Social Security Benefit Cuts Are Coming: Here's the Timeline of How We Got Here and the Latest Forecast of When These Cuts Can Take Place
The latest Board of Trustees Report estimates that the 75-year funding deficit for Social Security has ballooned to more than $25 trillion.
Even worse, cash outflows from the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund, which doles out monthly benefits to retired workers and survivor beneficiaries, are accelerating.
More than a half-dozen variables have played a role in Social Security's weakening financial outlook.
The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook ›
For many of the nearly 53 million retired workers who receive a monthly Social Security benefit, this income is indispensable. In 2023, the Social Security program pulled 22 million people above the federal poverty line, including 16.3 million adults aged 65 and older. Further, it's helped lower the federal poverty rate for those 65 and older, from an estimated 37.3% without the program to 10.1% with Social Security income (as of 2023), based on an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Despite the foundational role Social Security plays in the financial well-being of retired workers, this program is on anything but stable ground. Let's examine how America's leading retirement program got into this mess and lay out the updated timeline for when benefit cuts are expected to take place.
Every year since the first Social Security benefit check was mailed out in 1940, the Social Security Board of Trustees has published a report that intricately details the financial health of the program. This report tracks every dollar collected in income during the previous year and documents where every dollar is spent.
But what tends to garner the most attention is the Trustees' long-term forecast, which is defined as the 75 years following the publishing of a report. The Trustees take into account an assortment of fiscal and monetary policy changes, as well as demographic shifts, to estimate how financially sound Social Security will be over the long run.
Shortly after the bipartisan Social Security Amendments of 1983 were signed into law, the Trustees Report pointed to long-term trouble. Every report since 1985 has cautioned of a long-term funding shortfall. In simple terms, the estimated income to be collected over the 75 years following the release of a report is projected to be insufficient to cover program outlays, which include benefits (plus annual cost-of-living adjustments, or COLAs) and, to a far lesser extent, the administrative costs to oversee Social Security.
The 2025 Social Security Board of Trustees Report was issued less than two weeks ago, and it estimates the long-term unfunded obligation has ballooned to $25.1 trillion through 2099. While this is a daunting figure, it's not the most pressing problem for Social Security or the program's beneficiaries.
The glaring issue is the forecast for the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund, which is responsible for dishing out monthly benefits to retired workers and survivors of deceased workers.
In 2020, the OASI's asset reserves expanded by $7.4 billion to $2.812 trillion, which is just shy of its all-time high of $2.82 trillion (set in 2017). Every year since then, the OASI has outlaid more in capital than it's collected in income. The latest Trustees Report points to this outflow accelerating in the coming years, from a documented $103.2 billion outflow in 2024 to an estimated $441.9 billion outflow from the OASI in 2032. By 2033, the OASI's asset reserves are expected to be completely exhausted.
The silver lining here is that the OASI isn't required to have a cent in its asset reserves to continue doling out benefits to eligible retired workers and survivors of deceased workers. The 12.4% payroll tax on earned income generates the bulk of income collected by Social Security, which means payments will continue as long as Americans keep working and paying their taxes. In short, there's no danger of bankruptcy or insolvency for current or future generations of retirees.
But the 2025 Social Security Board of Trustees Report does indicate that the existing payout schedule, inclusive of COLAs, is unsustainable beyond 2033. If nothing is done to reform Social Security, OASI benefits may need to be cut by 23% in just eight years, which is a steeper reduction than was forecast in the previous Trustees Report.
Here's the prevailing question on the minds of current and future beneficiaries: How did Social Security get into this mess?
What can be said with concrete certainty is that the notions of Congress "stealing" funds and undocumented migrants receiving traditional Social Security benefits are both completely false and nothing more than internet myths. Every cent of Social Security's trust funds is accounted for and updated monthly online, and both legal and undocumented migrants are a financial benefit to the Social Security program.
