B.C. ombudsperson finds request for repayment of provincial COVID-19 aid unjust
The BC Emergency Benefit for Workers was introduced in 2020 and, in an effort to work quickly, the B.C. government initially required recipients to also be receiving the federal Canada Emergency Response Benefit.
Jay Chalke's office says in a news release that the province was unaware that some people who had lost their job due to COVID-19 were being paid through other federal benefits, including employment insurance.
He says the B.C. government paid those applicants, then ordered them to repay the funds.
Chalke says people applied for the benefits in good faith to get through a crisis, then were ordered to pay back the money, not because they lost their jobs, but because of how a federal benefit claim was processed behind the scenes.
His report makes one recommendation that the Finance Ministry change the Income Tax Act to extend the benefit eligibility to workers who lost their jobs due to COVID-19 but were excluded only because of employment insurance claims.
Chalke says 'it was unjust for the province to require repayment in such circumstances.'
The report also found some eligible workers were told to repay even though they met all the criteria.
It says the repayment letters people received were confusing and offered no explanation as to why they were being asked to repay the benefit.
The report also says the ministry did not use available federal data to verify their eligibility and instead placed the burden on the individual.
'This report isn't about trying to undo a program that was created in a hurry,' Chalke says. 'It's about what governments do when they later find out that parts of those programs were flawed.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 6, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
19 minutes ago
- CTV News
Canada still working toward Aug. 1 trade deal deadline, LeBlanc says, as U.S. senator casts doubt
President of the King's Privy Council for Canada Dominic LeBlanc speaks at a press conference while Prime Minister Mark Carney listens, on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Thursday, June 19, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Patrick Doyle WASHINGTON — Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc said Thursday he's feeling "encouraged" after meeting with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and American lawmakers in Washington, D.C., ahead of next week's tariff deadline. LeBlanc, however, indicated a new economic and security arrangement may not materialize by U.S. President Donald Trump's latest deadline. "Canadians expect us to take the time necessary to get the best deal we can in the interest of Canadian workers," LeBlanc said outside the Dirksen Senate Office Building. "So we are only going to be in a position to accept a deal when the prime minister decides that it is the best deal we can get in the interest of Canadian workers and the Canadian economy." U.S. President Donald Trump has sent letters to multiple nations, including Canada, saying that if no deal is made by Aug. 1, he will impose high tariffs on imports to the United States. Trump's letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney threatened Canada with 35 per cent tariffs but the White House has said the levies will not be applied to imports compliant with the Canada-U.S-Mexico Agreement on trade. Canada is also being hit with Trump's tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles, and will be impacted by copper duties that are also expected to kick in on Aug. 1. Only a handful of frameworks of trade deals have been announced since Trump first threatened his so-called "Liberation Day" tariffs in April. The president this week said his administration made deals with Japan and the Philippines, adding to previous agreements with Indonesia, Vietnam and the United Kingdom. Many details within the agreements remain vague but all include some level of a tariff, and it's unclear whether the deals would shield countries from Trump's plan to implement further sectoral duties on things like semiconductors and lumber. LeBlanc said "complex negotiations" are continuing between Canada and the United States and he will be returning to Washington next week. LeBlanc described his meeting with Lutnick as productive and cordial. The minister, who was joined by Canadian Ambassador to the U.S. Kirsten Hillman, also had meetings with Republican senators Kevin Cramer, Roger Marshall, Shelley Moore Capito, Todd Young and Tim Scott. LeBlanc said they discussed border security and defence issues and the American lawmakers shared a "desire to see more stability and predictability in the relationship with the United States." "My conversations have focused on how we share so many priorities of President Trump's administration that we should be able to figure out together a deal that's in the best interest of Canadian workers, and obviously they are going to do their side of the table in terms of the American economy and American workers," LeBlanc said. Federal officials have remained tightlipped about what Trump's team has said it wants from Canada. After this week's trade deals were announced, Trump boasted on social media, saying he will only consider lowering tariff rates if countries open their markets to the United States. The president also said Japan would invest $550 billion in the U.S. 