AfriForum fears National Dialogue will turn into monologue
AfriForum says the National Dialogue process is at risk of being controlled by Ramaphosa loyalists.
Afrikaner civil society group AfriForum has not ruled out participating in the planned National Dialogue, but is concerned about an attempt to hijack the process from civil society and make it a government issue.
AfriForum CEO Kallie Kriel said the idea of a National Dialogue is a great one, but it had a false start when President Cyril Ramaphosa made pronouncements on it without consultation with other stakeholders such as civil society.
Fears of government 'capture'
'From the AfriForum side, we believe dialogue is desperately needed in the interest of everybody in the country because we are experiencing crises on many fronts. That is why we are very disappointed there was a false start, or not a positive start, to this process with President Ramaphosa's announcement.
'Firstly, it seems as if there's an effort by the government to capture the process and dictate the process, while the idea originally started with the Thabo Mbeki Foundation. And the announcement by the president was done without prior consultation with anybody who has been involved.'
Concerns about political loyalty
Regarding the Eminent Persons' Group that Ramaphosa announced, Kriel said there were many good people in the group that he respected, but they were selected carefully to ensure that individuals would not criticise the ongoing mismanagement of the country.
Kriel said some of the individuals in the group, such as Roelf Meyer, were Ramaphosa loyalists.
ALSO READ: 'Bring all to dialogue': Experts insist national dialogue must be people-driven
Call for genuine civil society leadership
'And you know the danger of appointing loyalists of the ANC and Ramaphosa is that this would no longer be a dialogue, it would become a monologue.
'But because this dialogue is so important, we will do what we can to make sure this process is not totally captured by the government and that civil society plays a bigger role,' said Kriel.
As invitations to the National Dialogue had not yet gone out, AfriForum would wait before deciding what to do.
Mbeki's idea
The idea of a National Dialogue was initiated by former president Thabo Mbeki, who roped in other struggle stalwarts' foundations to participate in initial discussions.
Mbeki told an SA Communist Party congress in December they would like to see the National Dialogue led by the people and civil society.
He said the pre-1994 Convention for a Democratic SA was led by political parties and that should not happen again.
Political analyst Khanyi Magubane said: 'We do need a National Dialogue but not another empty talk shop. The committee needs to tell us what this National Dialogue will achieve for South Africans.'
NOW READ: Thandiswa Mazwai says she would've accepted invite to national dialogue had Ramaphosa sent it
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
12 hours ago
- eNCA
GNU tensions boiling over
JOHANNESBURG - The Government of National Unity is on shaky ground. The DA has withdrawn from the National Dialogue and vowed to vote against budgets for corruption-accused ANC Ministers. WATCH: Discussion | Political expert unpacks the future of the GNU This comes after President Ramaphosa removed DA Deputy Minister Andrew Whitfield, citing an unauthorised trip. The DA says the move was political and now threatens a motion of no confidence against the president, if things don't change.
IOL News
12 hours ago
- IOL News
Calls for government to create its own tech platforms
GovChat founder Professor Eldrid Jordaan speaking at the Social Media Summit for Government at the University of Johannesburg, in conversation with DeCode Communications CEO Lorato Tshenkeng. Image: Supplied GovChat founder Professor Eldrid Jordaan has implored the South African government to start, own and run its own technology platforms for the benefit of all South Africans. Jordaan has slammed big tech, particularly Meta - which owns the likes of Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, saying they posed a threat to the digital sovereignty of countries like South Africa. Jordaan, who was a key figure during the Mxit days and who later founded GovChat, which aims to enhance governance transparency and accountability through the provision of tools for citizens to measure service levels, was the keynote speaker at the Social Media Summit for Government, which is being hosted by the University of Johannesburg. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading His speech was on the topic of Technology, Trust, and Transformation: Bridging the Digital Divide in Citizen Engagement. He said big tech, particularly Meta, wanted to be the player and the referee. This comes after a long standing dispute between GovChat and Meta, which stems from 2020, where the civic organisation was accused of violating the terms of service of the WhatsApp Business API, despite the fact that GovChat had signed agreements with the SA government, allowing it to communicate on the governments behalf. 'The government needs to beware of public private partnerships that profit from public infrastructure,' Jordaan warned. 'Public goods should serve our people, not the private sector. GovChat was built to serve South Africans, it was not built to serve algorithms and shareholders. 'We can no longer afford to be digital tenants. We must use these tools, but not lose the power. We need to partner with big tech, do not depend on them,' said Jordaan. Jordaan said South Africa had 1.5 million public servants who needed to be upskilled to navigate a changing world driven by artificial intelligence. 'We don't need to go to the private sector, we are seeing too many people hand over their responsibilities to the private sector, the private sector should strengthen government, it should not replace the work that is done by the government, there should be a big difference between mandate, scope of work,' he said. Jordaan said it was important that big tech treats Africa with the same respect that it treated countries in the West, including how it harvested data of people on the continent. He said recently, authorities in Nigeria had issued a $200 million fine for the use of people's data without consent. 