Big 12 Commish Doubles Down On Preference For 5-11 Playoff Model If CFP Expands
"We have the responsibility to do what's right for college football ... not what's right for one or two or more conferences," Yormark said Tuesday at Big 12 football media days. "I think 5-11 is fair. Earn it on the field, assuming we want to expand. I love the current format, but if we're going to expand, let's do it in a way that's fair and equitable and gives everyone a chance."
While the SEC and Big Ten will have more of a say on the playoff format starting in 2026, when ESPN's $7.8 billion contract kicks in, Yormark believes the 5-11 format would be good for now and in the future. He said ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips feels the same way, and is expected to express that during his league's media days in two weeks.
"We do not need a professional model because we are not the NFL," Yormark said. "We are college football and we must act like it."
In the 12-team format still in place for this season, the five highest-ranked conference champions are guaranteed spots in the playoff. The difference this year is that the top four highest-ranked champions are no longer guaranteed the top four seeds that come with first-round byes.
Among potential 16-team formats would be four automatic qualifiers from both the SEC and Big Ten, and two each for the Big 12 and ACC. The Big 12 last season had only conference champion Arizona State make the playoff last season.
[Related: How 2024-25 CFP Would've Looked Under Proposed Expansion Formats]
"We want to earn it on the field," Yormark said. "It might not be the best solution today for the Big 12, given your comments about (automatic qualifiers), but long term, knowing the progress we're making, the investments we're making, it's the right format for us."
Yormark, who is going into his fourth year as Big 12 commissioner, believes that the landmark NCAA House settlement will have a positive impact for all conferences, especially if the College Sports Commission works the way it is intended in enforcing the rules in the remade system.
"It will. I have a lot of faith in Bryan Seely," Yormark said of the former Major League Baseball executive named CEO of the new CSC. "It should create a level playing field, and I'm not giving that up."
The Big 12 was already in transition and still at 10 teams when Yormark arrived in 2022. BYU, Cincinnati, Houston and UCF joined the league the following year.
Texas and Oklahoma, who won football national championships while in the Big 12, completed their long-planned move to the SEC last year. That is when Pac-12 schools Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado and Utah came into what is now a 16-team Big 12.
"I think parity matters, and I think ultimately over time, and that's hopefully sooner than later, there'll be a couple of our schools that will emerge, you know, as elite schools that are always part of the conversations at the highest levels. And that's what we're working towards," Yormark said. "But it starts with parity and being competitive top to bottom. And I think we're there."
Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily.
recommended
Item 1 of 3 Get more from the College Football Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'We don't know the rules' — Big 12 coaches still wrestling with new world order after player payment changes
FRISCO, Texas — Within a small booth three stories above the practice field of the Dallas Cowboys, Kenny Dillingham crosses his legs, leans back in a swivel chair and details exactly what's happening across the current college football recruiting landscape. 'We don't know the rules,' the Arizona State coach says. 'The settlement passed, but who knows what Deloitte is going to clear. Until there is clarity, you're living in limbo.' Advertisement And there's something else, too. 'You are seeing a lot of people lie and promise fake things,' he says. The Big 12 on Tuesday kicked off three weeks of conference football media days from the Cowboys' domed practice facility just north of Dallas, its head coaches, administrators and players jaunting across the turfed field to various media stations on Day 1 of a two-day event. It unfolded in front of a backdrop of what happened a week ago: the implementation of the NCAA's historic settlement of an antitrust case — a move that has ushered in direct athlete-revenue sharing. A similar theme emerged from the eight head coaches here Tuesday, one likely shared by the eight others who get their turn on Wednesday: The Wild West, they say, remains wild for now. Advertisement The finger pointing has already begun. Schools are making big enough contract offers to recruits that they cannot possibly remain under college football's new compensation cap, some coaches believe. Others are guaranteeing third-party NIL deals as part of the total compensation package to athletes — something against new revenue-share rules. A few are doling out cash from their collectives to high school players in an attempt to induce their commitment — also against new rules. And those schools rich enough to have front-loaded millions of dollars in the spring to compensate this year's roster — while perfectly within the rules — now hold an advantage in building next year's roster. 