Kremlin Blasts Germany As 'Dangerous Again' After Defence Minister's Lethal Force Vow Against Russians
/ Jul 15, 2025, 09:20AM IST
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has issued a stark warning following German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius' declaration that German troops are prepared to kill Russian soldiers if deterrence fails. The controversial remarks, made in an interview with the Financial Times, highlight a sharp escalation in rhetoric as Pistorius emphasized strength and readiness over diplomacy. Peskov condemned the statements as dangerous, suggesting NATO is fueling fear to justify soaring defense budgets.#Germany #Russia #NATO #MilitaryTensions #Pistorius #Peskov #Defense #Geopolitics #WarTalk #EuropeSecurity
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Russia hits massive JACKPOT, bad news for Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Qatar, this discovery may cause a new…
Russia hits massive JACKPOT, bad news for Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Qatar, this discovery may cause a new… Russia's crude oil discovery may have revealed a hidden treasure but exploring it can devastate the planet. By Anirudha Yerunkar Edited by Anirudha Yerunkar Advertisement Russia has reportedly found the world's largest crude oil reserve beneath the British Antarctic Territory, a region long protected under international treaty. It is estimated to be 511 billion barrels of crude oil, and is being described as an 'ocean of oil' buried under the icy continent. Russia's Oil Discovery The discovery was made by Rosgeo, a Russian state-owned geological research company, during a scientific survey in the Weddell Sea region. According to reports, the estimated oil reserves are larger than the total amount of oil ever extracted from Earth to date. Advertisement === Though Russia claims the survey was purely scientific in nature, experts suggest it could be a strategic move to exploit Antarctica's natural resources. What's Antarctic Treaty? The 1959 Antarctic Treaty prohibits all military and commercial activities in the region, especially resource extraction. So far, over 56 countries including Russia have signed the treaty, which has helped preserve Antarctica for peaceful and scientific use. Advertisement === However, this oil discovery has raised alarm bells. Media reports claim that when the world begins to face severe shortages of natural resources, countries might start competing for control over the Antarctic's energy reserves. The British Antarctic Territory is also claimed by Chile and Argentina, both of whom have now shown interest in the region after the discovery. This can hamper the spirit of international cooperation in Antarctica and add geopolitical tensions. Can This End Saudi Arabia's Oil Dominance? With a reserve of over 511 billion barrels, the Antarctic oil deposit if ever tapped can surpass Saudi Arabia's current oil resources and reshape global energy dominance. This has raised concern that nations may eventually ignore treaties and race to claim a piece of this massive resource. Experts fear that if the global community fails to uphold the Antarctic Treaty, the continent could become the next battleground for energy supremacy. While the discovery may give a potential boost to global energy security, it also increases risk to Earth's environmental stability.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump vs Putin: When a reality star meet a real dictator
Aditi Prasad is the Editor (Videos) at The Times of India and a certified geopolitics junkie. This blog is her escape hatch from studio chaos and the tyranny of breaking news. Flashback 2024 – Donald Trump repeatedly claimed that he alone could end the devastating Ukraine War, and that too in just 24 hours. Now six months later, Trump is facing an embarrassing reality, that Vladimir Putin is simply not willing to play ball. Trump's bluster has met its match in Putin's iron fist – and guess who's winning? TRUMP-PUTIN GEOPOLITICAL CIRCUS With Donald Trump around, geo-politics is no longer a matter of gravitas; it has become a circus where no one seems to know who the ringmaster is or for that matter, even who the clown is. The only predictable trait that Trump displays is unpredictability and a penchant to announce he is going to punish a nation… or its leader. And his latest target is Vladimir Putin who has been helming Russia for about 25 years. When campaigning in 2024, Trump would insist Putin is a 'great guy' and that he will bring an end to the wars around the world. Trump publicly even humiliated the Ukraine president Vladimir Zelenskyy at the White House and bullied him into re-starting peace talks with Putin's Russia. Back then, there were conspiracy theorists in Washington who pronounced that Trump is somehow beholden to Putin. Some wondered if