Rita Ora continues to feel Liam Payne's presence
The 34-year-old singer duetted with the tragic One Direction star - who passed away aged 31 after a falling from a hotel balcony in Argentina last October - on the track For You from the soundtrack to the 2018 movie Fifty Shades Freed and explained that she sings the tune "all the time" to keep his memory alive.
Asked if she will be watching Liam's final project - the Netflix show Building the Band - Rita told Elvis Duran and The Morning Show: "I 100 per cent will watch it.
"That's a really great friend of mine. I still sort of feel him anyway, so it's fine."
The Let You Love Me hitmaker continued: "I have the last song that I think we did together as a duo and I sing it all the time. And it just feels like he's just right there. And we always do a cute little moment of a photo of him and it feels fantastic to just feel like he's still around through music.
"That's why music is so powerful. It really does bring back a person, a memory, a feeling.
"So yeah, I have this incredible memory with him, with For You, our song together, and I'll always have that."
Rita hosted the MTV EMA Awards a month after Liam's death last year and paid an emotional tribute to him at the ceremony in Manchester.
She tearfully said: "I just want to take a moment to remember someone that was very, very dear to us.
"We lost him recently, and he was a big part of the MTV world and my world, and I think a lot of yours at home and everybody in here tonight. Liam Payne was one of the kindest people that I knew.
"And you know, there were so many ways that we were talking about honouring him, and I think sometimes just simply speaking is enough."
Ora added: "He had the biggest heart, he was always the first person to offer help in any way that he could. He put so much joy into every room he walked in. And he left such a mark on this world. So let's just take a moment to remember our friend."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Why the big streamers failed at the Logies and what it means for Aussie TV
What did we learn from last night's Logie Awards? That we love free-to-air TV (hooray for the ABC!), Netflix is bad (only one win from 18 nominations) and Home and Away's Lynne McGranger is the 'best' dramatic actress on Australian television. Mostly, that's correct. We do love the ABC – however much we like to complain about it – and its domination of the Logies, with 11 awards, including five for Kitty Flanagan 's terrific comedy Fisk, is a definite win for our public broadcaster. The ABC is the only free-to-air station providing a regular home for locally made dramas and comedy (honourable mention: SBS) and that should be celebrated, particularly in the face of a dramatic drop in locally made productions. But does the ABC's dominance mean we have turned our back on the flashy streamers? How else can you explain that Netflix, the most nominated streamer, won only one award (best miniseries or telemovie for Apple Cider Vinegar)? That's where it gets tricky. Netflix is the most popular paid streaming service in Australia, with an estimated 6.2 million subscribers. But over its 10 years in operation here, it has produced only a handful of local dramas, including three of the shows nominated last night: Apple Cider Vinegar, Territory and Heartbreak High. And while those dramas all feature high-profile talent, how many of us are actually watching those Australian dramas on Netflix? For the purposes of voting in the Logies, we don't really know as, unlike the ABC and the other free-to-air broadcasters, the streamers are unwilling to provide concrete ratings data. And when ratings data makes up 20 per cent of the Logies vote – along with 50 per cent for the popular vote and 30 per cent for the expert vote – the streamers are automatically kneecapped. But, wait, there's more! If you look at the results, it also shows us that yes, while shows such as Territory, for example, were disadvantaged from the beginning, it seems the audience didn't show up and vote for it, either, despite Netflix trumpeting its worldwide success.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Why the big streamers failed at the Logies and what it means for Aussie TV
What did we learn from last night's Logie Awards? That we love free-to-air TV (hooray for the ABC!), Netflix is bad (only one win from 18 nominations) and Home and Away's Lynne McGranger is the 'best' dramatic actress on Australian television. Mostly, that's correct. We do love the ABC – however much we like to complain about it – and its domination of the Logies, with 11 awards, including five for Kitty Flanagan 's terrific comedy Fisk, is a definite win for our public broadcaster. The ABC is the only free-to-air station providing a regular home for locally made dramas and comedy (honourable mention: SBS) and that should be celebrated, particularly in the face of a dramatic drop in locally made productions. But does the ABC's dominance mean we have turned our back on the flashy streamers? How else can you explain that Netflix, the most nominated streamer, won only one award (best miniseries or telemovie for Apple Cider Vinegar)? That's where it gets tricky. Netflix is the most popular paid streaming service in Australia, with an estimated 6.2 million subscribers. But over its 10 years in operation here, it has produced only a handful of local dramas, including three of the shows nominated last night: Apple Cider Vinegar, Territory and Heartbreak High. And while those dramas all feature high-profile talent, how many of us are actually watching those Australian dramas on Netflix? For the purposes of voting in the Logies, we don't really know as, unlike the ABC and the other free-to-air broadcasters, the streamers are unwilling to provide concrete ratings data. And when ratings data makes up 20 per cent of the Logies vote – along with 50 per cent for the popular vote and 30 per cent for the expert vote – the streamers are automatically kneecapped. But, wait, there's more! If you look at the results, it also shows us that yes, while shows such as Territory, for example, were disadvantaged from the beginning, it seems the audience didn't show up and vote for it, either, despite Netflix trumpeting its worldwide success.
