On a trade deadline day that called for action, the Cubs hugged their prospects tight
Try San Diego or Houston.
On Thursday, the Cubs played it safe, while the White Sox tried to muster some enthusiasm about another season of Luis Robert Jr. Meanwhile, Chicago just collectively shook its head and asked when the Bears' first preseason game is.
Advertisement
All that time spent coming up with fake trades was wasted.
It's fair to say the best addition by either team at the deadline was when Cubs president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer swung a deal for 'super-utilityman' Willi Castro.
The White Sox, who have used a hot streak to vault from the second-worst record in baseball to the second-worst record in baseball, made just two deals in the last two days.
The Cubs made a handful of moves but didn't address their most obvious need: starting pitching.
Sox general manager Chris Getz's only real trade chip was rental starting pitcher Adrian Houser. While he apparently had conversations with his friend Hoyer about another crosstown deal, it didn't happen.
The Cubs and Sox almost had a trade for Adrian Hauser. ' We worked really hard but didn't quite get there.'Hoyer told me. Getz confirmed that they had conversations up to 30 min before the deadline.Getz said he thought they were close for the prospects they asked for.
— Bruce Levine (@MLBBruceLevine) August 1, 2025
Once I saw that Getz traded Houser to the savvy Tampa Bay Rays, I figured he probably lost the deal.
In return for Houser, Getz got a former top prospect in Curtis Mead and two Triple-A relievers. The Charlotte Knights improved with this deal, but I'm not so sure about the White Sox. The easy comparison, and one Getz himself made, was to his deadline deal last year when he picked up Miguel Vargas from the Los Angeles Dodgers.
Vargas looked like he had never previously hit a baseball last season. This season, he is only slightly below average offensively, which is a massive improvement. Another year, another project. (Getz also got a minor-league pitcher from the Yankees for outfielder Austin Slater.)
The big news on Thursday was that Getz couldn't swing a trade of Robert, his former All-Star. It wasn't that big of a surprise considering how Robert has played for most of the season. Though he has heated up lately, no smart GM would trade top prospects for such an unsure thing. Unfortunately for Getz, most of the dumb ones aren't running teams in playoff contention.
Advertisement
In the wake of this failure, Getz tried to express his utmost faith in Robert, who has been unreliable and unproductive for the past two seasons.
'It starts with Luis and how we feel about him,' he said. 'You look at what he's done in the last month or so and he's impacting the game in so many different ways, which speaks to the talent he has. We believe in Luis Robert.'
We believe in Luis Robert … until next season, when we try desperately to trade him again. First, they have to pick up his $20 million option, which might give Jerry Reinsdorf some agita, but it's a bet they have to make.
OK, that's enough White Sox.
The Cubs were the team with the most to gain this week and their results are mixed at best. At worst, this was a failure. If we can meet in the middle, it was a missed opportunity.
Hoyer got swingman Michael Soroka on Wednesday and added relievers Andrew Kittredge and Taylor Rogers on Thursday. And if they weren't going to swing for the fences with Eugenio Suárez, Castro was a perfect addition for their needs. He can play multiple positions in the infield and outfield. He's the kind of guy that playoff teams get at the deadline.
As for the pitchers, well, we'll see. Relievers are a volatile bunch. I trust the Cubs' pitching department, but none of these guys are Mason Miller or Jhoan Duran. And aside from Soroka, who will probably be slotted into the bullpen down the stretch, they aren't starters.
Early Thursday evening, Hoyer walked into a second-floor conference room where the media was holed up to address his trade deadline moves and lack thereof. He wasn't thrilled to see a news conference setup. If he landed a top starter, he would've done cartwheels to the backdrop and lectern.
Instead, Hoyer had to address his missed opportunity to find a starter for a beleaguered rotation. Sure, Jameson Taillon and Javier Assad could be close to returning from their injury rehabs. But this is a team that desperately needed a proven starter not only for October, but also to help hold off the Brewers, who are currently in first place in the NL Central.
'The goal is to be good every year … the goal is not to have massive up-and-down cycles.' – Jed Hoyer pic.twitter.com/aznUyi6A6Q
— Marquee Sports Network (@WatchMarquee) August 1, 2025
Like a lot of baseball execs did Thursday, Hoyer noted the bold-faced names, the starting pitchers with years of control left, weren't traded at all. The teams that kept them wanted the farm in return, so to speak, and Hoyer drew a line in the dirt.
