
Unlocking The Potential Of Advanced Analytics To Ignite Growth
Digital marketing has blessed modern marketers with a wealth of customer engagement data. This data pours out of web sites, digital media campaigns, Customer Data Platforms (CDPs), ecommerce channels, CRM systems and mobile devices. In theory, the current revolution in advanced analytics and AI should multiply the ability of marketing leaders to use this data to unlock more growth for their businesses. Data-driven marketing can improve the performance of marketing campaigns, personalize customer experiences, and multiply the return on brand, relationship and channel assets. But in practice, most marketing teams are far from realizing the potential of big marketing data to ignite growth. And many are not satisfied with efforts to maximize AI's value – despite the hype.
For example, only 31% of marketers are fully satisfied with their ability to unify customer data sources, according to a survey of 5,000 marketers by Salesforce. Less than one third (32%) of marketers surveyed by Salesforce were completely satisfied with how they use customer data to create relevant experiences. And while almost every CMO surveyed by the Fuqua School of Business has invested in a wide variety of tools to manage and monetize this data, the majority of them are unsatisfied with the results they are getting from this technology. Over three quarters of growth leaders say they face talent gaps and operational constraints that limit their ability to effectively harness AI technology, according to a survey of 1,800 marketing and sales executives by The IBM Institute for Business Value.
This begs the question: why are marketers struggling to unlock the full potential of advanced analytics to ignite Growth? Is it the data? Is it the way it is organized? Are the tools and techniques being used to analyze it inadequate? Or the skills of the analysts? Or is it the inherent risks of relying on big data that are holding them back?
The answer is likely all of the above, according to Frank Findley, Executive Director of the Marketing Accountability Standards Board (MASB), who is actively studying the problem with a team of top academics in the field. 'There are no clear standards for the methods, tools and procedures that businesses use to collect, structure, analyze and monetize the wealth of 'marketing big data' that they generate,' says Findley, who is leading the MASB Big Data in Marketing Study. 'It is difficult for CMOs to know which analytical and statistical approaches still work in a world of big marketing data, and many have not yet figured out what what new AI enabled analytics methods they can rely upon to make better, faster and more reliable business decisions about their marketing actions and investments.'
For example, tried and true traditional statistical based approaches like regression analysis and reporting tools and dashboards that have been proven to be reliable for analyzing customer data in the past. But these proven tools may not be fast or cost effective enough to support the large data sets and analytical needs of a modern marketing organization. Likewise, while many marketers are quick to experiment with new AI enabled analytics approaches, such as Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning, and Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) – their efficacy, trustworthiness, reliability, and integrity remain in question.
In public forums, Marketers regularly tout the potential of advanced analytics to better segment audiences, plan media, forecast demand, optimize pricing, and allocate growth resources. For example, CMOs expect a full 44% of their work to be AI enabled in the next three years, according to the CMO Survey by the Fuqua School of Business. But behind closed doors they worry about whether AI will give them the wrong answers, introduce biases into their decision making, and create brand and compliance risks due to hallucinations and privacy breaches. In addition, the reliability, availability and cost advantages of these tools are not well understood.
'If marketers don't figure out the best ways to structure, analyze, and monetize their marketing big data, their role as the voice of the customer and the leader of customer insight will be called into question,' says Purush Papatla, a Professor of Marketing in the Sheldon B. Lubar School of Business who helped design the MASB Big Data in Marketing Study. Purush makes a prescient point. For the first time, fewer than half of CMOs report they have customer insights as one of their primary responsibilities in the latest CMO survey. If the marketing team does not own customer insights, which functional organization does? – and do they have the business acumen, analytical skills, and customer context to use those insights to improve go to market performance?
Getting an answer to the questions MASB is asking is important. Why? Because today, the knowledge that resides in this customer big data can be the largest and most valuable financial asset in the business. When you consider that over 80% of the value of any B2B organization is made up of 'intangible assets' like intellectual property, innovations, 'know how', customer insights, and codified information, and brand equity - the knowledge in your customer database could be worth millions or billions of dollars, according to analysis in the book Capitalism without Capital.
In that light, much of the value of marketing creates lies in their unique ability to capture, organize, and analyze all this customer engagement data to create useful information to support marketing decisions and actions. 'Our goal with the MASB Big Data Study is to help CMOs learn from the collective intelligence of other CMOs on how to best squeeze the most value out of investing in AI and how to avoid the roadblocks and landmines, so to speak, they will face along the way,' says Professor Papatla, who is also the Co-Director of the Northwestern Mutual Data Science Institute.
