logo

Outback is no longer America's king of steaks

CNN28-03-2025
Source: CNN
Americans don't want Outback's Aussie-themed steaks anymore. Instead, they're craving Texas-style cuts from Texas Roadhouse and LongHorn's tender filets.
Texas Roadhouse and LongHorn's sales topped Outback's last year, and the chains' stocks are going in different directions. Texas Roadhouse's stock has increased around 15% over the last year, while shares of LongHorn-owner Darden jumped around 25%. Meanwhile, Outback parent company Bloomin' Brands' stock has tumbled more than 70% to roughly $8 a share.
As inflation pressures cut into consumers' spending, Americans are abandoning casual dining chains they don't perceive as good value such as Outback and TGI Fridays. Instead, they are shifting to Roadhouse, LongHorn, Chili's and other chains they feel offer them a better deal when they go out to dinner.
It's a steep fall for Outback, which defined the casual dining steakhouse model in the United States. Founded in 1988, customers jumped on Outback's cheap, juicy sirloin steaks and deep-fried onion blossoms during the 1990s and 2000s.
But Outback's mistakes and competitors' innovative strategies have tipped the power order in the restaurant steak wars. Outback hiked prices too high, relied too heavily on promotions to draw diners, and cut costs too far. Customers and analysts alike say food quality suffered, table service slowed and restaurants became dingy. Outback is also more expensive: The chain's check average was $29 last year — $6 above Roadhouse and $2.50 more than LongHorn.
That allowed Roadhouse to peel off Outback's budget-conscious customers, while LongHorn won diners by increasing the size of its steaks. Both chains also increased prices at a slower pace than Outback while investing in their staffs and restaurant remodels.
These factors, combined with better menu quality, has led to the success of these brands, according to RJ Hottovy, an analyst at Placer.ai. Roadhouse and Longhorn both rank at the top of the American Customer Satisfaction Index, a benchmark of consumers' opinions about restaurants and fast-food chains.
Outback was Richard Mathis's favorite restaurant in high school, even celebrating his graduation there. But he says Outback is 'consistently disappointing' these days.
'When I go into an Outback now, it feels sterile and cold. They just don't feel fun,' Mathis said. 'I want to eat and leave. I don't feel any desire to hang out there.'
He now prefers Texas Roadhouse when he goes out to eat with his wife or friends. The steak is better, the staff is friendlier and it's 'fun, bright and there's music,' he said. 'Roadhouse feels like going to a country bar.'
Although the three chains are all casual steakhouses, there are key differences that explain their divergent performance.
Outback, whose concept was based on the movie 'Crocodile Dundee,' spread nationally during the 1990s and 2000s. Although its four founders were not Australian, Outback had faux-Australian items on the menu like 'Ribs on the Barbie' and 'Walkabout Soup.' The chain sold a wider variety of casual fare beyond steaks, becoming recognized for its signature items like the 'Bloomin' Onion' and 'Alice Springs Chicken.' But the size of the menu became unwieldy for staff as the chain also offered limited-time promotions to try to spur customers to visit.
