Exploring the 2023/24 funding of South African political parties
Image: Bongani Shilubane / Independent Newspapers
Political parties represented in Parliament shared over R3.24 billion in 2023/24 through private funding, allocation from Parliament and provincial legislatures, and the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC).
According to lobby group My Vote Counts (MVC), the ANC received the lion's share of nearly R1.72bn and the DA was allocated about R655 million, while the EFF got over R309m.
The list does not include uMkhonto weSizwe Party as it only contested elections for the first time in May last year following its establishment in December 2023.
In the 2023/24 financial year, the IEC received disclosure reports from Parliament and all nine provincial legislatures in respect of the funding of represented political parties.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
An amount of about R1.56bn from Parliament and nine provincial legislatures was allocated to 15 represented political parties.
The ANC's R1.72bn allocation includes R905m from Parliament and provincial legislatures, R527m through private funding, and R286m from the IEC-administered represented political parties and multi-party democracy funds, according to MVC.
The DA received R311m from Parliament and provincial legislatures, R213m through private funding, and R121m from the IEC.
The EFF's R309m includes R180m from Parliament and provincial legislatures, R79m from the commission, and R51m in private funding.
A few months ago, the National Assembly's Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs voted to double two crucial limits in the Political Funding Act.
This means the disclosure threshold and donations cap could be raised from R100,000 to R200,000 and R15m to R30m, respectively.
The MVC was among several organisations that objected during the public participation process, after which the committee unanimously voted to adopt a report and resolution recommending the increase.
'In passing the resolution, the committee chose to disregard both relevant empirical considerations and the public interest, in favour of political expediency,' the group accused the committee.
It noted that funding through the represented political parties' fund (RPPF), as revealed in Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's Budget, barely increases over the next few financial years.
'This belies the passion with which parties spoke about the need for more funding during the parliamentary processes... If parties are indeed so desperate for additional funding, why did they accept a Budget that offers them a real-term reduction in public funding?' it asked.
The amount allocated to represented parties through the RPPF in 2022/23 was R342m, and R322m is the adjusted appropriation for 2024/25.
The R850m for 2023/24 was an anomaly as an additional amount was distributed to parties to allow them to prepare for the 2024 national and provincial elections.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
25 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Mashatile fined for failing to declare diamond gift from Louis Liebenberg
The diamond was handed over to the NPA. Deputy President Paul Mashatile has been found guilty by Parliament's ethics committee for failing to declare a diamond gift received by his wife, Humile Mashatile, from controversial businessman Louis Liebenberg. Mashatile has also been in the spotlight due to his high-end lifestyle, luxury properties, and associations with corruption-accused individuals such as Edwin Sodi. According to the deputy president's office, the diamond was undergoing verification to determine its authenticity and would be declared once the verification process was complete. The office also stated that the diamond would be returned following the arrest of Louis Liebenberg last year on charges of fraud, theft, racketeering and money laundering. Despite this, a formal complaint was lodged with the Joint Committee on Ethics and Members' Interests. Parliament fines Mashatile over Liebenberg diamond Following an investigation, the committee fined Mashatile for not disclosing the 'unsolicited' gift to his wife in the parliamentary register. 'The committee, through the office of the registrar, received a formal complaint against the deputy president on 5 March 2025 for an alleged breach of the code of ethical conduct and members' Interests. ALSO READ: Mashatile reveals he spent R2.3m on travel, food, and laundry for Japan trip 'Item 13(3)(f) of the code requires members of parliament to disclose gifts received by their immediate family in the confidential part of the register,' Parliament's statement read on Thursday. 'Following consideration of the complaint and perusal of the confidential part of the deputy president's disclosed interests, the committee noted that the gift in question (a diamond from Mr Louis Liebenberg) was not disclosed.' Diamond with NPA Mashatile confirmed to the committee the precious stone had since been handed over to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). However, the committee argued that ethical conduct required the gift to be declared promptly, with its value to be determined and disclosed later. In addition to the fine, the committee has recommended that Mashatile be officially reprimanded in the National Assembly. 