logo
US War Powers Act: Can The President Declare War Alone

US War Powers Act: Can The President Declare War Alone

NDTV7 days ago

Until President Donald Trump confirmed that the United States carried out "very successful" strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, he remained non-committal and ambiguous about America's involvement in Israel's war with Iran.
" I may do it. I may not," Trump said on Wednesday when asked whether he planned to join the conflict.
That uncertainty vanished Sunday when US military jets launched precision strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites. Shortly after the operation, Trump declared, "Now is the time for peace."
This has led to debate over presidential war powers. Critics argue that Trump bypassed Congress, which, under the US Constitution, holds the sole authority to declare war.
What Is The War Powers Act?
The War Powers Resolution of 1973, commonly known as the War Powers Act, is a federal law intended to check the president's authority to commit US military forces to armed conflict without Congressional approval. It was enacted by Congress as a direct response to the Vietnam War (1955-75) and, more specifically, President Richard Nixon 's secret bombing of Cambodia, which killed thousands and sparked mass protests across the US.
Who Can Declare War In The US?
The US Constitution divides war powers between the legislative and executive branches. Under Article I, Section 8, Congress holds the power to declare war, raise and fund armies, and regulate the armed forces. Article II designates the president as Commander-in-Chief, granting the executive authority to lead the military and respond to emergencies. This division was meant to prevent unilateral decisions about war by any one branch of government.
Can A President Strike Without Congressional Approval?
Under the War Powers Act, if the president sends US troops into combat or near conflict, they must tell Congress within 48 hours.
After that, the president can keep troops there for up to 60 days without approval. If Congress doesn't give the green light, the president has 30 more days to pull the troops out, making a maximum of 90 days without official authorisation.
When Did The US Last Declare War?
The last time the US formally declared war was in 1942, during World War II, against Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania.
Since then, the US has engaged in some deadly wars, including Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War, Afghanistan, and Iraq, without formal declarations. It has also carried out military interventions and airstrikes in countries like Libya, Serbia, Somalia, and Yemen, relying instead on congressional authorisations or presidential powers.
How Does The US Go To War Without Declaring It?
The US has often bypassed formal war declarations by using Authorisations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs), laws passed by Congress to allow specific military actions. After 9/11, the 2001 AUMF gave President George W Bush broad powers to target al-Qaeda and its allies.
In 2002, a second AUMF-authorised action against Iraq led to the 2003 invasion. Both laws remain in effect and have been used by later presidents to justify military operations far beyond their original scope.
For instance, President Donald Trump cited the 2002 AUMF to justify the 2020 drone strike on Iranian General Qassem Soleimani.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CIA chief told lawmakers Iran nuclear programme set back years with strikes on metal conversion site
CIA chief told lawmakers Iran nuclear programme set back years with strikes on metal conversion site

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

CIA chief told lawmakers Iran nuclear programme set back years with strikes on metal conversion site

CIA Director John Ratcliffe told skeptical US lawmakers that American military strikes destroyed Iran's lone metal conversion facility and in the process delivered a monumental setback to Tehran's nuclear programme that would take years to overcome, a US official said on Sunday. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive intelligence, said Ratcliffe laid out the importance of the strikes on the metal conversion facility during a classified hearing for US lawmakers last week. Details about the private briefings surfaced as President Donald Trump and his administration keep pushing back on questions from Democratic lawmakers and others about how far Iran was set back by the strikes before last Tuesday's ceasefire with Israel took hold. "It was obliterating like nobody's ever seen before," Trump said in an interview on Fox News Channel's "Sunday Morning Futures". "And that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions, at least for a period of time." Live Events Ratcliffe also told lawmakers that the intelligence community assessed the vast majority of Iran's amassed enriched uranium likely remains buried under the rubble at Isfahan and Fordo, two of the three key nuclear facilities targeted by US strikes. But even if the uranium remains intact, the loss of its metal conversion facility effectively has taken away Tehran's ability to build a bomb for years to come, the official said. Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said Sunday on CBS' "Face the Nation" that the three Iranian sites with "capabilities in terms of treatment, conversion and enrichment of uranium have been destroyed to an important degree". But, he added, "some is still standing" and that because capabilities remain, "if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again". He said assessing the full damage comes down to Iran allowing in inspectors. "Frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared, and there is nothing there," Grossi said. Trump has insisted from just hours after three key targets were struck by US bunker-buster bombs and Tomahawk missiles that Iran's nuclear program was "obliterated." His defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, has said they were "destroyed". A preliminary report issued by the US Defence Intelligence Agency, meanwhile, said the strikes did significant damage to the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan sites, but did not totally destroy the facilities. As a result of Israeli and US strikes, Grossi said that "it is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage". Israel claims it has set back Iran's nuclear program by "many years". The metal conversion facility that Ratcliffe said was destroyed was located at the Isfahan nuclear facility. The process of transforming enriched uranium gas into dense metal, or metallisation, is a key step in building the explosive core of a bomb. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in comments at the NATO summit last week also suggested that it was likely the US strikes had destroyed the metal conversion facility. "You can't do a nuclear weapon without a conversion facility," Rubio said. "We can't even find where it is, where it used to be on the map. You can't even find where it used to be because the whole thing is just blackened out. It's gone. It's wiped out." The CIA director also stressed to lawmakers during the congressional briefing that Iran's air defence was shattered during the 12-day assault. As a result, any attempt by Iran to rebuild its nuclear programme could now easily be thwarted by Israeli strikes that Iran currently has little wherewithal to defend against, the official said. Ratcliffe's briefing to lawmakers on the US findings appeared to mesh with some of Israeli officials' battle damage assessments. Israeli officials have determined that Iran's ability to enrich uranium to a weapons-grade level was neutralised for a prolonged period, according to a senior Israeli military official who was not authorized to talk publicly about the matter. Tehran's nuclear programme was also significantly damaged by the strikes killing key scientists, damage to Iran's missile production industry and the battering of Iran's aerial defence system, according to the Israeli's assessment. Grossi, and some Democrats, note that Iran still has the know-how. "You cannot undo the knowledge that you have or the capacities that you have," Grossi said, emphasising the need to come to a diplomatic deal on the country's nuclear programme.

