Centre's schemes to make micro and small businesses green find no takers: Less than 1% of funds disbursed
The MSME Green Investment and Financing for Transformation Scheme (MSME-GIFT) and MSME Scheme for Promotion and Investment in Circular Economy (MSME-SPICE) have barely seen any interest from micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs).
Only 629 GIFT applications and four SPICE applications have been approved till June, data on the Union MSME ministry's performance smartboard showed.
These schemes are only meant for micro and small businesses.
While ₹6.87 crore has been dispensed under the GIFT scheme, SPICE has recorded an outgo of a paltry ₹36 lakh, with the two schemes slated to end in March 2026 and March 2027, respectively.
An email query sent to the ministry of MSME remained unanswered till press time.
Both schemes were launched in December 2023 as part of a World Bank-backed Raising and Accelerating MSME Performance (RAMP) project.
Green investments and emission reduction hold the key to MSME exports that account for 45.73% of the country's exports, 30.1% of India's gross domestic product (GDP) and 35.4% of manufacturing—especially in the wake of developed economies imposing carbon taxes.
Under the GIFT scheme, which has an outlay of ₹478 crore, micro and small enterprises can avail benefits in two ways—interest subvention and risk-sharing facilities. The interest subvention component, which has an allocation of ₹350 crore, provides affordable finance to micro and small enterprises for adopting green technologies by offering a 2% interest subvention per annum for a maximum of 5 years on term loans of up to ₹2 crore.
Under this component, micro and small enterprises that have received approvals for loans for green investments can seek interest subvention. Till June this year, a little over ₹6.87 crore had been disbursed, according to the Green MSME portal. which provides information and data about the GIFT and SPICE schemes.
Micro and small enterprises that have availed credit for green investments in renewable energy, energy efficiency, waste management, clean transportation, water management and circular economy practices can be part of the GIFT scheme.
The second component—the risk-sharing facility with an allocation of ₹125 crore—provides partial credit guarantee coverage to lenders, reducing their risk exposure when extending credit facilities to micro and small enterprises for green projects. Till June, no risk-sharing facility application had been accepted, and no loan amount guaranteed under this component, the Green MSME portal showed.
The SPICE scheme, which, with an outlay of ₹472.5 crore, allows micro and small enterprises to make green investments related to a circular economy, has also seen tepid interest from the industry. Only six applications have been filed, and four accepted, till June.
Under the SPICE scheme, the government provides a capital subsidy for circular economy projects in brownfield projects. The capital subsidy is up to 25% of a project cost up to ₹50 lakh. If the project cost is more than ₹50 lakh, the capital subsidy is capped at ₹12.5 lakh.
Circular economy projects eligible under the SPICE scheme include waste-recycling plants for plastics, rubber, electronic waste, municipal waste, compressed biogas, lithium-ion batteries, end-of-life vehicles and solar panels, among others.
India's massive micro and small enterprise sector, made up of more than 65 million businesses, is a key driver of exports, but faces a critical hurdle in the form of carbon tax policies in developed economies, experts said.
'Indian micro and small businesses exporting to Europe will certainly bear the brunt of CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism). They will have to cut down emissions one way or another to be eligible for exports there," said Gurudas Nulkar, professor and director, Centre for Sustainable Development, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics.
Under CBAM, a European regulation, shipments of steel, aluminium and some other products to the 27 nations of the European Union (EU) face a 'carbon tax' if the embedded carbon emission in these products is above what is allowed in EU.
Nulkar said micro and small enterprises that supply to other businesses do not have enough resources to turn their operations green. These are commonly manufacturing sector businesses, which run on low working capital and wafer-thin margins, he said.
