logo
U.S. and Canada restart trade talks after conflict over digital services tax

U.S. and Canada restart trade talks after conflict over digital services tax

Hamilton Spectator18 hours ago

OTTAWA - Canada and the United States have restarted trade talks after Prime Minister Mark Carney's government dropped Canada's digital services tax.
U.S. President Donald Trump suspended negotiations with Canada over the tax on Friday. Following a phone call between Carney and Trump on Sunday, Ottawa announced that it was eliminating the tax.
White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said Monday the U.S. would immediately restart trade talks with Canada. A spokeswoman for the Prime Minister's Office confirmed trade talks have resumed.
Hassett made the comments in an interview on Fox News, adding Trump asked Canada to drop the tax at the G7 meeting in Alberta earlier this month. He said the removal of the tax means Canada and the U.S. can get back to negotiations.
The tax would have applied a three per cent levy on revenue from Canadian users to large tech companies, including Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb.
Canada's move to drop the tax came just as the first payment under the tax was about to come due. The initial payment was retroactive to 2022 and could have collectively cost American companies US$2 billion.
On Monday, business groups on both sides of the border praised the government for moving to eliminate the tax, while critics accused the government of capitulating to the U.S.
Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet said Carney campaigned during the election on finding a way out from under Trump's tariffs but has nothing to show for it so far.
In a social media post, Blanchet said Carney's government 'made significant compromises on defence, borders and counter-tariffs, and now it is backtracking on a widely supported measure to protect culture, still with nothing to show for it — no gains or progress for Quebec and Canada, neither on tariffs nor on trade.
'This is deeply concerning,' he said.
Interim NDP Leader Don Davies also sounded off on social media, saying the decision to end the digital services tax amounts to 'pure caving in to Trump and his billionaire friends.'
'Canada is a sovereign country with the right to make our own tax laws. Abandoning fair taxation of tech giants is unacceptable appeasement,' Davies said.
Davies said that, coupled with Carney's openness to Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile defence plan and his sprint to meet the new 5 per cent NATO defence spending benchmark, 'it's looking more & more like Mr. Carney had his elbows up during the pre-game skate — only to drop them once the game started.'
However the Canadian Chamber of Commerce called the decision to drop the tax a 'savvy' one.
'This tax would have fallen on Canadian consumers, businesses and investors in the form of higher costs and hurt our economy at a critical time,' David Pierce, the chamber's vice-president of government relations, said in a media statement.
He said ending the tax 'moves us one step closer to a renewed, reliable trade deal' with the United States.
Rick Tachuk, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Canada, said the withdrawal of the tax was a 'welcome' move by the Canadian government.
'This is a constructive decision that allows both countries to focus on strengthening their economic partnership. Businesses on both sides of the border rely on policies that support certainty, collaboration, and long-term growth,' he said in a media statement.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 30, 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stocks Slip Ahead of Data; Senate Pulls All-Nighter on Trump Tax Bill
Stocks Slip Ahead of Data; Senate Pulls All-Nighter on Trump Tax Bill

Bloomberg

time2 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Stocks Slip Ahead of Data; Senate Pulls All-Nighter on Trump Tax Bill

Equity futures fall after the S&P 500 posted its best quarter since 2023, while the dollar saw its weakest half of a year since 1973. The Senate vote on President Trump's $3.3 trillion tax and spending bill continues into Tuesday morning. Europe is said to be pushing to negotiate on Trump's universal tariff, while Trump threatens to increase levies on Japan. Major central bank chiefs including Powell, Lagarde, Bailey, Ueda and Rhee are set to speak at the ECB forum in Sintra, Portugal. BNY's Geoffrey Yu and Kelsey Berro of JPMorgan Asset Management discuss their outlook for foreign interests in Treasuries and the dollar. 'Bloomberg Brief' delivers the market news, data and analysis you need to set your agenda. (Source: Bloomberg)

Thomas Massie Gets Brutal News From Poll
Thomas Massie Gets Brutal News From Poll

Newsweek

time6 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Thomas Massie Gets Brutal News From Poll