'I don't understand what rules everybody is playing by,' Cincinnati coach Scott Satterfield says. 'The whole point of this was for us all to be playing by the same rules, but we are not. We are not playing by the same rules, particularly this past spring when everybody is apparently frontloading where others are having to now spend their (revenue-share) cap.' The Big 12 and its coaches aren't alone in complaining about the new system after the House settlement. () (Icon Sportswire via Getty Images) Meanwhile, the newly minted entities charged with enforcing these policies, the College Sports Commission and its Deloitte-run NIL clearinghouse, are bogged down in legalities tethered to the settlement, those familiar with the process tell Yahoo Sports. Advertisement In fact, dozens and potentially hundreds of submitted third-party NIL deals — some, perhaps, from booster collectives — remain under review as college leaders negotiate with House plaintiff lawyers over a final set of cap-circumvention rules and penalties. Plaintiff lawyers, most notably co-lead attorneys Jeffrey Kessler and Steve Berman, hold authority and approval rights to a variety of settlement enforcement concepts, including rules and penalties that, in the end, are likely to determine final decisions from the College Sports Commission. These rules identity a variety of possible ways schools may attempt to circumvent the cap, including the guaranteeing of third-party NIL compensation in offers to athletes, NIL contracts struck with those in high school and particulars around the NIL clearinghouse's primary enforcement mechanisms for booster-backed contracts — that they are required to be within a 'fair market-compensation range' created by Deloitte and must be for a 'valid business purpose.' Contacted this week, Kessler told Yahoo Sports that attorneys are working with major conference administrators to finalize the approval of what some term as 'anti-circumvention' or 'gamesmanship' rules. In the meantime, certain submitted NIL deals remain in limbo. That doesn't go for all of them. Advertisement Of the more than 1,200 deals submitted to the clearinghouse so far, about one-third have been approved — many of them with little to no issue, those with knowledge tell Yahoo Sports. About 80 have been denied and are likely, if they haven't already, to be resubmitted (deals can be resubmitted once). Kessler says that no deals have advanced past the second denial stage and into the appeals phase, where athletes present their case before a neutral arbitrator. College executives and attorneys are finalizing a group of eight arbitrators — many of them former judges, Kessler says — to serve as an independent arbitration group. As college administrators and attorneys embroil themselves in legal negotiations, football coaches and general managers are preparing for the first-ever Aug. 1 official NCAA 'offer date,' when schools can formally offer revenue-share contracts to prospects (some have already, informally). On the recruiting trail across the country, Big 12 coaches say they are witnessing schools finding new ways, in the revenue-share era, to circumvent the cap and skirt the rules — perhaps even in their own league. Advertisement 'I've seen these agents coming out and saying, 'It's a guaranteed three-year deal for a high school kid.' One in our league right now,' Satterfield said. 'How?' Said UCF coach Scott Frost: 'Only comment I have is about some of the offers going out to freshmen. Those people must not be planning on there being a cap because they wouldn't be able to spend that.' In what's been no real secret, Texas Tech has used riches to fuel what's become a recruiting juggernaut. The athletic program has spent more than $50 million on their athletes in both front-loaded money this past spring plus revenue-share dollars this coming academic year. That's at least the frontloading of $30 million plus $20.5 million in rev-share. Frontloading refers to the literal loading upfront of player contracts as school collectives paid out all or a majority of deals before the settlement's implementation date of July 1. Deals paid out on July 1 and after are subject to the new enforcement system specifically created to prohibit booster and collective compensation. Advertisement Joey McGuire, the Texas Tech coach, describes his recruiting approach as the byproduct of high-level university support, careful planning and an 'aggression' that all schools should be taking to compete with the bluebloods of college football. 