logo
Sir Keir Starmer vows to fix ‘broken NHS' by dragging it ‘from bricks to clicks' in a technological revolution

Sir Keir Starmer vows to fix ‘broken NHS' by dragging it ‘from bricks to clicks' in a technological revolution

Scottish Sun15 hours ago
Meanwhile, Wes Streeting revealed the shock amount of Government MPs that are using fat jabs
NHS TECH BOOST Sir Keir Starmer vows to fix 'broken NHS' by dragging it 'from bricks to clicks' in a technological revolution
SIR Keir Starmer has vowed to fix the 'broken NHS' by dragging it 'from bricks to clicks' in a technological revolution.
The Prime Minister and his Health Secretary Wes Streeting said an NHS app and local medical centres will transform healthcare.
3
Sir Keir Starmer has vowed to fix the 'broken NHS' by dragging it through a technological revolution
Credit: Getty
Launching a ten-year health plan yesterday, they said it was 'change or bust'.
Focus will be pulled out of expensive hospitals and into community health clinics, at-home care and online booking and chat systems.
Experts hailed their ambitions but warned the changes will take time and money, and that similar plans had failed.
Sir Keir said: 'We need to make the NHS fit for the future with technology that is available to us now.'
The 168-page plan said the NHS must stop being a 'technological laggard' and 'make the move from bricks to clicks'.
Sir Keir added: 'Entire industries have reorganised around apps — retail, transport, finance, weather — why not the NHS?
'It will be like having a doctor in your pocket, providing you with 24-hour advice, seven days a week.'
Health Secretary Mr Streeting said: 'People will feel the change over the course of this Parliament and of course this is also a plan for the decade.
'We know the change in our plan is possible because it's already happened.
'We toured the length and breadth of the country and scouted the world for the best examples of reform.
'We will take the best of the NHS to the rest of the NHS.'
Keir will ABOLISH NHS England to bring health service 'into heart of Government'
3
Labour launched a ten-year health plan yesterday
Wes: Half of our MPs on fat jabs
By Sam Blanchard
HALF of Government MPs are using fat jabs and boast about it at work, Wes Streeting claimed yesterday.
The Health Secretary said injections such as Wegovy and Mounjaro are 'the talk of Commons tea rooms'.
He vowed to make them available from the NHS online, in pharmacies or in shopping centres as part of his ten-year health plan.
Mr Streeting said: 'Weight-loss jabs are the talk of the House of Commons. Half my colleagues are on them and are judging the rest of us saying, 'You lot should be on them'.
'I'm bringing to weight loss jabs the principle of fairness. They should be available based on need and not the ability to pay.'
They cost up to £200 a month, bought at chemists.
Boris Johnson and Nadine Dorries admit using them.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The year that permanently shattered our political mainstream
The year that permanently shattered our political mainstream

Telegraph

time22 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The year that permanently shattered our political mainstream

