Restarting executions in TN amounts to subjecting death row prisoners to torture
As The Tennessean reported recently, the state 'has announced plans to resume capital punishment with a new, more vague protocol for lethal injection — [one even vaguer than the previous protocol the state had a track record for botching. Now it will use] one drug called pentobarbital.'
This will satisfy only the animalistic desire for violently fatal retribution which civilized societies around the world long ago outlawed; they hoped the U.S. someday would follow suit, or, at least, that individual states like Tennessee would start to shutter their barbaric death penalty regimes; that's why in that 2019 essay I insisted: 'We must be honest about the death penalty's repugnance.'
I advanced then — and resubmit — that 'In these times, we must embolden noble, courageous people who exist in America, people with integrity, to call lethal injection the vile torture it is.'
Tennessee has plenty of prison space to incarcerate the 'worst of the worst,' saving Tennesseans a whole heap of money in lawyers' fees and other costs of maintaining Tennessee's barbaric machinery of death (think of the officials who get paid to be involved, the lethal drugs, etcetera).
And as The Tennessean astutely reported, there is a real 'lack of transparency over how the state is securing' the pentobarbital it will use, and therefore questions about whether it could be of shoddy quality.
This should be especially alarming as witnesses of pentobarbital executions have described condemned prisoners 'gasping for air before they died and autopsies showing their lungs were filled with fluid akin to drowning' (and the horrific torture known as 'waterboarding' ).
The Tennessean rightly observed that despite Trump's Justice Department's gung-ho approach to the death penalty, 'former U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland halted the use of pentobarbital for federal death row inmates after it was unable to determine whether the drug causes 'unnecessary pain and suffering.''
However, it's critical Tennesseans understand that legal experts who study executions have come to much starker conclusions about pentobarbital.
In a new book called 'Secrets of the Killing State' — about 'the untold story of lethal injection' — Corinna Barrett Kain, a professor at the University of Richmond School of Law, minces no words in her scholarly work that anyone who wants to know the truth about lethal injection must read. She concludes that 'pentobarbital executions are torturous in their own right.'
About Lain's book, Bryan Stevenson, author of 'Just Mercy' and executive director of the Equal Justice Initiative wrote: 'A compelling, thoroughly researched, brilliantly written investigation of how governments kill prisoners whose very lives may depend on the moral outrage of a nation that dares to look more closely at lethal injection and the death penalty. Disturbing, devastating, an urgent must-read.'
As I've argued before to Tennesseans in this newspaper: 'Abolishing the death penalty requires morality, but it also requires people of conscience to speak honestly — and ask tough questions — in support of an unshakeable belief that should be uncontroversial in a civilized, principled society: The death penalty is racist, barbaric, and immoral.'
And too: 'There exists too much mental illness, and far too much death and suffering in America already' and so all Americans, including Tennesseans, need to insist the state stop throwing scarce resources away on the death penalty in an immoral pursuit of 'justice.'
Pardon my reliance on my past publications in The Tennessean on this subject of great importance — to Tennesseans who care about human rights — but it needs repetition: 'The constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment bears no asterisk for crimes committed by society's most despised.'
Scheduling a flurry of lethal injections using pentobarbital is the wrong decision for Tennessee. It has already led to a flurry of litigation — with much more expected — and the amount of taxpayer money that is being used by the state to defend this torture will only mount.
It is important to let the politicians who represent you know that this is not what you want. And it is not what you will vote for going forward. Tell them you want a government that focuses on improving the quality of life for its citizens—not one focused on secretive protocols for torturous killings.
