"Brighton council pushed us away and made us feel worthless"
On Monday, the deputy leader of Eastbourne Borough Council, Peter Diplock, said placing vulnerable people that far outside the city was leaving people to "to sink or swim" in a corporate strategy of "out of sight, out of mind".His comments came after the deaths of two homeless men who were placed in emergency housing in the town.The two men, aged 38 and 60, died just over a week from each other in separate incidents at a hotel.Scott and Tina were also housed in an Eastbourne hotel but that tenancy was terminated after nine months due to disagreements with the hotel owner.
Despite their current predicament, Scott said they were "better off than a lot of people" who were having to sleep in doorways.But he said there was too much homelessness in Eastbourne."Eastbourne is just full of homeless people and when you actually speak to them rarely any of them are from Eastbourne, they're from Brighton, Worthing, they're all from way out of town."Someone should have a roof over their head where they can clean themselves, cook for themselves. We can't do any of that," he said.
'A safe space'
The couple visit the Matthew 25 Mission drop-in centre in the town most days to get food and support.He said: "Without these people providing this service, I don't think we would survive."It's more than just a food place... they do the washing, you can get advice, you actually relax, you have a safe space and know someone's going to sit there and listen."Tina added: "If services like this didn't exist then there wouldn't be anywhere for us to go. We struggle as it is to charge phones so that we can get hold of people like doctors."Meanwhile, Scott said Brighton council "don't give you five minutes to even listen to you."It felt like I was worthless. "They don't even have any empathy."
After Scott and Tina were found living in the tent just over a year ago, the StreetLink service, which connects people living rough with local services, put them in contact with BHCC to arrange housing because of Scott's type 2 diabetes.Scott said BHCC "didn't really help us. They moved us miles away to Eastbourne and pretty much never contacted us again until I kept pushing and pushing for a conversation."He said that conversation ended a week later "when some person just decided that we didn't deserve a house".An obstacle for Scott and Tina to be given a home was that they had rent arrears from a property they lived at in Durham two years ago.Scott said: "Brighton made it very clear they're not interested, even though they've decided we have priority need, we have local connections and I have health needs. "We do have rent arrears from Durham, but, you know, loads of people are in debt in this country."
'National housing crisis'
Tina said she grew up in Brighton and did not have any family in Eastbourne."The only person I have to talk to is Scott and sometimes it gets a bit lonely," she said."I do speak to my dad, but obviously it's not the same as going to see him [and] I don't have the luxury of funds to go there and spend time with him. "He's the only parent I have left."
Scott accused the council of "ticking boxes" and "pushing" the homelessness problem away."They're pushing people further and further away to Eastbourne, Worthing, wherever they can shove people because they can't deal with them properly themselves. BHCC has been approached for comment about Scott and Tina's situation.In a statement on Monday, councillor Gill Williams, cabinet member for housing, said the authority was operating within the constraints of a national housing crisis" where "the demand for housing far exceeds supply".It said where temporary accommodation was necessary, "we aim to place households within or near the city. However, due to limited availability and affordability, out-of-area placements are sometimes unavoidable. "These decisions are never taken lightly, and we work to ensure that placements are safe, supported, and communicated appropriately."The council extended its deepest sympathies to the families of the two men who died in Eastbourne.It said it was awaiting the outcome of the coroner's report, which it would "consider carefully to inform any further improvements" to its approach.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Sudoku 6,959 medium
Click here to access the print version. Fill the grid so that every row, every column and every 3x3 box contains the numbers 1 to 9. To see the completed puzzle, buy the next issue of the Guardian (for puzzles published Monday to Thursday). Solutions to Friday and Saturday puzzles are given in either Saturday's or Monday's edition.
