
Billionaire James Dyson set to get approval for helipad at his luxury Irish country estate
The ruling by An Coimisiún Pleanála follows a decision by Waterford City and County Council to grant planning permission for the helicopter landing pad as well as a new wastewater treatment for Ballynatray House on the Ballynatray Estate on the Cork-Waterford border outside Youghal.
Advertisement
The plans for the helicopter landing area had been criticised for disturbing local wildlife 'for the sake of one person's travelling convenience.'
The planning application was made in the name of the manager of Ballynatray Estate, Christopher Nicholson.
Dyson – one of Britain's richest individuals and one of the strongest advocates in support of the Brexit campaign for Britain to leave the EU – bought Ballynatray House, a protected structure, and its 850-acre estate for €29.25 million last year.
Its previous owner, Henry Gwyn-Jones, a British property developer, had bought the estate for over €11 million in 2004.
Advertisement
In a letter on the planning files, Dyson confirmed he was the ultimate beneficial owner of the property which is held on his behalf by Glashedy Fitzwilliam Trustees Limited.
Ballynatray House had been operated as an exclusive country house with guest accommodation by its previous owner but planning files show Dyson intends to use the mansion as a single residence.
The proposed helicopter landing area is located around 525 metres to the north-east of Ballynatray House in an agricultural field screened from the mansion by planting.
An environmental report submitted with the planning application said it had been 'objectively concluded that the proposed development will not adversely affect the integrity of Natura 2000 sites and there is no reasonable scientific doubt in relation to this conclusion.'
Advertisement
A consultant hired by the applicant said the ecological impact would be 'low and localised in the long term'
He added: 'Although there may be short-term disturbance during the work phase no significant impacts on birds or important mammals are expected to occur.'
Other reports also said the proposed development would have no impact on the house, which was constructed in 1795-1797.
The objector, David Orr, who lives across from Ballynatray House on the opposite side of the Blackwater, said the helicopter landing area would have a high impact on the surrounding environment from helicopters approaching, taking off and landing.
Advertisement
Mr Orr claimed the relatively low-level approach currently used by a helicopter landing at Ballynatray House was directly over Ardsallagh Woodlands which was part of a Special Conservation Area.
He said it posed 'a high risk of disturbance to wildlife within the surrounding area' which was home to a large number of species of birds and mammals.
Mr Orr said the woodlands were an important nesting site for a range of birds including herons, egrets, cormorants, owls and buzzards as well as being a habitat for otters, red squirrels, badgers, foxes, fallow deer and stoats.
He claimed that 'this little oasis' was very vulnerable to disturbance and that the intrusion of helicopters into an environmentally sensitive area would be detrimental.
Advertisement
Ireland
Revenues slide by 30% to €25m at Irish arm of Dyso...
Read More
'It seems to be that for the sake of one person's travelling convenience a large number of both human and non-human inhabitants of this area are going to be disturbed,' observed Mr Orr.
Planning documents submitted on behalf of Dyson noted that the responsibility of taking on such an important estate and designed landscape was understood.
They revealed that long-term plans included woodland management and the continued repair and conservation of Molana Abbey and Templemichael Church which are located within the estate.
An Coimisiún Pleanála ruled that Mr Orr's appeal was invalid as it was not accompanied by an acknowledgement by Waterford City and County Council of his original submission on the planning application.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Plans approved for upgrades to Warwickshire Police HQ site
Warwickshire Police has been given planning permission for 260 extra parking spaces at its force's plans also included additional lighting, security and connecting paths at the site off Woodcote Lane in Leek will also be a new one-way road system installed, which attracted objections from locals who said it could affect the junction of The Anchor District Council officers said it was "not a great junction" but added there would be no greater impact than at present because traffic volumes would not increase. "From the perspective of highways colleagues, the level of traffic using the site will remain unchanged in their opinion, and there would be no further impacts on the Anchor junction as a result of this development," an officer chief constable Ben Smith said the proposal would help ensure officers deployed from the site could do so effectively and councillor Josh Payne noted previously-approved plans for housing on neighbouring land, sold by Warwickshire Police when the force had expected to leave its current also highlighted plans for a nature reserve nearby and the prospect of housing plans on the Kenilworth School site among his on the planning committee heard there were 41 objections from locals and the parish committee approved the plans with instructions that building work must not conflict with work by Cala Homes on the neighbouring site. This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations. Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
New Eastbourne council planning controls to limit HMO conversions
New planning controls to curb the creation of Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs) in parts of Eastbourne town centre have been introduced by the borough Borough Council (EBC) said numbers in the area were already high, but properties that wished to become a HMO would now require planning Article 4 Direction is now in place, alongside new planning guidance, EBC said.A council spokesperson confirmed it related to the conversion of houses into small HMOs for between three and six people - who share basic amenities such as a kitchen or bathroom facilities. The council said this related to properties within Devonshire, Meads and Upperton wards, and a small part of St Anthony's Stephen Holt, EBC leader, said: "I have been campaigning for many years to improve the standard and quality of HMOs."I want to be really clear, HMOs play a crucial role in Eastbourne's housing landscape. "By introducing this comprehensive planning guidance and these new controls, this council is showing its commitment to improving living conditions for HMO residents, as well as their neighbours." EBC said the change did not apply to conversions that were completed before 30 July 2025, and those properties would not require planning permission. Owners of existing small HMOs may, however, apply for a Certificate of Lawful Development to formally confirm their property's lawful council added it had also recently adopted a new Supplementary Planning Document that provided detailed guidance on how existing planning policies would be applied to HMO planning applications. It would consider factors such as concentration, loss of family homes, impact on neighbour amenity, and accommodation standards.


Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Man at war with neighbours over 'oppressive' private drinking den in his garden 'just 20cm from their fence'
Disgruntled neighbours are at war over claims that a resident has built a private drinking den in his garden without planning permission. Company director Michael Bowe, 40, erected a sprawling summer house in the back garden, claiming in council documents that it was needed for 'modern home working and flexible living'. But neighbours allege the plush five-metre-long annexe in Marton-in-Cleveland, near Middlesbrough, looks more like a private bar than a home office. In objections submitted to Middlesbrough Council, disgruntled neighbour Debby Allan wrote to officials: 'We do not feel like the use of what this building is for is accurate. 'It appears to be a bar and when used there have been unacceptable noise levels, as there is a lot of glass that echoes from the outside which causes disturbance to us.' Council planners have now ordered the 'overbearing' and 'oppressive' summer house to be demolished after refusing a retrospective planning application. The flat-roofed garden building, which measures 3.5m by 5m, was built just 20cm from a neighbour's fence and stands nearly three metres tall. Planning permission is typically required when a building taller than 2.5m is located within two metres of a boundary. In planning documents, Ms Allan accused Mr Bowe, a co-director of Middlesbrough childcare agency Invested Childcare, of causing 'great disruption' and said the annexe was 'not in character with existing properties'. She added: 'The work to this property has already been carried out in 2022 and 2024. It has caused great disruption, which has in turn caused us a lot of stress and impacted our mental health. 'We work shifts including night shifts, the noise and disruption had meant we had to stay with relatives to rest in between. 'We were unable to open our blinds in the living room due to the lack of privacy by the builders.' Another neighbour also submitted complaints which claimed the annexe looms into view from her living room and dominates the garden, with its rear wall pressed up against Mr Bowe's back fence. Louise Finn claimed she had endured a loss of privacy and that a confrontation between the pair had caused 'a huge amount of stress and anxiety'. The concern, raised in the documents, read: 'This property has been developed without planning permission and any consideration to properties involved. 'I respectfully request that you reconsider the approval for this retrospective planning of the development, as it would have a negative impact on my property and health and well-being.' Town hall officials refused retrospective planning consent, despite accepting that the annexe was 'not unattractive or of low quality in design terms'. But it ruled the 'significant overbearing' development affects the 'quality of life and living conditions' of neighbours, and launched enforcement action. Mr Bowe, who bought his four-bed detached home for £390,000 in 2020, is appealing the council's order to raze the summer house, describing the planning permission refusal as 'without merit'. His planning consultants argue the summer house only marginally exceeds height limits due to its proximity to the boundary fence, and causes no actual harm to neighbouring properties. They claim 'careful consideration' was given to its placement behind a neighbour's garage, which they say 'almost entirely screens it from view'. The consultants said: 'In the present case, the proposed summer house has been deliberately positioned behind the adjoining property's garage, ensuring it is substantially screened from view and has no adverse effect on outlook, daylight, or privacy.' It said the summer house 'remains well-screened by boundary fencing, free from overlooking openings, and is positioned to avoid shadowing or overbearing effects. 'The design, while utilising a flat roof, does so in a low-profile and non-intrusive way.' The planning inspectorate will make a decision on whether to uphold or overturn the council's refusal later this year. When approached at his home, Mr Bowe declined to comment, describing himself as a 'private person'. He said: 'I don't feel like I've done anything wrong.'