
Is this the 'death of the great British summer job'?
UKHospitality said the hikes in labour costs imposed £3.4 billion of additional annual costs on the industry, declaring that 84,000 jobs have been lost in the sector since the Chancellor announced the changes last October.
And the effects are continuing to be felt as employers cut back on casual and temporary staff during the key summer months to save cash.
It spells bad news for the thousands of young people who will have been looking for work ahead of the new academic year this autumn, as well as those looking to take their first steps in the world of work.
Allen Simpson, chief executive of UKHospitality said: 'This is the time when hospitality businesses would be frantically hiring staff for the busy summer months, when the sector expects to welcome families to their hotels, and serve millions of people with ice cream on the beach, fish and chips on the pier, and cold pints in the pub garden.
'I know from personal experience how important hospitality summer jobs are for getting young people experience of work, however hiring this year has fallen off dramatically, with 22,000 fewer jobs available compared to last year. It is sadly reflective of the impact we have seen from increased costs over the past nine months – less employment, less opportunity and less growth in the economy.
'Unless the Government acts, we could well be seeing the death of the great British summer job. That's not good for the economy, for businesses, or for the people that need this flexible work during the summer. We need to see action at the [Autumn] Budget to reverse this damage. That starts with fixing NICs (national insurance contributions), lowering business rates and cutting VAT (value-added tax) for hospitality businesses.'
UKHospitality has not been alone in observing the trend. The most recent Small Business Index from the Federation of Small Businesses, which gauges sentiment among the organisation's members, found that in the second quarter nearly one in six (16.1%) in Scotland said they expect their staff numbers to drop. This was a slight increase on the first quarter, when 12.7% expected staff numbers to fall and more than double the number in quarter two last year (6.8%). The index also revealed a fall in the number of small businesses which said they would be recruiting, to 10.5% from 12.7% in the previous quarter and 12% a year ago.
According to the FSB, the rise in employer national insurance contributions has clearly had an impact on recruitment plans.
There is plenty of anecdotal evidence of the trend, too. Speaking to family, friends and colleagues, it is undoubtedly the case that it has been a lot more difficult than usual for young people to pick up casual or part-time work this summer, including in hospitality and retail – both traditionally big sources of employment for this demographic. Mr Simpson is correct to note that the lack of work will have a significant impact on young people, especially on those who are looking to move into the world of work for the first time and gain the experience that is so crucial to their development. This dearth of summer work has financial implications too as hard-pressed families were perhaps counting on some additional income amid what continue to be challenging economic times. Some young people would have been looking for work over the summer to build up cash to support them over the forthcoming academic year.
There is a potential impact on consumers too. Doubtless, hospitality operators will do their best to forecast the amount of staff they need over the summer. But what happens, for example, when the sun shines and people flock to the seaside or other popular spots in big numbers? Will pubs, cafes, hotels and restaurants have the staff they need to cope if they are deluged by thirsty and hungry customers? How understanding will people be if the service they receive falls short of the expected standard, even if it does for entirely justifiable reasons? Probably not very in my opinion, especially given how expensive it now is to eat and drink out in the UK following years of high inflation.
Of course, it is only fair to note that some hospitality operators are performing well despite the additional cost pressures they now face. Over recent days there have been positive trading updates from pub giants JD Wetherspoon and Mitchells & Butlers, owner of high-street brands such as O'Neill's, Harvester, and All Bar One, which have struck an upbeat note about their prospects even though labour costs have risen sharply. But it is important to remember that companies of this size, which own thousands of pubs between them, are a good deal more equipped to ride out the rise in costs than smaller independents.
