logo
Zohran Mamdani: 5 lessons for Democrats

Zohran Mamdani: 5 lessons for Democrats

The Hill3 days ago
New York Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani has stoked a debate in the wider Democratic Party with his surprise primary victory.
Do Democrats need to follow more of his lessons to get back on track with their brand? Or does the democratic socialist's brand of politics fit a left-leaning New York primary, but not the rest of the county?
The answer is probably somewhere in between, but a number of Democrats interviewed by The Hill said there are clear lessons the party can learn from the upstart's victory.
Affordability
Mamdani mounted his campaign on a message of affordability, coining soundbites such as 'freeze the rent,' 'city-run grocery stores' and 'make buses fast and free' as cornerstones of his campaign.
Political observers say the unequivocal cost of living promises resonated with an electorate seeking change.
'He answers the questions very directly and very specifically. … He's like, 'I want to freeze rents, I want to create free buses, I want to raise the minimum wage to $30 an hour,'' said Grant Reeher, the director of Syracuse University's Campbell Public Affairs Institute.
Democrats say the national party's messaging on economic issues in 2024 was weak, as Americans blamed then-President Biden for inflation.
Mamdani's victory shows the importance for candidates to be seen as being the side working to make things more affordable for average voters.
Authenticity
One of Mamdani's biggest assets, some Democrats say, is his authenticity.
The political neophyte went from relative obscurity to becoming a boldface name by keeping it real throughout his campaign. Not only did the 33-year-old speak about issues important to New Yorkers, but he did it in a way that was true to himself, instead of out of a Democratic playbook.
In a 30-second video posted to his Instagram and TikTok accounts four days before election day, for example, Mamdani could be seen walking with his sleeves rolled up surrounded by a crowd of his supporters delivering his message of affordability directly to voters.
'It's the authenticity, stupid!,' one top Democratic strategist said. 'Mamdani is showing that at least part of the path forward for Democrats is to stop running away from your perceived weaknesses; instead run directly at them.'
Eddie Vale, another Democratic strategist, agreed: 'The lessons that everyone can learn from and do is just be normal. Talk like a human being. Do events and tons of digital and podcasts, where normal people are.
New blood
Mamdani's youthfulness and grassroots campaign funding strategy appealed to voters who are looking for a new generation of political leadership — one that sheds the trappings of big-money interests and fights for regular people, Democrats said.
For example, Mamdani's campaign relied overwhelmingly on crowdfunding and matching funds from the city's Campaign Finance Board.
Mamdani is definitely an outsider, but 39 percent of voters in a poll by the Democratic super PAC Unite the Country said they think the Democratic Party is corrupt. So being seen as an outsider helped Mamdani.
Some Democrats think leaders of the party in Washington need to reach out more to Mamdani.
'It is baffling to me that Hakeem Jeffries hasn't embraced Mamdani wholeheartedly as a rising star,' Democratic strategist Christy Setzer said. 'Mamdani has done what few Democrats, including and especially Jeffries, can: Excite, rather than infuriate, the base. Fight with a smile. Disarm. Lead with love and big ideas.
Don't just be against Trump
For several cycles, Democrats have sought to rally their base around an anti-President Trump message. It worked during the 2018 and 2020 elections, but it fell flat in 2024.
'This party has to be for something for a change,' a second Democratic strategist said, adding that the party 'can't just be against Trump.'
Mamdani successfully walked the line between putting forward a vision of his own for New York and being an anti-Trump candidate. In doing so, some say he set an example for Democrats nationally.
'It's important to give voters something to vote for and not just something to vote against, and that's something that Mamdani did well,' said Basil Smikle, a former executive director of the New York State Democratic Party. 'He wasn't just the anti-Trump candidate, he wasn't just the antiestablishment candidate, but he talked about big picture ideas, things that voters really care very much about.'
Social media and retail politics
Democrats dropped the ball on social media in 2024 and had a hard time connecting with voters overall.
But Mamdani set an example for what effective social media campaigning looks like and leveraged the power of retail politics to connect with voters even more.
'Have a campaign that beats the moment,' Smikle said. 'It is 2025. It's driven a lot by social media, a lot by influencers, but also by really, really strong retail politics.'
Mamdani coordinated a citywide volunteer effort that elevated his ground game and allowed his campaign to reach every corner of the city. More than 30,000 people knocked on nearly 1.6 million doors across the city.
'His intense ground game — you can't underestimate the power of that,' Reeher said. 'Even from political science research, we know that the most effective way to get people to turn out is face-to-face contact. He's doing a lot of that. … He's got tons of volunteers.'
'You can't short-shrift the ground game, the retail politics,' he added.
Mamdani also used social media to generate energy around his campaign, becoming a trend of sorts on platforms such as Instagram and TikTok. He amassed his own following of more than 4.5 million across the two platforms and collaborated with various social media influencers in New York City throughout his campaign.
'He's generating enthusiasm from younger voters, and he's running a race on his own terms — not defensively, on someone else's terms,' Setzer said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

