
China might use water as weapon against India by constructing..., it will produce 300000000000...
A new company called China Yajiang Group was also officially unveiled on Saturday. Xinhua reported that this company will be responsible for the construction of this hydropower project with five waterfall dams located in Nyingchi city in the southeast of Tibet. Without giving detailed information about the capacity of the project, Xinhua said that the electricity generated here will be mainly supplied outside Tibet. However, some part of it will also be given for local consumption needs. How much electricity will China generate from Brahmaputra?
It is believed that the construction of this dam will produce 300 billion kilowatt hours of electricity every year. According to Xinhua, this plan of China will play a key role in achieving the goal of reducing carbon emissions and will boost industries like engineering. Along with this, this plan will also create employment opportunities in Tibet. What could be the effect on India-China relations?
This dam can cause tension between China and India, as the Yarlung Tsangpo or Brahmaputra River passes through Arunachal Pradesh region and joins one of the major rivers of India. However, China claims that it will not have any adverse effect on the lower areas. Chinese environmentalists have long been concerned about the irreversible impact of dam construction in the Brahmaputra Valley, where the river falls to a height of 2,000 meters (6,560 feet) in an area of 50 kilometers (31 miles). The area is a national nature reserve and one of the major biodiversity centers of the country. What is the threat to India from the dam?
The Brahmaputra River originates from the Angsi Glacier near Mount Kailash in Tibet. It is known as Yarlung Tsangpo in China. This river flows for a distance of 3000 km from Tibet and enters Bangladesh via Arunachal Pradesh, Assam. In Bangladesh, it is known as Jamuna. After this, Brahmaputra merges with the Ganges River. Media reports show that China will need to dig at least four 20 km long tunnels around Namcha Barwa mountain for this huge project in Tibet. This will divert the flow of Brahmaputra, the longest river in Tibet and reduce the flow of water in the lower areas. How can China use water as weapon against India?
China can use the water of the Brahmaputra River as a weapon against India. If needed, it can release the water stored in the dam in Tibet without any prior notice. This can cause floods in the lower areas of Arunachal Pradesh and Assam and worsen the situation. Construction of a large dam affects residential areas as well as forests and wild animals. The river brings silt which is rich in minerals and is essential for agriculture and sustainability of the coastal areas. Construction of the dam could affect the flow of silt and impact the biodiversity of Arunachal Pradesh.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
India–China thaw: Strategic signalling, not concession
Earlier this month, it was announced that India is resuming the issuance of tourist visas for Chinese citizens. Just before this, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and National Security Advisor Ajit Doval visited China for meetings of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar travelled to China shortly after and met with Chinese President Xi Jinping. This was the first such meeting since the Galwan Valley clash of 2020. This is a strategic signal from India amidst new circumstances created by some of the most powerful states in the existing international system. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India's recent uptick in diplomatic ties with China is not a concession; instead, it reflects India's calculated posture of strategic signalling. With the bilateral trade agreement with the US currently stalled and the global economic landscape shifting rapidly, India is engaging with China not to resolve old disputes but to gain strategic leverage through the creation of optics. Since late 2024, India and China have entered into a deliberate but structural phase to engage with each other to reduce tensions along the Himalayan border. After experiencing four years of protected standoff following the deadly Galwan face-off, the diplomatic levers have shifted. The latest phase began with an important breakthrough on October 21, 2024, when both countries agreed on a border pact, letting each other patrol at previously restricted friction points like Depsang and Demchok. The agreement helped significantly in restoring trust and establishing communication between two powerful neighbours. After this agreement there has been a flurry of diplomatic exchanges between both the powers. These consistent meetings, though, suggest a pattern in which both nations are trying to reduce mistrust and restore a dialogue to prevent further crisis. Both nations are engaging at a greater pace than they ever were doing. For India, this is about asserting sovereignty while avoiding conflict. For China, it is about projecting stability along its southern frontier as it faces growing pressure in the Western Pacific and domestic economic headwinds. Yet the question remains: Why is India doing this now when the Line of Actual Control (LAC) is still contested? New Delhi is pursuing economic de-risking, not decoupling from China. Despite all the geopolitical friction, India remains deeply entwined with Chinese capital, tech, and rare earth dependencies. India acknowledges this fact and is opting for stability management. Chasing a compartmentalised relationship that seeks to discuss boundary questions without foreclosing economic activities. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, India finds itself in utmost precarity when China also responded with bans and curbs on rare earth materials. Additionally, in an attempt to limit technology transfers to India, along with skilled workers, the Chinese government has recalled hundreds of Chinese engineers and technicians from Foxconn's iPhone factories in India. Foxconn is meeting the shortages by bringing in Taiwanese technicians. India is neither unaware nor unresponsive. Similarly, the suspicion runs through: Will this ongoing round of discussions succeed in producing lasting peace, or is it merely a tactical de-escalation? Historical experience suggests otherwise. The Galwan incursions occurred in the backdrop of the Wuhan summit in 2018 and the Chennai informal summit in 2019, which were also celebrated as turning points. Also, the fundamental issue, the differing perceptions of the LAC, remains unresolved. Confidence-building is underway, but confidence itself remains fragile. The recent diplomatic engagements in Beijing, including discussions on 'de-escalation' and 'normalising people-to-people exchange', occur against a backdrop where India perceives the complete resolution of the border issue as a prerequisite for normal relations, while China prefers to compartmentalise the border issue, pushing for cooperation while maintaining territorial claims and even military posturing. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While both sides have expressed a desire for a 'positive trajectory' and optimism for 'stable and constructive ties', the talks were steered towards managing disagreements rather than fundamentally resolving them. Opening direct air services and the Kailash Manasarovar yatra are positive steps but do not address the core issue of strategic and territorial disputes. Beijing, on the other hand, strongly objected to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's public birthday greeting to the Dalai Lama in July 2025, reiterating its opposition to any official engagement with the Tibetan spiritual leader. While both nations appear to agree on the need for immediate stability, their long-term goals diverge. India seeks a restoration of the pre-2020 border status and a rules-based order in Asia and elsewhere; China, meanwhile, aims to assert regional influence with and without direct confrontation, and examples range from Doklam to Galwan to China trying to wipe out the identity of Tibet, building the biggest dam on the Yarlung Tsanpo to throttle the downstream Brahmaputra River in India, and so on. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Operation Sindoor also served as an indirect test of tensions between India and China. Beijing's response, calling India's retaliation against terrorism 'unfortunate', caused a rift in New Delhi. While urging 'restraint on all sides", China notably refrained from denouncing the terror provocation or addressing India's security concerns. After Operation Sindoor, the deputy chief of army staff for India also issued a warning on Sino-Pakistan collusion during the operation. If there's one significant shift in India's approach, it is a more layered diplomacy—engaging China bilaterally but also within the framework of multilateral forums like the SCO and Brics, while continuing strategic balancing elsewhere. It is not containment nor alignment, but calibrated coexistence. For Beijing too, stabilising ties with Delhi serves a larger goal: preventing a second front while managing the US pressure in East Asia. Given that the US has lifted export restrictions on Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) tools and software bound for Chinese buyers, and the EU is desperately engaging with China, there is no clarity on whether India can ever count on Western powers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India understands China as a threat and has been at the receiving end of more conflicts, military and otherwise, with China than any other country in the world. However, it is also a neighbour and a powerful one, with which India will have to manage its relationship. There is no better way in such a complex scenario except diplomacy and optics. Sriparna Pathak is a professor of China Studies at OP Jindal Global University and a senior fellow at the Jindal India Institute. Gaurav Sen is a senior research fellow at the School of International Studies, JNU, New Delhi. He is the author of the book 'Peril of the Pacific: Military Balance and Battle for Taiwan'. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
US tariff hike puts Indian auto parts and tyre exporters at disadvantage: ICRA