'We are not saying that the private sector should not profit because that's their model, just like how you have a business model in the government. The private sector is important, we need the private sector, but we must guard against the dependency. 'When you are dependent on something they hold the stick, they hold the power - I'm nervous about that, we need to be careful around what the intentions are,' said Jordaan. Sassa own platform Jordaan said a state institution like Sassa, should have its own platform to administer the millions of social welfare payments it administers monthly. 'The private sector is lucky there is so much inefficiency in government,' he remarked. 'Look at Sassa, if the South African government wanted to own a platform, I would start there. You have more than half population on Sassa, but you choose to use platforms that exist. If I were the government, I would use my own platform and make it mandatory. 'I say it again, the private sector is lucky there are inefficiencies in the government,' said Jordaan. IOL editor Lance Witten speaking at the Social Media Summit for Government. Image: Supplied Earlier, IOL's editor-in-chief Lance Witten urged government communicators to listen to the people in developing narratives and content around their government departments. Witten made the comments during a fireside chat with SABC journalist Bongiwe Zwane at the summit. 'There is a steady decline in audiences engaging with platforms like news websites, which are now seen as legacy media. You can build the best content, but if you are not where your audience is, there is no point in creating that content,' he said. Witten said tailored and platform specific content and messaging was key for audiences. 'What we have discovered is that we need to be where the audiences are… you need to create specific native for the platform you are on, if it is all tailored for the platform, that is where and how the audience will engage with it,' he said. With shrinking revenues, Witten said it was important for communications teams to be clear about their identity, their narrative and to be unequivocal about a political stance. He also said the impact of the changing consumption habits and technology such as AI, had a big impact on news publishers, and content teams needed to be aware of AI optimization, as the AI and search engines like Google became more of answer engines rather than search engines. 'Am I creating the content on my platform? Is it good for the crawler? Is it good for ChatGpt? Are you creating content helping the answer engine? How am I answering the audience needs? 'From a news content provider perspective, it has impacted our concept of how we create content and the credibility, our audiences are on social media, they are good at spotting authenticity, they are less likely to trust a brand,' said Witten. IOL
The South African
12 hours ago
- The South African
Do SA refugee applicants have to make their social media profiles public?
South African applicants for the US refugee status programme are questioning whether a recent directive about making their social media accounts public applies to them. Last week, the US Embassy notified visa applicants that screening and vetting would be extended to their online presences. According to reports, 1000 Afrikaners will be resettled in the US by September as part of an executive order issued by President Donald Trump. Last week, the US Embassy instructed all applicants for the F, M, and J nonimmigrant visas to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media profiles to 'public.' This was part of their comprehensive vetting, which was extended to include individuals' online presence. The F, M, and J visas are open to students and are intended for educational purposes and not extended stays in the country. According to US intelligence expert Chris Wyatt, the social media clause outlined by the US Embassy is non-applicable to refugee applicants. He said in a clip posted on social media: 'Unless you're told by the Refugee Assistance Programme that you need to open it so they can see it, it's not something that affects you'. He continued: 'Relax, take a deep breath. It's all going to be fine. Do not panic'. @edlin1344 South African Refugees and Social Media Requirements#edlin1344 ♬ original sound – Edlin Wyatt added that there was a possibility that authorities would want to screen social media profiles in selected cases. He added: 'As a former federal law enforcement official, I would definitely want to be looking at people's social media when I'm trying to determine whether they're the right sort of people to come to America. 'Regardless of what programme they're applying for'. According to the US Embassy, applicants for the refugee programme must meet the following criteria. Be South African Be of Afrikaner ethnicity or be a member of a racial minority in South Africa. Must be able to articulate an experience of persecution or fear of future persecution. Applicants who met the criteria were encouraged to complete and submit a Statement of Interest form. In line with US President Donald Trump's claims of 'racial discrimination', applicants must prove that they have been 'persecuted' in their applications. 1000 Afrikaner refugees will reportedly be resettled in the US in the next few months. This forms part of President Donald Trump's Executive Order. Image via Canva In the Statement of Interest form, applicants are required to specify if the 'persecution' was based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, membership of a social group, or a fear of 'future harm'. Other questions included when the prospective 'refugee' would like to travel to the US, how many family members they would like to bring, and if interested parties have a valid passport. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