James Carville Gives Fox News Viewers An Uncomfortable Reminder About Jeffrey Epstein
James Carville Gives Fox News Viewers An Uncomfortable Reminder About Jeffrey Epstein

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

James Carville Gives Fox News Viewers An Uncomfortable Reminder About Jeffrey Epstein

Longtime Democratic strategist James Carville on Thursday reminded Fox News viewers of a name that's rarely heard on the right-wing network: Jeffrey Epstein, the late convicted sex offender who was once close with President Donald Trump. Fox News host Jesse Watters asked Carville if Democrats would consider Hunter Biden, son of former President Joe Biden, as a possible presidential candidate. 'You know, everybody in the world is talking about Epstein, and Fox is still talking about Biden's memory,' Carville said. 'That's so long ago I can't even remember it.' 'Well, do you want to talk about Epstein?' Watters asked. 'I don't mind talking about Epstein,' said Carville. Carville's reminder comes as a new report found that Fox News has indeed shied away from Epstein coverage ― just as Trump has asked. The report by Media Matters for America finds that on Monday, for example, Fox News mentioned former President Barack Obama 117 times and Epstein just twice. Carville and Watters resumed talking about the Bidens but returned to Epstein later in the segment. 'I wasn't even going to bring Epstein up,' Watters said. 'But because you did, do you, James Carville, a Clinton guy, think that the Democrats should be begging for the release of the Epstein files?' Like Trump, former President Bill Clinton was also once close with Epstein, who was convicted of sex crimes in 2008. He was arrested again in 2019 and died in custody later that year, apparently of suicide, while awaiting trial on allegations of trafficking underage girls and other charges. Carville said he didn't know what was in the files. 'I suspect that they'll come out. I don't know what they are, but the story is not going away,' he said. 'That's pretty clear. It's just not going anywhere.' Trump has been facing new questions over his ties to Epstein after the Justice Department said it would not release any new material related to the case despite Trump's promises to do so. When asked about the case, Trump has deflected and complained about Obama instead. See the full segment below:

Former Stockton mayor launches rematch bid against Rep. Josh Harder in 2026 congressional race
Former Stockton mayor launches rematch bid against Rep. Josh Harder in 2026 congressional race

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former Stockton mayor launches rematch bid against Rep. Josh Harder in 2026 congressional race

