logo
London heat network users say price cap lack has cost them dearly

London heat network users say price cap lack has cost them dearly

BBC News24-07-2025
Residents connected to council-run heat networks say they are struggling to pay for heating because their spiralling costs are not covered by the energy price cap.Heat network schemes are meant to keep costs down by buying fuel in bulk. But because gas is purchased on a commercial basis by councils, end-users are not covered by the energy price cap set by Ofgem, the gas and electricity regulator..Data obtained by the BBC revealed heat network residents in London have been paying nearly 30% more than the Ofgem price cap rate since 2023-24.The government said Ofgem would be made the regulator for heat networks in 2026 to "deliver fairer bills and ensure networks are kept in good condition".
About 500,000 homes nationally are connected to the UK's approximately 13,000 heat networks.They include the maisonette owned by Dolly Thomas, who has lived there since 2011 with her husband and two daughters.The estimated service charge for her home, in North Peckham, London, is more than £6,600 next year. More than half - £3,508.91 - is for heating and hot water. She will struggle to pay, she said."It's had a serious impact, it's not funny," said Ms Thomas. "We have [had] to give up a lot of things."I've got to the point where I've even asked the council to buy the flat back, but they said they don't have the money."Ms Thomas is connected to the Southwark Council-run North Peckham Heat Network which provides heating and hot water to 842 other homes, via a vast web of pipes.The total amount of gas used is divided between each property, regardless of how much they use.Ms Thomas was able to afford the service charge when she moved in, but the cost has tripled since she moved in.
What is a heat network?
Gas is purchased on a commercial basis by councils, and therefore not covered by the energy price cap set by Ofgem.This means there is no upper limit on how much consumers like Dolly can be charged.Experts say many older heat networks in London have been poorly maintained, meaning huge quantities of heat generated in the boil room is lost as it travels along inefficient and badly insulated pipes.
Stephen Knight, from the Heat Trust, said: "We see so many heat networks in the UK that have been poorly put together, poorly maintained with heat loses that is more than the heat delivered to customers. "That's what is driving a lot of the high prices along with really expensive and volatile commercial energy costs."The BBC has spoken to dozens of residents in London who are linked to communal heating systems and say they have seen big price hikes since the energy crisis in 2023-24.
Sharon Shanhani has lived alone in her three-bedroom flat opposite the Consort Estate in south London since 2019. She paid £3,369 for heating and hot water last year."I don't use it much and I only have one radiator on," she said. "I basically give all my money to Southwark Council and I don't understand how that can be when I own my own home. "I really have to scrape [by], but it's compacted by the fact that I shouldn't have to be paying it."We don't have any meters in this block... there is no connection between how much you're using and the price you pay."Ms Shanhani claims the system is unfair and said she was concerned that she may struggle to sell her flat in the future, because of the rising energy costs.Ideally, she would like her own boiler so that she only pays for what she uses.
What the BBC Investigation found:
The BBC used freedom of information requests to all London councils and found more than 34,000 homes are connected to a heat network operated by a local authority in LondonThis number could be much higher because only 18 out of 33 local authorities responded to our request - of those, nine confirmed they ran heat networksAnalysis of these figures by the Heat Trust found all those who responded were paying less for gas than the Ofgem domestic price cap up until 2022-23Since 2023-24 they have paid on average almost 30% more than the rate set by Ofgem's price cap The figures revealed all nine boroughs experienced a rise in gas prices between 2020-21 and 2023-24. Reported increases ranged from 140% in Kensington and Chelsea to 330% in Waltham Forest
Mr Knight said the data collated by the BBC revealed that "in the middle of the energy crisis in 2023-24, local authorities were paying more for the gas than those who had a home boiler that was paid through the domestic price cap". "Typically," he said, "it should be much cheaper for a big operator of a heat network to procure energy (gas) than a domestic consumer. "But, because of the lack of price protection from the price cap that situation was reversed during the energy crisis and that has led to thousands of consumers facing enormous bills, with some being lumbered in debt."
Sarah King, Southwark Council's cabinet member for council homes, said heat networks were "a key part of the government's plan to cut carbon emissions" and her council was "leading the way" with its network."We also have some older networks that use higher temperatures and more complex pipework, which can lead to more heat loss," she said. Ms King said the reliability of its network was "high" and, where performance was found to be lower it was "prioritising upgrades"."We buy fuel in bulk to keep costs down," Ms King said. "But rising energy prices have pushed up heating charges."The council said it was supporting residents who preferred heat meters to better manage and had already installed about 2,000 meters."We know energy costs are a real concern," Ms King said. "If you're struggling with bills, please contact the council for support."Miatta Fahnbulleh, the minister for energy consumers, said the government was "determined" to make sure heat network customers paid "fairer prices for the energy they use, with rapid support and compensation if things go wrong".She said the Energy Ombudsman, Citizens Advice and Consumer Scotland were all "now on hand" to offer help and advice to heat network customers."We will also go further by making Ofgem the new heat network regulator," she said, "with the power to deliver fairer bills and ensure networks are kept in good condition."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I tried out American Airlines' new Dreamliner cabin — here's why it's a game-changer
I tried out American Airlines' new Dreamliner cabin — here's why it's a game-changer

