Where is the center of the universe? The surprising physics behind an expanding cosmos
For centuries, the question 'Where is the center of the universe?' has mystified both scientists and laypeople alike. Thanks to breakthroughs in physics, particularly Einstein's general theory of relativity, we now understand that the universe has no center—at least, not in the way we intuitively think about it.
Initially, Einstein's theory, published in 1915, described a static universe—unchanging and eternal. But as astronomers peered deeper into space using powerful telescopes, they discovered something remarkable: the universe is expanding. This realization didn't contradict Einstein's equations—it expanded their interpretation. The cosmos isn't fixed; it's dynamic, constantly evolving.
This expansion isn't like an explosion from a single point. Instead, galaxies aren't moving through space away from a center—they're being carried apart as space itself stretches. Picture dots on the surface of a balloon: as the balloon inflates, the dots grow farther apart, not because they're moving, but because the surface between them is growing. But unlike a balloon, the universe isn't expanding into anything, nor does it have an 'inside.' The balloon's surface represents our entire universe, and like it, there is no central point.
This expansion occurs in all directions, simultaneously. That means any point in the universe can appear to be the "center" from a local perspective—because every observer sees galaxies receding away.
Complicating matters further is that our universe is four-dimensional, made of space-time—an interwoven fabric of space and time. While we can visualize three dimensions easily, grasping four-dimensional space-time stretches our imagination. Yet, this framework is crucial to understanding why there is no fixed center and why everything appears to be moving apart.
In short, the universe doesn't have a center—not because it's hiding it, but because the concept of a center simply doesn't apply. Instead, every galaxy is part of an ever-stretching cosmic fabric. And while we still don't fully understand what powers this expansion—dark energy being a leading suspect—it's clear that our universe is far stranger, and more beautiful, than everyday intuition might suggest.
📚 Adapted from an original article by Rob Coyne, Teaching Professor of Physics at the University of Rhode Island. Republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
From Einstein to Newton, how did world-famous scientists crack the genius code? Here is what their unique learning habits teach students
Albert Einstein, the man who revolutionised our understanding of space and time, regularly skipped university lectures. Marie Curie, the first woman to win a Nobel Prize, often collapsed from hunger whilst studying late into the night in a freezing Parisian garret. Isaac Newton made his most groundbreaking discoveries not in the hallowed halls of Cambridge, but locked away in isolation during a deadly plague outbreak. These aren't tales of academic rebellion or hardship, they're glimpses into the unconventional study methods that shaped history's greatest minds. While most of us were taught to sit quietly in rows, take meticulous notes, and memorise facts for exams, the world's most brilliant scientists were breaking every rule in the educational handbook. What if everything we've been told about effective learning is wrong? What if the secret to genius isn't natural talent, photographic memory, or even prestigious education, but rather a fundamentally different approach to how we absorb and process knowledge? The study habits of history's most brilliant minds reveal fascinating patterns that challenge everything we think we know about effective learning. Here are unique study habits of some of the world's greatest minds. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo Albert Einstein Albert Einstein's academic journey defies conventional wisdom. At thirteen, he taught himself an entire year's worth of mathematics, not because he was forced to, but because his curiosity demanded it. Einstein found traditional classroom environments stifling, particularly those focused on rote memorisation. Even at university, he skipped lectures regularly, preferring to rely on classmates' notes whilst dedicating extensive time to studying theoretical physics independently. This wasn't laziness, it was strategic brilliance. Einstein understood that true learning happens when we take ownership of our education, following our curiosity rather than rigid curricula. Issac Newton Isaac Newton's most productive period came during 1665-1666, when a plague outbreak forced him to leave Cambridge. In isolation, he made groundbreaking discoveries that would revolutionise science. Newton combined deep theoretical reasoning with meticulous experimentation, building his own instruments and refining his methods over years. Similar to Einstein, he described himself as a "lone traveller" who valued solitude as essential to his intellectual process. This pattern suggests that genius often requires stepping away from the noise of conventional academic environments to think deeply and independently. Richard Feyman Richard Feynman revolutionised learning with his deceptively simple approach. He maintained a "Notebook of Things I Don't Know About," actively identifying knowledge gaps rather than avoiding them. His method involved breaking down complex topics, reassembling them from first principles, and ensuring he could explain everything simply. This technique; now known as the Feynman Method, forces learners to confront their limitations honestly. If you can't explain something in simple terms, you don't truly understand it. Marie Curie Marie Curie's approach to study was defined by extraordinary perseverance against overwhelming odds. Raised in Russian-occupied Poland, she pursued education through underground schools where forbidden subjects were secretly taught. At the Sorbonne, she endured extreme poverty, studying late into the night and often collapsing from hunger. Curie's method was rigorous and patient; she spent years extracting tiny amounts of radium under dangerous conditions, driven by pure