he is genuinely obsessed with getting the Nobel Peace prize. But there are only a limited number of stunts that you can perform in a circus. Trump eventually realised that he and his team have spectacularly failed to stop the two conflicts that really matter: the war between Israel and Iran-backed Hamas and the big one between Russia and Ukraine that is on since February 2022. HOW PUTIN TURNED THE TABLES A few months ago, Trump blamed Zelenskyy for the prolonged war and virtually hailed Putin as a leader who seeks peace. Predictably, it took a few weeks for the tables to turn. Now, Putin is the arch villain and Trump has thunderingly vowed all sorts of punishments against Putin and Russia. The latest bouquet of threat from Washington is two fold: the United States will impose even more punitive sanctions against Russia. And it will also impose a further 100% tariff on Russian goods. Suddenly, the neocons in Washington who were in hibernation since November 2024 when Trump won the elections are back in action, guns blazing and regime change delusions unfolding. The primary target is Putin and Russia. But this avatar of Trump is also going after China, India and Brazil. Why? Because, Trump aides say that the three countries are strengthening Putin by maintaining trade and other ties with Russia. In their fantasy world, these neocons think such backyard bullying will bring Putin down to his knees. And then who knows? Putin could sue for peace and then Zelenskyy would nominate Trump for yet another Nobel Peace prize. The problem is: it is fantasy and Trump is engaging in childish games. For one, the United States has already imposed every possible sanction against Russia since February 2022 when it invaded Ukraine. Virtually all economic and financial assets of Russia and Russian entities have been frozen and or seized. The country has been locked out of the dollar designated global financial system. Trade is more or less frozen. According to the US chamber of commerce, trade between US and Russia amounted to a paltry $3.5 billion in 2024. What difference will it make to Putin if Trump imposes another 100% tariffs? Perhaps the Trump Team is aware of this. So why not go after China, India and Brazil to checkmate Putin? TRUMP'S MODI, XI LULA 'FANTASY' But again, it is a fantasy that will remain one. Take the case of India. Since February 2022, it has ignored sustained pressure from G-7 countries and 'increased' oil purchases at bargain prices from Russia. Does anyone think India will cave in now? For that matter, does anyone seriously think that Brazil will cave in? The very thought of Xi Jinping caving in is laughable. Together, the three countries have a GDP that almost equals that of the US. Not to mention Europe that is still very dependent on gas imports from Russia. Geo-politically speaking, the post Cold War era of a unipolar world is long gone. It is a multipolar world. Trump can bluff and bluster and perform for the gallery. He can threaten Putin with all manner of punishments. But the man in Kremlin will keep doing what he does. Rule Russia with an iron fist and engage with the rest of the world as he pleases. Meanwhile, the circus in Washington could move elsewhere. And don't be surprised in a few weeks time if Trump shifts focus and announces he is resuming efforts to take over Greenland. Or making Canada the 51st state of the US. Mere mortals like us can only watch and applaud the performance. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Whatever happened to Brics common currency
Yet another Brics Summit has ended as a non-event. The joint declaration at Rio de Janeiro, despite its grandstanding about multilateralism and a rules-based international order, is more notable for its political posturing: it calls for Israel's withdrawal from Gaza and condemnation of Ukrainian attacks on Russian infrastructure. The fact that geopolitics now occupies more mind space than economics in Brics is evident from the near silence in the declaration on its once-flagship initiative — a Brics common currency. The focus has quietly shifted to a more modest, though still ambitious, goal of promoting trade and settlement in local currencies. