Senate panel approves $500 million aid for Ukraine in defense bill
FILE PHOTO: A general view of the U.S. Capitol dome in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 8, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo
WASHINGTON - The Senate Armed Services Committee has approved $500 million in security assistance for Ukraine as part of its draft language for its Fiscal Year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, which also restricts A-10 aircraft retirements.
The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is an annual policy bill that authorizes funding levels and provides authorities for the U.S. military.
It ensures that American forces have the necessary resources to carry out their missions and is closely watched by weapons makers like Lockheed Martin Corp and Boeing Co.
The NDAA, passed by the Senate Armed Services Committee with a vote of 26-1 on July 9, 2025, includes a provision to extend the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative through 2028, increasing authorized funding to $500 million from $300 million in 2025.
The initiative aims to bolster Ukraine's defense capabilities as it battles Russian forces which invaded in 2022.
The bill also prohibits a controversial request made in President Donald Trump's June budget request to retire the Air Force A-10 fleet. The draft requires that the inventory of the A-10 cannot drop below 103 aircraft in FY26, ensuring the continued operation of these close air support planes.
The draft of the bill will make its way through the legislative process in the coming months. The lower House of Representatives kept Ukraine support at $300 million in its version.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore ST will have Govt's 'full confidence and support' in its mission: PM Wong
Singapore ST will aim to become an indispensable partner to S'pore's communities: Editor Jaime Ho
Singapore Heartbeats & Headlines: ST's 180-year legacy comes to life in immersive exhibition
Singapore Trusted news, smarter experience with new Straits Times website and app
Singapore Community space Stranger Conversations blossoms as a 'library of human stories' and life experiences
Singapore Judge declines to void alleged sham marriage in S'pore, says it is for Parliament to decide
Singapore New list of technologies that reduce carbon footprint of buildings to be ready by Q1 2026
Singapore Man who killed 5-year-old daughter gets life sentence after he appeals against 35-year jail term
The NDAA supports a total of $925 billion in funding for national defense, with $878.7 billion allocated to the Department of Defense and $35.2 billion to the Department of Energy. The bill also allows for up to $6 billion in general transfer authority for unforeseen higher-priority needs.
In addition to Ukraine, the NDAA addresses various global security challenges, including threats from China, Iran, and North Korea.
It emphasizes the need for technological advancements in areas such as artificial intelligence, unmanned technology, and hypersonic weapons to maintain U.S. military superiority. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
22 minutes ago
- Straits Times
The 20-somethings are swarming San Francisco's AI boom
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The entrepreneurs are part of a fast-growing cohort of chief executives in their 20s who have flocked to San Francisco's AI boom. SAN FRANCISCO – Mr Brendan Foody had just finished his sophomore year at Georgetown University in 2023 when he dropped out to jump into the artificial intelligence fray in San Francisco. Mr Karun Kaushik dropped out of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that year to move to California after constructing an AI tool in his dorm room. And Mr Jaspar Carmichael-Jack, who was traveling the world after high school, had the same idea in 2022. Now Mr Foody, 22, Mr Kaushik, 21, and Mr Carmichael-Jack, 23, are each running AI startups within a 30-minute walk of one another in San Francisco. They have raised millions of dollars for their businesses and are supervising dozens of employees. They all have a dream that their companies will make it big. 'When ChatGPT came out, it was so clear to me that this is obviously going to be a paradigm shift,' said Mr Carmichael-Jack, the chief executive of Artisan, which makes an AI sales assistant and has raised more than US$35 million (S$45 million) in funding. 'I knew I wanted to be involved in that.' The entrepreneurs are part of a fast-growing cohort of chief executives in their 20s who have flocked to San Francisco's AI boom. Among others, there are also Mr Scott Wu, 28, of Cognition AI, which makes a software coding assistant; Mr Michael Truell, 24, of Cursor, which sells an AI code editor; and Mr Roy Lee, 21, of Cluely, an AI software startup. Perhaps the most prominent is Mr Alexandr Wang, 28, who led the startup Scale AI before Meta tapped him in June to run its new superintelligence lab. Their growing ranks have injected a dose of youthful elan to the AI frenzy, which has been dominated by longtime tech giants like Google and Nvidia and decade-old startups like OpenAI. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia What's it like to deal with brutal US tariffs? Ask Malaysia Singapore Singapore launches review of economic strategy to stay ahead of global shifts Singapore A look at the five committees reviewing Singapore's economic strategy Opinion Keeping it alive: How Chinese opera in Singapore is adapting to the age of TikTok Life Glamping in Mandai: Is a luxury stay at Colugo Camp worth the $550 price tag? Sport World Aquatics C'ships in S'pore deemed a success by athletes, fans and officials Singapore Strong S'pore-Australia ties underpinned by bonds that are continually renewed: President Tharman Many of the entrepreneurs know one another from college or startup incubators like Y Combinator. Work is often at the centre of their lives – founders have to grind, after all – but they also host ping-pong nights, play poker together and meet up at networking events in the city. Venture capitalists are adding to the new blood with intensive startup programs geared to high school and college students. It's part of a well-worn pattern in which droves of young hopefuls are drawn to the nation's tech capital by a promising technology, much as 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and his friends did in the mid-2000s when they showed up in Silicon Valley with Facebook. Mr Zuckerberg, now 41, dropped out of Harvard. 'When you have these big technology waves, the whole chessboard changes and everything is up for grabs,' said Mr Saam Motamedi, an investor at the venture capital firm Greylock Partners. Greylock's San Francisco office recently hosted four 19-year-olds who are working on a 'stealth' artificial intelligence startup, he said, though the teenagers have since moved into their own space. Mr Pete Koomen, a general partner at Y Combinator, said the median age of the San Francisco incubator's most recent cohort of participants this year was 24, down from 30 in 2022. 'This is a group of largely young founders that have picked up everything and moved and gone all in on a crazy dream,' he said. 'They're all in close proximity with each other. They're helping each other out. They're competing with each other. It just creates this incredible energy.' Mr Foody runs Mercor, which provides automatic screening of resumes and AI job interviews. He established the company with two high school friends from San Jose, California, Mr Surya Midha and Adarsh Hiremath. Mr Midha, 22, is Mercor's chief operating officer and Mr Hiremath, 22, the chief technology officer. In February, they raised US$100 million, bringing Mercor's total funding to more than US$132 million and valuing the startup at US$2 billion. Investors include the venture capital firms General Catalyst and Benchmark. As Mercor flourished, it hired 150 employees in San Francisco and India. The startup is outgrowing its current space, which has a ping-pong table and dog cages dedicated to office pets, and is preparing to move into a bigger office nearby. Mr Midha said there was a sense of 'extreme urgency' and 'existential dread' among his peers who felt that now was the time to start an AI company. It 'just felt crazy not to go all in' on Mercor, he added. Mercor has already spawned other young chief executives. Ms Rithika Kacham, 22, who dropped out of Stanford during her senior year in 2024 to join Mercor as Foody's executive assistant, started her own company, Verita AI, in May. Her company hires professionals in various fields to help train AI models to recognise images more accurately, such as an intellectual property expert to help AI determine whether a Mickey Mouse cartoon is real. 'It's kind of this AI inflection point where it felt like almost everyone I knew at Stanford was dropping out to cofound a company,' said Ms Kacham, who was majoring in computer science and product design and is trying to raise money for Verita. To cut through the crowd, some of the young leaders have tried to go viral. In November, Mr Carmichael-Jack's Artisan plastered ads across bus stops in San Francisco with the outrage-inducing directive to 'stop hiring humans' and instead 'hire' the startup's AI sales agent, Ava. People were 'shocked' by the marketing campaign because it tapped into fears that AI would replace humans, Mr Carmichael-Jack said, but it also 'made them intrigued about what we were doing'. Mr Kaushik, the chief executive of Delve, a startup that automates the compliance busywork for businesses dealing with sensitive data, founded the company with his MIT classmate Selin Kocalar, 21. 'I don't think about age,' Ms Kocalar said. 'In today's day and age, the barrier to entry is so low with the help of AI.' Soon they may be mingling with an even younger crowd. A billboard in San Francisco on April 28, 2025, announcing Artisan's fund-raising this year. PHOTO: CAROLYN FONG/NYTIMES On a recent Friday in Fort Mason, a converted military hub in the city, the venture capital firm Founders Inc held a summer programme for high schoolers and college students to nurture their startup ideas. Long tables were covered in wires and open boxes of crackers, with some teenagers clustered together tweaking robots while others took a break to play videos games. Among the attendees was Mr Mizan Rupan-Tompkins, 18, a rising sophomore at San Jose State University who is studying computer science but pausing school in 2026 to build an AI-powered device to help unmanned air traffic control towers land airplanes safely. His company, Stratus AI, just got an investment from Founders Inc, which he declined to detail. Founders Inc, which also declined to share the investment amount, typically writes checks of US$100,000 to US$250,000 for startups. 'Stuff moves so quickly' that he could not wait until he'd graduate in 2028 to build a company, Mr Rupan-Tompkins said. 'It's better to be earlier than later, just in case I missed some type of wave,' he said. NYTIMES
Straits Times