scientific curiosity rather than recognition. Her meticulous experimentation reflected her belief that science was a mission, not a performance. APJ Abdul Kalam Dr APJ Abdul Kalam's educational journey demonstrates the power of practical learning. From his early days in Rameswaram to his specialisation in aeronautical engineering, he consistently pursued education with determination despite financial challenges. His approach was notably hands-on, he didn't just absorb theoretical knowledge but applied it directly to real-world aerospace and defence challenges. Throughout his career, Kalam embraced continuous learning and innovation, understanding that true mastery comes from bridging theory and practice. Rosalind Franklin Rosalind Franklin studied with remarkable precision and independence, choosing science as her path at just sixteen. Her mastery of X-ray crystallography was exceptional, and she used this technique with extraordinary skill to investigate atomic structures. Often working in isolation due to institutional sexism, she upheld the highest standards of scientific inquiry, meticulously controlling experimental conditions and performing complex mathematical analyses. Franklin's unwavering commitment to clarity and scientific truth, even in the face of discrimination, demonstrates that excellence transcends social barriers. Where do all their strategies meet? Several patterns emerge from examining these extraordinary minds: Independence over conformity : Each genius preferred self-directed learning over traditional educational structures. They followed their curiosity rather than prescribed curricula. Depth over breadth : Rather than superficial coverage of many topics, they pursued deep understanding of fundamental principles. Isolation as a tool : Solitude wasn't loneliness, it was a deliberate strategy for deep thinking and focus. Practical application : They didn't just learn theory; they applied knowledge to solve real problems. Embracing difficulty : Instead of avoiding challenging topics, they actively sought out what they didn't understand. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Time of India
7 days ago
- Time of India
When a Princeton Doctor stole Einstein's brain to uncover the secret of his genius: The bizarre tale of science and obsession
A Pathologist's Quiet Heist — PhysInHistory (@PhysInHistory) Where in the World is Einstein's Brain? — medicalmuseum (@medicalmuseum) What the Studies Found; and Didn't A Brain That Outlived Its Owner You Might Also Like: How Albert Einstein engaged with India & why some Indian scientists are reimagining his notion of gravity On April 18, 1955, Albert Einstein, the revolutionary physicist whose theories changed how we perceive the universe, died in Princeton, New Jersey, at the age of 76. True to his philosophy of simplicity and humility, Einstein had left clear instructions: no monuments, no posthumous glorification, and most importantly, no dissection. He wanted his body cremated and his ashes scattered in secret. But what happened next would become one of science's most puzzling and ethically murky pathologist assigned to perform Einstein's autopsy, Dr. Thomas Stoltz Harvey, made a controversial decision—he removed Einstein's brain without informing the family. Sliced into 240 pieces, the organ that had decoded the mysteries of space and time was placed into jars, boxes, and eventually even a trunk. Harvey kept it hidden for over four decades, traveling across the U.S. and Canada with parts of the brain in his car. He claimed he did it for science, believing the brain held secrets about Einstein's extraordinary intellect. Eventually, Einstein's son, Hans Albert, gave reluctant permission, but by then the deed was long pathologist's unauthorized preservation attempt soon spiraled into a bizarre chase. Some fragments of the brain were sent to researchers across the globe; others were tucked away in Harvey's basement. According to BBC and Science, around 170 blocks eventually returned to Princeton's University Medical Center. Forty-six wafer-thin slices are displayed at the Mütter Museum in Philadelphia. But many pieces simply vanished. Despite Harvey's efforts to preserve and study the brain, large sections remain unaccounted for to this first major scientific insight didn't come until 1985, when neurologist Marian Diamond from UC Berkeley studied samples provided by Harvey. Her team discovered an unusual concentration of glial cells per neuron, possibly hinting at heightened information processing. Later analyses, including one in 2012, found a unique extra groove in Einstein's frontal lobe, associated with memory and planning. But as Britannica notes, no definitive link between these anatomical quirks and Einstein's genius has ever been established. The biggest mystery, perhaps, is whether genius can ever be reduced to biology to a report from Aurora, Einstein once famously said, 'I want to leave when I want. It's in bad taste to prolong life artificially.' Yet ironically, his brain has outlived him in the most artificial and fragmented way. Thomas Harvey 's obsession cost him his marriage, his job, and ultimately, peace of mind. He died after a long illness, haunted by the organ he tried to now, parts of Einstein's brain sit behind museum glass, some circulate in scientific archives, and others are presumed lost—perhaps tucked away in forgotten drawers, private collections, or academic vaults. As Science wryly concluded, 'Einstein's brain could be anywhere.'The question remains: did dissecting Einstein's brain bring us any closer to understanding genius? Perhaps not. The more we tried to bottle it, the more it slipped through our fingers. In life, Einstein reshaped our understanding of space and time. In death, he left behind a riddle no one seems able to solve—where, exactly, is the mind of Albert Einstein?
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
18-06-2025
- Business Standard
India cracks quantum code: Unhackable communication is here! IIT Delhi
Indian scientists have made a major breakthrough in unhackable communication. The tech uses quantum code, a phenomenon even Einstein called 'spooky action at a distance.' Watch the video to know all about it.
