poppy syndrome is a big thing in this industry,' he said. His admission about the long-running NSW Fair Trading investigation contradicts the statement the Ray White Group provided to Daily Mail Australia a month earlier, which claimed that 'Josh Tesolin is not aware of any personal investigation into him'. Tesolin (pictured) was awarded the Number 1 Agent in Australia award via RateMyAgent four times in 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020 out of 60,000 real estate agents 'Rather, on 16 March 2023, the corporate licensee responded to an investigation by NSW Fair Trading; since that date, there has been no penalty, fine or regulatory action taken by NSW Fair Trading against the corporate licensee or Mr Tesolin,' it said. A Fair Trading spokesperson confirmed this week that the investigation was ongoing. 'The Strata and Property Services Taskforce within NSW Fair Trading is investigating Quakers Hill Ray White Real Estate and Josh Tesolin following proactive compliance blitzes into underquoting and complaints,' they said. 'As this investigation is ongoing, no further comment is available at this time.' It's understood the investigation will be completed in the coming weeks. When contacted by Daily Mail Australia about Tesolin's comments on the podcast, Ray White said it was unaware of the 'specific matters' under investigation. 'The Ray White Group has always offered its full cooperation and support to NSW Fair Trading in any investigation of its members,' a spokesperson said. 'In relation to Ray White Quakers Hill, we have still not been informed of the specific matters under investigation, despite being told by the media. 'NSW Fair Trading have provided Ray White - the franchisor - with no formal communication regarding its investigation regarding Josh Tesolin.' Daily Mail Australia is not suggesting Tesolin has engaged in underquoting, only that NSW Fair Trading is investigating his agency in Quakers Hill. In 2021, Tesolin was awarded the Number 1 Agent in Australia by RateMyAgent, a title he secured four years in a row, from 2020 to 2023, standing out among over 60,000 real estate agents nationwide. Never one to shy away from celebrating his achievements, Tesolin made a bold statement at a real estate conference in New Zealand, debuting a custom-made jacket adorned with images of properties he's had a hand in selling. Under NSW law, real estate agents must provide a reasonable estimate of a property's likely selling price in the agency agreement. If a price range is used in advertising, the highest price must not exceed the lowest price by more than 10 per cent. In NSW, underquoting is an offence, attracting penalties of up to $22,000. A property sold on June 5 by the Tesolin Group was guided at $950,000, much lower than the $1,145,000 it sold for in 2021. The home in Riverstone ultimately sold for $1,351,000, a difference of 42 per cent from the reserve. Tim McKibbin, the CEO of the Real Estate Institute of NSW, said it was unusual for a property to be listed for less than its previous sale price in the current market. 'I'm not shocked that it was marketed at a lower price, but generally, you wouldn't expect a property to sell for less than it previously did,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'There could be a multitude of factors influencing this, the property may have been damaged, or there may have been changes in the surrounding area. 'All of these elements can impact a property's value.' The agent interviewing Tesolin, Mr Bo, made headlines in 2019 after he was forced to resign from McGrath Real Estate in the city's eastern suburbs. His resignation came in the wake of an investigation into a complaint that Bo had reportedly asked a much younger staffer 'how many c***s he had sucked?'
