Ragwort Growing Outside Leinster House Addressed Dafm
Earlier this month, Independent Senator Aubrey McCarthy highlighted that the noxious weed was growing outside the Irish parliament, which he described as "a shameful symbol of non-compliance".
"If ragwort can flourish outside the very building where laws are made, it undermines our credibility and duty to uphold them," he said.
Under the Noxious Weeds Act, 1936 it is an offence for owners and occupiers of land not to prevent the spread of specified weeds.
The department of agriculture is responsible for overseeing the control and the prevention of the spread of certain weeds where there is a risk to agricultural land, as determined by a risk assessment.
The noxious weeds specified in the legislation includes common ragwort which has distinctive bright yellow flowers.
Ragwort growing outside Leinster House Source: @carthy_aubrey
"The Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine liaised with the Office of Public Works (OPW), which is responsible for the management of Leinster House.
"The OPW has advised that the ragwort has been addressed," a DAFM spokesperson told Agriland.
Following a public consultation, a new Statutory Instrument (SI) was signed by Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine Martin Heydon in May 2025.
This SI consolidates all secondary legislation on noxious weeds, codifies the existing species of noxious weeds with their botanical names.
In addition, the measure designates blackgrass as a noxious weed and limits controls to certain species of thistle and dock.
Over a ten year period to 2023, there were 198 complaints relating to noxious weeds made to DAFM and 60% of these related to agricultural land.
All complaints over the 10 year period related to ragwort, thistle or dock or a combination of these.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
5 hours ago
- The Journal
Here's where Ireland is opening five new embassies and consulates around the world
THE DEPARTMENT OF Foreign Affairs is opening five new embassies and consulates across the world as part of diplomatic missions seeking to expand Ireland's footprint. Embassies will be opening in Belgrade, Serbia as well as Chisinau in Moldova and Sarajevo in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In a statement, Tánaiste Simon Harris said the new embassies show Ireland's 'commitment to EU enlargement', as it takes up the presidency of the European Union in the second half of 2026. 'Our expanded presence in the Western Balkans and Eastern Neighbourhood will reinforce links with countries who look to Ireland as an example of how a country can benefit from, and contribute to, the European Union' The missions will begin operations in the autumn. In addition to the embassies, two new consulates will open – one in Málaga, Spain and one in Melbourne, Australia. Advertisement Consulates are offices that support the embassy in that country. The Tánaiste said these will deliver services to the growing Irish diaspora and holiday makers in both regions. Both are due to become operational in 2026. 'Taken together, and with the mission already opened as part of the Global Ireland strategy, these five new missions will further strengthen Ireland's global presence and influence,' Harris said. Under Global Ireland 2025 – a whole government strategy with the aim of doubling Ireland's influence and footprint – there have been 22 missions opened to date. These include embassies in Kyiv, Rabat, Wellington, Bogotá, Amman, Monrovia, Santiago de Chile, Tehran, Manila, Dakar, and Islamabad. Consulates general have been opened in Vancouver, Mumbai, Frankfurt, Los Angeles, Cardiff, Manchester, Lyon, Miami, Toronto, Milan, and Munich. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Agriland
6 hours ago
- Agriland
Scheme Eligibility Criteria Too Narrow for Forgotten Farmers Icmsa
The Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers' Association (ICMSA) is urging Minister Martin Heydon to extend eligibility criteria for the scheme to support Long Established Young Farmers. The scheme for these farmers - commonly referred to as 'Forgotten Farmers' – is now open for submission of online applications. While welcoming the long-awaited opening of the scheme designed to provide support for farmers who missed out on payments during the mid-2000s, ICMSA said that the scheme as outlined is "unfairly narrow and restrictive". The association's deputy president, Eamon Carroll said that while the scheme's introduction is a positive, several outstanding issues remain to be addressed. He said it is a "matter of regret that the scheme risked excluding many deserving applicants". Carroll, who also serves as chair of the farm and rural affairs committee, said that the association has advocated for such a scheme for many years. "This initiative is a long time coming and will be appreciated by those who qualify," he said. "However, the eligibility criteria are disappointingly narrow and there will be many obviously deserving cases that will not qualify, as presently set out." To be eligible for the 'Forgotten Farmers' scheme, an applicant must have set up as the head of an agricultural holding for the first time on or before December 31, 2007. Carroll said that a significant concern is this cut-off date, which he maintained would exclude many farmers now in their late 40s or early 50s. 'These were people who began farming during a period of economic hardship and who had limited access to any kind of young farmer supports," he explained. "ICMSA is calling on the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine to extend eligibility to include all farmers who entered the sector before 2015 and who never received young farmer payments. "The minister can make this important change and ICMSA urges him to do so in the interests of basic fairness."
RTÉ News
8 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Trump claims victory on trade - but EU had little choice
In many respects US President Donald Trump achieved his aims by introducing a swath of tariffs with America's main trading partners around the world. The European Union has a population of 448 million compared to the US which has 340 million. However, the US economy is larger. Many have been surprised at the way Donald Trump has appeared to be able to dictate terms to Europe. His announcement yesterday that he would commence the new tariff arrangements from 7 August appeared to be his decision with little input from the EU. President of the European Commission Ursula Von Der Leyen has defended the deal, which will see tariffs of 15% imposed on EU goods. There are two reasons why the EU did not want a full blown trade war with Mr Trump. Firstly, European businesses were opposed to a prolonged period of tit-for-tat tariffs with enormously damaging consequences. Secondly, if relations with Mr Trump soured, he could threaten to row back on defence commitments. The EU is highly reliant on the US for arm supplies, funding for NATO and military support for Ukraine. But looking at scale of tariffs imposed on other countries the EU's 15% does not seem too damaging compared to India's 25%, Canada's 35% and Switzerland's 39%. Most of the US' main trading partners have rates of 15% or 20%. The exception is the UK's 10% tariff. However, this is not an all-inclusive rate. In other words, other rates can be added to it. Nor does Britain have a written agreement capping pharmaceutical tariffs unlike the EU. It is worth bearing in mind that while tariffs on European goods go up, Mr Trump stated the EU would be "opening up their countries at zero tariffs" for US exports. Unanswered questions From the Irish point of view there are still many unanswered questions. There is no agreement on alcohol exports to the US. That sector was expected to be covered by a zero-for-zero tariff arrangement but that has not yet been confirmed. This is critical for Ireland's whiskey industry and the EU's wine exports. It seems clear that pharmaceuticals and computer chips will face tariffs of up to 15%, but the timing is still uncertain. Both are subject of so-called Section 232 investigations because Mr Trump believes the US' use of imports is a national security issue. Tánaiste Simon Harris said the tariffs for sectors under investigation will not become clear until those processes are concluded. For pharmaceuticals that is expected to happen in two weeks. But the fact that the EU-US agreement won't exceed 15% does provide some clarity for the industry. Bank of Ireland pointed out that drugs are relatively inelastic, which means if prices go up people still buy them because they are prescribed by doctors. The new swath of tariffs come at a time when the dollar has been weakening and making EU exports to the US more expensive at the worst possible time. Then there is the question of what this all means for the Irish economy. In March, the Department of Finance and the Economic Social Research Institute published research on the impact of tariffs on the Irish economy. It looks at a range of scenarios from tariffs of 10% to 25%. Based on that analysis, officials at the Department of Finance told business leaders yesterday that the economy would continue to expand, but at a slower pace than previously expected. Employment will grow but at a slower rate. The Government will now have to decide how all this will impact the Budget in October. But while Mr Trump may believe he has achieved his aims on tariffs, in the long run his actions carry the risk of higher inflation in the US and undermining the American economy.
