logo
What is a ‘bunker buster'? An expert explains what the US dropped on Iran

What is a ‘bunker buster'? An expert explains what the US dropped on Iran

News2423-06-2025
The GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP, which the US used in its attack on Iran on the weekend is the largest known bunker buster in the world, writes James Dwyer.
Late on Saturday night, local time, the United States carried out strikes against Iranian nuclear enrichment sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, marking its open participation in the conflict between Iran and Israel.
The US says it fired 30 submarine-launched missiles at the sites in Natanz and Isfahan, as well as dropping more than a dozen 'bunker buster' bombs at Fordow and Natanz.
The kind of bomb in question is the extremely destructive GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP, which weighs around 13.5 tonnes.
The attacks raise a lot of questions. What are these enormous bombs? Why did the US feel it had to get involved in the conflict? And, going forward, what does it mean for Iran's nuclear ambitions?
What are 'bunket busters' and why are they used?
Bunker busters are weapons designed to destroy heavily protected facilities such as bunkers deep underground, beyond the reach of normal bombs.
Bunker busters are designed to bury themselves in the ground before detonating. This allows more of the explosive force to penetrate into the ground, rather than travelling through the air or across the surface.
AFP
Iran's nuclear enrichment sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan are built deep underground. Estimates suggest that Fordow, for example, could be 80m beneath the surface, and capped with layers of reinforced concrete and soil.
What is the MOP?
The bunker buster used in this particular operation is the largest in the US arsenal. Leaving aside nuclear weapons, the MOP is the largest known bunker buster in the world.
Weighing some 13.5 tonnes, the MOP is believed to be able to penetrate up to 60 metres below ground in the right conditions. It is not known how many the US possesses, but the numbers are thought to be small (perhaps 20 or so in total).
We also don't know exactly how many were used in Iran, though some reports say it was 14. However, it is likely to be a significant portion of the US MOP arsenal.
Why does only the US possess this capability?
The US is not the only state with bunker-busting weaponry. However, the size of MOP means it requires very specialised bombers to carry and drop it.
Only the B2 stealth bomber is currently able to deploy the MOP. Each B2 can carry at most two MOPs at a time. Around seven of America's 19 operational B2s were used in the Iran operation.
There has been some consideration whether large transport aircraft such as the C-130 Hercules could be modified to carry and drop the MOP from its rear cargo doors. While this would allow other countries (including Israel) to deploy the MOP, it is, for now, purely hypothetical.
Why has the US (apparently) used them in Iran?
The Trump administration claims Iran may be only a few weeks from possessing a nuclear weapon, and that it needed to act now to destroy Iranian nuclear enrichment sites. This claim is notably at odds with published assessments from the US intelligence community.
However, Israel lacks bunker-busting weaponry sufficient to damage the deeply buried and fortified enrichment sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.
An F-15E Strike Eagle releases a GBU-28 'bunker buster' laser-guided bomb, a smaller equivalent of the 13,600 kg GBU-57 'Massive Ordnance Penetrator' believed to have been used in Iran. Michael Ammons / US Air Force
Only the MOP could do the job (short of using nuclear weapons). Even then, multiple MOPs would have been required to ensure sufficient damage to the underground facilities.
The US has claimed that these sites have been utterly destroyed. We cannot conclusively say whether this is true.
Iran may also have other undeclared nuclear sites elsewhere in the country.
Iran's reaction
The US has reportedly reached out to Iran via diplomatic channels to emphasise that this attack was a one-off, not part of a larger project of regime change. It is hard to say what will happen in the next few weeks.
Iran may retaliate with large strikes against Israel or against US forces in the region.
READ | Embassy of Israel in SA: Why Iran's nuclear ambition could no longer be ignored
It could also interrupt shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, which would affect a large portion of global oil shipments, with profound economic implications.
Alternatively, Iran could capitulate and take steps to demonstrate it is ending its nuclear programme. However, capitulation would not necessarily mean the end of Iran's nuclear ambitions.
The value of nuclear weapons
Perhaps a greater concern is that the attack will reinforce Iran's desire to go nuclear. Without nuclear weapons, Iran was unable to threaten the US enough to deter this weekend's attack.
Iran may take lessons from the fate of other states. Ukraine (in)famously surrendered its stockpile of former Soviet nuclear weapons in the early 1990s. Russia has since felt emboldened to annex Crimea in 2014 and launch an ongoing invasion in 2022. Other potential nuclear states, such as Iraq and Gadaffi's regime in Libya, also suffered from military intervention.
By contrast, North Korea successfully tested its first nuclear weapon in 2006. Since then there has been no serious consideration of military intervention in North Korea.
Iran may yet have the ability to produce useful amounts of weapons-grade uranium. It may now aim to buy itself time to assemble a relatively small nuclear device similar in scale to the bombs used in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Depending on what facilities and resources have survived the US strikes, the attack has likely reinforced that the only way the Iranian regime can guarantee its survival is to possess nuclear weapons.
- James Dwyer is a lecturer at the School of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Dakotans in Congress betray their state with votes that could kill SD Public Broadcasting
South Dakotans in Congress betray their state with votes that could kill SD Public Broadcasting

