logo
Almost 20,000 asylum seekers in 6 months proves a crucial point

Almost 20,000 asylum seekers in 6 months proves a crucial point

Metro18 hours ago
It will have surprised no one – but provoked a great deal of performative shock among politicians and commentators – that the number of people crossing to the UK in a small boat this year is significantly higher than previous years.
Almost 20,000 people risked their lives to make the journey in the first half of 2025. That's a 48% increase from the same period last year and 75% higher (amounting to 11,433 people) than in 2023.
The country, in so many ways so divided, is united in one thing: we do not want people arriving in dangerous circumstances like this. And we share an immense frustration with the succession of politicians who have claimed to make it their mission to prevent crossings – and failed.
It is clear that government enforcement policies in this area are having next to no impact on numbers. It is to a far greater degree the weather and crossing conditions in the Channel that have real sway on how many people make the attempt, week in, week out.
But the policing operations on French shores and escalating tactics, like the use of tear gas, have made the journey more treacherous.
This is on top of the fact that more and more people are dying in the attempt.
Governments seem addicted to these deterrence measures, despite evidence of failure.
The UN's International Organisation for Migration (IOM) found there was 'no discernible effect' on migration aspirations after asylum seekers were exposed to deterrence messages.
Providing people with safe alternative ways to make the journey has not been on the table for years – outside of a small handful of specific concessions.
But Keir Starmer says he regrets the divisive 'island of strangers' language he used in a recent speech about immigration, which he could prove by making a break from the failed politics of hostility to asylum seekers, if we hold him to his word.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
People crossing on small boats have already endured violence, lost homes, and seen despair and death along the way. They are resilient and determined to live: migration is a long-term strategy, both for their own survival, and for a future for their children.
The UK will always be one of the countries where people seek safety and opportunity, and with our ageing population and labour market needs, we have every reason to make the best of that.
Despite the latest big scary number, this is not a new phenomenon: it's as old as humanity itself.
Politicians trying to act tough are not the first in their place either. Over decades we have systematically eroded the rights of people coming to our shores as refugees. It has never prevented them from coming, but it has caused other problems.
One of these problems has been the subject of concern in recent weeks, with another moral panic stirred up over asylum seekers working. Thanks to that history of politicians slashing their rights in the hopes of making them disappear, migrants do not normally have the right to work legally while their case is being heard.
This process takes on average between one and three years. During this time, whatever their background, skills, or motivation, they're barred from entering the formal labour market.
And so, many of them find work to support themselves in the informal economy, often in highly exploitative circumstances. The political focus is on male gig economy workers, but there is evidence that the work ban also forces women asylum seekers into sex work.
Two insane cycles need to be broken.
Continuing to deny all safe means of travel for asylum seekers to reach the UK risks them taking irregular small boat crossings. And denying access to safe work for asylum seekers risks them working in the grey economy, subject to exploitation, low pay, and criminalisation.
We have heard rumours that the Government may be ready to finally try something different on one of these problems. With a deal with France to be announced next week, there's a possibility that we will see the start of some pragmatism to break this cycle of insanity.
In a small shift towards pre-Brexit models of cooperation, the UK may accept to offer safe ways for some asylum seekers to come here from France, and France will accept to receive returned asylum seekers in exchange. More Trending
This is an indication that pressure on the Government is working and we must keep it up, because real solutions are not as politically distant as they may seem. However, we should remember that before Brexit a very limited responsibility sharing system was in place, which didn't fully solve the issue of irregular crossings.
Safe pathways to travel must be accessible enough to give a real option to people who will otherwise take desperate means, and not be accompanied by even more failed policing operations.
Once here, the cycle of exploitation and demonisation will continue if we keep asylum seekers out of legal work and hounded by immigration police. Instead of helping them to find their feet, work in the areas we need them, and start building that future that they have risked everything to have.
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing James.Besanvalle@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: Rachel Reeves wipes tears from her cheeks at PMQs after Welfare bill U-turn
MORE: 'UK taxpayers will pay price': How people are reacting to the Welfare Bill vote
MORE: The stress caused by welfare reform flip-flopping left me feeling sick
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pound calm after Starmer backs Reeves, following bond sell-off
Pound calm after Starmer backs Reeves, following bond sell-off

The Guardian

time9 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Pound calm after Starmer backs Reeves, following bond sell-off

Update: Date: 2025-07-03T06:24:50.000Z Title: Introduction: Bonds and sterling in spotlight after Wednesday wobble Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. All eyes are on UK bonds, and the pound, after both fell sharply yesterday amid speculation over the future of chancellor Rachel Reeves. Wednesday was a turbulent day for the UK bond market; prices of British government debt fell heavily as investors were gripped by concerns of change at the top of the Treasury. The selloff highlights anxiety that the government's u-turn on welfare reform has blown a multi-billion pound black hole in the chancellor's budget plans. Bonds slumped, driving up borrowing costs, after Keir Starmer failed initially to give his full backing to Reeves at prime minister's questions, with a tearful chancellor alongside him. The pound also suffered, falling by a cent against the US dollar as it slid from $1.3745 to $1.3636, making it the worst-performing major currency in the world. Starmer has now defended Reeves, saying her tears were due to a 'personal matter' and insisted she will remain chancellor 'for a very long time to come'. The bond selloff may actually have reinforced Reeves's position as chancellor, highlighting that the markets would not welcome a replacement who might be less devoted to fiscal discipline. Andrew Wishart, economist at Berenberg Bank argues that 'Investors probably saved the Chancellor', saying: By selling sterling assets investors have probably kept UK chancellor Rachel Reeves in her post. Financial markets initially reacted little to the government failing to get approval for savings in the disability benefit budget from its own parliamentary faction. But when the Prime Minister failed to say that a visibly upset Reeves would remain in her job during Prime Ministers Questions, UK assets sold off. The Chancellor has become synonymous with a fiscal rule of covering day-to-day spending with tax revenue. UK selloff signals that fiscal rules are not just for show #reeves #fiscal #gilts #macro #ukeconomy #ukmacro That fiscal rule may dictate tax rises in the autumn budget, as spending cuts could be too much of a political headache, judging by the massive rebellion against the welfare bill that has created a £5bn hole in the chancellor's plans. America's economy may take the market spotlight off Reeves this afternoon, when the latest US jobs report is released. It will show whether trade war tensions have hit hiring at US businesses. 9.30am BST: UK service sector PMI for June 10am BST: OECD Economic Survey of the European Union and Euro Area 1.30pm BST: US non farm payrolls employment report for June