Courier-Mail
5 hours ago
- Courier-Mail
Why Prince William, Prince Harry won't inherit Princess Diana's childhood home
Prince William and Prince Harry will not be inheriting their late mother Princess Diana's childhood home. While the Princess of Wales left behind many possessions when she died in 1997, her Althorp property in Northamptonshire, was not one of them. The sprawling estate, which served as the backdrop for much of Diana's childhood, has belonged to the Spencer family since 1508, the New York Post reports. The late royal's father settled there in 1975 after becoming Earl Spencer. To date, the lavish home belongs to the current Earl Spencer, Diana's brother Charles. And once he dies, his son Louis, Viscount Althorp, will inherit the estate — meaning the ownership of the property will not reach the Prince of Wales, 43, or Duke of Sussex, 40. RELATED: 'Prison': Kate and Wills in shock move Meghan's next move after Netflix disaster 'Toxic': King's staff stage mass exodus The Spencer dynamic was thrown for a loop with the property, as Louis will be the next owner despite the fact that he has three older sisters. According to a years-long tradition of the Spencer family observing primogeniture, Lady Kitty, Lady Eliza, and Lady Amelia will not be inheriting the estate. Speaking in 2015 about the unwritten rule, Charles said that while he's 'totally relaxed' about Kitty inheriting the estate, he did note that 'it would be against all tradition.' 'It's just the way it is,' he told the Daily Mail at the time. 'I get the problems with it as a concept. I also get the strengths of it, having worked to date.' Later that year, Kitty said that while she's 'totally pro-gender equality,' she's 'quite happy' with the property becoming her younger brother's 'responsibility.' 'I just think it's the correct way,' she told Tatler. 'I like that the house stays within the same family, with the same surname. 'I wouldn't want it any other way for the Spencers. And I just know my brother is going to do an impeccable job.' The estate holds a significant meaning for the Spencer family, as it's also Diana's final resting place. The late princess is buried on a small island in the middle of its Oval Lake — which is not accessible to the public. Speaking about the chosen location, the beloved royal's brother previously said that the lake acts 'as a buffer against the interventions of the insane and ghoulish, the thick mud presenting a further line of defence.' The secluded location also means that William and Harry are able to visit their late mother's resting place without the fear of being seen. 'It is, luckily, very tranquil here, and [William and Harry] can come and go as they wish whenever they want. And that's very lovely for me to know that,' he added. In his 2023 memoir, 'Spare,' Harry opened up about visiting Diana's memorial with his wife, Meghan Markle. The Sussexes ventured out to Althorp to pay their respects to the late royal on the 25th anniversary of her death in August 2022. The Invictus Games founder said the duo took a boat across the lake and 'gazed around at Althorp's rolling fields and ancient trees, the thousands of green acres where my mother grew up, and where, though things weren't perfect, she'd known some peace.' 'At long last, I was bringing the girl of my dreams home to meet mum,' he added. Parts of this story first appeared in the New York Post and was republished with permission. RELATED: George must abide by sad rule 'Desperate': Harry's fear when Wills is King Harry and Meg slash staff in brutal move