22 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Badly bruised elite US universities are rushing to cut deals with Trump
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox WASHINGTON – As a growing number of the wealthiest US colleges capitulate in their battles with the Trump administration, the strain from lost and frozen federal funding is putting pressure on the remaining holdouts to cut a deal. Universities targeted by Mr Donald Trump's crackdown on diversity programmes and other policies he says show a liberal bias are essentially bleeding at the negotiating table after taking on debt, laying off hundreds of staff and slashing spending. As the fall semester approaches, they may be increasingly eager to ink accords that will stanch the flow. Cornell and Northwestern, both of which announced steps to address major budget shortfalls this year after the federal government suspended research funds, are now close to agreements with the White House, Bloomberg News has reported. Brown, Columbia and the University of Pennsylvania reached accords over July. But amid those settlements, new universities are being targeted. Most recently, the University of California at Los Angeles and Duke joined Harvard, Northwestern, Princeton and others in losing access to federal grants that are the financial lifeblood of large research institutions. It all adds up to an unprecedented pressure campaign that's roiling the world of higher education, reverberating through faculty, student and alumni groups and clouding the outlook for the type of medical and scientific research that takes place at the colleges. The multitrillion-dollar tax law signed in July also hikes the tax on income from endowments for some of the wealthiest private schools . As the Trump administration gains leverage, colleges' bruised budgets could drive them toward making agreements quicker. 'It seems like they want to get deals done now,' said Professor Brendan Cantwell, a professor at Michigan State University who focuses on the political economy of higher education. 'It's almost like a dam is broken. I would not be at all surprised if we saw a cascading set of agreements.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia What's it like to deal with brutal US tariffs? Ask Malaysia Singapore Singapore launches review of economic strategy to stay ahead of global shifts Singapore A look at the five committees reviewing Singapore's economic strategy Opinion Keeping it alive: How Chinese opera in Singapore is adapting to the age of TikTok Life Glamping in Mandai: Is a luxury stay at Colugo Camp worth the $550 price tag? Sport World Aquatics C'ships in S'pore deemed a success by athletes, fans and officials Singapore Strong S'pore-Australia ties underpinned by bonds that are continually renewed: President Tharman Federal funding has been used as a cudgel by the Trump administration, which has criticized what it says is a failure by academic institutions to crack down on antisemitism during campus protests over Israel's war in Gaza. The moves also come amid a broader campaign against diversity efforts and accusations of political bias. The fallout has already started. Northwestern said it would cut more than 400 jobs to save 5 per cent on labour costs, with university officials calling the past few months some of the most difficult in its 174-year history. The Trump administration in April paused US$790 million (S$1 billion) in research funding for the Evanston, Illinois-based school because of potential civil rights violations. At Cornell, leaders in June warned that drastic financial austerity measures were on the table after hundreds of millions of dollars in federal research contracts were terminated or frozen. 'The spring semester was unlike anything ever seen in higher education,' they wrote in a letter to students and staff. 'We have been using institutional resources to try to plug these funding holes in the short term, but these interim measures are not sustainable.' Late in July, the government froze US$108 million in research funding to Duke University, or about 20 per cent of its federal revenue, three Trump administration officials told Bloomberg. Duke is in talks with government officials on a settlement, according to an administration official. Duke's press office didn't provide a comment on the funding loss or the status of government talks. A Duke official, who asked not to be identified discussing internal deliberations, said the school is reconsidering its budget amid the funding loss, but that it hopes an end to the freeze will come soon. Cornell and Northwestern have declined to comment on any settlement talks. Trump agreements On July 23, Columbia University agreed to pay US$221 million in a deal that was promptly criticised for infringing on academic freedom at the school. Brown announced a deal on July 30, agreeing to give US$50 million over 10 years to workforce development organisations in its home state of Rhode Island in exchange for the reimbursement of at least US$50 million in unpaid federal grants. Shortly before reaching the deal, Brown took out a US$500 million loan – a sign of how strained the school's finances had become. Brown, the least wealthy of the Ivy League schools with an endowment of US$7.2 billion, had previously warned in June of 'significant' cost-cutting measures to offset the federal funding. The Trump administration's higher-education crackdown has exposed just how dependent some of the elite, research-focused universities are on the government. They're essentially 'major federal contractors' and stopping the stream would be catastrophic for many of them, according to Prof Cantwell. 