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky risks losing his seat in Congress amid his battles with President Donald Trump, according to a new poll. Polling from Kaplan Strategies found that Massie was unpopular among Republican voters and would lose more support if Trump endorsed a primary opponent. Why It Matters Massie has gained notoriety in recent weeks following a series of skirmishes with Trump. The Kentucky lawmaker has voiced his opposition to the president's "big, beautiful" spending bill and has criticized Trump over his decision to strike Iran. In response, Trump has denounced Massie, prompting the president's allies to launch a super PAC to oust the representative, who has held his seat since 2012. Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky speaking with reporters outside the U.S. Capitol on June 23. Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky speaking with reporters outside the U.S. Capitol on June 23. Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images What To Know The poll of 368 likely GOP primary voters found that 19 percent said they planned to vote for Massie in the 2026 Republican primary. If Trump endorsed a primary opponent, the proportion of people voting for Massie would drop to 14 percent. The poll also showed that 23 percent of respondents viewed the representative favorably, while 62 percent viewed him unfavorably. In terms of his arguments with Trump, 72 percent said they were less likely to vote for Massie because of his opposition to Trump's tax cuts and budget, while 58 percent said they were less likely to vote for him over his opposition to Trump's Israel policy. The poll was conducted between June 23 and June 24, and its margin of error was plus or minus 5.1 percent. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on June 24: "Third Rate Congressman Thomas Massie, of the Great Commonwealth of Kentucky, a phenomenal State that I won all three times (by a lot!), keeps talking about how he is going to protect the Constitution, but he is actually very bad for the Constitution, and will probably vote against 'THE GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL,' that grants the Biggest Tax Cuts in History, secures our Southern Border from Criminal Invasion, funds the Golden Dome, our Great Military and Veterans, protects our Second Amendment, grants NO TAX ON TIPS, NO TAX ON OVERTIME, and NO TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY (for our Great Seniors!), and so much more." In response to the president's post, Republican Representative Thomas Massie wrote on X, formerly Twitter: "@realDonaldTrump declared so much War on me today it should require an Act of Congress. #sassywithmassie." What Happens Next The general election for Massie's congressional seat is scheduled for November 3, 2026. The Kentucky representative has one declared primary challenger: Nicole Lee Ethington, a registered nurse.

Do the facts support Trump's claims? We asked AI.
Do the facts support Trump's claims? We asked AI.

Washington Post

time10 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Do the facts support Trump's claims? We asked AI.