Location mattered as well. Outback for years opened restaurants around malls, but that backfired as foot traffic to malls dwindled. Outback has closed dozens of its older restaurants in recent years.
As Outback struggled, competitors stepped in.
Texas Roadhouse stuck to lower prices on most items compared to the one-off promotions at Outback. The chain also won over customers with its lively, rodeo-style restaurants, featuring wood-paneled walls, murals and upbeat country tunes. Roadhouse distinguished its brand with free peanuts, bread rolls with honey cinnamon butter and occasional line dancing by waiters.
'Roadhouse is winning because they have a much better value proposition than anybody else,' said Peter Saleh, an analyst at BTIG.
LongHorn has stood out through its upscale-dining feel and bigger steaks for similar prices to Outback's.
LongHorn started in the early 1980s as a budget-friendly roadhouse restaurant. But LongHorn ditched that concept and moved upmarket to court higher-income diners. In 2007, Darden, the owner of Olive Garden, Capital Grille and Cheddar's Scratch Kitchen, bought LongHorn.
'LongHorn has made significant investments over the years in quality, and that continues to pay off,' Darden CEO Rick Cardenas said last year. He noted that LongHorn was attracting customers trading down from fine-dining restaurants.
But Outback says it can return to its past glory.
'Consumer research shows there is an affinity for [Outback],' a spokesperson for Bloomin' Brands told CNN. 'With the investments we're making to improve operations and deliver a better guest experience, we are excited about the future potential of our business.'
Despite its recent struggles, Outback believes it can turn its business around with a new strategy and leadership.
Mike Spanos, the former chief operating officer at Delta, became CEO of Outback parent Bloomin' last year. Outback also has a new president, Pat Hafner, a 29-year veteran of the chain.
'Outback is a great business. It is a great brand,' Spanos said last month. 'It is a very fixable business.'
Outback plans to cut 20% of the menu and reduce limited-time promotions to simplify operations for restaurant staff. These promotional offers hurt Outback's profit and created bottlenecks for workers. Instead, Outback will shift to setting consistently low prices.
'We were featuring items in short promotional periods that created complexity for our operators, and we failed to drive value in our core' menu items, Spanos said.
Outback also will slow its new restaurant openings and direct its investments to remodeling current locations.
'We need to focus on getting the guest experience right before we earn the right to grow,' he said.
Chili's recent turnaround offers hope for Outback and a roadmap it can follow.
Chili's has unexpectedly pulled off its comeback thanks to upgraded French fry and chicken tender recipes, fast food-like prices and viral TikTok videos of customers pulling apart its gooey mozzarella sticks.
Chili's sales at restaurants open for at least a year increased a whopping 31% last quarter. It was Chili's third-straight quarter of double-digit sales growth.
Old Outback customers like Richard Mathis are rooting for a Chili's-like comeback.
'I love the brand and wish it was back to the way it was,' he said. 'I want to go to Outback.'
See Full Web Article
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republican Rips Key Vote on Trump Bill as 'Power Move'
Republican Rips Key Vote on Trump Bill as 'Power Move'