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

I tried out American Airlines' new Dreamliner cabin — here's why it's a game-changer

Being only four weeks old, it's got that new plane smell. And the inviting interior scent belongs to a cabin that heralds a new era for American Airlines (AA). Just how positive this era will be is something I'm discovering. I'm on board one of the carrier's brand-new Boeing 787-9 Dreamliners at London's Heathrow Airport, the plane having just flown in from Chicago O'Hare Airport. On AA's scheduling, it would have been denoted as a 787P, the "P" standing for premium. This tells passengers it's a Dreamliner with a fully upgraded cabin, from front to back, with a new business-class seat called the Flagship Suite, a new premium economy and a refreshed economy offering. The new cabin launched in June on the Heathrow-Chicago route, but 787Ps will enter service soon from Philadelphia to Heathrow and Zurich, and from Dallas-Fort Worth to Brisbane and Auckland. The new cabin will be available on all newly delivered 787-9 aircraft, as well as new Airbus A321XLR aircraft and retrofitted Boeing 777-300ERs. By 2030, American will be flying 70 of them. I'm being shown the new flying experience by the carrier's Vice President of International Operations, José A. Freig. He points out the elegant American Airlines logo on the dark-grey partition at the front that greets fliers as they board, and we pause at the set of eight Flagship Suite Preferred seats at the front. These are supersized versions of the regular lie-flat Flagship Suites (that will eventually be sold for a supplementary fee) and come with 19 percent more bed space and 42 percent more "living area" than the business-class seats further back. They also sport a darker finish, with black marbling, brushed aluminum and darker brown upholstery apparently earning them the nickname of 'Darth Vader' seats. Jose says they're already highly sought-after slices of mid-air real estate for frequent fliers. I can see why. They have the air of a first-class berth and the moodier hues are alluring. As for the cabin as a whole, Jose says that customer feedback declares it a "game-changer". Jose lets me loose to explore on my own before the flight crew arrive for the return leg, and based on my 15-minute investigation, during which I'm able to sit in each seat type and press a few buttons, I'd be inclined to agree that this cabin is transformational. In the business-class cabin, arranged in a 1-2-1 configuration, the number one reason is that all the seats feature privacy doors. While the normal Flagship Business seat has a satisfying cocooning effect, the sliding door takes the cosiness factor up a level. I also love the chic cream, gray and light brown color scheme and the easy-to-reach seat controls. Aviation geeks will note that the Flagship Suite is based on the Adient Ascent design, which is also the seat platform for United Airlines' new Polaris Elevate business-class seat that I examined at a launch event in New York earlier this year. You'll also find it on the 787-9 Dreamliners flown by Qatar Airways and Hawaiian Airlines. So American Airlines isn't reinventing the wheel here, but has sensibly married a top-tier seat with a very good aircraft. Meanwhile, the premium economy seats — which have a pitch of 38 inches and a width of 19-19.5 inches depending on location — have thoughtful "privacy dividers" that help shield passengers from their neighbors and double the amount of in-seat storage. There are cabin-wide improvements, too, with entertainment screen sizes significantly bigger no matter which ticket you've bought. The screens in the 787P are 12 percent larger in Flagship Suite, 21 percent larger in premium economy and 29 percent larger in the main cabin, where seats have a pitch of 31 inches and a width of 16.5-17.6 inches. Charging options are also more ubiquitous. The older Dreamliners have AC and USB-A power points, but the 787P boasts these in all cabins along with USB-C and wireless charging in business and premium economy and USB-C ports in economy. There's now Bluetooth connectivity throughout, too. I tell Jose that this cabin feels more elegant and sophisticated than its predecessor. This has been achieved not just by the introduction of privacy doors and a new color scheme, but by a reduction in the number of seats in the aircraft overall, from 285 on the older 787-9 to 244 on the 787P. Seat pitch and width remain largely unchanged, but the cabin is intensely premium, with 32 premium economy seats versus 21 on the regular 787-9 - that's a 52 percent increase – and 70 percent more business-class seats, which are up from 30 to 51. Jose tells me after my Terminal 3 walkabout that the cabin gives American Airlines "a leg-up on its transatlantic competitors". The new cabin certainly puts the carrier in a strong position and I can't wait to try it while airborne. Watch this space — and for that magic letter "P" on your next American Airlines booking.