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has threatened 10% additional tariffs on Brics countries for what he labels 'anti-American' policies. (And, on Monday, when the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation was meeting in Beijing, he threatened 100% tariffs on Russia and secondary sanctions on countries buying oil from Russia, among them India.) His frustration is not unfounded. The Brics effort to reduce reliance on the dollar directly challenges American economic dominance. The dollar's centrality in global finance gives the US a structural advantage. As the world's primary reserve currency, the dollar allows America to borrow more cheaply in global markets. The world's demand for dollar assets effectively provides the US with an endless supply of low-cost credit. For example, if you carry $100 in your pocket, you are in effect giving America an interest-free loan of $100. That is the essence of what former French finance minister (and later president) Valéry Giscard d'Estaing famously called America's 'exorbitant privilege'. That privilege goes beyond economics. It gives the US the unique power to weaponise the dollar, using financial systems like Swift and dollar-clearing banks to impose sanctions and exert political pressure. Brics's move toward de-dollarisation is, in part, a pushback against this power. Still, for all the motivation, a Brics common currency remains a difficult project. Unlike the eurozone whose members are geographically contiguous and share broadly similar political and economic institutions, Brics countries are scattered across continents, with stark differences in governance, development levels, GDP sizes, and strategic interests. Even assuming political will, formidable technical and institutional hurdles remain. A common currency requires a common interest rate. But how do you calibrate monetary policy that works at the same time for China and South Africa, or Brazil and India, given their vastly different growth and inflation dynamics? More critically, are these countries ready to cede monetary sovereignty and expose themselves to the risk that economic instability anywhere in the bloc could mean economic instability everywhere? An even more complex issue is the China factor. With China contributing roughly 70% of the bloc's combined GDP, any common currency arrangement will inevitably be dominated by Beijing. In trying to escape the hegemony of the dollar, would Brics willingly embrace the hegemony of China, an authoritarian state with questionable transparency, weak institutional checks, and limited commitment to the rule of law? While the common currency vision stalls, the motivation to break free from dollar dominance remains strong, and is growing. The biggest driver is trade. A large proportion of intra-Brics trade is still settled in dollars, adding avoidable transaction costs. Eliminating these costs by using local currencies could boost intra-Brics trade. There are also deeper concerns. Brics countries see dollar dependence as a source of systemic risk to their financial stability. The Global Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008 was triggered by reckless risk-taking in the US housing and banking sector. Had this happened in an emerging economy, its currency would have collapsed. But the dollar, paradoxically, gained value during the crisis. Global capital, in search of safety, fled emerging markets and rushed into US assets, a phenomenon economists call the 'safe haven effect'. Ironically, it was emerging markets that paid the price for America's excesses. The GFC wasn't a one-off. The taper tantrum of 2013, the Covid-19 shock of 2020, and even recent US interest rate hikes have repeatedly exposed emerging economies to capital flight, currency volatility, and inflation — all collateral damage of an American centric global finance. Against this backdrop, Brics's pivot towards trade in local currencies seems pragmatic. While less radical than a common currency, it is a tangible step towards financial autonomy. For instance, if India and Bangladesh settle their bilateral trade in rupees and takas, both benefit by cutting out the dollar intermediation costs. However, local currency trade works best when bilateral trade is roughly balanced. But if the trade is lopsided, the arrangement falters. That's what happened with India-Russia trade. When Russia agreed to accept rupee payments for its oil exports, it quickly began accumulating rupee balances far beyond what it could spend on Indian goods. With no outlet for those rupees, Russia backed away from the deal. Can Brics still push ahead with local currency trade, especially under threat of punitive US tariffs? It's worth remembering that the dollar's status as a global reserve currency is not backed by any formal treaty. There's no international law obliging nations to use it. So under what legal basis can Trump, or indeed any American president, mandate Brics countries to stay within the dollar-based system? Yet, as we have seen over the last few months of Trump 2.0, US tariffs, no matter how whimsical, are hard to defy. This puts India in a delicate spot. As the US prepares to assume the presidency of the G20 next year, India will need to carefully navigate between supporting the Global South's push for a more multipolar financial system and maintaining stable relations with America, its most important strategic partner. Duvvuri Subbarao is a former governor of the Reserve Bank of India. The views expressed are personal.