For example, the best marketing organizations are creating value by connecting and consolidating their customer engagement data assets in ways that turn it into knowledge that can support marketing decisions and plans. There are many ways that marketers can use advanced analytics and AI agents to turn messy and disorganized marketing big data into valuable go-to-market knowledge that supports marketing actions and actions. They include:
A bigger opportunity to create financial value from this data is to turn it into codified knowledge that can be monetized in marketing channels, selling situations, commerce transactions, and customer responses. Codified, or explicit knowledge, is defined as information that is captured and cataloged and converted into knowledge that is ready for people to use – ideally to make more money. It appears in documents, procedures, and databases. In contrast with tacit or implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge is codified and articulated. The most important aspect of codified knowledge is that it is acknowledged by the accounting profession as an asset with financial value. In accounting, a knowledge asset refers to the intellectual resources and expertise an organization possesses that can be used to create value and gain a competitive advantage. These assets can include things like patents, trade secrets, customer databases, employee skills, and company processes. In the context of revenue generation, codified knowledge assets are useable materials in a customer database or knowledgebase such as codified/explicit knowledge such as instructions, AI agents, algorithms, models, software that can be used sales and marketing to generate future revenues. There are many ways that marketers can use advanced analytics and AI agents to turn insights into codified knowledge that can be monetized in marketing, media, and sales channels, according to a Certification program for marketers by Revenue Operations Associates. The list includes:
One problem is that in most organization, knowledge is spread around in many systems, brains and silos. Much of it lies in on average eight systems such as CDPs, marketing automation, CRM, digital media, content management, and first party web sites. Much of this knowledge still lives in adjacent systems like word processing, collaboration software, emails, SharePoint drives, or in spreadsheets. 'Marketers are tasked with analyzing a variety of first party data structures, that track behavior across web sites, mobile devices, commerce platforms and social media channels – but also increasingly unstructured data from audio recordings, video and images,' says Findley.
Another problem is there is often no single function, or role with responsibility to organize and analyze that data. Often big customer data is managed by marketing, or sales, or a third party vendor, according to Findley. In some cases a center of excellence is put in place to coordinate and analyze data. This challenge is multiplied by the growing variety of people who are actively analyzing that data. For example, in any given organization analysts from marketing, sales or finance can be evaluating the same data sets, in a different context, with different purposes (e.g. targeting audiences, defining account coverage, forecasting cash flow). Different players will have different levels of skills and use different types of tools. For examples marketers may use path analysis to optimize resources and attribute revenues, cluster analysis to segment markets objectively, and computer vision to evaluate, categorize and personalize creative. 'Specific tools have specific usefulness, so having a wide variety of proven tools in your belt can be a real advantage,' says Findley. 'But marketers also need to understand the unique risks and deficiencies of the tools they are using. For example AI agents create a range of compliance, bias, and privacy risks which are not well understood – while other traditional BI and reporting tools may be too slow or labor intensive to manage the large data sets marketers have at their disposal.' By examining the current practices for collecting, managing and analyzing customer data across hundreds of businesses – and cross referencing the associated risk and financial implications of those approaches – his team hopes to provide CMOs a complete picture of how they need to organize their approach to big data.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gizmodo
a few seconds ago
- Gizmodo
11-Port Power Station Now Going for Peanuts, Anker Clears Out Its Entire Stock Before Summer Ends
Summer is the best time to go on camping adventures, van life vacations, or weekend gatherings with friends, and a good power supply is needed to keep all your devices charged along the way. Devices such as the Anker Solix C1000 (1800W) have been very popular on Amazon over the last two years, and the current discount makes it almost unbeatable. Right now, you can get it for $469, down from $799, which is a 41 percent reduction just a few weeks after Prime Day. See at Amazon This model features a 1056Wh LiFePO4 battery that boasts great longevity with up to 3,000 charge cycles and an estimated 10-year lifespan. Its highest output capacity is 2400W (and the regular output is 1800W) which is powerful enough to supply power to nearly any house and outdoor device. With its 11 ports, you can charge multiple devices simultaneously and enjoy well over enough connections to power various gadgets and larger machines as well. Some of the things you can power with it include smartphones, laptops, mini fridges, electric grills or drones. It's also great as a home backup power during blackouts, so your requirements keep going uninterrupted. The Solix C1000 is the best in the group with its UltraFast recharge speed and it reaches 80 percent battery life in just 43 minutes of AC charging, and a complete charge in under an hour. That's quick enough to make it an absolute blessing for hectic lives and fast turnaround between uses. Moreover, the power station can also be recharged with solar power and fast recharging with solar up to 600W replenishes the battery fully in approximately 1.8 hours when an optional solar panel is employed. What's more, it is 15 percent smaller than comparable 1kWh units which makes it easier to carry with you and store when traveling. Its tough SurgePad technology allows it to deliver high surge power needed by more power-demanding appliances. The Anker app offers a tailored experience where you can track usage stats and adjust charging rates in the moment, with full control of your power station's features at your fingertips. If you're looking to invest in a (powerful) power station, this deal is worth serious consideration. See at Amazon