'I think that we obviously worked hard on some guys that I feel like could provide significant impact,' he said. 'In the end, the asking price on those guys would have been so detrimental to our future that we've obviously decided against it.'
Advertisement
You might call it prospect-hugging, Hoyer calls it responsible stewardship for a franchise he'll be running for the foreseeable future. His contract extension was announced Monday. All that talk about timing to help him at the trade deadline was just more wasted breath.
Going into a lame-duck season, Hoyer made a win-now move in the winter when he traded his 2024 top pick, Cam Smith, to Houston for one year of Kyle Tucker. On one hand, it has worked out for both teams. Smith went from prospect to starter for the Astros, and Tucker was looking like an MVP until the last month. But if the Cubs don't do anything this postseason and Tucker walks, it will no longer be looked at as such a win-win deal.
That's why the conventional wisdom was that Hoyer would take a couple more big swings at the deadline to try to improve his odds.
Now, if Hoyer had to deal multiple top prospects for starters with years of control, and if teams were really asking for Matt Shaw and Cade Horton, you can see why that's a nonstarter for him.
'Whether it's in this offseason or in the past, I think, certainly we've moved top prospects, but the calculus that we have to make is ultimately what is the impact this is making and how many wins are we losing going forward,' he said.
But all logic that doesn't make the Cubs' situation any more enviable now or in the future. The Cubs are going to need some luck to make a run in the postseason, and they'll still need to spend money — not chairman Tom Ricketts' favorite thing to do — in the offseason to keep this train moving.
It all comes back to money. If the Cubs had paid up for Alex Bregman in the offseason or spent more money on pitching — aside from Matthew Boyd's bargain of a deal — then Hoyer wouldn't be in the position to worry about the price of deadline poker.
Advertisement
But that's not the Cubs' reality, and Hoyer is left trying to toe the line between the present and the future.
'I think the job is to make the best decisions for the organization,' he said. 'And there's times that's focused on just right now and there's times that's focused on the future. And those are the conversations we have every day. So we try to be as unemotional about those as possible.'
In related news, the Cubs DFA'd former closer Ryan Pressly to make room for Rogers, the aforementioned reliever acquired from the Pirates. In his last outing in Milwaukee on Tuesday, Pressly gave up a grand slam to Andrew Vaughn to break open a close game.
Pressly was one of Hoyer's big acquisitions this offseason, but he didn't pitch up to his reputation and lost his job to Daniel Palencia. Now he's looking for a new place to pitch.
Can Rogers and Kittredge help the bullpen survive? Can those two, along with Soroka, be the kinds of 'out-getters' that manager Craig Counsell needs?
Will any of the prospects they didn't trade, like Owen Caissie, Kevin Alcantara and Moisés Ballesteros, be the reinforcements the team needs down the stretch?
On a day when the Cubs were supposed to get some answers, a lot of questions remain.
The most important one — 'Did the Cubs do enough?' — will be answered over the next two to three months.
(Photo of Kyle Tucker: Benny Sieu / Imagn Images)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI in food – 'secret sauce' solution sought for productivity
AI is expected to improve food manufacturers' productivity and efficiency but as with the development of any new technology there is an element of apprehension. Much of the anxiety seemingly comes down to a lack of understanding of the technology itself, how it works and the myriad of AI systems that could be employed for different applications and problem-solving. And then there's the question of labour, tech-skilled labour rather than the manual kind. Think about the evolution of phone technology – moving from analogue to digital devices and hefty back-of-the car handsets to those that now fit in a pocket – electric vehicles and their slow development due to a lack of infrastructure and the introduction of hybrid models as a half-way-house to address bottlenecks. Food manufacturers are adopting AI but reservations might come down to investing too much too quickly when the tech is advancing at pace, capital on hand and assessing the return on investment. Abhinav Agrawal, the co-lead of AI and data monetisation at consultancy AlixPartners, argues food manufacturers also face a bottleneck in that they 'are not exactly the desired location for data scientists, AI programmers and developers' to attract the desired talent pool. 'I don't recommend our clients make big bets right now,' Agrawal tells Just Food. 'One of our clients launched a $55-60m AI initiative about two years ago but there's no measurable ROI right now. There's no success that we can point to that $60m was worth investing. 'Instead, launch $5m projects and see. Maybe two of them fail but three of them produce a ROI and you gain a little more experience in which type of skills you need to hire. 'Then you launch another five, or maybe next time you can launch ten, so in the end you may end up spending $60m over three years, for instance.' 