'Think about Booz Allen or Raytheon,' Prof Cantwell said. 'If they said, 'All your federal funding will be frozen for 9 months,' you can imagine how those firms might react.' The Trump administration has dealt a harsher financial blow to Harvard than any other university in its crosshairs, freezing billions of multiyear research grants and contracts. The school estimates that the moves by the administration, as well as the endowment tax increase, will cost about US$1 billion annually. Harvard's Kennedy School already cut staff. 'The unprecedented challenges we face have led to disruptive changes, painful layoffs, and ongoing uncertainty about the future,' Harvard President Alan M. Garber said in a letter to the campus. Dr Garber has told faculty that a settlement with the government is not imminent and the university is considering resolving its dispute through the courts, the Harvard Crimson reported on Aug 4. Mr Larry Ladd, who served as Harvard's budget director and now advises schools at the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, said he cannot criticise any college for coming to a deal with the Trump administration given what is at stake for their campuses. 'Schools are likely facing pressure to use endowment and tuition revenue, which are typically used to support students, to support some of their research enterprise instead,' Mr Ladd said. 'They don't want to do that because they want to continue to support students. There's that pressure as well.' Ms Lynn Pasquerella, president of the American Association of Colleges and Universities, said campus leaders are being put in an 'untenable position' and worries that federal funds will continue to be weaponized by the Trump administration, even if schools make deals. 'The concern is the more we capitulate through making these agreements, the more the administration will be empowered to continue along these lines,' she said. BLOOMBERG
AsiaOne
22 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
US could require up to $19k bonds for some tourist visas under pilot programme, Lifestyle News
WASHINGTON — The US could require bonds of up to US$15,000 (S$19,308) for some tourist and business visas under a pilot programme launching in two weeks, a government notice said on Monday (Aug 4), an effort that aims to crack down on visitors who overstay their visas. The programme gives US consular officers the discretion to impose bonds on visitors from countries with high rates of visa overstays, according to a Federal Register notice. Bonds could also be applied to people coming from countries where screening and vetting information is deemed insufficient, the notice said. President Donald Trump has made cracking down on illegal immigration a focus of his presidency, boosting resources to secure the border and arresting people in the US illegally. He issued a travel ban in June that fully or partially blocks citizens of 19 nations from entering the US on national security grounds. Trump's immigration policies have led some visitors to skip travel to the United States. Transatlantic airfares dropped to rates last seen before the Covid-19 pandemic in May and travel from Canada and Mexico to the US fell by 20 per cent year-over-year. Effective Aug 20, the new visa programme will last for approximately a year, the government notice said. Consular officers will have three options for visa applicants subjected to the bonds: US$5,000, US$10,000 or US$15,000, but will generally be expected to require at least US$10,000, it said. The funds will be returned to travellers if they depart in accordance with the terms of their visas, the notice said. A similar pilot programme was launched in November 2020 during the last months of Trump's first term in office, but it was not fully implemented due to the drop in global travel associated with the pandemic, the notice said. A State Department spokesperson listed the criteria that will be used to identify the countries that will be affected, adding that the country list may be updated. "Countries will be identified based on high overstay rates, screening and vetting deficiencies, concerns regarding acquisition of citizenship by investment without a residency requirement, and foreign policy considerations," the spokesperson said. The State Department was unable to estimate the number of visa applicants who could be affected by the change. Many of the countries targeted by Trump's travel ban also have high rates of visa overstays, including Chad, Eritrea, Haiti, Myanmar and Yemen. US Travel Association, which represents major tourism-related companies, estimated the "scope of the visa bond pilot programme appears to be limited, with an estimated 2,000 applicants affected, most likely from only a few countries with relatively low travel volume to the United States." Numerous countries in Africa, including Burundi, Djibouti and Togo also had high overstay rates, according to US Customs and Border Protection data from fiscal year 2023. A provision in a sweeping spending package passed in the Republican-controlled US Congress in July also created a US$250 "visa integrity fee" for anyone approved for a non-immigrant visa that could potentially be reimbursable for those who comply with visa rules. The US$250 fee goes into effect on Oct 1. US Travel said that fee could hinder travel and said "if implemented, the US will have one of, if not the highest, visitor visa fees in the world." [[nid:720963]]