On the other hand, micro and small enterprises that deal with consumers directly and are in the services sector may be pushed by investors to turn green. "Such consumer businesses do not want to remain MSEs but compete to be unicorns," said Nulkar, an expert of industrial sustainability and environmentalmanagement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
8 minutes ago
- Economic Times
New Delhi opens govt procurement to UK companies
Representational For the first time, India will open approximately 40,000 high-value contracts from central ministries and departments in sectors such as transport, green energy and infrastructure to UK bidders. UK-origin goods with just 20% domestic content will be treated as 'Class II' local suppliers under India's Public Procurement Order (PPO), a classification previously reserved for Indian suppliers with 20-50% local content under the CETA. India will offer concessions in government procurement to UK firms under the free trade agreement, a move experts see as a strategic shift away from using public procurement as a tool for domestic industrial development. After the UAE, India has opened its central government procurement for British companies, subject to certain conditions. "The GP chapter provides a legal guarantee for Indian suppliers to be treated on par with UK suppliers regarding social value considerations within procurement processes, ensuring a level playing field for Indian businesses to compete fairly," said an official.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
8 minutes ago
- Business Standard
FTA with UK adds strength to India's hand in other deals: Sunil Mittal
Soon after India and the United Kingdom (UK) signed the free trade agreement (FTA) on Thursday, industry leaders cheered the move. Sunil Bharti Mittal, chairman of Bharti Enterprises and co-chair of the India-UK CEO Forum, and Chandrajit Banerjee, director general, Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), who were in Chequers (near London) for the FTA signing as part of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's entourage, spoke to Nivedita Mookerji on the various aspects of the deal. Edited excerpts from a Zoom conversation: Who's the biggest winner in this FTA? Sunil Bharti Mittal (SBM): It's a win win for both sides with a balanced outcome after a very long and hard negotiation…. I think you will now see a lot of British companies getting much more confident about investing in India, working in India, setting up their bases in our country. The Prime Minister spoke today of taking the bilateral trade from $56 billion to $112 billion in five years—It's an ambitious target, but achievable, given the way this FTA has been set up. So I would say it's hard for FTAs to be agreed. Your 'asks' and their 'gives', their 'asks' and our 'gives'--there's always a resistance on both sides…. But over here, you don't see any major resistance, finally, because both have come to an agreement which is balanced. Chandrajit Banerjee (CB): There are many sectors from the Indian side which will benefit. From both manufacturing as well as services. But if you see some of the critical sectors, like textiles and apparels, that opens up a huge market. In the pharma sector also, we are getting huge opportunities. The small and the mid size companies across the engineering area as well as auto components will also gain. Plus, the labour intensive sectors like leather and footwear will benefit due to the increased access to the UK market. Will there be a ripple effect of the UK agreement on the US deal that is in the works? SBM: I think closing of this deal is important for India. It does add strength to India's hand. But the US is altogether different. It's the largest market in the world,… It's good to have this one out of the way. Now you will have one less trade deal to work on and the negotiators will be able to concentrate more on the next one. The one with the EU is expected to be done in the next few weeks or months. As for the US, some interim deal should be done. It's easy for you and I to discuss it here, but there are new developments in the US on a daily basis. CB: In some ways, the UK FTA is a signal to the world that India has been entering into large number of trade agreements with different countries, both in the eastern hemisphere and now in the western hemisphere, and the Indian industry is competitive. It also shows that India provides not just opportunities to companies to come and participate in the Indian economy in terms of investments, but our companies themselves are investing strongly in other economies…. So, this is indicative of balance of power. Mr Mittal, there's a full chapter on telecom in the deal. Any significance? SBM: Well, I'm delighted to see that chapter, as you can imagine. Both countries will be having open doors for telecom in terms of foreign direct investment (FDI). As you know, Vodafone had 100 per cent in India…. What the FTA will do is to take the agreed position to a hard wired position. Do you think this deal will help in the making of global brands? Hasn't that been a gap for the Indian industry? SBM: I would say yes…. You have to have large corporations first, and then you go global. That's been the norm world over. And the western world has had that privilege for decades, because they became rich much before us. I think India is on that path now, and you will