'Strategic advantage' It's a bit of a juggling act for food manufacturers. There's almost an obligation to invest in AI now or risk being left behind and losing a competitive edge. Or as Tom Clayton, the CEO of Sheffield-based IntelliAM, puts it, gaining a 'strategic advantage'. Clayton, the head of the tech company specialising in AI software and machine learning for manufacturers, believes productivity improvements through the tech are a way to address the increasing demand for food as global populations rise. 'In the food and beverage world, where you're talking about high volumes and low margins, it's really interesting because, if you can make an extra 100,000 SKUs a day, that's direct profit to the business. Similarly, if you can avoid wastage, you're moving costs from the bottom line. 'We're talking considerable amounts of money. Essentially, the driver of these organisations is to be able to improve capacity of the plants by being more intelligent and doing more with less.' AI not yet 'transformational' to profits There's an obvious buzz around AI, not just in the food industry but outside as the benefits (or otherwise) of the technology are debated across media. Clayton says there's been an 'immense increase' in interest over the last two years as boardrooms wake up to the fact the tech might give them an advantage. 'In any new technology convergence, there's always people who want to embrace it immediately. As your competitors do it, you've got to do it. Unfortunately, I think there's going to be a bit of first-mover advantage over the AI element,' he adds. Agrawal presents an example of how AI can work its magic in improving productivity and efficiency in terms of a salty snacks manufacturer for which AlixPartners acted as an adviser – assessing the size and shape of corn used in the production process to ensure quality and consistency. The production line's operating efficiency rate went up from the 80s percentage range into the 90s from employing an AI system, he says, adding each percentage point increase 'translated into a couple of million dollars of bottom-line impact'. However, Agrawal suggests the tech is not yet 'transformational' when it equates to output and profitability. 'For me, transformative means you're going after 30-40-50% plant P&L improvement, that type of thing. I would not say it is possible right now. It is in maybe the 20s with these technologies,' he argues. 'But I do think that in a year or so, the technology can improve, that it can produce like an 30-40-50% improvement.' Labour leverage Nevertheless, AI can translate into savings on the labour front, Agrawal says, proposing 'what was not possible even five years ago is possible now'. A bakery manufacturer in the US needed a lot of temporary, hourly paid staff to help run its 30 or so production plants, with managers having to assess shift arrangements and working patterns on a daily and weekly basis, he says. 'Our algorithms recommended how much labour they needed by the day, by zone and by type, and whatever. We tracked it for six months and those predictions saved them on average 20%,' Agrawal explains. For those food and CPG manufacturers already 'leveraging' AI tech, Chris Ashley, the vice president of strategy at Peak, a unit of software company UiPath, says the 'advantages compound over time'. He believes the 'more sophisticated they become, the more they can leverage these systems'. Ashley adds: 'They will accrue more working capital efficiency, more operating margin, more productivity and that will just continue to compound over time. We think this needs to be a topic of conversation in every boardroom currently on how to educate the teams. 'I think the impacts can be transformational. The augmentation of these teams with AI-driven systems is driving more productivity and driving more economic upside for the business, which means more jobs.' Level playing field Meanwhile, Clayton at IntelliAM says AI helps improve the reliability and life of production components by identifying problems before they arise, reducing maintenance times and the potential for lines going out of action. AI does that by 'ingesting millions of data points from the brains of the machines in a factory and contextualising' them to 'understand tolerance settings to get maximum throughput speed settings, reduce bottlenecks, to understand the blend of different ingredients from different suppliers to achieve quality improvements, and to reduce waste streams', he explains. IntelliAM advised an unnamed dairy producer trying to make the best use of hygiene requirements between the production of different SKUs on the same line. 'If you're running ten SKUs a day, that might save an hour's production a day and an hour's production turns into hundreds of thousands of bottles of milk,' Clayton suggests. AI is impacting snacks much more than proteins or meat Abhinav Agrawal, AlixPartners However, it's not a level playing field in terms of benefits when it comes to assessing the AI productivity impact on different food categories, Agrawal proposes. In areas like meat and pastries, for instance, AI-driven robots don't yet have the 'delicate' touch to avoid damage, although developments are being made there. 'My experience is that for the protein manufacturer, the ROI from AI so far is still there but it is modest compared to snacks and things like that, largely because there are some regulations around humans doing certain inspections. 