Normalcy favours Labour. The conventional course of events is for a party to win a general election, run into trouble, lose popularity, grit its teeth, recover somewhat – and go on to be re-elected. Only once since the Second World War, during the roller-coaster 1970s, did a Government fail to win again: in 1974, the Conservatives' stiff, luckless Edward Heath was narrowly defeated by Labour's manoeuvrable, wily Harold Wilson. Wilson had lost to Heath four years earlier, but had won in 1966. Sir Alec Douglas Home had lost to Wilson in 1964, but the Conservatives had won a third successive election victory in 1959 under Harold Macmillan. Clement Attlee had lost to Sir Winston Churchill in 1951, but had won a year earlier for Labour in 1950. The same pattern was observable almost half a century on. Sir John Major lost to Tony Blair in 1997, but the Conservatives had won four elections in a row previously, three of them under Margaret Thatcher. Gordon Brown lost in 2010 – turned out by a coalition of Conservatives and Liberal Democrats – but Blair had previously won three elections of his own. Which takes us to Sir Keir Starmer – victorious in 2024 after four terms of Conservative or Tory-led government. At 172 seats, his majority was only seven fewer than Tony Blair's 179 seat margin in 1997. A year into his premiership, he has good reason, if his history is anything to go by, to look forward to the next election with confidence. But history repeats itself until it suddenly stops doing so. And the question that the Prime Minister must surely be asking himself this weekend, as he reflects on the implosion of his authority this week, is whether the orderly, stable, predictable Britain of those election results is becoming more like, say, Italy – a country in which established political parties can unexpectedly collapse. For they hold firm only if their base is solid. What is Labour's? The clue is in the name: Labour, traditionally, was the party of the working class, drawn from the trade unions, in a country that was largely white. Their rivals, the Conservatives, stood for capital, property and, in the broadest of terms, the middle class. Such was the politics of the post-war settlement. In retrospect, it can be seen to have been quietly fading for three quarters of a century – since 1962, to be precise, when a Liberal by-election victory in Orpington heralded the erosion of the two party monopoly in England. Winnie Ewing signalled the rise of the SNP in Scotland five years later, winning a by-election in Hamilton. In the first of 1974's two general elections, the Liberals won six million votes and the SNP gained seven seats. By 1997, the age of three party politics in England had come: the Liberal Democrats won 46 seats. Ten years later, the SNP formed its first Government in Scotland itself, and has held power there ever since. Where is Labour's base in this brave new world? Much of the white working class doesn't vote at all: only three in five voters turned out to the polls last year. Older, working class, and former Leave voters are deserting Labour for Reform. Younger urban voters, many of them women, are opting instead for the Greens, Liberal Democrats and independents. In short, the coalition that Sir Keir built was shallow as it was wide – and the 411 seats he won may turn out to matter less than the 34 per cent of the vote he won it with: the lowest proportion of the vote for any winning party since 1945. Indeed, the combined share for the two main parties, at 57 per cent, was its lowest in modern times. Labour could recover, as history suggests that they will. Or a crisis in the markets could somehow rescue the Conservatives – establishing them in the public imagination as the party least likely to over-spend, over-tax and over-borrow (despite their record in Government in the wake of Brexit). But the electoral trends of this fragmenting politics suggest a hung Parliament – especially if, on the one hand, Labour clings to economic orthodoxy and, on the other, Jeremy Corbyn's new party gains significant traction and adds definition to the emerging coalition of Greens, Islamists and unreconstructed socialists. Meanwhile, the Conservatives lost control of all 15 councils they were defending in May's local elections, have fallen from 24 per cent in the polls last year to 17 per cent, and face hazardous local elections next year – especially in the east of England, where Reform is very strong. As matters stand, they are set to be the smaller of Britain's two Right-wing parties. The last major political party to collapse here as a governing force was the Liberals – dominant for much of the nineteenth century, displaced on the Left by Labour in the twentieth. 'To lose one parent, Mr Worthing, may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness,' wrote Oscar Wilde in The Importance of Being Earnest. One wonders what he would have said of an age that sees the loss of not one but two great political parties as dominant governing forces. It hasn't happened yet and may not happen at all. But a combination of fractured continental-style politics, with a multiplicity of parties and first past the post are set to produce unsettling results. Lord Goodman of Wycombe is a Senior Fellow at Policy Exchange

Trump says US to start sending out tariff letters to trade partners
Trump says US to start sending out tariff letters to trade partners

BBC News

time24 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Trump says US to start sending out tariff letters to trade partners

The US government is to start sending out letters to countries with details of higher US tariff rates that will begin on 1 August, President Donald Trump has 10 to 12 letters will go out on Friday, with more over the coming days, the president told import duties will range from "60% or 70% tariffs to 10 to 20% tariffs," he said, the top end of which is much higher than he had previously has set a deadline of 9 July for negotiations over import tax rates as countries scramble to reach deals. He has previously said there would be a baseline tariff of 10% on many economies up to a 50% did not say which countries' goods would face the US taxes, or whether the rates would only apply to certain goods."My inclination is to send a letter out and say what tariff they're going to be paying," he told reporters on Thursday. "It's just much easier."He added: "We're going to be sending some letters out, starting probably tomorrow." Tariffs are taxes imposed on goods coming into a country, paid by the firms may choose to swallow the higher costs, but ultimately are likely to pass them on to US idea is to have more money flowing into the US government, and also to make foreign goods more expensive, so boosting demand for US-made goods. Trump's comments come before a deadline next week that could see steeper duties imposed on goods from a number of range from the European Union, which was previously threatened with 20% tariffs later raised to 50%, to Japan, which could face 35% tariffs on its UK and US have partly agreed a trade deal, covering US cars and US beef and bioethanol, but not steel.

Word cloud exposes Labour's biggest success is after 1 year
Word cloud exposes Labour's biggest success is after 1 year

The National

time26 minutes ago

  • The National

Word cloud exposes Labour's biggest success is after 1 year

Pollsters More in Common asked voters to list Labour's biggest achievement after one year in power, and the top answer by a landslide was "NOTHING". More in Common are known for their word clouds, like this one for Keir Starmer (which is also features a huge NOTHING), and this one for Rishi Sunak, just before the General Election in July last year. They are fantastic visuals to really get across the overall opinion of the sample set, or better yet, really put the sting in the perception have of you. I've personally never seen a bigger and more brutal NOTHING. READ MORE: Glasgow locals give verdict on Keir Starmer's Labour after one year in power It's followed by the NHS, but that is actually the only other thing you can read without squinting. Or is that just my eyesight? Those asked were also asked to say, in their own words, what they thought the UK Government's biggest mistake in the last year was. "It's one of the most stark word clouds we've seen," UK Director Luke Tyrl wrote on Twitter/X. Winter Fuel Allowance drowns everything else out. But we can also see immigration, benefits, welfare and economy. So all good in Downing Street, aye? With his Chancellor crying in the Commons and his predecessor launching a new party, proclaiming "real change is coming", I'm sure the Prime Minister is having a very happy first anniversary in office.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store