'The committee remains steadfast in its quest to ensure accountability of all members of parliament as demanded by the code. The disclosure process not only facilitates public trust in Parliament but also enhances its credibility.' READ MORE: Should Paul Mashatile be president? This ANC veteran thinks so Earlier this year, opposition party ActionSA called on the Public Protector to investigate the diamond gift and whether there were any breaches of the Executive Members' Ethics Act. 'Alarmingly, this 'gift' raises serious concerns when viewed in the context of allegations surrounding the deputy president's unexplained lavish lifestyle, claims that he too engages heavily in trading favours, and Liebenberg's reputation for 'gifting' extravagant items to high-ranking politicians and government officials as a means to buy influence,' the party said in a statement at the time. Mashatile's property declarations Mashatile recently declared ownership of a R28.9 million estate in Constantia, Cape Town, despite previously denying any property ownership in the area. In October 2024, the deputy president's office insisted that he had no properties in Cape Town aside from a house in Kelvin, Johannesburg, purchased through a bank loan with his late wife. At the time, the Constantia property was said to belong to a company linked to his son-in-law. However, new disclosures made this year list the 4 000-square-metre Constantia house as Mashatile's, along with a 9 300-square-metre home in Waterfall, Midrand, reportedly valued at R37 million and the Kelvin residence. The Hawks are currently investigating Mashatile following criminal charges laid by the DA. Last year, Mashatile declared ownership of two properties, one located in Midrand spanning 1 000 by 1 200 square metres, and another in Sandton covering 600 by 800 square metres. NOW READ: Mashatile denies family tied to multibillion-rand lottery deal
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Paul Mashatile FINED for failing to declare wife's diamond ‘gift'
Parliament's Ethics Committee has imposed a fine on Deputy President Paul Mashatile for failing to declare a diamond gift to his wife. Image: GCIS The Joint Committee on Ethics and Members' Interests has recommended that the National Assembly reprimand Deputy President Paul Mashatile and impose a R10 000 fine for failing to declare a gift received by his wife in the confidential part of his financial and registrable interests register. The committee's decision follows a formal complaint filed on 5 March 2025, accusing Mashatile of breaching the Code of Ethical Conduct and Members' Interests. According to Item 13(3)(f) of the code, Members of Parliament are required to disclose any gifts received by their immediate family in the confidential section of the register. ADVERTISEMENT Failure to Disclose Gift The committee's investigation revealed that Mashatile had not disclosed a diamond he received from businessman Louis Liebenberg, which he later surrendered to the National Prosecuting Authority. Mashatile, 63, had previously explained that he was waiting for an appraisal of the diamond to determine its value before making a declaration. However, the committee maintained that ethical conduct demanded the immediate declaration of the gift, with the value to be disclosed later once it was determined. The failure to declare the gift was deemed a violation of both Item 13(3)(f) and Item 16(1)(a)(ii) of the code. Reprimand and Fine In light of the breach, the committee has recommended that the National Assembly issue a formal reprimand in the House and impose a R10 000 fine on Mashatile for this first offence. The committee emphasised the importance of transparency and accountability in Parliament, underscoring that the disclosure process is critical to maintaining public trust and the credibility of the institution. ADVERTISEMENT The committee reiterated its commitment to ensuring that all Members of Parliament adhere to the ethical standards set out in the code. It stressed that maintaining transparency in the financial and registrable interests register is essential for upholding the integrity of South Africa's legislative body. The full report on the matter will be made available on the Announcements, Tablings, and Committee Reports section of Parliament's official website. WHAT DID PAUL MASHATILE DECLARE? Parliament has released the 2025 register listing the financial interests and other benefits of the current Members of Parliament (MPs). Due to the nature of their jobs, MPs are required to disclose financial interests, such as shares and other financial interests in companies and other corporate entities; remunerated employment or work outside of Parliament; directorships and partnerships; consultancies and retainerships; sponsorships; gifts and hospitality as well as benefits and interest free loans. In addition, they are required to disclose travel; ownership in land and property; pensions; rented property income generating assets; and trusts. In fact, there are 13 different categories. The register is extensive and broken down per political party. By way of an example, let's take a closer look at Deputy President Paul Mashatile (real name Shipokosa Paulus Mashatile). Paul Mashatile is one of 183 ANC MPs to feature on the register. As soon as