On 39th Anniversary of Mizo Peace Accords, MNF Erects Hoarding of Article 371G in Aizawl
Through the 53rd amendment to the Constitution, that Article was a promise by Indian Parliament to the people of the border state of Mizoram to protect their customary laws, religious and social practices, land ownership, etc, as consigned in the Mizo Accord, signed between the Mizo National Front (MNF) and the Rajiv Gandhi government on June 30, 1986.
This June 30, marking its 39th anniversary, the youth wing of MNF, installed a hoarding of Article 371G of the Constitution in front of the party's office in Aizawl. That peace accord had brought the curtains down on two decades of insurgency in what was then called the Lushai hills. The Accord had facilitated the birth of Mizoram on February 20, 1987 with MNF founder and respected Mizo leader the late Pu Laldenga as its first chief minister.
Besides Laldenga, the other two signatories to that Accord were the then Home Secretary R. D. Pradhan and the then Mizoram chief secretary Lalkhama. This June 30, Lalkhama, the only surviving signatory to that peace Accord with Centre, unveiled the hoarding in the presence of many including MNF youth wing president and legislator Robert R Royte.
Speaking on the occasion, Royte recalled the sacrifices made by the MNF cadres and their leaders to get that peace agreement with New Delhi. According to the Mizoram Post, Royte also stated that the Constitutional provision ensures that 'the Mizoram assembly has the constitutional power to accept or reject the Acts passed by Parliament in matters concerning Mizo religion, customary law and land as per Article 371G.'
'Only Mizoram and Nagaland assemblies have such powers,' he added.
'Mizo peace accord was not with MNF but between India and the Mizoram'
Later, addressing a public meeting on the occasion at Saitual, Zoramthanga, former chief minister and top MNF leader and a former associate of Laldenga, said, 'Some vested interests may devalue the Mizo peace accord as only the accord between India and the MNF. However, it was an accord between Mizoram and India. It was signed by Laldenga on behalf of the MNF and Lalkhama (former chief secretary) on behalf of the Mizo people, who did not go underground.'
He also said, 'Unlike Nagaland, which was given special protection (Article 371A) on compassionate ground, and can easily be abrogated (by Parliament), Article 371 (G) or special protection was brought about by the Mizos, and it therefore, can't be easily abrogated.'
After the Narendra Modi government read down the Article 370 of the Constitution, which gave special powers to Jammu and Kashmir, there has been apprehensions in several northeastern states including Sikkim, Nagaland and Mizoram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Threatens Washington Commanders' Stadium Over Name Change
President Donald Trump threatened to block the Washington Commanders' bid to build a new stadium in the District of Columbia, escalating his feud with the NFL franchise over its decision to change its name from the Redskins. 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,'' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. 'I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington.' Trump has previously complained about the football team's decision to change its name amid concerns the old name was a slur against Native Americans. Earlier Sunday, he had asserted there was a 'big clamoring' to switch it back. 'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen,' Trump posted. 'Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' The Commanders didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump also leveled criticism at the Cleveland Guardians, the Major League Baseball team that changed its name from the Cleveland Indians in 2021. Trump has sought to reverse other name changes done in an effort to be racially or culturally sensitive. Trump is limited in what he can do about sports teams outside Washington, DC. But the Commanders plan to build a new stadium on land that has been managed by the US National Park Service. The tract's RFK Stadium was home to the team for roughly three decades until 1996. With assistance from Nathan Risser. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
India Today
35 minutes ago
- India Today
Shahid Afridi breaks silence on India-Pakistan match fiasco: There is one rotten egg
Controversial Pakistan cricketer Shahid Afridi stoked fire on Sunday, July 20 against the Indian team, which pulled out of their match against Pakistan at the World Championship of Legends (WCL 2025). Multiple players from the Indian team opted out of the exhibition game against Pakistan due to the presence of Shahid Afridi, who had made some problematic statements against India during the tensions between the two to the local media on Sunday, the day that the match was scheduled to be played, Shahid Afridi claimed that even the Indian cricketers were disappointed to not play the game and blamed the pull-out on Shikhar Dhawan, who had publicly announced that he would not play the exhibition match if Afridi was part of the Pakistan line-up. Afridi called Dhawan a 'rotten egg' and blamed him for 'spoiling' the rest of the Indian cricketers. "...Sports brings countries closer. If politics comes between everything then how