logo
Andrew Malkinson ‘not finished' fighting for reform after wrongful conviction

Andrew Malkinson ‘not finished' fighting for reform after wrongful conviction

The 59-year-old had his conviction overturned in 2023 after years protesting his innocence.
Mr Malkinson, who told The Sunday Times his 'life was desolated' by the wrongful conviction, says he is determined to change the justice system, starting with the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC).
'I haven't finished. I want to change a lot more,' he said.
'It's a good feeling that something so dreadful and tragic is leading to real change.'
It comes amid news Dame Vera Baird KC will become the interim chairwoman of the CCRC.
The barrister will take up the post from June 9 until December 8 next year, and is tasked with carrying out an urgent review into the running of the independent body and making sure lessons have been learnt from previous cases.
Mr Malkinson said he remained 'incandescent' at the CCRC, as well as the Government's compensation scheme, which makes it difficult for wrongly-convicted people to receive payouts.
'This is an assault on innocent people,' he said.
'It's an assault on the public, because any member of the public could end up where I was. Anybody could be the next victim, because there will be more.'
Despite having his conviction quashed in 2023, he had to wait until February to get his first compensation payment.
Mr Malkinson had been living on benefits and food banks from his release until then.
Under the 2014 Antisocial Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act, payments are only awarded to people who can prove innocence beyond a reasonable doubt.
Ministry of Justice data showed that only 6.5% of people who had applied for compensation due to a miscarriage of justice between April 2016 and March 2024 were awarded payouts. Of 591 people who applied, 39 were granted compensation.
Figures showed that 35 have since received money, with average amounts totalling £68,000.
In a statement in February, lawyer Toby Wilton welcomed the payment, but said the £1 million cap on compensation payouts should be lifted.
This is currently the maximum amount that can be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice who are wrongly jailed for at least 10 years.
'The Government should lift the current cap on compensation, and end the twisted quirk that whilst awards under other compensation schemes are excluded from assessment for benefits,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Windrush commissioner: Apprehension and suspicion remains towards Home Office
Windrush commissioner: Apprehension and suspicion remains towards Home Office

ITV News

time24 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Windrush commissioner: Apprehension and suspicion remains towards Home Office

Apprehension and suspicion remains towards the Home Office among the Windrush generation and their descendants, the pastor who has vowed to be their 'trusted voice' to get justice has said. Reverend Clive Foster, the first Windrush commissioner, has pledged to push for speedier payouts from a much-criticised compensation scheme for those affected by the scandal. Last month just ahead of announcing his appointment, immigration minister Seema Malhotra confirmed around 64 claimants had died after applying for payouts, as she set out the Government's wish to speed up 'justice'. On Wednesday, she will attend an event with Mr Foster where people affected by the scandal, which erupted in 2018 when British citizens were wrongly detained, deported or threatened with deportation despite having the right to live in Britain, will hear from the commissioner on his aims for his role. A total of 10,326 claims had been made under the scheme as of May this year, according to the latest Home Office data. The figures also showed that just over £112 million has been paid out so far, covering 3,334 claims. In an interview with the PA news agency ahead of the event, Mr Foster said he will be advocating for a 'fair, accessible and trauma-informed' compensation scheme. While some campaigners have called for the scheme to be moved out of the Home Office altogether, due to applicants' lack of trust in the department, Mr Foster appeared to disagree with such a change. He said: 'I think what I will be pushing for is to make sure that this compensation scheme must be seen to be fair, accessible and trauma-informed, and I will be pushing to get swifter outcomes. 'I know there's been a call for movement into another area (out of the Home Office), but I think we should be careful what we wish for. 'I think it's important that we make the scheme workable.' Asked if he felt moving it to another department might risk further delays to payouts, he said: 'I think that is a possibility.' He said the Home Office would not want a situation where it has 'further 'reasons why it cannot be giving out fast decisions and compensation to people who have been terribly affected as a result of the scandal, and so this movement, I think, would inevitably cause some of that slowing down, and I think that is something that we have to be aware of'. He said he had already pressed on the minister the need for guarantees around pension losses being covered by the scheme. Ms Malhotra has previously said officials in her department are 'reviewing the current exclusion within the rules of compensation for private and occupational pensions'. Mr Foster said he will work with 'like-minded campaigners' to address problems with the scheme and 'to inform the Home Office where they're getting it right and where they're getting it wrong, without fear or favour'. Asked to describe the level of trust in the Home Office currently among those affected by the scandal, he said: 'I'm afraid I still feel that there is apprehension and some suspicion with regards to, 'is this working towards better outcomes?' 'What we need to accelerate is the actions and activities that are going to build trust. I always say 'you can't cross a bridge until you've built it.'' He said the department must show through actions rather than only words 'that there is going to be a culture change'. Mr Foster, a senior pastor at a Pilgrim Church in and the son of parents who migrated to the UK from Jamaica in 1959, said he will 'be reaching out to communities and acting as that advocate and trusted voice, as it were, going forward'. Among his top priorities will be ensuring people are comfortable to come forward and get the correct documentation to ensure they have settled status and are not 'wrongly classified as illegal'. He said: 'People still need to feel that they can be respected and accepted to come forward without that fear of being penalised as a result of not having (the right documentation).' Meanwhile, Mr Foster said he will also be working to ensure the legacy of the Windrush generation is celebrated in the future, including through the annual Notting Hill Carnival. Campaigners last month called on the Government to step in to protect the future of the west London carnival, which they said was in jeopardy, as they asked for urgent funding to save the world-famous event. Mr Foster said carnival 'brings so much to the country, and I think that is an expression of the Windrush generation legacy'. He added: 'One of the things in my role would be to be looking to ensure that we continue to celebrate the legacy and the contribution of the Windrush generation, and carnival is one of those aspects, and I'll be happy to engage in conversations to look at that going forward.'