Starmer's strategy unravels as policy U-turns erode authority
Starmer's strategy unravels as policy U-turns erode authority

Telegraph

time25 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Starmer's strategy unravels as policy U-turns erode authority

Despite Labour's landslide majority, Hodges noted that 'this is not normal… It is not normal for a prime minister facing open revolt from his party'. He points to the failure of Sir Keir's leadership strategy: 'The sort of proper preparations, the hard yards, the hard policy development, the clear 100-day strategy – none of that was done. And what we are seeing is a prime minister who just was not prepared for the demands of government.' With further party unrest caused by reforms to the welfare Bill, there are questions surrounding the ambitions of the Deputy PM: ' She's very popular amongst activists. She has support amongst the trade unions and amongst the growing cadre of Labour MPs who are starting to see the primary threat to Labour coming from Farage and Farage's populist working class appeal.' The prospect of Sir Keir holding the party together, Hodges suggested, is narrowing: 'Both his Left flank and his Right flank are collapsing simultaneously, which is why he's in the dire predicament he is.'

Just one more volte-face, Rachel, and it could be crisis averted
Just one more volte-face, Rachel, and it could be crisis averted

Telegraph

time25 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Just one more volte-face, Rachel, and it could be crisis averted

Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves gained power committed to achieving growth – but our economic problems go far deeper than improving GDP. The key to us sharing in rising prosperity can be seen by observing how other countries improved their living standards – and it lies in solving Britain's poor productivity. Britain is in the grip of a productivity crisis, and our Chancellor has made it worse by raising capital gains tax. While productivity grew at a rate of 2.5pc in the years before the financial crisis, in the years since, the annual average growth in UK GDP per hour worked has been just 0.5pc, with no sign of an improvement. A report from The Productivity Institute argues we need to solve Britain's massive shortage of capital that few politicians talk about and, if anything, make the problem worse. The report reveals UK workers benefit from 33pc less capital per hour worked than workers in high productivity peer countries (the US, Germany, France, and the Netherlands). Average UK real wages from 1970 to 2005 grew on average by 33pc per decade, but since then have flatlined. The comparison with the US is particularly stark. Since 2005, US labour productivity has grown at an annual average of 1.4pc, almost three times faster than in the UK. The result is much higher living standards in the US, with salaries some 30pc to 50pc higher than UK equivalents. If UK private investment had matched the average of France, Germany and the US since 2008 – requiring additional investment of just over 2pc of GDP annually – UK GDP today would be nearly 4pc higher, equivalent to an extra £1,250 per worker in annual wages. It is capital that finances the new machines and new technologies that enable workers to become more productive. Increased productivity leads to higher wages, demonstrating the fact that much of the benefits of capital accrue not to its owners' return on investment, but to the workers whose increased wages depend on it. Without much more capital, wages will remain depressed. It requires a major effort to turn this around. As The Productivity Institute notes: 'Marginal increases to public investment combined with minor initiatives to encourage private investment are a distraction, and do not constitute a strategic take on the issue.' In particular, dribbling bits of extra cash into Britain's inefficient and unproductive public sector and calling it 'investment' is not the solution. Moreover, the increasing share of national resources taken by the public sector – about 45pc of GDP – is a direct cause of Britain's productivity problem. Productivity across the public sector is still 4.6pc lower than in 2019, with the health service in particular an amazing 10pc less productive. The first corrective step is to stop sucking capital out of the private sector through high capital taxes. When you are in a hole, stop digging. Capital taxes don't raise much revenue, but they have a catastrophic effect on investment. When capital taxes are lowered or eliminated, the expected return to investors is raised, leading them to invest more. The reverse is also true. When capital taxes are raised, the returns on capital fall and people invest less. Rachel Reeves chose the wrong route by raising capital taxes. Secondly, lower the burden of taxation on companies. Britain has the third highest rate of taxation of corporate income in Europe, which actively discourages investment. It's vital we make it worthwhile for pension funds to invest in Britain again. Gordon Brown's removal of the pension dividend tax credit is most to blame for stopping pension fund capital investment, but today's stamp duty on British share transactions is also a major factor. Thirdly, we must slash Britain's absurdly high energy costs. The cheaper that energy is, the more goods and services can be produced per hour at competitive prices. Yet energy capacity has been reduced since its peak in 2005 – and our trend rate of productivity has slowed sharply. Fourthly, we must do more to attract wealthy investors from around the world, not drive them away. Cutting capital gains tax and corporate taxes isn't just about boosting profits for investors, it's about creating the conditions for businesses – large and small – to thrive, and for workers to share in the rewards of that success. When businesses invest in productivity-enhancing technologies and processes, it leads to higher output, greater efficiencies and better pay for workers. Improving productivity is not some desktop theory, it is what has made other countries more prosperous. If Rachel Reeves wants to achieve higher tax revenues, she must cut capital gains tax, not raise taxes even more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store