Iga Swiatek's Wimbledon run fuelled by strawberries mixed with pasta
But being under the radar is suiting the former world number one just fine, and she progressed to the last 16 with a 6-2 6-3 victory against fiery American Danielle Collins.
Pasta with strawberries 🍓@iga_swiatek's favourite meal is an interesting one 😂#Wimbledon pic.twitter.com/FJNdwRBE8x
— Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 5, 2025
Afterwards, Swiatek revealed her diet this fortnight has included strawberries and pasta, a childhood favourite in Poland.
The 24-year-old was perplexed by the attention given to her culinary choices, saying: 'Why is it such a big thing? Everybody should eat that. I think in summer kids are eating it a lot. It's just a perfect mix of tastes. We have great strawberries in Poland, as well.
'My dad adds the cream. And some sugar. I try to eat with yoghurt to at least pretend that it's a good meal.'
Asked which country's strawberries were better, Swiatek admitted her answer might get her in trouble.
'I think Poland,' she said. 'Because we have a better climate for strawberries, right? Now Wimbledon is probably going to ban me from answering these questions. The strawberries are great here, as well. They are different. But they are great.'
Swiatek is a former junior champion but she has often cut an uncomfortable figure at Wimbledon, weighed down by the pressure of expectation on a surface that is not natural to her.
But this year the Pole is only seeded eighth, while she found her feet on grass by reaching the final of the warm-up event in Bad Homburg last weekend.
She never looked in the slightest trouble against Collins, who has beaten her twice in the past, including on her favoured clay this year in Rome.
There is little love lost between them, with Collins, who reversed a decision to retire at the end of last season and start a family because of fertility issues, criticising Swiatek for 'fakeness' in her reaction after pulling out injured during their clash at the Olympics last summer.
Collins is renowned for her feisty attitude on court and earned headlines around the world at the Australian Open in January when, after beating home hope Destanee Aiava in a hostile atmosphere, she blew kisses to the crowd and slapped her bottom.
'Every person that's bought a ticket to come out here and heckle me or do what they do, it's all going towards the Danielle Collins Fund,' she said. 'Me and my group of girlfriends love a five-star vacation.'
A mid-afternoon Centre Court crowd in SW19 is about as big a contrast as it is possible to get, and Collins simply did not play well enough to apply any psychological pressure to Swiatek.
'I was just in the zone. I knew how I wanted to play and I knew I needed to be brave,' said the five-time grand slam champion, who was particularly effective on serve.
'You can't let Danielle play her winners. I'm really happy with the performance, it was a good match. It's much more fun this year. I had some practices where the ball was listening to me, which was pretty new on grass.'
This is only the third time Swiatek has reached the fourth round at Wimbledon, with her best run so far a quarter-final appearance two years ago.
She faces a dangerous opponent next in 23rd seed Clara Tauson, who defeated former champion Elena Rybakina, but, with so many big names already out of the tournament, Swiatek appears to have a good chance of going all the way.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The incredible story of a Wimbledon finalist who became a murderer: Son of Irish baron with a 'killer' backhand saw his life spiral out of control after SW19 heartbreak
The front page of French newspaper 'Le Petit Journal' in 1907 illustrated the crime of a former Wimbledon finalist in the most graphic manner possible. A severed head and legs can be seen poking out of a hat box, while the majority of the remains of a women's body were located in a trunk. Blood was seen pouring out of both. The front cover also illustrates the three people at the centre what became known as 'The Monte Carlo Trunk Murder'. At the centre was the victim, a Danish widow named Emma Levin. Pictured either side were the owners of the hat box and trunk, with Marie Goold shown on the left. To the right was her husband Vere, who 28 years earlier had been a men's singles finalist at Wimbledon. Vere Thomas St Leger Goold had been the second son of an Irish aristocrat, with tennis and boxing having been two of his passions at a young age. His prowess on the court saw him win the first Irish Open back in 1879, before he set sights on the Wimbledon title later that year. Goold won five matches at the tournament, but was ultimately beaten in straight sets 6-2, 6-4, 6-2 by the Reverend John Hartley in the final. It was one of two Wimbledon titles earned by Hartley in the first four years of the Championships. It was claimed that Goold had been suffering from a hangover after drinking heavily ahead of the final, where he had been the favourite to triumph. Reports described Goold as having a 'killer' backhand, while Hartley had described his rival as being a 'cheery wild Irishman' having triumphed in the final. The statements proved prophetic, with Goold's life said to have descended into a negative spiral following his defeat in the Wimbledon final. The tournament itself refers to Goold as an 'all-round degenerate', having become an alcoholic, opium addict and slow payer of gambling debts. After his tennis career falling apart, Goold met his future with Marie Giraudin in 1886. Giraudin had already been widowed twice and ran a loss making dressmaking company. The couple married four years later and were claimed to have then built up substantial debts by visiting London's finest restaurants, before briefly emigrating to Canada. When they eventually returned to London in 1903, they began introducing themselves at Sir and Lady. Marie was then said to have convinced her husband to move to Monte Carlo, suggesting she had devised a scheme to outsmart the various casinos. The couple, instead, wracked up major debts and turned to their eventual murder victim for assistance. Danish widower Emma Levin was said to have been taken in by their social