Hyundai Ioniq 5 Drives Nearly 20,000 KM to the Arctic Ocean on a Single Charge… Sort Of
The man behind the wheel, Patrick Nadeau, set off from Hyundai Canada's headquarters in Markham on April 24, reaching the remote town of Tuktoyaktuk, Northwest Territories, by June 10. His car? A showroom-spec 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 Preferred AWD with the Ultimate Package, wrapped for visibility, but otherwise untouched. The real test wasn't range. It was resilience — and the Ioniq 5 passed on both fronts.
Source: Hyundai Media Centre
What It Took To Reach The Arctic
This was no lightly padded road trip. Over nearly 20,000 kilometers, Nadeau's Ioniq 5 averaged 18.9 kWh/100 km, needed 87 charging stops, and carried 400 pounds of gear — including a full-size spare. Total cost in electricity? Just $1,403 CAD — or around $1,025 USD — for a journey that would've cost more than twice that with gas.
Notably, this wasn't the high-performance Ioniq 5 N, the $66,000 beast that Hyundai recently dropped a competitive lease deal on. This was the more grounded, long-range version, and that made the feat more relevant — especially for real-world EV buyers who are less interested in drift modes and more concerned with how their EV will perform on a winter highway.
Of course, for those still cross-shopping the Ioniq 5 N, experts have suggested there might be better value in trims like the Limited or Preferred unless you're heading straight for a race track. This journey underscores that point — a factory-standard Ioniq 5 handled thousands of kilometers, gravel roads, flooded ferry crossings, and wildfire detours with zero mechanical complaints. It's what you'd call a stress test in the real world.
Source: Hyundai Media Centre
This Wasn't Just About Driving
Hyundai also used the trip to support its Hope on Wheels campaign, shooting virtual reality content that will soon be delivered to children's hospitals across Canada. The goal: provide young patients with immersive VR experiences of Canada's north, bringing the Arctic into treatment rooms through the eyes of the Ioniq 5's windshield.
That mission aligned nicely with the Ioniq 5's broader appeal — a car that's as comfortable in slushy city commutes as it is charging through the Yukon. As we saw in our review of the refreshed 2025 Ioniq 5 Limited, the car blends performance, comfort, and usability in a way that's steadily won over skeptics.
Source: Hyundai Media Centre
From Ice Roads To High Speeds
After reaching the Arctic Ocean and pausing briefly in Ucluelet, British Columbia during the 2026 Ioniq 9 media launch, Nadeau turned the journey home into a rapid-fire sprint, averaging over 1,000 km per day. A trip that started as a slow-paced sightseeing mission became a no-nonsense return leg that proved the Ioniq 5's rapid charging ability and fatigue-free ride comfort.
No charging miracles. No super-secret prototype tweaks. Just a regular Ioniq 5 and a bit of planning — the same kind of trip more EV drivers may soon find themselves attempting as infrastructure improves.
In short, this wasn't just a road trip. It was a rolling case study — not in speculation, but in execution. The Ioniq 5 didn't just survive the Arctic. It made it look easy.
About the Author
Max Taylor View Profile
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Blog
6 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Will Mazda Face Buyer Backlash for the 2026 CX-5's Touchscreen Controls?
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. The new CX-5's interior tech pivots hard Mazda's redesigned 2026 CX-5 is undoubtedly attractive, but it isn't exactly a dramatic change, the way the fifth-generation Hyundai Santa Fe was when it debuted in 2024. Yes, the 2025 CX-5 is bigger, especially between the wheels where it counts most, but its sheet metal is largely evolutionary, coupled with a fresh face and tail, slab doors like the CX-70/90, and a stronger resemblance to the rest of the brand's SUV lineup. Audi A5 replaces A4: So, what's changed? Watch More The cabin has been redone in excellent Mazda fashion, and the changes are more significant inside than outside. Materials quality and refinement both have improved, on top of what was already one of the best interiors in its class. The biggest change, however, might not be perceived as an improvement. The new infotainment touchscreen (12.9-inch standard, 15.6-inch optional) now incorporates climate and audio functions, replacing the excellent physical controls for which Mazda has been known. Will there be a sales backlash from would-be buyers of the new CX-5? Infotainment details The optional 15.6-inch center infotainment touchscreen is the biggest one ever fitted into a Mazda. The last CX-5's screen was a rather small 10.2 inches, so even the change to the standard 12.9-inch screen is a marked improvement. The new system is now Google-based rather than being a proprietary Mazda operating system, which was criticized as being overly simplistic and dated in its appearance. In addition to built-in Google Maps, the new system will utilize Google Assistant for voice commands, providing improved accuracy and a better user experience. Owners will also have access to the Google Play Store for car-friendly apps. A controversial change 2026 Mazda CX-5 — Source: Mazda Mazda owners, by and large, love the physical controls in their vehicles. My family owns two Mazda vehicles, and one of the reasons we chose our Mazda6 and CX-9 was because of their excellent switchgear. Mazda's physical controls are attractive, well-made, and easy to operate. The physical audio, infotainment, and climate controls from the 2025 CX-5 are nowhere to be seen in the 2026 CX-5. Their absence has already sparked controversy, not because on-screen controls are uncommon in the industry, but because Mazda has had a longstanding reputation for tactile, driver-focused interiors and controls. While some may view this as a necessary evolution to keep pace with tech-savvy competitors, others, especially brand loyalists, may view this as a move in the wrong direction. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. 2025 Mazda CX-5 — Source: Mazda The 2025 CX-5's climate controls consisted of two knurled metallic knobs that flanked a digital screen. Above and below the screen were two rows of buttons. It was one of the easiest systems to use while driving, and none of the controls utilized haptic feedback. Its Commander rotary control knob between the seats made a touchscreen unnecessary since you could rotate, toggle, and press it to find and activate functions. The learning curve was easy, and you could operate the system quickly and easily. The Commander control knob is no longer available on the 2026 model, and only three physical buttons remain on the center stack for defrost, defog, and hazard lights. Instead of a central rotary knob, everything from audio settings to climate control is now managed through the center screen. It seems anti-Mazda, frankly. The potential backlash 2026 Mazda CX-5 — Source: Mazda Mazda's previous infotainment systems disabled touchscreen inputs while driving as a safety precaution, relying instead on the rotary controller and steering wheel controls. On some models, you could use a touchscreen only while phone mirroring. With the controller now removed in the 2026 model, only being able to use the touchscreen when parked could frustrate drivers who are forced to rely on voice commands or complex menus while in motion. Again, this seems at odds with Mazda's driver-centric cabins. Forums are already rife with criticisms from current Mazda owners who refuse to upgrade to the 2026 CX-5 until a refresh brings them back. We don't blame them. 2026 Mazda CX-5 — Source: Mazda Consumer studies and feedback from drivers reflect an overwhelming preference for physical controls over touchscreen controls. Touchscreens demand more attention than knobs or switches, which are typically easier to locate and use by feel. There is no muscle memory for non-tactile controls; you are forced to take your eyes off the road and onto the screen in order to find them, and there's no guarantee that you'll hit what you're aiming for. Mazda says that the new CX-5 continues the driver-centric focus by providing an enhanced voice command experience, but statistics show that only about 17 percent of American drivers use voice commands to execute vehicular functions. That number is sure to grow, but it doesn't represent the vast majority of drivers. 2026 Mazda CX-5 — Source: Mazda Mazda further justifies the shift as a way to offer better software integration, faster response times, and smarter features through Google's connected services. In doing so, the brand also aligns itself with competitors like Volvo, Honda, and GM, all of which have adopted Google-based infotainment systems in recent years. This trend could be upended by regulatory pressure, though. Case in point, beginning in 2026, Euro NCAP (the European car safety assessment program) will begin docking safety points for vehicles that fail to provide physical buttons for essential functions like climate control and hazard lights. Mazda may find itself forced to reintroduce some tactile elements just to maintain strong safety ratings in Europe and potentially North America. 2026 Mazda CX-5 — Source: Mazda Final thoughts While the 2026 CX‑5 is undoubtedly more connected and feature-rich, the tradeoff between elegant design and practical, everyday usability is already generating debate. On the upside, the interface looks clean and modern. It offers better voice control through Google Assistant, potentially allowing drivers to manage tasks hands-free. However, drivers will essentially have to learn a new system, lose tactile feedback, and take their eyes off the road more frequently. Many loyal Mazda owners who have stuck with Mazda because of its great physical controls may look elsewhere, as others, like Toyota, still have their latest models, like the 2026 RAV4, outfitted with switchgear. That said, younger, tech-forward customers may be drawn to the CX-5 for the same reasons Mazda loyalists may leave. For them, the CX‑5's digital dashboard and Google-native systems may have been a long time coming. The 2026 Mazda CX-5's interior comes as a bit of a surprise, as many automakers are shifting in the other direction by returning to physical controls. This new cabin philosophy for Mazda is unlike any of the brand's current models, and it could set the tone for the rest of the lineup. On the other hand, the fully digital experience might be short-lived for the brand with customer pushback, regulatory pressure, and safety concerns. We will have to give our assessment once we get to review the 2026 Mazda CX-5 for ourselves. About the Author Amos Kwon View Profile
Auto Blog
6 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Can the Hyundai Ioniq 6 N Dethrone the Tesla Model 3 Performance?