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

South Dakotans in Congress betray their state with votes that could kill SD Public Broadcasting

I never thought I would see the day when U.S. Senators John Thune and Mike Rounds and Rep. Dusty Johnson would sell out their South Dakota values and upbringing to become puppets of a president. Nor did I think I would see them damage institutions that are at the core of South Dakota's society. Unfortunately, it appears that President Donald Trump is so powerful that personal values no longer matter. Last week, all three voted to rescind $1.1 billion in funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting — funding that all three had previously voted to approve. It's clear that National Public Radio was Trump's target. He believes taxpayer money shouldn't be going to support news he perceives as a challenge to his line of thinking. But often when we act hastily and with little thought, the grenades we throw miss the intended target and damage innocent victims. Such is the case here. Only 1% of NPR's operating budget and 15% of the Public Broadcasting System budget comes from the corporation, and both will survive. Most of the corporation's funding goes to support local public broadcasting systems, which likely will not. 'After the cut, NPR is still going to be NPR and PBS is still going to be PBS,' said Julie Overgaard, executive director of South Dakota Public Broadcasting. 'They are all going to continue to exist.' So will public stations in the major metropolitan areas. 'It's the places like us that will suffer the most,' Overgaard said. 'The reason the CPB was set up was so that rural communities can share in a collective public media. 'We don't have enough people and wealth to exist on our own. The very thing they were trying to eliminate will survive. Instead, it's something very important to our state that will be eliminated.' Programs like 'South Dakota Focus,' 'In the Moment,' 'Dakota Life' and 'Jazz Nightly,' along with statehouse coverage and broadcasts of high school sports and activities, may all disappear. What a legacy for Thune, Rounds and Johnson — the men who destroyed SDPB. Last week while casting their votes, they hid behind the need to cut the budget deficit. Funny. They found deficit religion only a few weeks after they voted for Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Act that increases the deficit. The more talented politicians become, the better they are at creating alternative realities. Here's the reality of SDPB's future. The impending loss of $2 million in funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting may force SDPB to quickly cut up to 20 people from its 60-member staff. The damage likely will be worse. Even if SDPB could raise $2 million in three months, it probably wouldn't matter. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is essentially dead as of Sept. 30, severing the technical backbone of SDPB's network. It facilitates the sharing of programming from network to network. It facilitates emergency alerts and emergency alerts. It handles SDPB's website and negotiates music broadcast rights nationally. 'The situation is grave, fluid and chaotic,' Overgaard said. Rounds acted like he was the champion leading up to the vote, holding out to the last minute as he secured an agreement to find $9.4 million in funding elsewhere for communication towers on Native American reservations. That's not likely to be sustainable in the long-term. 'It's a nice gesture, but it is hollow in its result,' Overgaard said of Rounds' action. 'It will still result in the demise of tribal stations.' Programs like Native American News and other nationally shared music and talk programs likely won't be produced, and the national network that distributes it won't exist. Money and technical support for local programming also disappear. SDPB had just survived a funding fight in the South Dakota Legislature after then-Gov. Kristi Noem suggested cutting $3.6 million in state funding, also largely aimed at silencing NPR. Legislators were inundated with calls, and the result was an overwhelming restoration of funding. 'We know we are very important in people's daily lives,' Overgaard said. 'They trust us in moments of crisis and joy. This has nothing to do with whether we are a valued service. This is politics. I don't know that we ever had a chance to win this.' The only chance is for federal funding to be restored in the upcoming federal budget, perhaps absent taxpayer support for NPR and PBS. SDPB supporters will have opportunities to speak with their congressional delegates during the upcoming August recess. Looking at constituents in the eye can be uncomfortable. Trump puppets are not what we thought we elected. Thune, Rounds and Johnson, what have you become? EDITOR'S NOTE: Brad Johnson is married to a retired former employee of the nonprofit Friends of South Dakota Public Broadcasting. This article originally appeared on Sioux Falls Argus Leader: South Dakotans in Congress betray their state with votes that could kill SD Public Broadcasting

Trump Is Hiring ICE Agents to Arrest Immigrants Coast to Coast, Border to Border
Trump Is Hiring ICE Agents to Arrest Immigrants Coast to Coast, Border to Border

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Is Hiring ICE Agents to Arrest Immigrants Coast to Coast, Border to Border