standing and lent the Goolds around £40 in 1907 - close to £6,000 in the present day. Levin later sought out the couple as she prepared to leave Monte Carlo, with a bloody argument said to have ensued. Police would later arrive, looking for Levin, only to discover blood stains on the wall and ceiling. A dagger and butcher's knife were found at the scene of the crime. The Goolds themselves had fled to Marseille and left instructions for a Marie's hat box and a trunk to be sent on to London, which they expected would be their final destination. A porter, however, noted blood was leaking out and informed the police. Levin's head and body were discovered when they were opened, while her intestines were later found hanging from an iron stake along the Cote d'Azur near Monte Carlo. The Goolds, who had initially claimed the bags contained dead chickens, were ultimately arrested at Marseille train station. Following a trial that generated international headlines, the couple were convicted of murdering Levin. Marie Goold was initially sentenced to death by guillotine, after the prosecution argued claimed she had instigated the murder. Her sentence was later changed to life imprisonment and she died in prison of typhoid fever in 1914. Vere was sentenced to life in prison on the notorious Devil's Island in French Guiana. The former Wimbledon finalist died by suicide at the age of 55 in 1909, just two years after being convicted for the gruesome murder. Vere was said to have suffered from nightmares while on the island as he battled withdrawal from both alcohol and opium.
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Novak Djokovic plays God-mode tennis to dismantle friend Miomir Kecmanovic
Novak Djokovic last lost a match at Wimbledon to anyone other than Carlos Alcaraz in 2017. And even that defeat, to the Czech player Tomas Berdych, was down to an elbow injury that forced him to retire. It is a staggering run, stretching over eight years and 45 matches. Yet rarely has Djokovic played as well as he did here against his fellow Serb Miomir Kecmanovic on Saturday night. Over the course of three destructive sets, Djokovic hit 60 winners to just 19 unforced errors as he put a masterclass of spin and subtlety, guile and laser-like power, to a wildly appreciative Centre Court. Certainly Kecmanovic, the world No 49, had no answers. Then again, with the seven-time champion in this form, how many would? If anything the 6-3, 6-0, 6-4 score could have been even more emphatic. Victory left Djokovic beaming, especially when he was told that he had just become only the third player in Wimbledon singles' history to enter the 100-win club, joining Martina Navratilova and Roger Federer. 'It sounds very nice,' Djokovic said. 'Particularly at this age, I am still going strong and still trying to compete with the younger players. I'm doing some slides and some splits on the court and am pushing myself to the limit. 'Wimbledon is a dream tournament. And any history I make at my favourite tournament, I am blessed.' Initially we looked to be in for a contest of sorts. Djokovic started with an ace and won the first three points of the match. But Kecmanovic retaliated with a textbook drop shot and a forehand winner before forcing deuce. It set the early tone. Djokovic pressing, but with his opponent determined to resist. But, all of a sudden, the dam broke at 4-3. It came after one of the rallies of the tournament, a 14-shot thriller that twirled into life with an immaculate Djokovic drop shot. It led to the players exchanging diving volleys at the net, before a lob volley by Djokovic had his opponent scrambling backwards. Somehow Kecmanovic got to the ball, and the subsequent smash, and even looked to be winning the point with a pass. But while Djokovic turned 38 in May, he is as spry as he ever was. Somehow he was able to launch his body towards the ball, Boris Becker-style, and hit a winning backhand volley. As the Centre Crowd crowd rose to applaud, Kecmanovic stood at the net smiling before playfully hitting a ball at Djokovic, his good friend and Davis Cup teammate. But it also seemed to implant a thought in his head: how the hell am I going to beat this guy? Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion Three points later Kecmanovic lost his serve, and Djokovic was serving for the first set which he duly took. 'It was kind of like an ecstasy, to be honest, in that moment,' said Djokovic when asked about the rally. 'I was super, super happy. It came at a really important moment, as well. 4-3, deuce, long point. We were both running around each other, around the whole court. Then just that diving backhand volley down the line passing shot. Can't wait to see the highlights! 'I was pumped for that one,' he added. 'Obviously I'm not diving as much on the courts. Obviously the only surface where you would dive is grass. But I'm not used to it as much. So these unique, rare moments are really something you cherish. Of course, if you win a point like this in an important moment, it is even better.' It had been a startlingly impressive opening, but it turned out Djokovic was just getting started. He raced through the second set in just 24 minutes, hitting 13 winners and just two unforced errors. When Kecmanovic finally stemmed the bleeding by holding his serve at the start of the third set, he felt compelled to raise his arms in triumph. But Djokovic continued to play God-mode tennis, and when a lob volley put him 5-1 up it looked like nothing could interrupt his flow. That wasn't quite the case as a rowdy Centre Court crowd briefly distracted him. After losing three games in a row, he recovered his composure to book a last-16 match against Alex de Minaur, who beat August Holmgren in straight sets. 'I enjoyed myself very much, except the last couple of games,' said Djokovic. 'A bit of tension at the end, things got a bit complicated. It is never easy playing a friend and compatriot.' True. But over one hour and 48 minutes of engrossing tennis, Djokovic showed he means business. And while the bookies might think this year's tournament is a near coin-toss between Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner, write him off at your peril.