'What we do as a conference is so important, but we also got to do it off the field,' he told Yahoo Sports in an interview. 'We've got to recruit at this level if we are going to continue to be in the same conversation as the SEC and Big Ten. We've got to understand as a conference that we've got to commit to that. We have committed to that at Texas Tech and eliminated any people saying 'Well, they can't do it there.'' They are far from alone in frontloading. Booster collective spending on athletes in June was more than 800% higher than last June, according to Opendorse, an NIL platform used by dozens of collectives. According to another NIL platform, Teamworks, collectives distributed a whopping $71 million to athletes in June using their system. 'When you frontload, that gives you the ability to have money in the rev-share this year to make big-time payments and close out guys,' says Baylor coach Dave Aranda. 'That's what I'm seeing right now. There's a fair amount in our league that did it. There are a couple of schools here today.' Advertisement But there is a downside, Dillingham says. 'Most places are so win now and most coaches aren't at a place they want to stay at,' he said, 'Either you're at the top, and it's win now or as long as you can. Or you're at a place where it's win now and you can leave and get out. The frontloading allowed coaches to win now to take another job. 'But at the end of the day, all these people who frontloaded, eventually, you're gonna have to tell players they have to take less. You may have set a standard for what people should be paid. Your starters may expect a certain amount of money when in reality they cannot functionally earn that amount of money if you want to build a team.' All of that, of course, is contingent on the College Sports Commission and Deloitte-operated NIL clearinghouse policing deals strictly enough. Advertisement 'I don't know how Deloitte is going to act,' Dillingham said, 'but I know there are some future challenges where people don't get the money that they were told they'd get.' Kansas State coach Chris Klieman didn't have the luxury to frontload, he said. 'There are schools [that will] have $50 million rosters," Klieman said. "You can't be mad about it because it was legal, but that's why this first year will be interesting once we end the season. What will happen moving forward? That's where it's going to get really interesting. That's what we are concerned about: How do we reel this in? Is Deloitte going to really stay on top of that?' Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark, one of the people intimately involved in decisions around the new enforcement entity, holds confidence that the system will work. Advertisement 'In theory, the settlement should create a more level playing field and enforcement will effectively determine if that's the case or not,' he told Yahoo Sports. 'I think the onus is on the commissioners to reinforce that there needs to be a change in behavior.' Already, there are cap-circumvention issues emerging in contracts and promises made to athletes. For instance, at SEC spring meetings in May, Georgia coach Kirby Smart told Yahoo Sports that schools are promising high school recruits and transferring players third-party NIL deals as part of their compensation package despite an important fact: None of those deals have been approved by the clearinghouse. Advertisement Some school-affiliated booster collectives are currently compensating high school players — upwards of $20,000 a month — to remain committed and eventually sign with their school, Smart and other coaches say. Dillingham said he's seen contracts that also permit schools to end or reduce a player's salary over the course of the deal, something reported earlier this spring by Yahoo Sports via Illinois law professor Michael Leroy, who uncovered more than 90 different player contracts through open-records requests. 'These NIL contracts read like employee handbooks that reserve a right of employment at will for employers,' he said. 'They don't use 'at will' but the concept is, they can terminate the contract.' In one ACC revenue-share contract obtained by Yahoo Sports, the school includes in the total compensation to the player a figure for 'NIL' of $25,000 annually. Next to that figure is a line: 'Subject to the Deloitte Clearinghouse.' Advertisement 'You don't know if your NIL collective deals will go through and the school can change your rev-share dollar amount at any time,' Dillingham said. 'Well, then what are we actually doing?!' Many coaches are asking that question and plenty more. Asked Tuesday if he's heard feedback from the NIL clearinghouse, Scott Frost smiled: 'No. Have you?'