The Indian automotive component and tyre industry could face significant headwinds following the United States' decision to impose a 25 per cent tariff on all Indian imports starting August 7, ratings agency ICRA has cautioned. With the US accounting for a substantial share — 27 per cent — of India's auto component exports and 17 per cent of tyre exports, the move puts domestic manufacturers at a strategic disadvantage compared to peers from countries like Japan, Vietnam, and Indonesia, which enjoy lower or preferential tariff structures. 'The imposition of the tariff has raised concerns across India's automotive and tyre sectors, both of which have sizeable exposure to the US market,' ICRA noted in its analysis released on Saturday. The higher tariffs are expected to erode the competitiveness of Indian suppliers, particularly in segments such as off-highway vehicles and replacement tyres. Indian tyre makers, who earlier held a pricing advantage over Chinese exporters, may now lose ground to Southeast Asian rivals benefiting from better trade terms. What are the solutions? To mitigate the impact, ICRA expects Indian exporters to explore new geographies and double down on cost optimisation efforts. However, near-term margin pressures are likely, especially for firms with high dependence on US-bound shipments. India's auto components industry recorded a turnover of $80.2 billion (₹6.73 lakh crore) in FY25, registering a 10 per cent growth over the previous year. Exports during the same period rose by 8 per cent to $22.9 billion (₹1.92 lakh crore). Despite this growth, the new tariff regime threatens to slow momentum in the export-driven segments of the sector unless favourable trade negotiations or alternate market strategies are implemented quickly.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
China's Brahmaputra hydropower project raises alarm among Tibetan experts, downstream nations
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Dharamshala: The construction of a mega hydropower dam by China on the Brahmaputra River in Tibet has triggered serious concerns among Tibetan experts in exile, who warn of its potential impact on the environment, regional geopolitics, and the livelihoods of downstream countries like India and proposed dam, expected to be larger than the Three Gorges Dam, is coming up in the seismically active Medog region. Experts say the project could alter the river's natural flow and place downstream nations at risk of floods and Palmo, a researcher at the Tibet Policy Institute of the Tibetan government in-exile, told ANI, "This is not surprising at all. For the past many decades China has been looking into ways to exploit these water resources. Last year China announced that they had approved the construction of the dam and now recently Chinese government have announced that they are going to start the construction."She pointed out the lack of transparency around the project's design and impact. "The more concerning issue is that they have not announced that how this dam will be constructed and what impact it will have on the people. They should also take into consideration the concerns of lower downstream countries."Palmo emphasized that China has not shared key details about the project. "Overall they have not shared the information about the project it can have impact on the environment, the people who are living along the river and it can also have geopolitical impact on the region."Highlighting environmental risks, she said, "The region is itself seismically active and there are many recent incidents where there are number of landslides and earthquakes happening in the region. So, by constructing such a huge dam which would twice the size of Three Gorges Dam, can create huge impact on environment and the people."She added, "The secrecy and the Chinese government not sharing this information also make people more concerned about what impact it has. If there is a transparency from the Chinese government side, it can also ease the tensions among people and other countries."Palmo warned that downstream countries remain vulnerable. "Since it is transboundary river, many of the downstream countries like India and Bangladesh, they are heavily dependent on rivers. So most of the agriculture in Assam are also dependent on the rivers. Rivers are also considered a lifeline for Bangladesh.""So by holding so much of water in these dams it can cause anytime floods and droughts in downstream countries. It is like downstream countries are at the mercy of Chinese government," she Tsering, deputy speaker of the Tibetan parliament in-exile, echoed similar concerns, stating, "It is a great concern. China has the maximum number of hydro dams in the world and still they are not satisfied with that. The Three Gorges Dam was supposed to be the biggest Dam, now they are building bigger than Three Gorges Dam over Brahmaputra."She stressed that the project's location in a seismic zone could pose dangers to all riparian nations. "I think it is a very serious concern the world needs to take note of because it is in a seismic prone area of south Asia, if something happens to dam what will happen to all the riparian nations."She also pointed out China's potential use of the project as a political tool. "China might use hydro power as leverage to have any deal with rest of countries where these waters are flowing and next to that the world must take into consideration that by building all these power grid they are selling power to different countries."Tsering said the Tibetan parliament-in-exile has been trying to raise the issue. "Whenever the Indian parliament session is held, we always go there and try to bring it in the notice to the members of the parliament. Since more than two years we have been talking about this dam the one in Medog is coming up. India should take a note of it and we are sure that they will look into it."Explaining the meaning of "leverage", she added, "When I say leverage, it means they are going to weaponise the hydropower dams. When the tap is in their hands towards the northeastern side, whenever they want they can use it as a flood generating dam or whenever our crops are good they may just close it and bring drought to our farmers. These are related to the livelihood and existence of communities in the south Asian countries."