Former Stockton Mayor Kevin Lincoln has announced he will challenge U.S. Rep. Josh Harder in California's 9th Congressional District once again. Lincoln, a Republican who unseated former Stockton Mayor Michael Tubbs in 2021, lost to Harder in last year's congressional race by fewer than 4 percentage points. District 9 encompasses a large portion of the San Joaquin Valley, including most of San Joaquin County and parts of Contra Costa and Stanislaus counties. The district includes the cities of Stockton, Tracy, Manteca, Lodi, Ripon, Escalon and Mountain House, as well as several census-designated places such as French Camp. The National Republican Congressional Committee is targeting the District 9 seat, along with 25 other Democratic-held seats. The goal is for Republicans to flip those seats in the 2026 midterm election to grow the House majority. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee listed Harder's seat as one of the most vulnerable in the midterm election after President Donald Trump's nearly 2-point win in the district last year. Lincoln, a former military police officer and pastor, joins two other Republicans running for the District 9 seat: businessman Jim Shoemaker, who lost to Jerry McNerney in the 2024 race for California's 5th State Senate District, and athletic coach John McBride, who lost to Harder in last year's congressional race. "I'm honored to announce my campaign for Congress," Lincoln wrote in a social media post on Tuesday. "As a Marine, I learned the value of service and sacrifice. As mayor, I challenged the status quo and fought to make our communities safer, more affordable and more prosperous." Harder's campaign responded to Lincoln's announcement the same day. "Kevin Lincoln is a failed mayor and serial candidate who allowed crime and homelessness to soar in Stockton, all while spending millions on perks for himself and aligning with Washington extremists to rip health care away from Valley families," Harder's campaign said. While serving as mayor, Lincoln said crime and homelessness were two of his top priorities. During his final State of the City address in 2024, he said Stockton saw a 1.2% decrease in violent crimes and an 8% drop in homicides in 2023. He also said the city had invested significantly in housing and services for the homeless, including 10 emergency shelter projects, nine permanent supportive housing projects and four affordable housing projects. 'This is not how you treat people': Advocates criticize Stockton homeless encampment sweep The 2022 Point-in-Time count found that there were 893 people living on the streets of Stockton. An updated count in 2024 found that number had risen to 2,996. Voters will head to the polls on Nov. 3, 2026, for the District 9 election. The primary takes place on June 2, with the two candidates receiving the most votes advancing to the general election. Record reporter Hannah Workman covers news in Stockton and San Joaquin County. She can be reached at hworkman@ or on Twitter @byhannahworkman. Support local news, subscribe to The Stockton Record at This article originally appeared on The Record: 2026 election: Republican Kevin Lincoln to challenge Josh Harder Solve the daily Crossword

Focus groups: Nevada swing voters turning on Trump
Focus groups: Nevada swing voters turning on Trump

Axios

time22 minutes ago

  • Axios

Focus groups: Nevada swing voters turning on Trump

A majority of Nevada swing voters in our latest Engagious / Sago focus groups who backed President Trump in November said they now disapprove of his administration's actions. Why it matters: These swing voters' assessment of the administration were the most negative of any of our monthly panels this year besides March, when Michigan voters recoiled against Trump's tariff threats and antagonism toward neighbor Canada. The big picture: Concerns about inflation, the "big, beautiful bill" and the late sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein's associates drove the change of heart for the Nevada voters. The Nevadans' comments amplify downward trends for Trump that are emerging in several national polls. Seven of the 12 participants said they disapprove of the administration's overall actions since January, while two said they are neutral and three said they are supportive. Asked which is more important to them — inflation or Epstein — 10 of the 12 participants said inflation. What they're saying:"I disapprove because I was hoping that the basic cost of living would go down, gas prices, grocery prices, and for the most part I haven't seen any change," said Nicole M., 47. Tammy S., 52, said Trump made promises that he "just didn't deliver on." "While Democrats continue to pummel the president over the Epstein case, they're ignoring Nevada swing voters' immediate concern: the stubbornly high cost of living," said Rich Thau, President of Engagious, who moderated the focus groups. Panelists also expressed broadly negative views about the Democratic Party, hinting at challenges for Democrats trying to flip control of Congress in the midterms. How it works: Axios observed two Engagious / Sago online focus groups Tuesday night with 12 Nevadans, all from Clark County, who voted for Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2024. Ten are independents and two are Republicans. While a focus group is not a statistically significant sample like a poll, the responses show how some voters are thinking and talking about current events. The details: All 12 respondents knew Trump had signed into law something called the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," but most were confused over the details. When it came to the Medicaid provisions in the new law, ten of 12 said they liked the tighter work requirements — but because of provisions that could cause millions of people to lose health coverage, nine of the 12 said they oppose the Medicaid provisions. Similarly, there was confusion around the legislation's No Tax on Tips aspect — a salient issue in Las Vegas' economy. Once they read details, all 12 said "no taxes on tips" would be an inaccurate description. Five of the 12 concluded that they liked the law, while four were neutral and three dislike it. All 12 respondents knew who Epstein was. Eight said they believe there's a cover-up around his clients and associates and that they want full transparency, and most of those were suspicious about Trump being engaged in a cover-up to protect his own reputation. Said Mary M., 44: "It just feels like typical Trump deflection, right? Give me a straight answer about Jeff Epstein and let's move forward, right?" "I believe they're all guilty, but who is being protected?" said Cymbra V., 61. "I think it's very, very problematic that Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of trafficking, but we have no idea who she trafficked to. And Trump said he was going to be transparent."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store