Fox News
a minute ago
- Fox News
Why AI is causing summer electricity bills to soar
If your electricity bill seems shockingly high, you're not imagining it. A big part of the spike is being driven by rising artificial intelligence electricity demand. PJM Interconnection, the largest power grid operator in the United States, says electricity usage is climbing sharply this summer. Some areas may see bills increase by as much as 20%. One of the main drivers behind this trend is the growing power consumption from data centers that support AI systems like ChatGPT and other generative tools. Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you'll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my PJM supplies electricity to 67 million customers across 13 states: Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia, as well as the District of Columbia. It manages a vast and complex network of power distribution. This summer, the grid is showing signs of strain. In just the past year, data centers running AI have started using much more electricity. These centers can consume up to 30 times more power than traditional data centers. Most of them are connected to the same grid that serves homes and businesses, which means the cost of that power growth is shared by everyone. AI took off in 2023 when tools like ChatGPT became widely adopted. Since then, companies have been racing to build more infrastructure to keep up. PJM's territory now has the largest number of data centers in the world. Between 2024 and 2025, electricity demand from AI and data centers in the PJM region contributed to a $9 billion increase in power costs. PJM expects peak usage this summer to reach over 154,000 megawatts, with the potential to exceed all-time records during heat waves or emergencies. While demand is rising quickly, the power supply is not keeping up with the pace. Many fossil fuel plants are shutting down due to state regulations, aging infrastructure or market conditions. More than 9,000 megawatts of coal capacity will retire or convert to gas in 2025 alone. Clean energy options like wind and solar are often the cheapest ways to add new power, but developers are struggling with permitting delays, rising costs and a loss of federal incentives. For example, the 30% federal solar tax credit for homeowners will end after 2025. That change is already slowing down new installations. Even if you never use AI tools yourself, you are still likely paying for their growth. The cost of expanding the data center's power supply is spread across all grid users, including regular households. PJM customers have been warned to expect electric bills to increase by $25 or more per month. Commercial users may see prices climb nearly 30%. To help prevent rolling blackouts, PJM is rolling out demand response programs that pay large businesses to temporarily reduce their electricity use during periods of extreme demand. Still, if electricity usage exceeds 166,000 megawatts, some regions may not have enough reserve power to maintain reliability. Looking for ways to lower your electricity bill as prices surge? Here are some effective tips you can start using today: For more tips and expert advice, check out the 7 best ways to save money on your electricity bill AI electricity demand is growing faster than the grid can handle. As more data centers come online to power tools like ChatGPT, the strain is showing up on your utility bill. Without major upgrades to infrastructure or smarter energy policy, prices could keep climbing. The tech may be smart, but the cost of keeping it running is getting harder for everyone else to ignore. Have your electricity bills gone up recently? Let us know by writing us at Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you'll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my Copyright 2025 All rights reserved.


Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
Book Review: Mark Shupe's 'The Moneyball Method'
PHOENIX, AZ - February 29: General Manager Billy Beane of the Oakland Athletics stands in the ... More clubhouse during a spring training workout at Papago Park on February 29, 2012 in Phoenix, Arizona. (Photo by Michael Zagaris/) Charlie Munger famously said, 'It's remarkable how much long-term advantage people like us have gotten by trying to be consistently not stupid, instead of trying to be very intelligent.' Were he still with us, Munger might admit that when it comes to money, it takes a lot of intelligence or at least a lot of emotional intelligence to be 'consistently not stupid.' Just the same, the insights from the late multi-billionaire demand more knowledge attainment from all of us so that we can know what to do when perhaps it isn't obvious. One aid in the human desire to be smart about money will surely be longtime wealth management and trust expert Mark Shupe's new book, The Moneyball Method: A Middle-Class Manifesto for Objective Investing. Shupe tells readers that 'the Moneyball Method is most suitable for middle class and affluent investors who own brokerage accounts, retirement plans, trust accounts, bank deposits or annuities.' Shupe met and led the needs of just these kinds of clients at First Merit Bank (later Huntington National Bank), along with Morgan Stanley. It was while at these institutions that Shupe happened on the myriad fallacies associated with 'best practices' on the matter of wealth management. Sensing customers were being misled by