will you move forward? Without communication, things cannot be solved. The idea for these kinds of events is also to meet one on one. But you know, there is always one rotten egg, which spoils everything," Shahid Afridi told the media on Sunday, July further added fuel to the fire by insinuating that Dhawan was an embarrassment for his nation. He went on to add that the Indian team should have stayed home if they did not want to play cricket at the WCL 2025."They trained a day before the match. I think that they pulled out just because of one guy. Even the Indian team is very disappointed. They were here to play. I am telling you, you should be a good ambassador for the country, not an embarrassment," Afridi said. Shahid Afridi's Double StandardsThe words of sports diplomacy come in sharp contrast to the comments made by Shahid Afridi in the month of April, where he had alleged that the Indian government carried out attacks on its own citizens in Pahalgam."The terrorists continued to kill people in Pahalgam for an hour, and not a single Indian soldier out of 8 lakh showed up. But when they did, they blamed Pakistan," Afridi had told local reporters in Pakistan."India carries out terrorism itself, kills its own people, and then puts the blame on Pakistan," he Sunday, Afridi turned up in another avatar, stating that he was there as an ambassador of cricket and was hugely disappointed that the match did not take place at were very excited to play the second match (vs India). I thought we would be at the ground. We were expecting 17,000–18,000 fans, who would have enjoyed the match. But yeah, it is quite disappointing that we did not play," he said on further claimed that if he had known that the Indian team had problems with his presence, he would have removed himself from Sunday's game."If they did not play for me, I would have stayed home. Cricket should have continued. Who is Shahid Afridi in front of cricket? No one. If they did not want to play why did they come here? Go sit at home and play between yourselves," he India vs Pakistan match at WCL 2025 was supposed to be the first cricketing event between India and Pakistan since Operation Sindoor. However, the match was called off after a massive backlash from Indian citizens on social media, who questioned the former cricketers for participating in an event alongside Pakistan cricketers amid cross-border tensions with the neighbouring state.- EndsTune InMust Watch
India Today
36 minutes ago
- India Today
Illegal: Russia's biggest oil producer slams EU sanctions on India's refinery
Rosneft, Russia's biggest oil producer, condemned the European Union's sanctions on Nayara Energy, an Indian oil refinery partly owned by Rosneft. The company called the EU's move "unjustified" and "illegal," warning that these restrictions threaten India's energy security and could hurt its EU announced the sanctions on Friday as part of its 18th package of restrictions against Russia, targeting its oil trade to pressure Moscow over the Ukraine invasion. Nayara Energy, located in Gujarat, processes crude oil and is partly owned by Rosneft, which holds 49.13% of the refinery. The EU's goal is to cut Kremlin revenues by limiting Russia's crude exports to countries like said in a statement that Nayara Energy is an "important asset" that ensures a steady supply of petroleum products to India's domestic market. Rosneft also clarified that it holds less than half of Nayara and does not control the company, which is run by an independent board. The company called the EU's reasons for the sanctions "far-fetched and false." It pointed out that Nayara is an Indian legal entity focused on developing its assets and reinvesting profits to grow the refinery and its petrochemical Energy runs a large refinery with a capacity of 400,000 barrels per day and owns nearly 7,000 fuel outlets across India. It is also working on a new petrochemical plant near its refinery to expand its production REJECTS EU SANCTIONSIndia's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has also criticised the EU sanctions. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said that India "does not subscribe to any unilateral sanction measures" and reaffirmed that India only recognises sanctions decided within the United Nations framework."We have noted the latest sanctions announced by the European Union. India does not subscribe to any unilateral sanction measures. We are a responsible actor and remain fully committed to our legal obligations," Jaiswal said in a statement posted on BLAMES EU FOR VIOLATING INTERNATIONAL LAWRosneft accused the EU of ignoring international law and interfering with the sovereignty of third countries like India. The Russian oil giant called the sanctions part of a broader attempt to destabilise global energy markets and create unfair ownership of Nayara Energy is shared between Rosneft and the Indian investment group SPV Kesani Enterprises, along with other retail investors. Reports suggest Rosneft is looking to exit the Indian venture because sanctions have made it difficult to send its earnings out of said it expects Nayara to protect the interests of its shareholders and customers. It also said that Russia and India's governments would support the company in dealing with these challenges.- EndsWith inputs form AgenciesMust Watch