Stephen Cooper is a former D.C. public defender who worked as an assistant federal public defender in Alabama between 2012 and 2015. He has contributed to numerous magazines and newspapers in the United States and overseas. He writes full-time and lives in Woodland Hills, California. Follow him on "X"/Twitter @SteveCooperEsq
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Scholars call death penalty drug pentobarbital 'torturous' | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
16 minutes ago
- Forbes
Cut 'Em Loose With No Government Props
(CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images) CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images The Trump Administration is seriously considering privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. It's long past time that it did this. The business of these two giants is to bundle and sell mortgages to investors with a government guarantee. That is, investors are covered if there are losses because of homeowner defaults. Washington, via the Federal Housing Finance Agency, took control of both entities in 2008 because of their massive losses. The seizures were called 'conservatorships.' The takeover was supposed to be temporary, yet here we are nearly a generation later, and the conservatorships are still intact. Fannie and Freddie are the elephants in the housing market, backing some $7 trillion in mortgages. They have an eye-popping line of credit with the Treasury Department of $254 billion. They charge a so-called guarantee fee of around two-thirds of 1% on each mortgage. Fannie tends to work with larger financial institutions, while Freddie goes with smaller ones. It's a nice business. As President Trump noted, they are gushing cash. Trumpites estimate the market cap of these two monsters would be $330 billion, with the government's share coming to more than $250 billion. In these times of rivers of red ink in Washington, the prospect of getting that much cash without raising taxes should be irresistible. The two got into trouble because they went heavily into debt. Why not, they figured. The higher the leverage, the bigger the profits, which shareholders loved. They could borrow at rock-bottom interest rates because there was an implicit government guarantee. It wasn't written into law, but the markets figured Uncle Sam would come to the rescue if there were trouble. That ar-rived with the financial crisis that began in 2007, when the housing market was imploding. Washington stepped in. But shareholders were largely wiped out. What made the two particularly complacent was their extraordinary political muscle, especially Fannie Mae's. They made sure every member of Congress learned how important they were to constituents involved in local housing markets. And jobs were to be had for congressional relatives and friends. The challenges of pushing Fannie and Freddie out of the Washington nest are real, but that shouldn't deter the move. Critics say changing the status quo will raise mortgage rates, a particularly sensitive topic at a time when housing affordability is a big issue. If Fannie and Freddie are to be truly private companies, they'll need higher profits, which could lead to more expensive mortgages. Guarantee fees for mortgages would also likely go up. This is why the Trump Administration doesn't want to do away with guarantees, implicit or explicit. But this would put Fannie and Freddie back where they were when they got in trouble. If there are any guarantees, the two monsters should have to pay Uncle Sam realistic insurance fees, which would run into the tens of billions of dollars. Critics underestimate the power of competition. Instead, the two enterprises should be broken up. Competition works. As for mortgage rates, the problem is the Federal Reserve, whose ignorance of inflation is keeping the cost ofmoney unnecessarily high.


Bloomberg
18 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Canada Talks Up Pension Funds' Financial Muscle as Lever in US Trade Talks
Canada's major pension funds could boost their investments in the US, a top Canadian cabinet minister said, as the country looks to negotiate a trade agreement with the Trump administration. Dominic LeBlanc, the minister responsible for US trade, is in Washington for talks with US lawmakers. He brought up Canada's pension funds when asked if President Donald Trump will seek a specific pledge for more investment into the US.


USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
President Trump issues college sports executive order addressing NIL and pay-for-play
President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Thursday, July 24 that attempts to create a national standard for NCAA name, image and likeness programs. The order is Trump's latest entry into a debate that has embroiled the NCAA since NIL rules went into effect in 2021, ushering in a wild-west era of college sports that has come under increasing scrutiny by local and national legislators. Broadly focused on efforts to 'save college athletics,' the order also seeks to preserve and support "expansion of opportunities for scholarships and collegiate athletic competition in women's and non-revenue sports." Most of the NIL money is given to athletes in football and men's and women's basketball. The settlement in the long-running House v. NCAA case went into effect July 1 and allowed schools to directly pay college athletes through a revenue-sharing model. In May, Trump appeared poised to create a commission co-chaired by former Alabama coach Nick Saban and influential Texas Tech booster Cody Campbell with a directive to explore and address major issues facing college sports. But there have been no announcements regarding that directive. This week, a bill in the U.S. House of Representatives aimed at restructuring rules around the administration of college athletics passed two committees and is expected to move to the House floor when the summer recess is over in September. Speaking at a National Press Club event in Washington earlier the day, before the order was signed, NCAA President Charlie Baker was asked about possible executive order on college sports. He said he was open to ideas, but 'our focus needs to be on the legislative process.' SEC commissioner Greg Sankey, who along with many in college sports has been advocating for federal intervention, told USA TODAY Sports last week, 'The President is going to do what he wants to do.' 'I've read things on social media, but I also read that there would be a presidential commission,' Sankey added. 'So the question with an executive order is if (Trump) does, and then what it is, and then we'll go from there.'