accepted wisdom, he turned his own 'principles into practice.' Why the Moneyball reference related to Michael Lewis's much-revered book? It's because as contrarian baseball mind Bill James explained it about baseball, 'A great portion of the sport's traditional knowledge is hokum.' Shupe feels the same way about money management. He sees an investment metaphor in Moneyball that can be applied to money, that 'the natural world is orderly and knowable and you can choose to live in harmony with reality, or not.' Shupe chooses reality, and aims to convey it to his readers. He tells them to 'replace the stress and errors of predicting the future and beating the market with the resilience of objective data.' From there, he notes that 'the objective investor chooses the destination and uses the historical data for the navigational chart.' Put another way, markets themselves inform us about markets, including how to best hedge against the inevitable downturns in markets. In Shupe's words, 'market prices fluctuate, market leadership changes – and that is guaranteed.' The only add here to Shupe's wise words is something he might agree with: markets gain strength from times of weakness as the bad to mediocre are replaced through price signals by the good and great. Contrast the above with the popular view inside the money management world itself that the Federal Reserve, by merely fiddling with interest rates, can trick markets into rallies wholly at odds with market realities. What nonsense. What an implied comment that money is stupid, and this is important given Shupe's routine assertion throughout the book that money is the opposite of stupid. As the Ayn Rand devotee in Shupe puts it, and in a fashion that would surely please Rand, 'Money is an effect that is caused by productive people using persuasion – not force, to achieve their goals.' Yes, money that actually circulates is the surest sign of production, which explains Rand's reverence for it. Opposite the simplistic inside and outside of Wall Street, along with the simplistic inside and outside of academia and punditry, money is never 'easy' precisely because production is never easy. And no amount of central bank meddling can alter the previous truth. Very disappointingly, right-of-center types who should know better lament at times 'easy money' that is allegedly having all sorts of market and economic impacts, all of which speaks to many important aspects of Shupe's book. He's not having it. He's congenitally predisposed to seeing money as it is, not what the simplistic want it to be. Which requires readers to forget what central banks and monetary authorities are doing or have done, what they've 'printed' and what they haven't, so that they can then concentrate on money in circulation as opposed to money created by central planners from the Commanding Heights. In thinking about this, readers will hopefully see that allowing for its myriad demerits care of powerfully flawed economic theory on the right (Milton Friedman, and countless others) and left (Paul Krugman, and countless others), the dollar facilitates exchange and investment around the world exactly because production itself is money. And the dollar, allowing once again for its demerits born of President Nixon's decision to sever its relationship with the constant that was and is gold, is seen the world over as money par excellence precisely because the producers who bring goods to market will generally only accept money broadly exchangeable for real market goods, services and labor in return for a commensurate amount of their own market goods. The above is something that Shupe somewhat uniquely grasps. In his words, 'money in circulation will always maintain its ideal level.' Again, forget what central banks, mints, and monetary authorities produce based on the phrenological belief of economists and their disciples that creation of so-called 'money supply' instigates production, and instead recognize what's true, that money in circulation is as natural as the production that money facilitates the exchange of. That's why there's a lot of money in Manhattan, but relatively little in the Bronx. Of course, the truth embraced by Shupe that 'money in circulation will always maintain its ideal level' rejects all the fabulism on Wall Street, academia, and within the economic commentariat that aggressive creation of what they imagine is 'money' instigates stock-market rallies. What an insult. Call it 'you didn't build that,' Wall Street edition. More realistically, producers decide what monetary forms circulate based on the not-so-insightful truth that they seek roughly equal amounts of product for the product they bring to market. Applied to equities, the very notion that owners of shares in the production of the world's most innovative people would blithely exchange what's precious for just any paper is truly silly. It's not just that government meddling runs wholly counter to what lifts equity markets, it's not just that markets yet again gain their vitality from periods of weakness as money relentlessly puts out to pasture what is no longer meeting and leading the needs of the people, it's not that the mindless contradiction that is 'easy money' has never lifted stocks in Europe and Japan in the way that the confused claim it's lifted them stateside (again, 'you didn't build that'), it's that all of what's been used to explain market conditions completely misunderstands what money is. Money rewards production, nothing else. It's where production is, nowhere else. Shupe puts it so well, that 'when we understand that money is the stored legacy of productive minds, we earn a healthy respect for it.' Markets respect money, so does Shupe, but not most conventional thinkers who comment on money and markets. Hence Shupe's book. From this understanding of money as evidence of production expands understanding for readers more broadly. Consider the myth about so-called 'pricing power.' Reporters, pundits, and economists talk about it, believe it's real, but since money in circulation reflects production while attaching a money price to market goods, the