More people are paying tax on their savings. Here's why
More people are paying tax on their savings. Here's why

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

More people are paying tax on their savings. Here's why

About 300,000 more people are now liable to pay tax on their savings interest compared to five years ago, with the number rising from 3.06 million in 2020-21 to 3.35 million this year. These figures, obtained by Nottingham Building Society, highlight a "growing and often hidden tax burden on ordinary savers", primarily driven by fiscal drag due to frozen tax thresholds and inflation. While government rules allow for tax-free personal allowances and a "savers' allowance" of up to £5,000 interest, experts say the system is complex and emphasise the value of tax-efficient Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs). Nottingham Building Society is urging the government to simplify and strengthen cash ISAs, rather than introducing new barriers. A Treasury spokesperson affirmed the government's commitment to protecting the £20,000 tax-free yearly ISA limit, ensuring most people continue to pay no tax on their savings.

PIP review lead gives update on planned changes after Labour U-turn
PIP review lead gives update on planned changes after Labour U-turn

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

PIP review lead gives update on planned changes after Labour U-turn

Further details about Labour's review of Personal Independence Payments (PIP) have been revealed after the government's climbdown over changes to the health-linked benefit in June. The review will be led by veteran Labour MP Sir Stephen Timms, who shared more information about how he will approach the issue. Currently claimed by 3.7 million people, PIP is designed to help with extra costs incurred by living with an illness or disability. Labour's proposals to tweak the assessment criteria for the benefit to effectively make it harder to claim was met with fierce opposition from campaign groups and disabled people's organisations. Ministers backed down on the plans in late June after over 100 Labour MPs threatened to vote against the government on the measures. The concession was announced by Sir Stephen in the middle of the debate on the legislation. One of the key criticisms against the plans was over the government's lack of consultation with disabled people over the changes, leading to accusations that the legislation had been 'rushed'. Sir Stephen has now confirmed that his review of PIP will be co-produced with disabled people and disability organisations. Speaking to the BBC's Access All podcast, he said: 'We are going to be taking a lead from disabled people and representatives of disabled people in this work over the next year or so.' However, the social security minister added this will likely only comprise a 'fairly small group of ten people,' with the reviews recommendations likely then opened to a public consultation after its conclusion in Autumn 2026. Sir Stephen also said that the review is 'not intended to deliver cuts,' but that it 'will certainly have to operate within the current projections for what spending is going to be.' Labour ministers had originally planned to save around £5 billion from its planned changes to welfare spending, with £4.1 billion of this being from changes to PIP. With changes to the benefit no longer on the table, questions have been raised around how Labour may look to find these savings elsewhere. Reflecting on the government's forced U-turn over the changes, Sir Stephen said: 'I think there's been a lot of relief that that initial proposal is not being taken forward. I think people are pleased about that, and I understand why. 'What we've seen is an example of democracy doing what it's supposed to do: people express their concern to their MPs, the MPs express those concerns in parliament, and the policy's changed as a result.' 'I think that's a positive example that we need now to build on in taking forward this review.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store