Newsweek

time36 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Republican Rips Key Vote on Trump Bill as 'Power Move'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republican Representative Keith Self of Texas ripped a procedural vote taking place on the much-debated financial package dubbed the "big, beautiful bill" by President Donald Trump Wednesday night, saying he's a "no," as more talks are vital. Newsweek reached out to House Speaker Mike Johnson's office via email for comment. Why It Matters The attempted passage of Trump's fiscal initiative—the centerpiece of his legislative efforts—agonized party traditionalists and grassroots activists who have long campaigned on promises of fiscal restraint. Clashes over the bill also underscore significant fractures within the Republican Party as it aims to hold control of Congress amid mounting pressure from both establishment leaders and populist outsiders. The outcome of the final House vote on the bill will ultimately determine whether Trump's comprehensive policy package—including tax cuts, border security initiatives, and major spending realignments—becomes law, shaping his legacy and affecting millions of Americans. GOP Representative Keith Self of Texas is pictured as the House votes on a speaker during the first day of the 119th Congress, in the U.S. Capitol on January 3 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by... GOP Representative Keith Self of Texas is pictured as the House votes on a speaker during the first day of the 119th Congress, in the U.S. Capitol on January 3 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) More What To Know According to PBS NewsHour Correspondent Lisa Desjardins on X, formerly Twitter, Self said while speaking to Newsmax that the procedural vote late Wednesday night is a "power move," adding its "a pressure move," as lawmakers "are still in the middle" of critical negotiations and compromise. Self posted on X Wednesday night during the procedural vote, writing, "I came to Washington to help rein in our national debt. In negotiations with House leadership, commitments were made to ensure the One Big Beautiful Bill would include key provisions, such as: - Matching every $1 of tax cuts with $1 of spending cuts. - Terminating Biden's Green New Scam. - Prohibiting taxpayer-funded experimental gender transition procedures." The Texas lawmaker added, "Senate broke the House framework, and then they stomped all over it. Now, House leadership wants to cram this broken bill down our throats by rushing it to the floor while in the middle of discussions, completely disregarding their promises." "The only way of making this right is by leadership adhering to their commitments and restoring, at a minimum, these three important issues from the House version," Self added. "While honoring one's commitment may be a rare commodity in Washington, each member of Congress is obligated to return home and explain their actions to the constituents they serve." Concluding, Self said, "Ultimately, this is an issue of morality. Abiding by our word is the only thing we have; therefore, as the bill currently stands, I voted against the rule. We have an incredibly rare opportunity to extend President Trump's tax cuts, begin restoring fiscal sanity by reducing spending to pre-COVID numbers and truly leave our country better than we found it." As House margins are razor thin, Republicans can only afford to lose three votes if all Democrats vote no, as expected. NBC News reports that lawmakers can switch their votes up until the last moment. With the GOP's narrow majority and key defections among both fiscal conservatives and moderates, the bill's fate reflects broader fractures inside the party over fiscal strategy and social spending. As the July Fourth self-imposed deadline by Trump looms, failure to pass the legislation could stall the president's second-term agenda and fuel ongoing leadership debates within the party. What People Are Saying Trump posted to Truth Social on Wednesday: "It looks like the House is ready to vote tonight. We had GREAT conversations all day, and the Republican House Majority is UNITED, for the Good of our Country, delivering the Biggest Tax Cuts in History and MASSIVE Growth. Let's go Republicans, and everyone else - MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Johnson, on X before the key vote: "President Trump KEPT HIS PROMISE to secure the border. Now Congress MUST do its part. The only way we keep the border secure and the American people safe is by passing the One Big Beautiful Bill. @HouseGOP, time to get it done." Vice President JD Vance posted to X on Wednesday: "The Big Beautiful Bill gives the president the resources and the power to undo the Biden border invasion. It must pass." What Happens Next The bill's fate remains uncertain Wednesday night, as the House is divided on the legislation. Should the bill pass, it would mark a major victory for Trump's policy agenda; if it fails, internal party strife and questions over leadership authority are likely to intensify, analysts speculate. If the procedural vote passes, Republicans can then debate the bill and bring it to the floor for a final vote.

Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary bluntly speaks on divorce and stupidity
Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary bluntly speaks on divorce and stupidity

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary bluntly speaks on divorce and stupidity