Rather, Social Security's shaky foundation can be boiled down to seven variables, some of which are more apparent than others:
Baby boomers retiring: As baby boomers leave the workforce in greater numbers, there simply aren't enough new workers to replace them. This has led to a steady decline in the worker-to-beneficiary ratio.
Increased longevity: When the first Social Security retired-worker benefit was mailed in January 1940, the average life expectancy in this country was about 63 years. In 2023, the average life expectancy stood at 78.4 years, according to mortality data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Social Security wasn't designed to pay benefits to the average retiree for close to two decades.
Rising income inequality: In 1983, approximately 90% of all earned income (wages and salaries, but not investment income) was subject to Social Security's 12.4% payroll tax. But as of 2023, only 83% of earned income was applicable to the payroll tax. This shows that wages and salaries for high earners are increasing at a faster pace than the National Average Wage Index, which is what controls the upper bound of the taxable earnings cap associated with the payroll tax.
A record-low fertility rate: According to the CDC, the U.S. fertility rate (projected births per woman over their lifetime) hit a record low in 2023. Couples are waiting longer to get married and have children, with some clearly concerned about the economics of bringing a child into the world. If low birth rates persist, it'll further weigh on an already challenged worker-to-beneficiary ratio.
A sizable decline in legal net migration into the U.S.: Another culprit has been the sizable drop-off in legal net migration into the U.S. since 1997. Social Security counts on younger workers migrating to the U.S. and contributing via the payroll tax for decades before one day earning a retirement benefit of their own. Fewer legal migrants equate to less payroll tax being collected.
Fed monetary policy: The nation's central bank deserves a piece of the blame, as well. A period of historically low interest rates throughout the 2010s sent Treasury bond yields plummeting. Social Security's asset reserves are required by law to be invested in special-issue, interest-bearing, government bonds. When yields plunged, so did Social Security's ability to generate meaningful interest income.
Congressional inaction: Lawmakers are to blame for Social Security's woes, but not for the mythical belief that they've stolen funds. Rather, the inability of Republicans and Democrats to find common ground is kicking the can on an important issue, widening the long-term funding deficit, and making an eventual fix even costlier for working Americans.
Make no mistake about it, there are solutions from both sides of the political aisle that would strengthen Social Security. But with 60 votes needed in the Senate to amend the Social Security Act, there's no chance of fortifying this all-important social program until lawmakers from both parties find common ground. All the while, benefit cuts are now just an estimated eight years away.
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income.
One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these strategies.The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Social Security Benefit Cuts Are Coming: Here's the Timeline of How We Got Here and the Latest Forecast of When These Cuts Can Take Place was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
My dad, the main breadwinner, just lost his job at 61. And he fears he won't find work at his age — what now?
Losing a job can be a huge blow at any age. But when you're in your 60s, it can be an even harder struggle. Although it's illegal for employers to discriminate against job candidates based on age, it happens frequently and it's hard to prove if it happens to you. AARP reports that 74% of job seekers aged 50 and over have concerns that their older age will be an impediment to being hired. If you're in the position in question, it could make for a difficult financial situation. Plus, you're still a year away from being able to claim Social Security benefits. While you're old enough to access a 401(k) or IRA without facing an early withdrawal penalty, tapping one of those accounts at 61 could lead to a savings shortfall later on. There's also the issue of health insurance to think about. If you were covered through your job, you're still four years away from being eligible for Medicare. Here's how to handle this unfortunate situation on a short- and longer-term basis. I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Losing a job can be a shock, so you may need a few days or even weeks before you feel ready to dive into a job search. But one thing you should do immediately is file for unemployment benefits. Typically, you're eligible for up to six months of benefits if you lose a job through no fault of your own and meet your state's earnings requirements. Unemployment benefits won't replace your full paycheck, but at least you'll have a portion covered. You should also talk to your employer about severance, if applicable. And if there's no severance package, see if you're entitled to be paid out on accrued vacation or sick days you never used. That could add some extra money in your bank account while you figure out your next steps. Additionally, it's