President Donald Trump has presented himself as a strong champion and consistent supporter of artificial intelligence. Upon returning to the White House, one of his first acts was to issue an executive order to 'sustain and enhance America's dominance in AI.' On his second day in office, he announced the Stargate Project, calling it 'the largest AI infrastructure project, by far, in history.' The president has courted AI luminaries, most notably Sam Altman, Larry Ellison, Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. His 'big, beautiful budget bill' contains a provision prohibiting states from regulating AI over the next decade, in the hopes that this will help secure U.S. supremacy in the global AI race. However, though Trump appears to support AI, that does not mean AI supports him, as our recent AI analysis of some of the president's many questionable public statements shows. To counter any inadvertent bias or systemic failures, we asked each of five leading AI models — OpenAI's ChatGPT; Anthropic's Claude; X/xAI's Grok (owned by Elon Musk); Google's Gemini; and Perplexity — to verify the president's most oft-repeated claims or assertions. The systems are completely independent, with no known ideological filters and no revealed perspective biases among the model trainers. Statisticians would call this methodological verification a check for inter-rater reliability. Artificial intelligence discredited all the Trump claims we presented, fact-checking the president with startling accuracy and objective rigor. Story continues below advertisement Across all questions, AI model responses disproving Trump's claims or rejecting his assertions were always in the majority (i.e., 3 out of 5 responses or greater). All five models generated consistent responses firmly denying the claims in 16 of the 20 questions. In 15 of those consistently firm responses, all five AI models debunk the claims. (Note: Question 19 in the comprehensive analysis addresses the models' lack of inherent bias against Trump and is one of those 16 responses, bringing the technical total down to 15 instead of 16.) But even those responses that we categorized as 'less firm' partially refute Trump's claims. Consider the following sample of responses. Most questions with 'less firm' responses have been included and are denoted by an asterisk. 1 Will Trump's current tariff policies be inflationary? ChatGPT Yes, Trump's proposed tariffs would likely raise consumer prices in the short-to-medium term, contributing to inflation unless offset by other deflationary forces. Grok Trump's 2025 tariff policies are likely to be inflationary, with estimates suggesting a 1-2.3% rise in consumer prices, equivalent to $1,200-$3,800 per household in 2025. 2 Is the U.S. being taken advantage of on trade by its international partners? ChatGPT The U.S. is not broadly being 'taken advantage of' — but there are real areas where trade practices are unfair or asymmetric, especially involving China, and to a lesser extent, the [European Union] and some developing countries. Perplexity The U.S. runs large trade deficits with several key partners … However, the economic reality is more complex: trade deficits do not necessarily mean the U.S. is 'losing' or being exploited … Public opinion generally supports free trade … Story continues below advertisement Advertisement 3 Are Trump's cryptocurrency investments a conflict of interest? Claude Yes, Trump's cryptocurrency investments do present significant conflict of interest concerns, and these have become a major issue since he took office. … GrokTrump's cryptocurrency investments … present a strong case for a conflict of interest due to his administration's pro-crypto policies, personal financial gains, and events like the $TRUMP gala, which suggest access-selling. Foreign investments and regulatory pauses amplify concerns about influence and corruption … 4 Has the Department of Government Efficiency actually 'found hundreds of billions of dollars of fraud'? Gemini Donald Trump's claim that DOGE has 'found hundreds of billions of dollars of fraud' is highly misleading. While there is indeed a recognized problem … DOGE has: not exclusively attributed its claimed 'savings' to fraud; often taken credit for fraud … already discovered; and presented 'estimated savings' that have been challenged. GrokThe Department of Government Efficiency has not substantiated claims of finding 'hundreds of billions of dollars of fraud.'… DOGE's verified savings ($2-8.6 billion) are a fraction of its $55 billion claim, often tied to ideological cuts (e.g., DEI, USAID) rather than proven fraud. Trump and Musk's assertions lack specific evidence of criminal intent, as legal experts note. 5 Is Harvard more antisemitic than other universities? ChatGPT Harvard is not measurably more antisemitic than peer universities, but it has become a focal point in the broader national and political debate about antisemitism on campus … *Claude The evidence suggests Harvard has serious antisemitism problems that place it among the worst-performing major universities, but it's part of a broader pattern affecting many elite institutions rather than being uniquely problematic. *Gemini Harvard has been particularly prominent in the public and governmental discourse due to the severity and visibility of incidents, the responses of its leadership, and the extensive legal and regulatory scrutiny it has faced. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement 6 Is Trump right that the media is 'dishonest' or 'tells lies'? Perplexity Fact-checking evidence does not support the blanket assertion that the U.S. media is 'dishonest' or 'tells lies.' Donald Trump's own record of false and misleading statements is well-documented and far exceeds the rate and scale of inaccuracies found in mainstream media reporting. His attacks on the media are widely seen as a political tactic rather than an accurate assessment of journalism. ChatGPTTrump is right that media bias, errors, and spin exist — and that some stories mislead. But his blanket claim that the media is inherently 'dishonest' or always 'lying' is misleading and self-serving. The truth is more complex: journalism is flawed but still vital — and lumping all media into one corrupt entity is as dangerous as it is inaccurate. 