It is no secret that the emotional reality of divorce is painful. It also has a huge impact on couples regarding the money involved, due to its complex redistribution of assets, obligations, and long-term economic implications. Kevin O'Leary, an investor who appears on ABC's "Shark Tank," offers some blunt words on divorce, plainly stating exactly what he thinks about it from a financial viewpoint. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Divorce often requires the division of property acquired during the marriage, including homes, vehicles, retirement accounts, and investments. Determining equitable distribution can be complicated by varying state laws and the couple's financial circumstances. In addition to asset division, ongoing financial responsibilities such as alimony and child support may be mandated. These can significantly impact one or both parties' budgets, particularly if income disparity exists. Related: Dave Ramsey has blunt words for Americans buying a car Legal fees, mediation costs, and additional expenses related to establishing separate households further strain resources. Both parties may face reduced living standards post-divorce, as the cost of maintaining two separate households tends to exceed that of a shared one. Divorce can also affect long-term financial planning. Retirement savings may be split, and future contributions could be diminished. Investment strategies may need reconfiguration, and insurance policies often require revision. Tax consequences also arise, as filing status changes and some deductions may no longer be available. In cases involving children, education and health care costs must be considered, often requiring ongoing coordination between both parties. O'Leary explains his take on divorce that many people may not want to hear. In a post on Instagram, O'Leary spells out in no uncertain terms how he feels about the decision to get a divorce. "Think of the geometric loss of wealth every time you get divorced," O'Leary said. "You pay the woman that you divorced, or man, and you pay the government a third - often through capital gains liquidation - because you can't separate all the assets without liquidating them sometimes." "So you've got government sitting there, you've got the other spouse sitting there," he continued. "This is the stupidest thing you could ever do." More on personal finance: Dave Ramsey offers urgent thoughts about MedicareJean Chatzky shares major statement on Social SecurityTony Robbins has blunt words on IRAs,401(k)s O'Leary describes his view on the background involved in many divorce cases. "You've spent your whole life to actually create this nest egg," O'Leary explained. "It could be, you know, you're 45, or whatever. You've got a comfortable life and all of a sudden you don't like your wife or husband." "Think about that for a while," he said. "Because you are going to wipe out up to two-thirds of your wealth." Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary warns Americans on 401(k)s O'Leary emphasizes his blunt opinion on one aspect about the decision to get a divorce that many people would seemingly not wish to confront. "You better really like somebody else a lot," he said. "And frankly, sometimes it's not the other person you're divorcing. It's you. You're the problem." "If you're getting married for the third time, you're a guy or a woman, it's not them. It's you," O'Leary continued. "There's something wrong with you. And you should probably not get into another economic union." O'Leary further explains his perception that ending a marriage can be one of the most financially damaging experiences in a person's life. When you marry, you're forming a joint economic venture - every dollar, asset, and liability is shared, he says. That partnership carries high stakes, so selecting a compatible financial partner is vital. O'Leary advises couples to discuss money habits early, align their long-term financial aspirations, and build safeguards to maintain stability. A well-matched union isn't just about love; it's also a strategic alliance, he explains. Without shared financial values, the costs of separation can be devastating. O'Leary suggest that people consider not just the emotional side of commitment, but also the financial blueprint they are crafting together. If you are the type of person that repeatedly faces divorce, he has a frank word of advice. "You should probably just date till you drop dead, because it's stupid," he said. Related: Tony Robbins sends strong message to Americans on 401(k)s, IRAs The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

JMP Maintains Market Outperform Rating on Whitestone REIT (WSR)
JMP Maintains Market Outperform Rating on Whitestone REIT (WSR)

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

JMP Maintains Market Outperform Rating on Whitestone REIT (WSR)

Whitestone REIT (NYSE:WSR) is one of the most undervalued stocks. On June 18, JMP Securities maintained a Market Outperform rating on WSR with a $16 price target, driven by the company's latest Texas acquisition. The firm sees Whitestone's new asset purchase as a strategic move that bolsters its presence in a market with solid fundamentals. The deal aligns with its focus on high-traffic tenants, steady income streams, and mark-to-market opportunities. Whitestone's real estate portfolio currently includes 57 properties concentrated in the Texas and Arizona markets, which JMP mentioned for their robust demographic growth trajectories. The analysts highlight that the company has regularly shown better-than-average performance from these properties. Aerial view of a neighborhood center with many holiday shoppers. JMP praised Whitestone REIT (NYSE:WSR)'s focused expansion in primary markets and its efforts to upgrade asset quality. The firm noted that proceeds from selling underperforming assets at favorable margins are reinvested into higher-return opportunities, driving immediate earnings upside. Analysts pointed out that Whitestone's stock is priced below 12 times its expected 2025 FFO, around two times less than the average for similar REITs. JMP says this is unfair, since Whitestone is growing faster, has better market coverage, and is lowering its debt. Its current ratio of 2.65 shows it has more than enough liquid assets to cover short-term needs. Whitestone REIT (NYSE:WSR) is a community-centric REIT specializing in the acquisition, development, and management of open-air retail centers across high growth US markets, including Phoenix, Austin, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, and San Antonio. While we acknowledge the potential of WSR as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure. None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store