
Choir that drowned out Germany's AfD leader happy to ‘bend the ear' of country
'We were hugely surprised and truly happy to hear at that moment that our song was receiving such a public airing,' one choir member told the Guardian.
The choir had not known of the carefully orchestrated plans by the Centre for Political Beauty (ZPS) – an association of action artists led by the philosopher Philipp Ruch – to use their song to disrupt the so-called summer interview, a regular annual TV fixture in which leaders of the main political parties are questioned in turn, typically in a relaxed setting.
Neither had the authorities, nor the public broadcaster ARD. And disrupt it certainly did. The sweet-sounding 19th-century Styrian Christmas yodel, which Corner Chor had rewritten as a three-voice protest song against the far right, managed to drown out much of the hour-long exchange, prompting Weidel to lean into the interviewer Markus Preiß and tell him: 'I have problems understanding you against this noise.'
She insisted on continuing with the interview, however, at the same time as accusing the choir of being state-funded, an erroneous slur increasingly used by the party to attack its opponents. The party's leaders later said they had been victimised and insisted on a rerun, which the broadcaster has so far refused to entertain.
Ruch called the action less of a disruption and 'more of an embellishment'. The state had classified the AfD as rightwing extremists earlier this year, he said in an interview. He added ''[ARD] should have figured out for themselves that this in itself was an indecent idea.'
Corner Chor, from the southern city of Augsburg, has been quietly making a name for itself as an activist choir, part of a growing trend in Germany. Established six years ago as a musical education project, it appears everywhere from street corners to festivals, performing its songs and mantras in myriad settings from river swims to squats, to underground passageways.
Its topics, alongside anti-fascist activities, include campaigning for free sanitary products or against extortionate rents and the gender pay gap. It is a 15-strong collective of self-described feminist Flinta-friendly singers (a German acronym standing for women, lesbians, inter, non-binary, trans and agender people).
The singers emphasise they are not just interested in political protest, also singing everything 'from sea shanties to Mozart'. However, the broadcast of their yodel has taken the collective into a new realm as well as heightening their sense of social responsibility, four members told the Guardian in a recent interview over Zoom, for which they did not want to be individually identified, citing their wish to be viewed as a collective voice, as well as fears for their safety.
'We simply wanted to expose the AfD's content in a non-aggressive way, through this very uncomplicated, mantra-like song, which has something very contemplative about it because it's usually sung at Christmas and allows us to express exactly what we wanted to say, as clearly as possible,' a second singer said.
The song was inspired by a notorious 2023 meeting of neo-Nazis and other extremists that party members had taken part in, where the mass deportation of foreigners was a central topic, and which sparked a wave of nationwide protest.
The singers, who come from all walks of life, admitted to being a little shocked by the resonance their song had enjoyed since going viral at the Weidel broadcast, having reached No 6 in the iTunes Germany charts. It received 60,000 plays on Spotify, drew thousands of new followers on their Instagram account and an innumerable number of downloads from SoundCloud of a Scheiß AfD ringtone. The choir has also attracted donations for forthcoming projects.
The song has already been widely remixed by other musicians, picked up by choirs around the country and become a regular feature at demonstrations, including recent Pride marches, with many citing the 'earworm' quality of what the Corner Chor describes as '15 seconds of music against rightwing extremism'.
Yet the reception has not been entirely positive. The choir, which describes itself and its weekly rehearsals as a 'safe space', has received threats and offensive posts on social media. Its critics have accused it of trying to silence the fifth of German voters who support the AfD, the largest opposition party in the Bundestag.
'We must ask ourselves: who exactly are we giving a platform to? And how loud are they allowed to be?' a third member said.
'Attempts to label us as a bunch of hysterical women are ill advised. We are humorously disruptive, peaceful protesters … We had not intended to bend the ear of the whole country but we're happy we've done so. People are speaking about this way beyond the event itself, about the AfD.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
German hesitation on Gaza could encourage atrocities, Israeli academics say
BERLIN, Aug 5 (Reuters) - More than 100 Israeli academics have warned in a letter that a failure by Germany to put pressure on Israel could lead to new atrocities in Gaza. "Further hesitation on Germany's part threatens to enable new atrocities - and undermines the lessons learnt from its own history," the academics wrote in the letter, addressed to senior Social Democrat (SPD) lawmakers Rolf Muetzenich and Adis Ahmetovic and seen by Reuters on Tuesday. On July 22, the two men, whose party is in the ruling coalition, had called for Germany to join an international coalition pushing for an immediate end to the war in Gaza, sanctions against Israel and a suspension of weapons deliveries. The German government - comprising the conservative CDU/CSU bloc and the SPD - has sharpened its criticism of Israel over the manmade humanitarian catastrophe visited on Gaza's 2 million people, but has yet to announce any major policy change. Israel denies having a policy of starvation in Gaza, and says the Hamas militant group, responsible for an operation that killed 1,200 people in Israel in October 2023 and took hundreds more hostage, could end the crisis by surrendering. Critics argue that Germany's response to the war has been overly cautious, mostly owing to an enduring sense of guilt for the Nazi Holocaust, weakening the West's collective ability to put pressure on Israel. "If over 100 Israeli academics are calling for an immediate change of course ... then it's high time we took visible action," Ahmetovic told the public broadcaster ARD. Britain, Canada and France have signalled their readiness to recognise a Palestinian state in Israeli-occupied territory at the United Nations General Assembly this September.


Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
Former Romanian President Iliescu, who led free market transition, dies at 95
Aug 5 (Reuters) - Romania's former President Ion Iliescu, who led its transition from communism and set it on the path to European Union and NATO membership, but faced charges of crimes against humanity for violently suppressing protests in the 1990s, died on Tuesday aged 95. Iliescu had been admitted to hospital with lung cancer roughly two months ago. The government said he would receive a state funeral. "History will judge Ion Iliescu, the main figure of the 1990s transition," said current President Nicusor Dan. Iliescu went from a rising member of Romania's Communist Party to a leader of the bloody December 1989 revolution - which toppled dictator Nicolae Ceausescu and led to his summary execution on Christmas Day - to become the first freely elected president. At the height of his popularity, Romanians were known to chant "The sun shines, Iliescu appears". But when student protests against him broke out in the capital Bucharest in June 1990, he called on coal miners, then politically influential, to put them down by force. After repeated failed attempts to investigate him, he was sent for trial at the start of this year on charges of crimes against humanity for his part in violence in which 20,000 miners entered the capital to crush peaceful anti-government protests. Four people were killed and hundreds injured. He always denied wrongdoing and was never convicted. Miners' riots throughout the 1990s hampered Romania's transition to a market economy and deterred badly needed foreign investment for years. Iliescu's critics have accused him of delaying the transitions, trying to block reform and protect the political heritage and ruling elite of the Communist system. But Iliescu was also the one who got all political parties to agree to support Romania's path to EU and NATO membership. It joined the NATO alliance in 2004 and the EU in 2007. The founder of the leftist Social Democrat Party (PSD), to this day the country's largest, Iliescu is its only leader to have won three presidential elections. No other PSD leader has managed to win since his last term ended in 2004. "Ion Iliescu must be understood in the context of his time," said Sergiu Miscoiu, a political science professor at Babes-Bolyai University. "He stirred anti-totalitarian sentiments in the 1990s, rightly so, but he was also the object of adulation by a large part of the population. "While he called miners to Bucharest and sealed the slow and uncertain transition, he also ... pushed Romania on a Euroatlantic path, such as it was understood at the time." He is survived by his wife Nina. The government has declared August 7 a day of national mourning.


The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on asylum myths: when truth loses, scapegoating takes over Britain's migrant debate
In politics, numbers rarely speak for themselves. They must be framed and interpreted. They are often weaponised. In Britain's increasingly toxic debate over asylum and migration, the question isn't just how many asylum seekers arrive on small boats. It's what those numbers are made to represent – and why polls suggest a large proportion of the public now believes things that are simply untrue. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, has staked her political credibility on restoring a sense of grip over the asylum system: reducing the backlog by processing cases, accelerating returns of those with no legal claim to stay and launching an as yet small-scale 'one in, one out' returns deal with France. In balancing operational realism with symbolic reassurance, Ms Cooper walks a knife-edge between policy and perception. The small boats issue is no longer just about shortcomings. It is a cultural firestorm – and one increasingly fuelled not by facts, but by misinformation. According to new YouGov polling, nearly half of Britons wrongly believe that illegal migrants now outnumber those here legally. A staggering 72% of those who support mass deportations hold this belief – even though official estimates show legal migration outnumbers irregular migration by at least 10 to 1. That gap between belief and reality is not accidental. It is the outcome of years of distortion by populist media and politicians who conflate asylum, illegality and criminality. Figures like Nigel Farage and Robert Jenrick have led the charge, using cherrypicked statistics and lurid anecdote to foster the sense of a country under siege. Hotels housing asylum seekers have become flashpoints for far-right protest. Last summer's riots, frighteningly, appear to be no fluke. They look like a trial run. Ms Cooper's strategy to confront this with better data and a functioning system is, on paper, entirely rational. She wants to reassert the difference between political theatre and policy. But data alone cannot win a cultural war. Publishing the nationality or immigration status of offenders, even in the name of transparency, may serve only to reinforce the belief that 'foreignness' explains criminality – particularly when the dominant public narrative is already so skewed. Amnesty's warning that disclosing suspects' ethnicity risks becoming a 'lightning rod' for racist sentiment is well grounded. Moderate former Tory ministers have rightly urged caution, calling for accurate data and cooler heads. The former counter-terrorism chief Neil Basu is right to compare Faragism to Trumpism: both rely on lies about migrants that outpace the truth to win votes. The real problem isn't the number of small boats, but the growing number of Britons who see all migration as a threat to identity and safety. YouGov finds that a significant proportion of the public now supports not just border control, but mass removals of migrants who have already settled here. That is a policy with no precedent in mainstream politics since 1971. Worryingly, it is now slithering back into public debate. Labour inherited a broken asylum system. But it also inherited a poisoned political environment. The risk is that by trying to neutralise extremism with incremental reform and datasets, it lends legitimacy to the deeper narrative: that the migrant is, at root, the problem. Britain is playing with fire, not just because its systems are failing, but because the public's trust in those systems has been methodically eroded. That is harder to repair. And far more dangerous to ignore.