7 Did the '60 Minutes' interview with Vice President Kamala Harris that aired in October distort the truth and damage Trump's candidacy? GrokThe 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris on October 7, 2024, did not distort the truth in a deceitful manner, as Trump alleged. CBS's editing used different segments of Harris's response to the same question, a standard practice for time constraints, not a deliberate attempt to mislead, as confirmed by the released transcript … 8 Was the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 President Joe Biden's fault? Gemini The overwhelming majority of experts and international bodies attribute the 2022 invasion directly to Vladimir Putin's decisions and his long-standing geopolitical objectives … President Biden's administration worked to deter the invasion through diplomacy and warnings, and … led a strong international response to support Ukraine. *Claude The evidence suggests that while some Biden policies may have been suboptimal, Putin bears primary responsibility for choosing to invade a sovereign nation. *GrokThe Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 was primarily Vladimir Putin's decision, driven by long-standing geopolitical ambitions … Biden's policies, like the Afghanistan withdrawal and Nord Stream 2 sanctions lift, may have contributed to perceptions of U.S. weakness … The international consensus and expert analyses place primary blame on Putin, not Biden. 9 Was the American economy the worst in its history under the Biden presidency? Gemini While the Biden presidency has been marked by high inflation … other key economic indicators such as job creation, unemployment rates, GDP growth and new business formation suggest a strong and resilient economy. To characterize it as the 'worst in history' is not supported by … economic data and historical precedents. 10 Was the Biden administration responsible for higher levels of inflation following the covid-19 pandemic and through 2024? Claude The Biden administration bears partial responsibility for higher inflation levels following COVID-19, but it was not the sole or even primary cause … While the American Rescue Plan did contribute to inflationary pressures by boosting demand during a supply-constrained period, most economic analysis suggests supply chain disruptions, energy price increases, and global pandemic effects were more significant drivers. 11 Did 21 million illegal immigrants enter the United States [during the Biden administration]? And were many of them murderers, human traffickers, gang members, or other sorts of serious criminals? ChatGPT No, the claim that 21 million illegal immigrants have entered the U.S. — and that many are murderers, traffickers, or gang members — is significantly misleading, not supported by verified data, and often used in politicized or inflammatory rhetoric … GrokThe claim that 21 million illegal immigrants entered the U.S. is false. CBP data shows 10.8 million encounters and 2.3 million gotaways from FY21-24, with net entries likely 3-5 million, and the total undocumented population remains 11-13 million. The assertion that 'many' are murderers, human traffickers, or gang members is exaggerated. ICE's 425,431 convicted noncitizens (5-6% of undocumented) include 13,099 murderers and 15,811 sexual assaulters, but these span decades, include legal immigrants, and are mostly pre-Biden. Note: Grok contradicts itself, incorrectly claiming 425,431 convicted noncitizens is 5 to 6 percent of the undocumented population, when the number represents only about 3 percent. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement 12 Were the Jan. 6, 2021, rioters who stormed the capitol 'patriots' or 'heroes'? ChatGPT Calling the Capitol rioters 'patriots' or 'heroes' ignores the facts, undermines the rule of law, and insults the democratic process. While people can peacefully protest, those who used violence to overturn an election result crossed a clear line — and have been treated accordingly by courts, law enforcement, and historians. 13 Was the 2020 presidential election stolen from Trump? Gemini No, the overwhelming consensus from all official and credible sources is that the 2020 presidential election was not stolen … Despite persistent claims from Donald Trump and his supporters, there is no credible evidence from courts, election officials, or independent investigations to support the assertion. 14 Is Trump the most dishonest president in U.S. history? PerplexityBased on available fact-checking data and expert analysis, Donald Trump is considered the most dishonest president in U.S. history in terms of the number and frequency of false or misleading statements. *Claude Rather than definitively ranking presidential dishonesty, it's more accurate to say Trump's approach to truth-telling was distinctively frequent and public in ways that differed from his predecessors, while acknowledging that presidential deception has unfortunately been a recurring feature throughout American history. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement How would Trump respond to the near-unanimous denial of his claims by the five AI models? Probably the way he always reacts to unfavorable news — by discrediting the dissent. But would he disavow the technology he is decisively promoting? Or, is there something fundamentally wrong with the accuracy of these AI models that is not widely realized? The simple truth our analysis points to is this: Either the president is wrong, or the technology is a failure. We leave it to you to choose. But as Aldous Huxley said: 'Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store