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Mobile phones: Children under-14 advised against smartphones
Parents of thousands of children have been asked not to give them a smartphone until at least 14-years-old amid fears some were using devices for eight hours a dayMany schools have already banned smartphones on site but one part of the UK thinks it will be the first to have a countywide policy advising parents against giving children smartphones at mobiles is already banned in schools in Monmouthshire, south Wales, but due to a rise in cyber-bullying reports and fears phone use at home is affecting schoolwork, schools are going a step further."We've got reports of students who are online at two, three, four in the morning," said headteacher Hugo Hutchinson. "We get a lot of wellbeing issues, as do all schools, that come from social media activity online over the weekend, or when they should be asleep," added the head of Monmouth Hutchinson said schools had worked on "robust" phone policies but pointed out ultimately children's time was largely spent outside of school, where many still had unrestricted access to teachers in Monmouthshire acknowledge they can't force parents not to give smartphones to their under-14 children, schools have taken a "big step" to give advice about what parent should do in their own in some areas of the UK have already asked parents not to get their under-14s smartphones - like in St Albans, Belfast and Solihull in the West Midlands. 'I was worried my son would feel left out' But Monmouthshire believe they're the first county in the UK where all secondary and primary teachers in both state and private schools are advising against smartphones for more than 9,000 children under the age of of those parents being advised not to give their children a smartphone is Emma who said she felt like "the worst parent in the world" after continuously telling her 12-year-old son Monty he wasn't allowed one."He was feeling left out," she said. "He would be sitting on the school bus without a phone and everybody else would be doing the journey with a phone. He found that quite difficult. I think for boys it's more about games on the phone."The mum-of-three is worried what her son could be exposed to online and how "addictive" devices were but offered Monty a "brick phone" – a term to describe older models that can't connect to the internet and is only capable of calls and the thought of giving Monty a smartphone when he reached secondary school had become one of her "biggest fears", she and other parents said they were relieved schools are taking ownership. Schools hope the intervention of teachers would help those parents that were worried saying no to a smartphone would mean their child was "left out".But other some argued their children had been using smartphones without any Dorkings' son, who is moving up to secondary school in September, had his own smartphone when he was eight-years-old."He's always sort of been on one," he said. "It's like a calming thing, or [something to use] out of boredom. He's not on it that much, he's more of a TV boy. He doesn't pull it out his pocket every five minutes, he can put it down and just leave it."Nicholas said he could understand why schools wanted to get involved, but he believed smartphones had become essential to how young people Lili's primary school class is one of the first to be targeted by the new policy, after teachers wrote to their parents urging them to consider "brick phones" - if they felt their child needed something for travelling to school. 'Most kids around here have smartphones' Lili said she felt "14 to 15" was about the right age for children to get their first smartphone as by then they might stand a better chance of knowing if something they read online "wasn't true"."We found out that one in four children have been cyber-bullied within our school, which is really strange," said the year six pupil. "It shouldn't be right, there shouldn't be the chance for people to be cyber-bullied, because we're really young."Lili's classmate Morgan said she had got a smartphone but had decided to stop using it after learning more about them in school."Most kids around here have smartphones," said the 11-year-old. "They are just 100% always on it. When kids come over to play at some households they just go on their smartphones and just text.""I used to go on it to just scroll but I got bored - but then I'd also get bored not being on my smartphone. I just decided to stop scrolling to read a book or the trampoline." Are mobile phones being banned in UK schools? Schools in Northern Ireland are advised to restrict pupils from using phones, in Scotland teachers are backed to introduce phone bans while in Wales, headteachers have been told smartphones shouldn't be banned "outright".In England, the children's commissioner has said banning phones should be a decision for head teachers but insisted parents had "the real power" to alter how their children used phones with more time spent on them outside of now every parent of all of Monmouthshire's state and private schools will be told about the county's new smartphone over the coming months. 'People have an addiction to smartphones' "This is not a school issue. This is a whole community and society issue," added Mr Hutchinson, whose comprehensive school in Monmouth has 1,700 pupils. "Like all schools, we are experiencing much higher levels of mental health issues as a result. Addiction to smartphones, addiction to being online."We have students who on average are spending six, seven, eight hours a day online outside school. We've got reports of students who are online at two, three, four in the morning. "So the impact on their school day, the impact on their learning and the impact on their life chances is really fundamental." In a token of solidarity to their son Monty and to encourage their two younger daughters, Emma Manchand and her husband Kev offered give up their own smartphones."We do 24-hours without the phone, which has been quite a challenging," she said."Sometimes we might slightly fail. But the first time I did it, although I was nervous, I felt like I'd had a little mini break."The kids love it as well, because of course they get to be the ones telling us to put our phones down."
BBC News
6 hours ago
- BBC News
Wales' papers: Tourism tax go-ahead and 'violent death' inquest
Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.