the register was made public, eagle-eyed South Africans were quick to notice he declared a 4 000 square metre Constantia, Cape Town mansion worth a reported R28.9 million, which is registered under his son-in-law Nceba Nonkwelo's company as one of three 'residential' properties. The Hawks are investigating the source of the funds used for the purchase. Paul Mashatile register declarations 1. Shares and other financial interests Nothing to disclose 2. Remunerated employment or work outside of parliament Nothing to disclose 3. Directorships and partnerships Nothing to disclose 4. Consultancies and retainerships Nothing to disclose Nothing to disclose 6. Gifts and hospitality Description Value Source Portrait of Deputy President Estimate R3 000 National Youth Development Agency HILIA designed box: silver Omani Daggers. Collection (Wildlife of Russia) made in 2022, Manufacturer: TISSO – The collection consist of three sets dedicated to animals, birds and fish that are mainly found on the territory of the Russian Federation Estimate R2 000 Russia Prime Minister: Mikhail Mishustin, during the Deputy President working visit in Russia PYCCKNE CAMOLIBETBI (sets of two saucers and tea cups). Tea sets: four cups, one small kettle and four saucers Estimate R1 500-R2 000 Russia Prime Minister: Mikhail Mishustin, during the Deputy President working visit in Russia Backpack bag (black and grey in color with written Harambee on the back) Hoodie Jersey Bennie Estimate R700 Harambee Youth Employment Accelerator: CEO – Kasthuri Soni. RT Mirco Phone Thelema The Mint 2021 Cabernet Sauvignon Estate Wine and Lindor double chocolate Estimated R1 000 China council for the promotion of international trade (CCPIT) Japan Bottle of Wine and Small grey bowl Estimate R2 000 Ambassador of Japan and Takeshi Iwaya, Japan's Minister of Foreign Affairs Hibiki Suntory Whisky Bottle, Edo Glass for Whisky Isuzu light-duty truck (Toy display), N Series, and Decor Pot Estimate R2 000 Working Visit in Japan The Taberer Avontuur Stellenbosch Wine Estimate R500 Ahmed Kathrada legacy fundraising breakfast Black pot for décor Estimate R1 500 People's Republic of China, H.E GAO Yunlong Silver Elephants Statue display Estimate R2 000 The Minister of External Affairs New Delhi, India 7. Benefits and interest free loans Nothing to disclose 8. Travel Nothing to disclose 9. Ownership in land and property Description of property Area where property is located Size of the property in square metres Residential family home Constantia, Western Cape 4 000 square metres Residential family home Waterfall, Midrand Gauteng 9 000 square metres Residential Kelvin, Johannesburg Gauteng 3 000 square metres 10. Pensions Source of the pension Public / Private GEPF Public 11. Rented property Nothing to declare 12. Income generating assets Description of income generating asset Nature of the income Old Mutual Unit Trust Interest generated on account 13. Trusts Nothing to declare The full public section of the register can be accessed here: Anything appear 'strange' to you among Paul Mashatile's declarations? Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Parliament fines Mashatile after failing to declare ‘diamond' gift to his wife
Parliament fines Deputy President Paul Mashatile R10,00 after failing to declare 'diamond' gift to his wife Image: Siyabulela Duda/GCIS Parliament's Ethics Committee has imposed a R10,000 fine on Deputy President Paul Mashatile for failing to declare a diamond gift from businessman Louis Liebenberg to his wife. Mashatile failed to disclose in the confidential part of his financial and registrable interests register. The committee, through the Office of the Registrar, received a formal complaint against Mashatile on March 5, 2025, for an alleged breach of the Code of Ethical Conduct and Members' Interests. Item 13(3)(f) of the code requires Members of Parliament to disclose gifts received by their immediate family in the confidential part of the register. Following consideration of the complaint and perusal of the confidential part of the Deputy President's disclosed interests, the committee noted that the gift in question (a diamond from Louis Liebenberg) was not disclosed. Although the committee acknowledged the Member's response, which included his claim that he was awaiting the diamond's appraisal to determine its value before making a declaration, and that he has since surrendered the gift to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), the committee maintained that ethical behaviour necessitates declaring the gift, with its value to be disclosed at a later stage. In a parliamentary statement, the committee found that Mashatile breached item 13(3)(f) as read with item 16(1)(a)(ii) of the code. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'As a result, the committee will recommend to the National Assembly to impose a reprimand in the House and a fine of R10,000 for a first offence of a breach of the code. 'The committee remained steadfast in its quest to ensure accountability of all Members of Parliament as demanded by the code. 'The disclosure process not only facilitates public trust in Parliament but also enhances its credibility,' the statement read. Parliament said the full committee report will be published on the announcements, tabling and committee report. IOL Politics