NBC Sports
an hour ago
- NBC Sports
UCF's Scott Frost tries to skip talk of failed Nebraska tenure, but falls a bit short
FRISCO, Texas — Scott Frost's celebrated return as coach at UCF comes with the backdrop of a failed tenure at Nebraska, the alma mater he said he didn't want to talk about at Big 12 football media days Tuesday. Even though he did. Frost said, 'I really want to keep it about UCF,' just a few hours after telling a reporter from The Athletic that he never wanted to take the Nebraska job in the first place coming off a 13-0 season in 2017 that sparked debate about whether the Knights should have had a chance to play for the national championship in the four-team playoff. 'I said I wouldn't leave unless it was someplace you could win a national championship,' Frost told The Athletic. 'I got tugged in a direction to try to help my alma mater and didn't really want to do it. It wasn't a good move. I'm lucky to get back to a place where I was a lot happier.' When the same reporter asked Frost in a one-on-one interview what he learned from his time in Nebraska, the former Cornhuskers quarterback said, 'Don't take the wrong job.' Frost's tone was quite a bit different in two different settings with reporters at the 12,000-seat indoor stadium that is also a practice field for the Dallas Cowboys. 'When you go through something that doesn't work, just ready for another chance, and I'm ready for another chance,' Frost said. 'This is about the Big 12. This is about UCF. Everybody has success in life and has failures in life, for all sorts of different reasons. I'm excited to get back in a place where my family and I get treated well.' Frost inherited an 0-12 team at UCF and turned it into an undefeated American Athletic Conference champion in just two years. Nebraska fans were ecstatic when he made the move 20 years after leading the Cornhuskers to a perfect 1997 season and a split national title with Michigan in the final season before a championship game was established. Three games into his fifth season in Lincoln, Frost was fired with a 16-31 record. Almost three full college seasons later, it's back to Orlando — after one year working under Los Angeles Rams coach Sean McVay. 'I really enjoyed two years off,' Frost said. 'I got to spend a whole year with Ashley and the (three) kids, and I'll never get that time back. I played more catch with my son and touch football in the yard with him and going to Little League and seeing my daughter do gymnastics. And then some time out in LA really, really helped reset me, too.' Images endure of Frost celebrating a 34-27 Peach Bowl victory over Auburn that clinched UCF's perfect 2017 season almost a month after he had been named the coach at Nebraska. Fast-forward almost eight years, and Frost was delaying a scheduled roundtable with reporters to take a few pictures with the players he brought with him to media days. 'Yeah, being around the guys,' Frost said of that moment. 'I'm sorry, I'd rather be around the guys than you guys.' And there are times when Frost brings up the old days with his new guys. 'We talk to them about all those things,' Frost said. 'What happened in 2017 is at times relevant, but this is a new team. So we only point those things out, not to live in the past, but just to help them with any lessons that we want to learn.' Frost wasn't sharing the lessons he learned in Nebraska with everyone.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Social media reactions to the news of Oklahoma AD Joe Castiglione retiring
Big news hit Sooner Nation on Monday morning when it broke that Oklahoma Sooners athletic director Joe Castiglione would be retiring at the end of the 2025-2026 academic year. Oklahoma will begin searching for his replacement in the coming months, but Castiglione's impact on the University of Oklahoma can't be understated. From helping OU Athletics dig out of a financial hole to the 26 national championships and ushering the Sooners into the SEC and through the start of the name, image, and likeness era, Castiglione has helped OU navigate a lot of changes in collegiate athletics over the last 27 years. From media to administrators, fans and former athletes, many took to social media to express their admiration for Joe Castiglione over the last couple of days. Here's how social media reacted to the retirement of "Joe C." From the President From SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey From his son What an impact From the Protege From the Broadcast Booth From former Sooner Trent Ratterree A Legend in Admin The GOAT A Mentor to Many One of a Kind Game recognizes game Friend to Many Made a lasting Impact From Oklahoma Men's Gymanstics Coach South Carolina Head Coach Shane Beamer Oklahoma Football GM Jim Nagy Former OU Softball Star Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions. You can also follow John on X @john9williams.