time to assess your emergency fund to see how many months of bills it can cover. If you're able to cut back on spending, between lower expenses, your wife's paycheck and unemployment benefits, you may be able to get away with minimally tapping your emergency fund while you start your job search. You'll also need to figure out next steps regarding health insurance — check to see If you can get onto your wife's job plan (if it offers health benefits). The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) may be an option, as it allows you to retain your employer coverage for a period of 18 to 36 months. But it can prove to be extremely expensive, since you're effectively paying the unsubsidized rate for your old health plan. You may find that a marketplace plan through is cheaper, especially if you qualify for a subsidy. Read more: You don't have to be a millionaire to gain access to . In fact, you can get started with as little as $10 — here's how This is the time to be aggressively job-hunting. Until you're able to find a full-time job, it's important to preserve your savings — both your emergency fund and your retirement nest egg. If you're still unemployed at the six-month mark, look at gig work, a side hustle or a part-time job when your unemployment benefits run out. That way, you'll have some income coming in while you continue looking for a full-time job. It's also important to look at your retirement portfolio carefully. If you weren't planning to use that money for another five years or longer, you may have a larger portion of your portfolio in stocks. If it's looking like you may need to tap into your nest egg sooner, shift a portion of your portfolio out of stocks and into assets that are stable, such as bonds and CD ladders. The good news is that interest rates are still pretty strong, so you can earn a decent return from a CD ladder without taking on the same risks you do with other investments. You can even keep a chunk of your retirement funds in a high-yield savings account, for added flexibility. It can be discouraging once you've reached the 12-month mark of being unemployed. But keep the faith and don't give up! It could make sense to shift away from seeking a full-time job and see if you can get by with a couple of part-time jobs or expand your side hustle to tide yourself over until retirement. Of course, you may not end up being able to earn the income you want in the coming years, so you'll need to figure out if you can maintain a pared-down lifestyle to avoid draining your nest egg early. By now, your home may be paid off. If so, downsizing is an option. It could allow you to not only lower your housing costs, but walk away with some equity you can use as income. Another option you can look at is claiming early Social Security. You'll face a permanent reduction in benefits if you don't wait until age 67 to claim them, since that's your full retirement age based on your year of birth. But if you're scared to tap your retirement funds and can only reduce your expenses so much, at least it's on the table. Depending on your situation, it could make more sense to tap your savings than to claim Social Security early. If you get a full-time job at the 18- or 24-month mark, you can replenish your savings then. But once you claim Social Security early, you're generally locked into the lower monthly benefit for life. Looking on the bright side, if your financial situation permits, you could leverage your current lower income by converting some retirement funds to a Roth IRA, which offers tax-free withdrawals in retirement. Keep in mind, though, that you'll need to pay taxes on the converted amount in the current tax year. If you're experiencing financial difficulties, adding this tax burden might not be the best choice right now. This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Last-minute changes to Senate's 'big, beautiful bill' stun clean energy industry (and Elon Musk)
The Senate is making a final push to advance President Trump's signature legislation with a flurry of last-minute changes that stunned Elon Musk and the already besieged clean energy industry while offering new support for fossil fuels. The controversy surrounding the bill's energy approach is just one front in a frenzied final push with plenty of additional attention on the price tag after a new weekend tally found that bill has grown by nearly $1 trillion since the Senate took it up. Meanwhile a grueling final Senate push to approve the package cleared a key procedural hurdle over the weekend, with consideration continuing and an amendment process expected to take up much of Monday before a final vote later Monday or perhaps Tuesday. The energy provisions of the 900-plus page bill have come in for particular scrutiny after last minute changes phased out clean energy tax credits faster than expected and also added new taxes on wind and solar projects. At the same time, new last minute inducements were unveiled for fossil fuels, including one classifying coal as a critical mineral when it comes to a government manufacturing credit. "We're doing coal," Trump said in an interview released over the weekend on Fox News's "Sunday Morning Futures" where he also called solar energy projects "ugly as hell." The mix left fossil fuel advocates celebrating and clean energy advocates slamming the bill at a new higher volume. Tesla (TSLA) CEO Musk — who worked in the White House before his dramatic falling out with the president — was perhaps the loudest voice in the latter group. He issued a series of weekend posts calling the bill "utterly insane and destructive [with] handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future." The energy changes came as top-line costs of the deal remained a key point of contention. A nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office tally released over the weekend showed the revised bill would add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt. That assessment, which does not include additional interest costs, comes after a similar analysis of the House package found a $2.4 trillion tab. Trump suggested Republicans look past the deficit implications in one of his weekend posts, urging passage as soon as possible saying he also wants to cut costs but adding to lawmakers: "REMEMBER, you still have to get reelected." He also made a case that White House projections of blockbuster economic growth (dismissed by many economists as fantastical) will make the math add up in the end. The focus on energy comes after weeks of debate over Biden-era energy credits. The initial Senate blueprint had offered a slower rollback of clean energy credits for things like solar panels and electric vehicles but last minute changes to the bill put it more in line with the harder line House version which seeks to eliminate the credits sooner. Some provisions are even more immediate with the Senate version proposing to eliminate EV credits by September 30 of this year. And on top of that, a new tax was unveiled when the bill was released that would not just eliminate government help for renewable energy projects — but add a new cost for wind and solar projects completed after 2027 if a certain amount of supplies came from China. The changes stunned many clean energy advocates — not just Musk — with a statement from the American Clean Power Association saying the effect would be to "strand hundreds of billions of dollars in current investments." What that could means for consumers down the road — some concluded — are higher utility bills as currently under construction AI data centers are set to increase electricity demand in the years ahead. Some are even projecting double digit price increases in some utility bills by 2029. An analysis from the left-leaning Center for American Progress found that the bill would exacerbate existing upward pressure on utility prices, with Democratic Senator Brian Schatz adding "we are literally going to have not enough electricity because Trump is killing solar." Fossil fuels advocates meanwhile were largely ebullient at the last minute changes which saw existing fossil fuel focused provisions — around issues like permitting, lease sales, and methane emissions fees — joined by some new credits for these producers including for coal. Senate Republicans say the bill will generate over $15 billion in new federal revenue through expanded oil, gas, and coal leasing with leaders with Senator John Barasso of Wyoming saying "America is an energy superpower and once again, we are going to act like it." The bill is also set to be even more expensive after weeks of negotiations saw expensive compromises on issues like state and local tax (SALT) deductions, more generous business tax credits, and the adjustment of some cost savings around Medicaid. The fullest accounting came over the weekend when the CBO estimated the Senate bill would increase the debt by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034. The analysis also found that 11.8 million additional Americans would become uninsured by 2034 because of the health care provisions — an increase over the findings for the House-passed version that tallied that 10.9 million people would be without health coverage of that version passed. The bill is projected to be even more expensive after things like interest costs are included, with the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget protecting the current total tally as in the neighborhood of $3.5 to $4.2 trillion over the next decade. "The debt impact could rise as high as $4.5 trillion if various rumored adjustments are made," the group added of potential additional changes still to come. The findings also come as Senate Republicans push forward on a budget gimmick that is set to hide $3.8 trillion in red ink using a "current policy baseline" that Democrats say violated Senate rules but appears set to proceed. Either way the sky-high debt findings could imperil the bill politically, with two GOP senators already likely to vote no and others not yet saying they will back Trump's effort to get this over the line in the coming hours. The bill will also need to be approved by the House if the amended package advances and is then considered by a bloc of fiscal conservatives there who say they barely voted in May for that less expensive version. One initial comment from the House Freedom Caucus was negative, with the group writing that the new tally was above "our agreed budget framework." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AbbVie to buy Capstan Therapeutics for up to $2.1 billion
(Reuters) -AbbVie said on Monday it will acquire Capstan Therapeutics in a deal worth up to $2.1 billion, adding experimental treatments for autoimmune diseases to its portfolio.