rational can see that it's not. As Shupe notes, 'prices are information and new sellers will continuously enter the marketplace to capture some of that business.' What's true about market prices is true about equity prices. The price of well-regarded, some would say 'dominant' corporations is the lure for new investment meant to compete away the dominance. Quoting Shupe directly from the previous paragraph, 'prices are information and new sellers will continuously enter the marketplace to capture some of that business.' All of which explains why so-called 'monopolies' should be revered and cheered. They're the price signal that summons competition. Conversely, a lack of so-called 'monopoly' profits should similarly be cheered as information for telling investors where more capital is not needed. As Shupe explains it, 'breaking even is not productive.' No, it's not, which is why prices are so elemental to progress. From the above we can further see the truth about money. The very notion that central banks could 'gun' so-called 'money supply,' or equally ridiculous, that central banks could contract so-called 'money supply,' insults common sense. Production is money, it's an expression of a desire to get, so to pretend as the right and left do, that economic progress or contraction is an effect of how 'easy' or 'tight' a central bank is, really and truly vandalizes reason. It also explains why the dollar circulates all over the world, and in countries that already have their own currencies. It's quite simply not money unless producers say so. Real money doesn't instigate, it's an effect. Rand wore the dollar sign because the dollar then and now facilitates the exchange of goods, services and labor for goods, services and labor. Equities are a market good like any other. Their prices once again instruct us on what's needed, what's not, and what could be. Which is why per Shupe yet again that 'money in circulation will always maintain its ideal level.' It quite simply wouldn't be money if it didn't. In an investing-specific sense, Shupe's client-focused approach is to find out 'how much downside market risk can be absorbed without changing the spending goals, saving habits, or the timing events for the investor.' Which seems to ask how much money is the individual willing to lose in the near-term, and in recognition of what near-term losses could mean for the long term. The question itself would elicit as many answers as there are people, along with wildly different answers from those same people depending on the direction of the stock market. Which seemingly helps this reviewer to provide a simplified approach to Shupe's more detailed investment technique. Put in Moneyball terms, how to avoid getting outs? On per Munger, how to be "consistently not stupid." The seemingly obvious answer is that there's no way to avoid it altogether. Which is no insight. Just as you can't coach speed, you also can't coach a lack of emotional swings. Better to let the markets worry for you, rather than worry about what can't be controlled. Which means there's no certain, individual stock-picking style that's necessarily going to work. That's particularly true if you have a destination that you're trying to reach. To see why, contemplate the blue-chips at the beginning of the 21st century. Seemingly buying the best of the best corporations to buy and hold would seemingly be the path to a gilded retirement? Perhaps think again. When the 21st century dawned GE was the world's most valuable company, AOL and Yahoo were the darlings of the internet, Barron's told us Tyco was the next GE, Enron had the smartest executives (which may have been true despite the outcome), Lucent was the future of communications, etc. Readers get where this is going. So does Shupe. As first discussed early in this review, Shupe once again tells readers to 'replace the stress and errors of predicting the future and beating the market with the resilience of objective data.' Markets once again predict markets. Rather than trying to pick the best of the future best on the way to market-beating returns, just be invested in broad market indices, including those known to perform best when stocks are known to perform the worst. Shupe observes that 'index funds are the best fit,' while intermediate term (7-10 years) Treasuries 'are the best historical hedge against stock market risk.' The Treasury hedge in dollar terms would seemingly grow or shrink depending on one's willingness to take risks. It had me wondering while reading The Moneyball Method how much of Shupe's own wealth is hedged. This is asked not as a sleuth trying to find holes in Shupe's investment process, but is instead a question rooted in speculation, all based on Shupe's reverence for productive minds. While Treasuries are in a very real sense a riskless income stream since they're backed by productive minds via taxation, equities represent an ownership stake in the brilliant work of productive minds. Treasuries are yet again an income stream in dollars, while equities represent ownership of the boundless upside that can be captured when productive minds are matched with capital. It's a long way of speculating that Shupe is hedged quite a bit less than most for whom he's managed wealth. And that's not a criticism. As alluded to earllier, there are as many investing styles as there are people. Still, as someone who recognizes what money is, and who has a healthy respect for money based on this understanding, it's hard to imagine that Shupe would ever heap even a little disrespect on precious money by exchanging it with the U.S. Treasury in return for the latter's excessive taxable access to our production. Mark Shupe has written a very interesting and enlightening book about investing. Of great importance to readers, he doesn't just provide them with a roadmap for putting wealth to work, he also provides them with a rare understanding of the money that represents the wealth, and that clarifies money as the brilliant effect of the productive minds who relentlessly improve the world through tireless efforts to improve themselves.