Four Pensacola women federally charged in $14.6 billion nationwide healthcare scheme
U.S. Attorney John Heekin announced charges against 31-year-old Alexandra Christensen, 41-year-old Lindsay McCray, 36-year-old Heather Bradley and 39-year-old Jennifer Purves.
"As alleged in the indictment, between 2015 and 2024, McCray, while employed by a medical practice, forged controlled substance prescriptions using the names, signatures and Drug Enforcement Administration registration numbers of the practice's two physicians without their knowledge or authorization," a release said.
As a result of the conspiracy, McCray, Christensen and others allegedly contributed to the unlawful distribution of over 300,000 hydrocodone pills and over 30,000 oxycodone pills. McCray is further charged with distributing and aiding and abetting the distribution of amphetamine with Bradley and Purves.
Christensen and McCray are charged with conspiracy to distribute and dispense controlled substances, while McCray, Bradley and Purves are charged with distribution of controlled substances.
McCray is also charged with identity theft in connection to diverted oxycodone, hydrocodone and amphetamine.
Trial for all four defendants is scheduled for Aug. 15. McCray faces up to 80 years in federal prison while Christensen, Bradley and Purves face up to 20 years.
Heekin says the arrest of the four defendants are part of a nationwide law enforcement action that has resulted in the arrest of 324 people for their alleged participation in health care fraud and illegal drug diversion schemes that involved the submission of over $14.6 billion in intended loss and over 15 million pills of illegally diverted controlled substances.
"The defendants allegedly defrauded programs entrusted for the care of the elderly and disabled to line their own pockets," the release said.
This article originally appeared on Pensacola News Journal: Pensacola women charged in nationwide healthcare fraud scheme
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Michigan utility aided sabotage of Covid lockdown policies, documents reveal
Newly released court documents show power utility DTE Energy knowingly contributed $100,000 to a dark money non-profit that helped sabotage Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer's Covid lockdown policies. The documents contradict previous DTE statements that claimed the utility was not involved with the donation. In January 2023, the Guardian detailed how a DTE-affiliated dark money non-profit financially contributed to the successful repeal of Whitmer's emergency order powers. The campaign, coordinated with state Republican leadership, helped bring about an end to Covid lockdowns and policies. Related: Group aiming to sabotage Whitmer's Covid policies funded by dark money Peter Ternes, then a DTE Energy spokesperson, twice emphatically denied the company's involvement. In late 2022, he told a Guardian reporter, 'DTE unequivocally is not financially supporting' the campaign to kill Whitmer's emergency order powers, led by Unlock Michigan, and made an almost identical statement when asked in 2020. New emails, however, show a DTE employee coordinated the $100,000 contribution. The dark money non-profit and Unlock Michigan leadership referred to it as a 'DTE donation' and '$100,000 DTE check', emails show. The emails are part of a criminal case over alleged Unlock Michigan campaign finance violations and are not directly related to DTE. The 'revelatory' emails illuminate how DTE 'deploys dark money in Michigan', said Karlee Weinmann, research and communications manager with the utility industry watchdog Energy and Policy Institute. The group detailed the emails in a new report. 'The emails raise questions about the appropriateness of DTE's political spending and activity,' Weinmann added. Michigan was a global flashpoint in the cultural and political fight over how governments should handle Covid. Whitmer's lockdowns were effective at controlling the virus's spread, but rightwing opposition to the restrictions culminated with multiple demonstrations and armed protesters storming the state legislature in mid-2020. While the Covid restrictions are over, dark money groups remain powerful players in state and national politics, and the emails show how lax transparency laws shield them as they move funding for politicians or causes. Utilities generally opposed lockdowns in 2020, industry observers have said. During the first wave of Covid restrictions, many voluntarily stopped or were required to cease shutting off service to financially struggling customers. Sources initially alerted a Guardian reporter to the donation around the time it was made in late 2020, but no public record of it was available at the time. Internal Revenue Service records confirming the donation became public in late 2021. They show the funds went from a DTE-affiliated dark money group, Michigan Energy First (MEF), to another dark money non-profit called Michigan Citizens for Fiscal Responsibility (MCRF). The latter served as a primary funder of the Unlock Michigan campaign, donating about $1.8m in 2020. Though DTE lobbyists served on MEF's board, then DTE spokesperson Ternes had steadfastly insisted it was a separate entity and there was no coordination between the two. Ternes also said DTE did not give donations to MEF. In an email sent on Wednesday, DTE spokesperson Jill Wilmot conceded that the company gave money to MEF, representing a shift from its past statements. Still, DTE denied that it knew what MEF did with the donation. 'While DTE has contributed to Michigan Energy First (MEF) in the past, we can't speak on behalf of MEF or the contributions the organization makes,' the spokesperson said. However, the new emails show DTE did know how MEF would spend the money. The company's corporate and government affairs chief of staff, Pam Headley, in 2020 facilitated the $100,000 donation from MEF to MCFR, emails show. MEF's board president at the time was Renze Hoeksema, a now-retired DTE lobbyist. Headley was a DTE employee with no known role with MEF. Headley sent an email from her DTE email account during business hours to MCFR with the subject line 'RE: Contribution from Michigan Energy First'. The email shows how Headley coordinated the DTE donation: 'Renze asked me to let you know that today the Michigan Energy First Board approved a $100,000 contribution to Michigan Citizens for Fiscal Responsibility.' She included a request for an invoice and closed out the email with her DTE email signature. The criminal filings also include emails between MCFR and Republican Senate leadership working with Unlock Michigan. They refer to the donation as being from DTE Energy. One email states, 'I think I'm getting the $100,000 tomorrow from DTE.' Another from the following day states, 'Unlock Michigan update: $100,000 DTE check arrived today.' In 2022, DTE's Ternes told the Guardian: 'DTE has worked hand-in-hand with the governor to protect our customers, employees and the public throughout the coronavirus pandemic. The actions taken by the state have slowed Covid transmission and death rates.' The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post See our guide at for alternative methods and the pros and cons of each. The utility industry widely uses dark money to influence policy across the country, and the donations have been at the center of recent scandals, including two in neighboring Ohio. MEF also donates millions each election cycle to a bipartisan group of lawmakers, including to Whitmer's affiliated Pac. The donations show DTE 'has power and wields influence over parts of people's lives that they don't want DTE to have influence over', said Eli Day, communications director for the We the People Action Fund, which has been involved in utility affordability campaigns. Donations like this are made through dark money channels because companies know their political donations would generate blowback, Day added. 'Ordinary people who are outraged can have a real impact and change their lives for the better, and DTE is terrified of that,' he said.
Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Musk Accuses Trump of Epstein Coverup With Clown Meme
Elon Musk is hitting back where it hurts. Just hours after Donald Trump dismissed him as a 'train wreck' for launching a new political party, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO returned fire by reviving one of the right's most radioactive conspiracy obsessions: the Jeffrey Epstein files. In a series of cryptic and mocking posts on X (formerly Twitter), Musk appeared to accuse the Trump administration of hiding explosive information about Epstein's ties to powerful figures, including Trump himself. The posts combined memes, sarcasm, and callbacks to MAGA promises that have yet to be fulfilled. Musk's first post on the morning of July 7 was simply the angry swearing emoji: 🤬. The post included a popular meme format of a clown preparing for a performance; in the meme, each step of the clown putting on makeup was labeled with a line referencing the Epstein files: The clown metaphor painted the Trump administration, and perhaps the entire MAGA movement, as clowns performing a script of delay and deception. 🤬 — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 7, 2025Trump and his allies had repeatedly promised to release the full Epstein files during the 2024 campaign, portraying it as a symbol of draining the swamp and exposing the elite. With Musk's financial support—estimated at $290 million—the Trump campaign leaned hard into that narrative. When Trump returned to office, his administration did release what it called 'part one' of the Epstein documents in February. But the release revealed little that wasn't already public and drew backlash from Trump's base. Trump Declares Musk a 'Train Wreck' After Party Launch A frustrated user on X commented under Musk's post: 'What happened to 'the client list is on my desk'? What happened to 'the Epstein files part 2'? What happened to those magical binders? What a farce.' Musk replied simply: 'This is the final straw.' This is the final straw — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 7, 2025 He then followed up with another meme, this time showing a digital countdown clock reading '0000' with the title: 'The Official Jeffrey Epstein Pedophile Arrest Counter.' 'What's the time? Oh look, it's no-one-has-been-arrested-o'clock again,' Musk wrote. What's the time? Oh look, it's no-one-has-been-arrested-o'clock again … — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 7, 2025When a user suggested that if either side had damaging information on the other, it would already be public, Musk responded: 'Unless both sides were guilty.' Unless both sides were guilty — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 7, 2025Musk had already escalated the feud on June 5 when he posted: 'Time to drop the really big bomb. Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That's the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day.' He deleted the post shortly after, but the damage was done. The accusation created ripples across the MAGA ecosystem, which has long treated Epstein's client list as a mythic document that would expose Democrats, elites, and deep-state operatives. Now, Musk was flipping the script, suggesting Trump himself was the one hiding the truth. Trump and Epstein were known to be friendly. In a 2002 interview with New York Magazine, Trump said he had known Epstein for 15 years and called him 'a terrific guy.' In 2017, journalist Michael Wolff recorded Epstein saying that Trump was his 'closest friend.' While those statements don't prove complicity, they've added fuel to years of speculation. Importantly, no criminal evidence has emerged tying Trump to Epstein's sex crimes. His name appearing in public documents, guest lists, or social connections does not imply wrongdoing. But in conspiracy circles, that distinction often doesn't matter. And for Musk, who has increasingly embraced MAGA memes, culture war battles, and anti-elite rhetoric, it's a potent weapon. Elon Musk Apologizes to Trump. But One Explosive Question Won't Go Away Musk's 'clown' meme ends with a jab at the entire notion of an Epstein list. In the final frame, as the clown finishes dressing up and prepares to go onstage, the text reads: 'There is no Epstein list.' That line reflects recent reporting. On Sunday, Axios revealed that the Justice Department and the FBI concluded there is no evidence that Epstein kept a 'client list,' blackmailed elites, or was murdered. A memo obtained by Axios summarized the findings and noted that prison surveillance footage showed no one entering Epstein's cellblock the night of his death. The report marked the first time the Trump administration formally contradicted Epstein conspiracy theories, many of which had been promoted by Trump's own FBI director Kash Patel and deputy Dan Bongino when they were social media influencers. Both men have spent recent weeks on right-wing media attempting damage control. 'I've been putting out the truth my entire career,' Patel said during a June 5 appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience, the same day Musk posted his most direct accusation. 'Why would I risk all of it on this guy?' But for Musk, that answer isn't good enough. 'So … umm … then what is Ghislaine Maxwell in prison for?' he wrote in response to the Axios story. 'Stuff like this does not improve people's faith in government.' So … umm … then what is Ghislaine Maxwell in prison for? Stuff like this does not improve people's faith in government. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 7, 2025