The Guardian
8 hours ago
- The Guardian
Doge wants to replace our institutions with a tech utopia. It won't work
Elon Musk has stepped away from Doge with very little 'efficiency' to show for it. While it may have been more of a showpiece than real policy, this brutal and short experiment in Silicon Valley governance reveals a long-simmering battle between digital utopians and the institutional infrastructures critical to functioning democracies. Doge's website dubiously claims $190bn in savings. The receipts show that they are less about efficiency than they are aimed at effective dissolution, a fate met by USAID, the federal agency responsible for distributing foreign assistance. Don't be fooled. These brash new reductions are not just your garden-variety small-government crusades or culture-war skirmishes. This administration's war on institutions derives from the newfound power of Silicon Valley ideology – a techno-determinism that views each institution's function as potential raw material for capture by private digital platforms. All the while, Elon Musk sold the White House on an 'AI-first strategy' for the US government. The recent executive order Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence mandates that barely tested Silicon Valley AI be jammed into the government's work. It directs agencies to use AI to 'lessen the burden of bureaucratic restrictions'. This is a thinly veiled attempt not just to reduce institutional activities; it's also a degradation play. Doge makes plain an often misunderstood tension: Silicon Valley's final dream is a world without institutions. Since the rise of the internet, startups have long encouraged, and profited from, institutional decline. This anti-institutionalism goes back to the roots of computing. Charles Babbage's difference engine, central to modern computing, was built on technologies meant to control labor. It was a reflection of Babbage's belief that the highest intention of the factory manager was to reduce the skill and cognitive complexity of laborers' tasks. If the machine could manage production, humans – now smoothed-out automatons – would hardly need accompanying social protections, or even any governance at all. In 1948, Norbert Wiener founded the discipline of cybernetics, 'the science of control and communications in the animal and machine'. This automated governance was eventually brought into direct competition with public institutions. The revolt against the state took many forms in the history of computing thereafter, from the libertarian California ideology ('information wants to be free') to the very idea that a new 'cyberspace' would be liberated from governments. Here the individual is an entrepreneur of the mind, able to instantly improve their lot without the mediating hand of the institutional form. To get to the real heart of Doge's ideology, read The Cathedral and the Bazaar, Eric Raymond's manifesto on building open-source software. For Raymond, cathedrals are 'carefully crafted by individual wizards or small bands of mages working in splendid isolation'. This slow, deliberate work is no match for the networked and digitally enabled bazaar, where many software developers move fast by releasing early and often, delegate everything they can, and are open to the point of promiscuity. Something like scripture for computer engineers, Raymond's ideas soon jumped out of the network and into governance of the physical world, where all human organizations were scrutinized as the maligned 'cathedral'. Entrepreneurs loved this idea, too. The management method known as the 'lean startup' is a lightweight program of data-driven optimizations designed to quickly scale businesses. Instead of human labor and judgment, lean startups use data and algorithms to experiment their way toward governance. But there's a catch: a public institution is not supposed to be run like a digital startup. Silicon Valley may have carved out a niche in which its organizational philosophies mastered food delivery apps, AI girlfriends and money-laundering shitcoins, but the moment they take these methods to institutions entrusted with public welfare, they've lost the plot. Governments don't have customers – they care for citizens. If classical liberalism had the state and its many sovereign institutions, and neoliberalism had the divine hand of the free market, today's platform class elevates computation as the ultimate arbiter of truth. When presented with an institutional force, the platform class first asks: how could this be delivered by way of a digital platform? Digital technology doesn't have to be this way. Good software can augment institutions, not be the rationale for their deletion. Building this future requires undoing Silicon Valley's pernicious opposition to the institutional form. By giving into the digital utopian's anti-institutionalism, we allowed them to reshape government according to their growth-at-all-costs logic. If the newly empowered digital utopianism goes unchecked, we face a platform-archy where black-box AI makes decisions once adjudicated through democratic institutions. This isn't just a Silicon Valley efficiency fantasy; it's on the roadmap of every authoritarian who ever sniffed power. Thankfully, the anti-Doge backlash was swift. The abrupt layoffs backfired, leading many Americans to fully understand just how much research and resources for advancing science, medicine and culture are tied to federal support. In the private sector, since capital is no longer free after the federal government hiked interest rates in 2022, the growth of the big Silicon Valley platforms have almost completely stalled. In search of an answer, Silicon Valley is making a big bet on AI, overwhelming users with automated answers that hallucinate and mislead at every turn. It's becoming harder and harder for the average person to buy what the digital utopians are selling. The response to this assault on our institutions might be a kind of Digital New Deal – a public plan for institutions in the AI era. This 21st-century economics must go well beyond solving for mass unemployment. Reconstructing the institutional foundations of public goods such as journalism, libraries and higher education requires more than just restoring the public funds stripped by Doge. It will require forceful assertions about their regulatory value in the face of a fully automated slop state. Governments come and go, but free and open institutions are critical to the functioning of democracy. If we make the mistake of misrecognizing digital platforms for public institutions, we will not easily reverse Doge's mistakes. Mike Pepi is a technologist and author who has written widely about the intersection between culture and the Internet. His book, Against Platforms: Surviving Digital Utopia, was published by Melville House in 2025