Daily Mirror
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Carlos Alcaraz relationship challenges, Jannik Sinner behaviour and ban reason
Carlos Alcaraz is chasing a third straight Wimbledon title after back-to-back final victories over Novak Djokovic - but what else do we know about the Spaniard away from the courts? Carlos Alcaraz is eyeing his third consecutive Wimbledon win after taking down Novak Djokovic in the finals of the past two years. The Spanish sensation has been in formidable form, notably rallying from behind to clinch the French Open against Jannik Sinner in what was an electrifying match. Having also lifted the trophy at Queen's Club for the second time with the HSBC Championships under his belt, Alcaraz is aiming for another Wimbledon victory that could catapult him into the annals of tennis history at the tender age of 22. Yet, despite the buzz surrounding his success streak, Alcaraz maintains his eyes are only set on the prize, not the history books. Prior to Wimbledon, he said: "I'm coming here thinking that I really want to win the title, I really want to lift the trophy. I'm not thinking about how many players have done it, winning three Wimbledons in a row." Off the court, Alcaraz's life is just as scrutinised, especially regarding personal matters such as his love life and his relationships with other professionals. Here's what we know about the Spanish sensation... Girlfriend challenges Speaking with the Sunday Times last year, Alcaraz candidly revealed the challenges of finding love amidst the constant travel demanded by the sport. He said: "I am single. "I am looking for someone. It can be difficult as a tennis player to meet the right person because you are travelling all the time." He adopted a similar tone with Vogue the year before too, telling the publication: "It's hard to find the person who can share things with you if you're always in different parts of the world." Sporting rivalry Reflecting on Alcaraz's triumph over Sinner at the French Open, 1989 Roland Garros winner Michael Chang told Clay Tennis: "The generation that we followed was very competitive, [players] didn't really talk to each other. Alcaraz and Sinner have a very healthy respect for one another. Different than in years past, like a McEnroe-Connors or a McEnroe-[Ivan] Lendl. There was no friendship there." He added: " [Roger] Federer and [Rafael] Nadal changed the culture in the locker room. On court, it's business. You want to play your best and beat your opponent, but off court they were kind to everyone, whether you were world No. 2 or No. 100 in doubles. "Roger, Rafa, and even Novak are responsible for that transformation. They treated everyone the same and were kind. I think that respect has carried over to the current generation because they respect everyone." Party ban Speaking to El Laguero, Juan Carlos Ferrero explained that his partying plans after the French Open may have been toned down through his guidance. He explained: "Yesterday, I told him to have a good time, that he deserved it, but to remember he's a tennis player at all times. "We know how he is and these days do him good. When he returns, he comes back with a clear head, renewed. It's no longer about the word 'party', but about disconnecting. Being with his friends and not thinking about tennis and being a normal 22-year-old, and returning to work with enthusiasm." Alcaraz himself is no stranger to the nightlife, candidly speaking of his fondness for partying in his Netflix special, 'Carlos Alcaraz: My Way'. He said (via the Express): "Look, in Ibiza... I'm not going to lie to you. It's about partying and going out. I went there to let loose. I don't know if it's right to say it that way, but I went out. "I made the most of it. On my return, of course, I won at Queen's and Wimbledon. I'm not saying I won because of the party, but those days did me good. And if things go well, I have to repeat."