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Obama-appointed judge to rule on motion to dismiss in high-stakes Abrego Garcia case hearing
Justice Department lawyers and attorneys for Salvadoran migrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia will square off in court Monday as a federal judge in Maryland weighs a flurry of motions over his U.S. custody – and the Trump administration pushes to dismiss the civil case entirely – in a closely watched legal battle that's become a flashpoint in President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis scheduled the hearing last week to consider recent motions from both sides, after Abrego Garcia was wrongfully deported to El Salvador in March and returned three months later to face criminal charges in a different state. The hearing is all but certain to reignite a high-profile fight over Abrego Garcia's legal status in the U.S., which is currently playing out in two separate federal courts. Ahead of the 11 a.m. hearing, here's what to know about the civil case – and potential next steps from Judge Xinis. The hearing in Maryland comes after Salvadorian migrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia was summarily deported by Trump officials to El Salvador in March in violation of an existing court order. His family sued the Trump administration over his removal almost immediately, and later that month, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis, an Obama appointee, ordered the Trump administration to "facilitate" Abrego Garica's return to the U.S. The ruling was later upheld by the Supreme Court, though it took three months – and many discovery hearings before Xinis – for Trump officials to eventually comply with the court's order and return him to the U.S. in June. On return, Abrego Garcia was immediately taken into custody in Tennessee for federal charges stemming from a 2022 traffic stop. Court documents show the charges were brought in late May, prompting questions as to when the investigation, and the impaneling of a grand jury, would have taken place. It's unclear how far Xinis will go in addressing the competing requests filed by both sides, though she signaled last week that the hearing will remain narrowly focused on the government's motion to dismiss the civil case and the plaintiffs' bid to transfer Abrego Garcia into U.S. custody in Maryland. Abrego Garcia's lawyers had asked Xinis to issue an order blocking his possible removal from the U.S. without prior notification, pointing to statements from the Trump administration as evidence that they could try to remove him to a possible third country other than El Salvador. "Defendants have repeatedly stated their intent to remove Mr. Abrego Garcia to a third country," his lawyers said last week in a filing, adding that he could face "persecution or torture if removed directly to various other countries," including Libya, South Sudan and Eritrea, which are notorious for human rights abuses. Meanwhile, new allegations made in court filings days earlier could prove difficult for the court to distinguish in its consideration of the other issues. Last week, Abrego Garcia alleged in a filing that he was severely beaten and psychologically tortured in El Salvador's maximum-security prison, CECOT, when he was detained there earlier this year. Adding to the complexity of the matter is the separate criminal case playing out in Tennessee. The federal judge overseeing that case on Thursday ordered the Trump administration to comply with rules prohibiting Justice Department and DHS officials from making any public statements about Abrego Garcia that could potentially prejudice a jury or impact the integrity of the court proceedings, after his attorneys accused administration officials of months of "extensive and inflammatory extrajudicial comments" against their client that threatened to prejudice his right to a fair trial. "Thus far, the government's unabated public disparagement of [Abrego] has far outpaced its ability to muster actual evidence, notwithstanding its extraordinary efforts to conjure up such evidence," they wrote, warning that such statements could complicate efforts to seat an impartial jury in the Middle District of Tennessee, where his trial is set to take place. It remains to be seen what Xinis will do in Abrego Garcia's civil case, especially as the criminal case in Tennessee proceeds. But her frustration with the Trump administration has been clear in earlier proceedings. For months, Xinis struggled to obtain answers from Trump administration officials on Abrego Garcia's status in El Salvador, as well as what, if any, efforts the Trump government had taken to comply with her order to facilitate his return to the U.S., and at one time suggested she could move to open possible contempt proceedings against the administration. In May, Xinis sparred with the Justice Department lawyers for more than two hours over their lack of candor and compliance with the discovery process and the deadlines set by the court. It was the last public status hearing she presided over before the administration returned Abrego Garcia to U.S. soil. During that hearing, Judge Xinis rebuked the Justice Department for attempting to invoke the state secrets privilege via a footnote that referenced a filing in a separate federal court case, before a different federal judge. She also excoriated the lack of compliance from Trump administration officials, and attempts to press the administration for answers, which she described as beating a "frustrated and dead horse."