Low growth, high inflation: welcome to Reevesonomics
Low growth, high inflation: welcome to Reevesonomics

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Low growth, high inflation: welcome to Reevesonomics

We are not the fastest growing. Nor do we have the highest level of productivity, or the strongest stock market. Still, there is one economic measure by which Britain is topping the G-7 league tables, as the Chancellor Rachel Reeves promised we would during last year's election campaign. We now have the highest rate of inflation of all the major developed countries – and, worst of all, it is the soaring cost of Government that is driving prices higher. It is yet more bad news for the Chancellor. After output shrank last month, and borrowing overshot its target, we learned today that prices are now rising at 3.6 per cent a year, significantly up on last month, and well above the predictions of most mainstream economists. That will inevitably make life even tougher for anyone already struggling with the cost of living. And it will make the Government's finances look even worse, with the 'triple lock' driving pensions higher, with price rises fuelling demands from the public sector unions for even higher wages, and with the interest payments on index-linked gilts going even higher (the UK has £600 billion of inflation linked bonds outstanding, the highest in the developed world). The inflation figures are not just an unfortunate blip. They are a major problem for the Government. And yet, it has only itself to blame. When it came into office, inflation was down at close to 2 per cent, right on target. Everything the Starmer administration has done since then could have been purposefully calculated to drive prices higher. It has loaded a huge tax increase on businesses, in the form of employer's National Insurance, and ignored warnings that it would be passed on in higher prices. The result? Given that the supermarkets were among the hardest hit, by the extra tax, along with pubs and restaurants, it should be no surprise that food prices are one of the main contributors to rising inflation. Likewise, it has accelerated a poorly planned rush for net zero, brushing aside fears over mounting costs. Energy costs are also going through the roof. Meanwhile blockbuster pay awards in the public sector have driven up wage demands across the economy, whole extra borrowing and spending has pushed up demand. Indeed, given how much the Government has done to raise prices, it is surprising that inflation is not even higher. There is more to come. The impact of the NI increase has only just started to feed through into the data. The rise in business rates has still to make itself felt. And the pressure on wages driven by the public sector is not going to abate any time soon. Indeed, the massive numbers of people now opting for benefits instead of work will mean pay has to be a lot higher to hire those that still want to work. In reality, with the state now accounting for 44 per cent of GDP, and on track to punch through the 50 per cent barrier over the next few years, it is the cost of Government that is now the major determinant of the overall level of prices. The cost of the British state is spiralling out of control – and today's inflation figures are, unfortunately, just a taste of what is to come.

Sir Ben Wallace doesn't know why Afghan superinjunction was imposed
Sir Ben Wallace doesn't know why Afghan superinjunction was imposed

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Sir Ben Wallace doesn't know why Afghan superinjunction was imposed

Sir Ben Wallace said his government did not initially apply for a superinjunction to block reporting of a massive data leak relating to Afghan soldiers and he did not know why it had been granted. The then defence secretary said the original application from the Tory government was for a four-month injunction to stop the media from disclosing the details of the leak. But he said that this regular injunction was subsequently upgraded to a superinjunction but he was unaware of the reasons why. He told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: 'We went to court seeking a four month injunction to be placed on the reporting of this leak. 'Many of these injunctions are constantly having to be refreshed and between now and back then on numerous occasions government lawyers would have been going back to the court justifying the reason for this. 'I am afraid I was not in court on the 1st of September, I had actually handed over. I don't know why Justice Knowles at the time converted that to a superinjunction. It wasn't what our application was.' The original application for the injunction was made in August 2023 after the Ministry of Defence became aware of the leak. It was revealed yesterday when the superinjunction was lifted that a dataset containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) was released 'in error' in February 2022 by a defence official. That prompted the government to set up a secret Afghan relocation scheme to help the victims amid fears they could have been targeted by the Taliban.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store