Performance figures show the new Hyundai is more than a match for the Tesla Model 3 Performance Tesla arguably kicked off the introduction of performance EV models with the Tesla Roadster way back in 2008, but it's a wildly different landscape now, and you can purchase a very fast EV from automakers like BMW, Ford, and everything in between. One of the most competent performance EVs out there is the Hyundai IONIQ 5 N, and now, there's a sedan version in town. Sharing a powertrain but getting smaller and cheaper means the new IONIQ 6 N has the Tesla Model 3 Performance squarely in its sights. Hyundai IONIQ 6 N Tesla Model 3 Performance, poundage, and price: How much trouble is the Tesla Model 3 in? The IONIQ 6 N takes an early lead on the Tesla Model 3 Performance — on paper, anyway. The IONIQ 6 N shares a powertrain with its predecessor, the 5 N, which means up to 641 horsepower on tap when you click into N-Grin Boost mode, and 567 pound-feet of torque available whenever. Hyundai quotes a zero to 60 mph time of 3.2 seconds. Both the IONIQ 6 N and the Tesla rely on all-wheel drive and dual electric motors, but while the Tesla Model 3 Performance isn't a slouch, it loses the initial comparison. Base horsepower and torque figures sit at 510 and 554, respectively. Surprisingly, though, Tesla claims a quicker zero to 60 mph time, estimating the sprint takes just 2.9 seconds. One reason for the quicker sprint to 60 mph might be the Tesla's lower curb weight. The fastest Model 3 tips the scales at a fairly light 4,054 pounds. We don't have official numbers for Hyundai's IONIQ 6 N, but we can take a guess. Comparing the IONIQ 5 to the IONIQ 5 N reveals the standard all-wheel drive car weighs 4,608 pounds, while the N version weighs 4861 pounds. A regular IONIQ 6 with all-wheel drive weighs 4,462 pounds. Assuming the 6 N gains the same amount of weight from the full N treatment, we can guess the IONIQ 6 N's weight at around 4,715 pounds. That 700-pound disadvantage relative to the Model 3 Performance could cost it first place on the dragstrip. So, finally, there's the price. A bigger horsepower figure doesn't always mean a higher MSRP, but the IONIQ 6 N will start a little bit higher than the Tesla Model 3 Performance. Hyundai hasn't released pricing yet, but since the IONIQ 6 is around $5,000 less expensive than the IONIQ 5, the base MSRP should be right around $60,000. That's a $5,000 premium compared to the Tesla, which starts at $54,990. The Tesla also likely touts a longer range. The mechanically identical 5 N offers an estimated 221 miles, while the Model 3 Performance makes it 298 miles on a full charge. More money for identical performance? A deeper dive says otherwise On the surface, the IONIQ 6 N may look decidedly more like a sidegrade than an upgrade compared to the Tesla Model 3 Performance. However, there are also other key areas where the Hyundai sedan should excel. The Hyundai IONIQ 6 N gets massive brake rotors that dwarf the Tesla Model 3's, measuring 15.7 inches in the front and 14.1 inches in the rear. That's about an inch bigger in the back and nearly two in front. While both vehicles share 20-inch aluminum wheels, only the IONIQ 6 N offers 275-section tires on all four wheels. Finally, the IONIQ 6 N offers a lauded 'fake shift,' which allows drivers to 'change gears' via paddle shifters. These differences may seem small, but they could make a big difference, especially in the kind of driving situations the cars are ostensibly built for. IONIQ 6 N Tesla Model 3 Final thoughts The Hyundai IONIQ 6 N and Tesla Model 3 Performance are more similar than different, and both look to be incredibly competent performance sedans. Do we think the IONIQ 6 N is objectively superior to the Model 3 Performance? We'll have to drive it to find out. That said, it certainly has some clear advantages. At the very least, the competition will force Tesla to take notes. About the Author Steven Paul View Profile
Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
Despite tariffs, it's still America first for Asia's legacy automakers
SEOUL/TOKYO, July 15 (Reuters) - Toyota (7203.T), opens new tab and Hyundai Motor ( opens new tab may have a beef with U.S. protectionism, but they have one thing in common with President Donald Trump: when it comes to global car markets, it's America first for Asia's legacy automakers. Trump's tariffs on imported automobiles have upended the outlook for the global industry, yet the U.S. remains by far the most important market for Japan's Toyota, South Korea's Hyundai and Asian rivals including Honda (7267.T), opens new tab and Nissan (7201.T), opens new tab. North America accounts for at least 40% of the revenue at both Toyota and Hyundai, filings show. The market's importance is unlikely to change any time soon, industry insiders and analysts said, especially with China, now the world's biggest auto market, dominated