These undoubtedly remain challenging times for hospitality and it is a crying shame that, as businesses adapt to the new cost environment, it is thousands of young people who will be among the biggest losers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Polarising Donald Trump's North Sea comments tapped into growing frustration
It's time to listen to the point made by US president Donald Trump and turn his soundbite on the North Sea into a smart, sober policy, writes Ryan Crighton. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Donald Trump's shoot-from-the-hip diplomacy was on full display in Aberdeen this week as he waded into the UK's energy debate, calling for lower taxes on North Sea oil and gas operators. The president's remarks – delivered both in person and online to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer – will have raised eyebrows in Westminster. However, in the north-east of Scotland, where redundancies are mounting, his comments tapped into a growing sense of frustration. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad US President Donald Trump on the first tee during the official opening of the New Course, the second championship course at Trump International Golf Links, on the Menie Estate in Balmedie, Aberdeenshire | PA He may be a polarising messenger, but his advocacy for the repeal of the Energy Profits Levy (EPL) aligns with what the data, the workers and the businesses on the ground have been saying for over two years – that the windfall tax is killing off a vital British industry and a crucial national asset. According to data from Offshore Energies UK, 10,000 jobs have already been lost since the levy's introduction by the Conservative government in 2022. Harbour Energy, the UK's largest oil and gas producer, has since laid off 600 people in Aberdeen alone. These aren't abstract statistics — they are highly skilled individuals, families, and communities being sacrificed on the altar of fiscal short-termism. The failure of the north east green freeport bid is a major blow for a regional economy transitioning away from fossil fuels. Picture: Andy Buchanan/Getty Worse still, the economic wreckage isn't even delivering the returns that were promised. Independent analysis from Stifel shows EPL revenues have consistently come in at the low end of government forecasts. Why? Because the supposed "windfall" they are taxing does not exist. Oil prices are down 50 per cent since the peak of the Ukraine crisis. Gas prices have collapsed by 80 per cent. The result is a textbook case of policy failure. Tax hikes intended to boost revenues have instead triggered a collapse in investment, with over £20 billion of planned capital spending now cancelled or paused. Exploration activity has ground to a halt. Fields are being decommissioned prematurely. The UK is forfeiting not just jobs and tax income, but its energy security. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This shouldn't just be of concern to those living and working in Aberdeen - this should alarm everyone, because the UK still needs oil and gas. Even in the most ambitious net-zero scenario, the country will require between 13 and 15 billion barrels of oil equivalent by 2050. Right now, we're on track to produce less than four. And that energy shortfall isn't going to be filled by wind turbines and hydrogen pipelines overnight. The reality is that we are swapping cleaner, domestically produced energy for dirtier, imported alternatives. According to the North Sea Transition Authority, gas extracted in the UK has less than a quarter of the carbon footprint of imported LNG. Yet we are allowing that domestic capacity to decline while increasing our reliance on higher-emission imports from the US and Qatar. It is environmental hypocrisy at its worst. All the while, the UK government continues to claim we are 'maximising value' from our domestic resources. But how? By driving capital offshore? By gutting the supply chain that is also needed to deliver renewables, carbon capture, and green hydrogen? By forcing energy companies to pay tax rates that, in some cases, exceed 100 per cent? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ryan Crighton, policy director at Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce and a senior partner at True North Advisors. | True North Advisors In 2024, Harbour Energy reported a pre-tax profit of £950 million. However, after accounting for an effective tax rate of 108 per cent, the company posted no net profit for the year. This level of taxation is without parallel in the UK economy. It's not just unfair - it's economically suicidal. The UK's approach also compares poorly to our North Sea neighbours in Norway. While their headline tax rate is similar, the Norwegian government supports exploration and shares risk through its fiscal regime. That's why Norway continues to attract investment and why its energy sector is thriving. We, by contrast, have taken the opposite path – penalising production, scaring off capital, and hoping for different results. What's even more galling is that the levy is being used to fund Great British Energy – the new public clean energy company set-up by the Labour Party. According to Stifel, EPL revenues are set to collapse from £5.5bn to under £1bn by 2029. You cannot fund the future of energy by strangling the very sector that underpins it. So yes, President Trump is right to shine a spotlight on this issue. But the solution isn't a populist soundbite or a quick political win. It is a long-overdue dose of energy pragmatism. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad That means abolishing the EPL – now – and restoring a stable, competitive tax regime that can unlock investment, extend production and retain the critical skills base we will need for the next generation of energy infrastructure. It also means rejecting the false binary between fossil fuels and renewables. The future is not oil or wind. It is oil and wind. And hydrogen. And carbon capture. We need all of it. Everything, everywhere, all at once. The UK cannot build a low-carbon future while dismantling the industrial engine required to deliver it. A managed transition must be just that – managed. And that means recognising the continuing role of oil and gas, treating our energy sector with the strategic seriousness it deserves, and stopping the ideological war against the basin that still powers Britain. So, let's take Trump's call and translate it into smart, sober policy. Not because he said it, but because the facts demand it. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The North Sea doesn't need special treatment, but it does deserve fair treatment. The alternative isn't a greener future – it's a weaker Britain.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The British public deserves to know what Miliband discussed with Beijing