'In a nutshell, AI is impacting both sides but it is impacting snacks and those things much more than the proteins or meat and those types of products.' 'Secret sauce' Food manufacturers that Just Food approached to comment for this article were generally disinclined to chat or did not respond – Tyson Foods, Nestlé, Mondelez International and Kellanova fell into the former camp, for instance. It's a 'sensitive' topic, Agrawal says, because some food manufacturers are now using custom solutions rather than the 'out-of-the-box software' in the past – their 'secret sauce'. Cargill was, however, more willing by identifying its 'patent-pending' computer vision technology CarVe, which measures red meat yields. It was rolled out at the company's beef facility in Friona, Texas, in 2024 and additional plants will be added in a 'phased rollout'. Through cameras, CarVe uses AI-inputted models to assess human cutting and trimming techniques to ensure consistent quality and to reduce waste. 'Those gains, together with steadier throughput and better use of labour and materials, strengthen overall plant economics and help us stay cost-competitive for customers,' Jarrod Gillig, senior vice president for food at Cargill's North America beef unit, says. 'Our philosophy with CarVe is to test, learn, refine then scale. We pilot first, capture lessons quickly and scale once the business case is clear. This approach lets us invest wisely, stay nimble and roll out proven innovations across our facilities when they're ready to deliver value for producers and consumers.' Cargill's comments were echoed by Roger Gaemperle, the head of industry strategy and marketing in EMEA markets at US-headquartered automation and tech firm Rockwell Automation. 'There is a lot of potential or high impact on margin' through increased yield output when AI assisted robots can replace the human role in meat processing, which is often not 'nice work' conducted in a cold environment, Gaemperle says. 'If you really want to optimise the margin and also productivity or the output, I think these are the systems that producers need to look at. And, over the next few years, the systems will get smarter and smarter,' he envisages. Another AI benefit is the reduction of waste in raw materials, Gaemperle adds, using the example of milk powder production and the need to have a consistent milk fat percentage to ensure equal quality by production unit. It's becoming transformational because of the speed of the algorithms and computing power Roger Gaemperle, Rockwell Automation More generally, Gaemperle adds: 'It's really becoming transformational because of the speed now with the algorithms and computing power. That's really what has opened up many new opportunities that were not feasible in the past. 'Look at it holistically, the whole production process, and identify first where there are potential opportunities, and then prioritise those opportunities. If the return on the investment can be proven first with one line, then additional use cases can be implemented over time.' Implications for jobs It would be amiss here not to address one of the biggest concerns over the implications of AI technologies across industries – jobs. Opinions varied for this article but the underlying theme to emerge was new types of jobs will be created. 'If you take a modern food and beverage organisation, whilst there is arguably a high degree of automation, there is still a hell of a lot of human interaction and judgement. AI will replace all that,' Clayton opines. However, he throws in the caveat: 'There's an argument that jobs will change, that there will be a transfer of skills because of AI. But there will be better jobs, it's not about job reduction. 'People are intrinsically part of the solution because a) you need the automation engineers to support obtaining the data to create the insights in the first place and then b) they need to look at the people on the output to react to these or manipulate data, like data scientists.' Agrawal suggests the food industry will eventually replicate the semiconductor sector, where companies such as Nvidia and TSMC are using AI to the 'fullest'. 'What I see as the biggest change in four or five years is that we will not need as much human labour in manufacturing. I don't think it'll lead to mass unemployment because there'll be other manufacturing opportunities,' Agrawal suggests. For Ashley at Peak, boardroom education has a key role to play. 'Those jobs might look different going forwards in terms of individuals that can map decision logic and map processes and help architect AI systems. The nature of those jobs and the skills required may shift slightly but I think there is huge upside economically and for every workforce in the AI era,' he argues. 'I think that for the manufacturing industry it basically means that there's incredible opportunity to deploy pilots and capabilities that you can test very quickly to see if they drive business uplifts but it also means there's an education challenge in boardrooms. 'I think it is a watershed moment but it is evolving continuously and businesses need to lean into that and try and figure out how to harness it as best as possible.' "AI in food – 'secret sauce' solution sought for productivity" was originally created and published by Just Food, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Piscataway home furnishing business eyes expansion. See what's planned