start to see Indian MNCs emerging on the global stage. Tatas have already been there with Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) and others. I think we can count ourselves (Airtel) as that. There are a few other companies which are on that path to some extent--Godrej, Mahindras, for example. For your group, what does this deal mean? SBM: It validates what we've been doing for so many years in sectors such as telecom, real estate and hospitality. We also have the satellite deal—OneWeb--with the British government. So this just strengthens our hand to do more between the two countries. Perhaps, we can pick up some technologies here that we can take back to India and use the technology back home in the Indian market, which is much bigger. We remain agile. We are looking at opportunities. But today, I stand in front of you as the co-chair of the Indian business leaders' delegation, the CEO forum, and my job is to work on the larger piece. In this capacity, I have to see that Indian industry and the British business leadership can combine their minds to take our trade to the level that has been set by the two partners. What are your thoughts on utilisation of trade deals? In many cases, we've seen that we are not able to utilise the deals that are signed. How can the industry help? SBM: This is a rare opportunity where both sides can gain from combining strengths of each other. There's high degree of complementarity between the two nations. And that really makes a very strong, powerful platform, or a bridge, if I may say, between the two countries. You're right that not all trade deals result in tremendous amount of uptick in trade and services or investment. I think this is different. In this case, I feel in the first year itself, as soon as this treaty is ratified, we will see the direction of trade going up in the upwards trajectory. CB: This trade agreement is designed to work for both countries, be it for bilateral investment or bilateral trade. Whether it's small or mid-sized companies, technology, education or anything else, we (India-UK business forum) can form different groups and see to it that we are able to identify the enablers. So there should be possibilities of constructive ways of working towards taking advantage of this trade agreement. Is there anything in this FTA that you think could have been done better? Any gaps? SBM: Well, there's always something that one feels could have been better. Some parts of the industry may feel that certain things could have been better handled. But by and large, I don't think there is any reason to complain. There may be somebody unhappy out there, but, you know, in a trade deal of this nature, it is rare to get to a win win situation like the one we are seeing in this one. What is the overall mood of the industry? SBM: Very good. Industry is very upbeat. CB: I think what we have seen is an amazing partnership between the government and the industry. I think that collaborative framework is going to be a key factor as we move ahead, when industry is taken along and consulted. That collaboration should work to see that FTAs are working in a win win way.
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Sundar Pichai becomes a billionaire after 10 years as Alphabet CEO, now his net worth is...
Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai has become a billionaire after the tech giant added over $1 trillion in market value and provided 120% returns to investors since 2023. As Alphabet's shares closed at an all-time high, the 53-year-old Indian-origin CEO became worth $1.1 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Google CEO Sundar Pichai has become worth $1.1 billion.(AFP) This is an especially rare feat for a non-founding CEO, especially in the tech industry. Other top executives like Meta's Mark Zuckerberg and Nvidia's Jensen Huang got their fortune due to the founding equity stakes in their companies. Pichai is also the tech giant's longest-serving CEO, having completed 10 years in the role in August. In August, Pichai shared the earnings update on X, earning praise from SpaceX CEO Elon Musk. "Just got off the earnings call - great quarter, and it was our (and my) 40th call as Alphabet. August will mark 10 years since we announced Alphabet. Been thinking about the incredible growth in our new businesses since then - Cloud, YouTube, Play, Subscriptions etc. To give a sense of progress, in 2015 all of Alphabet's revenue added up to $75B. YouTube and Cloud alone ended 2024 at an annual run rate of $110B," he wrote. Musk called the milestone "impressive" to which Pichai responded with a simple folded hands emoji. All about Sundar Pichai Born into a middle-class family in Tamil Nadu, Sundar Pichai grew up in a two-room apartment and won a scholarship to Stanford University in 1993. He was hired by Google in 2004 and worked his way up to the top job over the next decade. He helped lead the tech giant's Android division and developed the Chrome browser before taking over as CEO in 2015. Sundar Pichai holds a modest 0.02% economic stake in Alphabet, which is valued at around $440 million. Most of his wealth is in cash. By contrast, Alphabet co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin are in an entirely different league. Page is worth $171.2 billion, while Brin has a net worth of $160.4 billion, making them among the seven richest people in the world.