When the Government signed a deal on net-zero co-operation with Canada, the text of the memorandum was published. So too were the texts of deals with Ireland, Norway, South Korea and Chile. Five months after the Energy Secretary Ed Miliband signed a similar memorandum with the Chinese government, however, we are still in the dark as to precisely what was agreed. Chinese media have asserted that the Energy Secretary agreed to co-operation on power grids, battery storage, offshore wind power and carbon capture, among other areas; it is understood that Chinese investment in the UK was not discussed by Mr Miliband. The role of the Chinese state in Britain's net-zero ambitions may well be an uncomfortable issue for the Labour Government to discuss. While the Defence Secretary is insisting that Britain is 'ready to fight' over the future of Taiwan and the Foreign Secretary is explicitly referring to China as a 'sophisticated and persistent threat' that requires hundreds of millions of pounds in additional funding for the intelligence services, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been courting Chinese investment, and Mr Miliband's drive to meet his net-zero targets is heavily dependent on Chinese industry. Both the switch to electric vehicles and the decarbonisation of the energy grid will make heavy use of Chinese products. One study commissioned by the German defence ministry recently warned that this position at the heart of Western energy systems could result in Beijing enjoying the power to trigger remote shut-downs as 'an instrument of economic warfare'. Such concerns are less hypothetical than we might wish. Earlier this year, undocumented communication devices were located in Chinese-made power inverters exported to the United States, triggering fears that Beijing could use compromised equipment to 'physically destroy the grid'. This would be fully in line with the current approach of the People's Liberation Army to warfare as a clash between systems, and the extensive Volt Typhoon operation carried out by Chinese state-sponsored actors. Even given the understandable desire to avoid a sudden break with China, the delicacy of the balance between trade and reliance is such that the British public deserves to know what Mr Miliband has discussed with Beijing.


Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Scots losing free ATMs at rate of nearly four per week in cash access crisis
Figures from LINK, the UK's cash machine network, show free-to-use ATMs in Scotland have declined by about 30 per cent since 2018. Scots are losing free ATMs at a rate of nearly four per week amid a mounting cash access crisis, data shows. Figures from LINK, the UK's cash machine network, show free-to-use ATMs in Scotland have declined by about 5100 in 2018 to around 3500 today. That means there's about one free cash machine for every 1600 Scottish adults. Campaigners say the decline of bank branches along with ATMs is a 'disaster' for remote and rural communities and vulnerable groups who depend on cash. Ron Delnevo, of the Payment Choice Alliance, said: 'It's a bit scary for Scotland, because once you get out of the big cities, there's not a lot left. It's pathetic.' He used the example of Edzell, near Brechin, which lost its only bank branch, a Bank of Scotland site, in 2016. Delnevo said: 'There's no ATM in Edzell, so if you want cash from an ATM you have to go as far as Brechin. That's a 12-mile round trip. "These people have suffered, in the last ten years, a massive deterioration in the service. "If you go all around Scotland, it's the same thing when you find small places. "In the UK, I think Scotland is worst affected, because taking into account population, we've got a massive geographic area and there are many isolated communities. "They've been badly let down by the banks." The relentless pace of bank branch closures - particularly across remote and rural areas - has coincided with the rise in online banking. The Covid pandemic also saw a drive by firms towards cashless payments. But LINK's own research shows cash remains the most trusted payment method, with 76 per cent of British consumers saying it's important to have the option to pay with hard currency. Douglas Ross, Tory MSP for the Highlands and Islands, said: 'The rapid decline of free-to-use cash machines is deeply worrying, particularly for older Scots and vulnerable people who rely on cash to manage their day-to-day lives. 'Access to cash isn't a luxury, it's a necessity, especially in rural areas and for supporting local businesses that still depend on cash payments. 'We need a clear strategy to safeguard the remaining cash machines across Scotland before it's too late.' It comes as Scottish Labour has today launched a new consultation to tackle 'scandal of financial exclusion' including issues with cash access to help tackle poverty. The party's finance spokesman Michael Marra said: 'Low-income families are often reliant on cash, and the loss of bank branches and ATMs has hit them hardest.' Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Some of the most vulnerable groups in the country often rely on cash, including people with disabilities, older people and those in abusive relationships who might depend on cash as an escape route from controlling partners. UK-wide, free cash machines hit a peak of around 55,000 in 2018 but have since plummeted to around 35,000, latest data shows - a drop of more than a third. Insiders say the UK total could eventually "bottom out" at around 15,000. Delnevo added: "What would that mean for Scotland? It would certainly be a dramatic loss. It might mean Scotland is left with fewer than 1500 ATMs. "If it goes down to that level, you're going to have miles and miles without any ATM coverage."