PISCATAWAY - A home furnishing company is looking to expand its Hoes Lane site into its national headquarters by adding a nearly 50,000-square-foot building. Venture Net Properties LLC, based in Flushing, New York, is seeking preliminary and final site plan approval along with a use variance and bulk variance relief from the township Zoning Board of Adjustment for property at 425 Hoes Lane. The application is scheduled to be heard at the board's Aug. 14 meeting. Venture Net Properties is looking to use two existing office buildings on the property, located in a business professional zone, and add a 46,249-square-foot, one-story building. The new building is proposed to be used for product assembly, shipping and receiving along with other site improvements and interior modifications. The property will be used as a combination office, wholesale showroom, light assembly, warehouse storage and distribution for the applicant's home furnishing business. The applicant is seeking a variance for the proposed uses in a zone where only the office is permitted. More: Here's where Piscataway is proposing hundreds of affordable housing units Tim Arch, attorney for the company, told township officials last September that the business had been delayed in submitting plans for the construction because of the state Department of Environmental Protection's (DEP) new flood hazard rules. Venture Net Properties also will seek relief for the building's side yard setback where 80 feet is required and 55 feet is proposed, minimum accessory rear yard setback where 15 feet is required and 14 feet is proposed, along with parking requirements where 397 spaces are required and 381 spaces are proposed. Email: srussell@ Suzanne Russell is a breaking news reporter for covering crime, courts and other mayhem. To get unlimited access, please subscribe or activate your digital account today. This article originally appeared on Expansion proposed for Piscataway home furnishing business Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trailhead Biosystems Expands iPSC-Derived Portfolio with TrailBio® Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells
BEACHWOOD, Ohio, Aug. 5, 2025 /CNW/ -- Trailhead Biosystems, Inc. ( a biotechnology company advancing scalable human cell models derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), announces the commercial release of TrailBio® Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells. These progenitor cells are derived from a single, well-characterized iPSC line using Trailhead's proprietary High-Dimensional Design-of-Experiments (HD-DoE®) platform, providing researchers with a consistent, scalable, and ready-to-use tool for hematopoietic research. TrailBio® Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells express key hematopoietic markers including CD34, CD43 and CD90. Functional characterization confirms their ability to form myeloid and erythroid colonies in colony-forming unit (CFU) assays, differentiate into multiple hematopoietic lineages and demonstrate hematopoietic commitment through transcriptomic profiling. Designed for applications such as hematopoietic disease modeling, drug screening and hematotoxicity studies, TrailBio® Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells enable a reliable human model system that eliminates donor variability and supports reproducible results. "TrailBio® Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells strengthen our portfolio by providing researchers with high-quality, human-relevant cellular models," said David Llewellyn, Chief Executive Officer of Trailhead Biosystems. "Their consistency and multipotency enable scientists to advance research in hematopoietic biology and therapeutic development." "These Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells deliver a dependable combination of purity, potency and versatility," said Angelica Gomes Ueltschy, Scientific Director at Trailhead Biosystems. "Their robust marker expression and multilineage differentiation capacity make them well suited for modeling blood disorders and evaluating therapeutic candidates." Cell characterization information and additional data can be found at About Trailhead Biosystems Trailhead Biosystems, Inc. is pioneering an informatics-based approach in regenerative medicine and drug discovery. Founded in 2015 as a spinout from the Cleveland Clinic and Case Western Reserve University, Trailhead emerged from the research of CSO/CTO and founder Dr. Jan Jensen. Trailhead creates optimized human cells at scale with its proprietary High-Dimensional Design-of-Experiments (HD-DoE®) platform, integrating advanced mathematical modeling with high-throughput robotic manufacturing. This innovative system allows Trailhead to develop specialized, high-quality iPSC-derived human cells for drug discovery and cell-based therapies. TrailBio® Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells join a growing portfolio of iPSC-derived human cell types designed to bridge the gap between discovery and clinical translation. Learn more about Trailhead Biosystems, TrailBio® Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells and HD-DoE® at For more information, please contact: Tim Mauk, Corporate CommunicationsTrailhead BiosystemsEmail: info@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Trailhead Biosystems Inc View original content to download multimedia: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