Donald Trump is looking to hire 10,000 officers to help carry out his administration's widespread detention and deportation of migrants with tens of billions of dollars in funds from his 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Job postings show that in 25 cities from coast to coast, Immigration and Customs Enforcement is hiring deportation officers who will arrest, detain, and deport migrants, and manage migrants' cases. The listings give insight into where ICE may be ramping up operations. ICE has already been carrying out broad arrests, including at workplaces and courthouses. Agents have been wearing masks and lacking identifying information as they snatch immigrants, sometimes breaking their car windows to drag them out faster. 'Are you ready to defend the homeland?' the job posting reads. 'Launch a dynamic and rewarding career as a Deportation Officer with Enforcement Removal Operations (ERO) at ICE! Join a dedicated team safeguarding U.S. borders and upholding immigration laws, playing a key role in defending our nation.' At a time when the U.S. job market is slowing down and prices remain high, ICE is offering $50,000 signing bonuses and $60,000 in student loan repayment with a salary of about $50,000 to $90,000. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has already issued 1,000 tentative job offers, the Associated Press reported Friday. A spokesperson for DHS said many of the people offered jobs were 'ICE officers who retired under President Biden because they were frustrated that they were not allowed to do their jobs.' These retired officers are being offered $88,000 to $144,000 along with a $50,000 bonus. An image of Uncle Sam, the ultimate recruitment propaganda, appears on the DHS website with the words 'RETURN TO MISSION.' 'Your country is calling you to serve at ICE. In the wake of the Biden administration's failed immigration policies, your country needs dedicated men and women of ICE to get the worst of the worst criminals out of our country,' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said earlier this week. 'This is a defining moment in our nation's history. Your skills, your experience, and your courage have never been more essential. Together, we must defend the homeland.' ICE is hiring in Los Angeles, where Trump deployed the National Guard and Marines to lead a militarized crackdown on protests against his immigration raids. Major cities where ICE is hiring include Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Denver, New York City, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Seattle, and Washington, D.C. The agency is hiring in several large cities with large Latino populations including Dallas, Houston, Miami Beach, Phoenix, San Antonio, and San Diego. ICE is also hiring in Baltimore, New Orleans, Newark, Saint Paul, and Salt Lake City. The agency is hiring in El Paso, a city on the Texas.-Mexico border where detentions are reportedly increasing. They are also looking to hire in Detroit and Buffalo, which are on the U.S.-Canada border. ICE is looking to hire in Harlingen, a Texas border city. The deportation flights taking migrants to an El Salvador torture prison and war-torn South Sudan, both in defiance of judicial orders in cases that went to the Supreme Court, took off from Harlingen. DHS is hiring new criminal investigators, or special agents, at salaries of $63,000 to $102,000 with a bonus $50,000. Returning criminal investigators are being offered $105,000 to $171,000 per year, plus the $50,000 bonus. The department is hiring attorneys all over, at field locations in 90 cities. The jobs are being funded with tens of billions of dollars included in Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' the president's first major agenda legislation. The bill also slashes taxes for the wealthy and will force millions of Americans off Medicaid, the government health insurance program for low-income and disabled people. 'The funding from President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill will play a key role in fulfilling his promise to the American people to deport criminal illegal aliens,' White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement, Politico reported. 'Getting 10,000 [new employees] means basically hiring the people who walk in the door because you're trying to hit your quota,' Josiah Heyman, an anthropology professor who directs the University of Texas at El Paso's Center of Inter-American and Border Studies, told The Los Angeles Times. 'Rapid, mass-hiring lends itself to mistakes and cutting corners.' The Trump administration is also looking at increasing their use of the military in domestic immigration enforcement, The New Republic reported Saturday. A memo from Philip Hegseth, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's younger brother, calls on military leadership to 'feel — for the first time — the urgency of the homeland defense mission' and work together with ICE and Customs and Border Patrol agents. 'The memo is alarming, because it speaks to the intent to use the military within the United States at a level not seen since Japanese internment,' Carrie Lee, senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund, told The New Republic. 'The military is the most powerful, coercive tool our country has. We don't want the military doing law enforcement. It absolutely undermines the rule of law.' More from Rolling Stone Trump's Admin Is Investigating Jack Smith, Who Prosecuted Him Over Jan. 6 'Grow Up': Conservative Senators, Economists Slam Trump for Firing Labor Stats Chief You May Be Asking Yourself How Did Dan Bongino Get Here Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence

Latest Trump tariffs unlikely to budge, top negotiator says
Latest Trump tariffs unlikely to budge, top negotiator says

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Latest Trump tariffs unlikely to budge, top negotiator says

(Reuters) -The tariffs U.S. President Donald Trump imposed last week on scores of countries are likely to stay in place rather than be cut as part of continuing negotiations, Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on Sunday. Ahead of a Friday deadline, Trump set rates including a 35% duty on many goods from Canada, 50% for Brazil, 25% for India, 20% for Taiwan and 39% for Switzerland, according to a presidential executive order. In trade talks since Trump returned to office, the White House has lowered some rates from levels initially announced, including halving import duties set last week as part of a deal with the European Union. Greer told CBS's Face the Nation on Sunday, however, that this would not be the case on the most recent round of tariffs. "A lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country," he said. "These tariff rates are pretty much set." Greer also said recent trade talks with Beijing had been "very positive" and were focused on the supply of rare earth magnets and minerals. "We're focused on making sure that the flow of magnets from China to the United States and the- and the adjacent supply chain can flow as freely as it did before ... and I'd say we're about halfway there."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store