'at my direction." When Trump first browbeat Canada over tariffs, saying it was linked to the flow of deadly fentanyl, Ottawa responded with a boosted border plan and named a "Fentanyl Czar." Last month, Ottawa walked back its digital services tax after Trump threatened to halt all trade talks. Carney last week announced measures to stop Chinese steel dumping in Canada. Hillman said those efforts help Canada in its ongoing negotiations. "In our discussion with the American senators this week, the American administration, the measures that Canada has taken on steel in particular... are some of the strongest in the world," she said. "And that has been recognized and very much appreciated. So we are making some positive progress." Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski joined a bipartisan group of American lawmakers in Ottawa last week. The Republican said on Thursday that "we would all like to get to a better place with our trade relationship with Canada" but remained skeptical it would happen ahead of Aug. 1. Canada cannot be treated "as yet one more country that we need to reconcile tariffs on" because of shared economic and national security issues, she said. "I wish that I could say, 'It feels good,' that this is all going to be taken care of before the first of August, but I'm not sensing that," she said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 24, 2025. Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press
Toronto Sun
19 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
DE LUCA-BARATTA: Canada's other supply management problem
Dairy cows being checked out by a farmer and vet during feeding. Photo by Getty Images While Canada-U.S. trade negotiations reignite debates over supply management for dairy and poultry, Canadians overlook a far costlier system — the unofficial supply management of housing through restrictive land-use regulations . This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Most Canadians support weakening or abolishing the current agricultural supply management program , a long overdue realization. Under this program, a national marketing agency sets provincial production quotas for eggs, poultry, and dairy. Farmers then receive permission to produce and sell a set amount of each good at a guaranteed minimum price. A University of Manitoba study found that families pay over $900 million more per year for supply-managed goods than they would in a free market. But the effects of Canada's second, unofficial supply management system are much worse. Through a web of urban planning rules , municipalities prevent housing construction from keeping up with growing demand, causing home prices and rents to balloon. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The two systems differ in their details, but not in their effects, because the underlying economics are the same. When the government artificially constrains supply, consumers foot the bill through higher prices. Under supply management, the federal government directly sets production ceilings to stabilize prices and guarantee farmers' incomes. This system protects farmers at the expense of consumers, who pay more for groceries than they otherwise would. Under land-use regulations, local governments limit building heights, set aesthetic standards, ban certain types of construction in designated areas, and impose other rules, such as parking requirements and minimum lot sizes. These rules have various goals, from environmental protection to the preservation of historic neighbourhoods. However, by making housing harder and more costly to build, they also constrain supply and radically inflate prices. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Individually, these rules may seem reasonable, but cumulatively, they stifle development by outright banning projects or layering costs that render new housing unprofitable. The result is a shortage of housing, most of which becomes too costly for the average homebuyer or renter. When more people bid for goods, the price of those goods rises. In a free market , producers respond by producing more of them, lured by the prospect of higher profits. Over time, as more producers enter the market and existing firms compete with one another to attract buyers, prices decrease to attract new customers. Firms that overcharge lose revenue, since customers can simply move to a seller offering a better deal. In Canada, construction of new housing has not kept up with demand for decades, because developers cannot respond to higher prices by simply building more units. When they do manage to build, the process is usually extremely costly. Those costs are ultimately passed on to homebuyers and renters. Excessive land-use regulations thus make luxury-tier housing the only kind of housing worth building. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. A study by the C.D. Howe Institute found that in eight urban areas — Vancouver, Abbotsford, Victoria, Kelowna, Calgary, Toronto, and Ottawa-Gatineau — homebuyers paid an extra average of $230,000 for a new house due to land-use regulations that prevent new construction. In Vancouver — where the average home costs $2 million — regulatory costs account for nearly half the price. In Toronto ($1.2 million average), it's 20%. This system is especially unfair to young people, who often find themselves priced out of the housing market altogether. To understand just how unaffordable housing in Canada has become, consider a family earning $183,000 per year, nearly $100,000 above the median Canadian household income. That family would have to set aside 10% of its income for 15 to 25 years (depending on the income split between the spouses) to afford a down payment on a house in Toronto. The average young family simply does not stand a chance. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Those who blame greed instead of overregulation for Canada's housing crisis should look at cities with few land-use regulations, like Houston, Texas . For the most part, builders are free to build in response to demand. The median home price in Houston is about $350,000. Houston's developers are no less 'greedy' than Toronto's; they're simply constrained by competition in a freer market. A relatively free housing market incentivizes them to compete for customers through lower prices and an almost non-existent regulatory burden allows those prices to remain quite low indeed. The same can be true in Canadian cities if governments get out of the way. It's about time for Canadians — young Canadians in particular — to start demanding that local officials get rid of regulations that price them out of the housing market. Federal and provincial governments must penalize those who cling to obstructionist rules. Canadians are tired of overpaying for a carton of milk — and rightfully so. It is time we lost patience with paying too much for housing, too. Anthony De Luca-Baratta is a contributor to the Center for North American Prosperity and Security, a project of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute Sports World Ontario Canada Toronto & GTA
an hour ago
Canada's trade team downplays chances of deal with Trump by Aug. 1
With the clock ticking on U.S. President Donald Trump's threat to boost tariffs on some Canadian exports to 35 per cent starting Aug. 1, Canada's top trade negotiators are downplaying the likelihood of reaching a deal by that deadline. Dominic LeBlanc, minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, and Canada's ambassador to the U.S., Kirsten Hillman, wrapped up two days of meetings with Republican senators. These included a brief sit-down between LeBlanc and Howard Lutnick, the U.S. secretary of commerce and Trump's point man on tariffs. We've made progress, but we have a lot of work in front of us, LeBlanc told reporters outside a Senate office building on Thursday. LeBlanc said he had a productive, cordial discussion with Lutnick and plans to return to Washington next week. He also added some caveats about the path to reaching a deal. We're going to continue to work toward the Aug. 1 deadline,' he said. But all of these deadlines are with the understanding that we'll take the time necessary to get the best deal that we think is in the interest of the Canadian economy and Canadian workers." Hillman, who was appointed Canada's chief negotiator with the U.S., also suggested an agreement with the Trump administration is not imminent. WATCH | Dominic LeBlanc speaks after meeting Trump's point man on tariffs: It's important for us to recognize that there is a time when the deal is the right deal, and it's important for us to be in a position to continue negotiating until we get to that point, she said. Their comments are the latest evidence that Prime Minister Mark Carney's government is not in a rush to sign a deal with the U.S. Carney said Tuesday that his objective is "not to reach a deal whatever it costs (new window) ." Following Carney's meeting with Canada's premiers earlier this week, Nova Scotia's Tim Houston said the prime minister isn't dead set on signing a deal by the deadline. Other countries reach tariff deals with Trump This comes amid Trump's announcements this week of framework agreements on tariffs struck with Japan (new window) and Indonesia, and reports the U.S. is closing in on a deal with the European Union. Canada may be less panicked than other trading partners about the Aug. 1 deadline because only a small portion of Canada's exports to the U.S. would be affected by Trump's threat of 35 per cent tariffs. That's because most goods enter the U.S. tariff-free (new window) under the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, or CUSMA. Officials say LeBlanc and Hillman met with five Republican senators in Washington: Kevin Cramer (North Dakota), Roger Marshall (Kansas), Shelley Moore Capito (West Virginia), Tim Scott (South Carolina) and Todd Young (Indiana). Another Republican senator, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, told reporters in Washington on Thursday that the U.S. shares a lot of security and economic interests with Canada and shouldn't treat it as just another country when it comes to tariffs. "I wish that I could say it feels good, that this is all going to be taken care of before the first of August, but I'm not sensing that," said Murkowski, who visited Ottawa on Monday (new window) to meet Carney and some of his cabinet ministers. Mike Crawley (new window) · CBC News · Senior reporter Mike Crawley has covered Ontario politics for CBC News since 2009. He began his career as a newspaper reporter in B.C., spent six years as a freelance journalist in various parts of Africa, then joined the CBC in 2005. Mike was born and raised in Saint John, N.B. Follow Mike Crawley on Twitter (new window)