‘US must rule out more strikes before new talks,' says Iran minister amid Israel-Iran ceasefire
‘US must rule out more strikes before new talks,' says Iran minister amid Israel-Iran ceasefire

Indian Express

time35 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘US must rule out more strikes before new talks,' says Iran minister amid Israel-Iran ceasefire

The United States must eliminate any possibility of further strikes on Iran if it wants to resume diplomatic talks, Tehran's Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi said amid a ceasefire in hostilities between Israel and Iran announced last week, which was brokered by US President Donald Trump and Qatar. Ravanchi said that the Trump administration conveyed its message to Tehran via mediators that it wants to return to the negotiation table regarding Iran's nuclear program but had 'not made their position clear' on the 'very important question' as talks take place between the two countries, reported BBC. In the last couple of months, the US and Iran have had at least five rounds of mainly indirect talks regarding the Islamic Republic's nuclear program and the sanctions imposed by Washington. The sixth round of talks were scheduled to take place on June 15 in Muscat but Israel launched its offensive against Tehran on June 13 and the plan for further talks were foiled. The United States also got directly involved in the conflict between Tel Aviv and Tehran, when its 125 military aircrafts, including B-2 Stealth bombers dropped bombs and targeted three Iranian nuclear sites, namely Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. America codenamed the operation as 'Midnight Hammer'. Ravanchi reiterated Iran's stance of allowing to enrich uranium as they are for 'peaceful purposes' and rejected the accusations of the West that Tehran was secretly developing a nuclear weapon. Iran's deputy foreign minister said 'The level of that can be discussed, the capacity can be discussed, but to say that you should not have enrichment, you should have zero enrichment, and if you do not agree, we will bomb you, that is the law of the jungle,' BBC reported. The extent of damage to Iran's nuclear program due to strikes by the US and Israel remains unclear and the minister refused to give an exact assessment of the situation.

Amid feud over 'Big Beautiful Bill,' Trump says Elon Musk is a 'great guy'
Amid feud over 'Big Beautiful Bill,' Trump says Elon Musk is a 'great guy'

Hindustan Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Amid feud over 'Big Beautiful Bill,' Trump says Elon Musk is a 'great guy'

Amid the feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the US President in an interview on Sunday referred to the tech mogul and former advisor as a "great guy." Musk served as a close advisor to the US President till May 2025, when his tenure came to an end. President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the White House(AP) However, Elon Musk's exit from the White House soon turned explosive after the SpaceX and Tesla CEO expressed his dissatisfaction with "Trump's "big beautiful bill" for tax cuts. Speaking to Fox News, Trump referred to the former advisor as a "great guy" and that he is "going to do well always." "I think he's a wonderful guy. I haven't spoken to him much, but I think Elon is a wonderful guy, and I know he's going to do well always. He's a smart guy. And he actually went and campaigned with me and this and that. But he got a little bit upset, and that wasn't appropriate," Trump told Fox news reporter Maria Bartiromo. When asked about what led to the great fallout between Trump and Musk, the US president said - "Look, the electric vehicle mandate, the EV mandate, is a tough thing for him. I would, you know, I don't want everybody to have to have an electric car." Musk's stance against the GOP bill, which he claims would destroy millions of jobs," triggered an online feud as both men proceeded to bash one another on social media accounts. The feud also led to Musk posting about the alleged connection between Donald Trump and the Epstein files, which was later deleted. Ahead of the key Senate vote for the 'big beautiful bill,' Musk took to X and described the latest version of the bill as 'utterly insane.' 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country! Utterly insane and destructive,' wrote Musk. Despite criticism and defection from three Republicans, the tax-cut bill was passed with a vote of 51 to 49. The bill will now be voted on in the House of representatives before it is enforced as a law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store