by homegrown electric vehicle makers such as BYD ( opens new tab. Those Asian legacy carmakers with more robust margins and a strong hybrid lineup - such as Toyota, Hyundai, Kia Corp ( opens new tab and to a lesser extent Honda - are more likely able to weather the U.S. tariffs storm, and potentially take market share from weaker players like Nissan, analysts said. "The environment that we're in now is becoming increasingly harsh and uncertain, starting with U.S. tariffs," Mazda executive officer Noriyuki Takimura told reporters at an event in Tokyo last week. Mazda (7261.T), opens new tab aims to strike a balance between "defensive" measures like cost-cuts and "offensive" ones like strengthening its product lineup, he said. Two Hyundai insiders and two Japanese auto executives separately told Reuters they had no intention of downsizing their U.S. businesses in response to tariffs, even as they acknowledged the difficulties ahead. All four spoke on condition of anonymity. The U.S. is Toyota's biggest market in terms of vehicles. It sold 2.3 million vehicles there in 2024, including its Lexus brand, accounting for more than a fifth of its global total. As a source of revenue, North America was second only to Japan in the last financial year. Hyundai's North American revenue was the highest in almost a decade last year. Kim Chang-ho, an analyst at Korea Investment & Securities, estimated it generates around 60% of its profits from the U.S., thanks to higher vehicle prices. Mocked in the U.S. in the 1980s for its perceived shoddy quality, Hyundai doubled down there around a decade ago, especially after tensions between Beijing and Seoul and the rise of domestic EV makers saw it start to lose ground in China. "After years of putting in effort, our brand is finally gaining recognition in the United States," one of the Hyundai insiders said. "So we will not take our hands off the U.S." The U.S. has seen a surge in demand for hybrids as consumers have become more concerned about the battery range, price and charging hassles of EVs. Fuel-efficient models such as hybrids will be a key driver to gaining market share, said Morningstar analyst Vincent Sun. Toyota, Hyundai and Kia have particularly strong hybrid offerings. So far, most legacy Asian automakers have avoided raising prices in the U.S. and stronger players are likely to continue to hold off doing so, despite lower profitability, analysts said. Instead, the focus will likely be on taking market share from lower-margin rivals like Nissan and Stellantis, analysts said. 'It will shape up like a game of chicken," said Kim Sung-rae, an analyst at Hanwha Investment & Securities. "Those who will hold up well will emerge as winners.' Over time, tariffs could be a catalyst to help drive consolidation in the industry, or at least deepen existing tie-ups. Investors wonder if tariffs could push Nissan to revive merger talks with Honda that fell apart this year. Mazda, which is 5.1% owned by Toyota, and Subaru, which is 21% owned by Toyota, could become more reliant on the bigger company. While Hyundai and Kia have three U.S. factories, they still import about two-thirds of the vehicles sold there. Toyota manufactured 1.3 million vehicles in the U.S. last year, equal to 54% of the vehicles it sold there. Japanese automakers have invested more than $66 billion in U.S. manufacturing since the 1980s, building some two dozen plants, according to the JAMA auto lobby group. At a White House event attended by Trump in March, Hyundai announced a $21 billion investment plan, including a new steel factory, and a plan to boost U.S. production capacity to 1.2 million vehicles a year. The tariffs are likely to encourage Japanese and South Korean automakers to invest more into expanding production capacity and localising supply chains to protect their positions, said Justinas Liuima of research firm Euromonitor International. They will also continue to benefit from one aspect of U.S. protectionism: higher tariffs on Chinese EVs, which means they don't face the same Chinese competition in the U.S. that they do in emerging Asian markets, Liuima said. China ships very few cars to the United States, which imposed a 100% tariff on imported Chinese EVs under the previous administration of President Joe Biden. One of the Japanese executives said it wasn't a matter of simply boosting U.S. production, as high costs, especially of labour, would also weigh on profitability. "It is really a game-changer," Julie Boote, analyst at Pelham Smithers Associates in London, said about the potential longer-term tariff impact. Some automakers have held off giving guidance that takes into account tariffs for the full year, meaning investors may be in store for a rude awakening as companies adjust forecasts as they report quarterly earnings, she said. "There's lots of talk that it's already priced in. I don't really think it is."
