Voxtur Announces Results of Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders
At the Meeting, the shareholders of the Company approved a resolution setting the number of directors of the Company at four and authorizing the Board to set the number of directors, and elected the following persons to serve as directors of the Company (the 'Board'), each for a term of one year or until their successor is duly elected or appointed: Michael Harris, Allan Bezanson, Ray Williams, and Gary Yeoman.
The shareholders also approved the appointment of MNP LLP as the Company's auditor and the ratification of the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 'LTIP'). A complete copy of the LTIP is available in the Management Information Circular for the Meeting, which is available at
www.sedar.com
. Finally, the shareholders confirmed, ratified and approved the Advance Notice By-Law.
About Voxtur
Voxtur is a proptech company. The company offers targeted data analytics to simplify the multifaceted aspects of the lending lifecycle for investors, lenders, government agencies and servicers. Voxtur's proprietary data hub and workflow platforms more accurately and efficiently value real estate assets, providing critical due diligence that enables market participants to effectively originate, trade, or service defaults on mortgage loans. As an independent and transparent mortgage technology provider, the company offers primary and secondary market solutions in the United States and Canada. For more information, visit
www.voxtur.com
.
Forward-Looking Information
This news release contains certain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively, 'forward-looking information') which reflect the expectations of management regarding the Company's future growth, financial performance and objectives and the Company's strategic initiatives, plans, business prospects and opportunities. These forward-looking statements reflect management's current expectations regarding future events and the Company's financial and operating performance and speak only as of the date of this press release. By their very nature, forward-looking statements require management to make assumptions and involve significant risks and uncertainties, should not be read as guarantees of future events, performance or results, and give rise to the possibility that management's predictions, forecasts, projections, expectations or conclusions will not prove to be accurate, that the assumptions may not be correct and that the Company's future growth, financial performance and objectives and the Company's strategic initiatives, plans, business prospects and opportunities, including the duration, impact of and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, will not occur or be achieved. Any information contained herein that is not based on historical facts may be deemed to constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities laws. Forward-looking information may be based on expectations, estimates and projections as at the date of this news release, and may be identified by the words 'may', 'would', 'could', 'should', 'will', 'intend', 'plan', 'anticipate', 'believe', 'estimate', 'expect' or similar expressions. Forward-looking information may include but is not limited to the anticipated financial performance of the Company and other events or conditions that may occur in the future. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking information is not based on historical facts but instead reflects estimates or projections concerning future results or events based on the opinions, assumptions and estimates of management considered reasonable at the date the information is provided. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking information are reasonable, such information involves risks and uncertainties, and undue reliance should not be placed on such information, as unknown or unpredictable factors could have material adverse effects on future results, performance, or achievements of the Company. Among the key factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information include but are not limited to: additional costs related to acquisitions, integration of acquired businesses, and implementation of new products; changing global financial conditions, especially in light of the COVID-19 global pandemic; reliance on specific key employees and customers to maintain business operations; competition within the Company's industry; a risk in technological failure, failure to implement technological upgrades, or failure to implement new technological products in accordance with expected timelines; changing market conditions related to defaulted mortgage loans, and the failure of clients to send foreclosure and bankruptcy referrals in volumes similar to those prior to the COVID-19 global pandemic; failure of governing agencies and regulatory bodies to approve the use of products and services developed by the Company; the Company's dependence on maintaining intellectual property and protecting newly developed intellectual property; operating losses and negative cash flows; and currency fluctuations. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information contained herein. Factors relating to the Company's financial guidance and targets disclosed in this press release include, in addition to the factors set out above, the degree to which actual future events accord with, or vary from, the expectations of, and assumptions used by, Voxtur's management in preparing the financial guidance and targets.
This forward-looking information is provided as of the date of this news release and, accordingly, is subject to change after such date. The Company does not assume any obligation to update or revise this information to reflect new events or circumstances except as required in accordance with applicable laws.
Neither TSXV nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Voxtur's common shares are traded on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol VXTR and in the US on the OTCQB under the symbol VXTRF.
Company Contact:
Jordan Ross
Tel: (416)708-9764
jordan@voxtur.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
CubicFarm Systems Corporation: Announces Failure to File Cease Trade Order
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - July 4, 2025) - CubicFarm® Systems Corp. (TSXV: CUB) ("CubicFarms" or the "Company"), a leading local chain agricultural technology company, announces that the British Columbia Securities Commission (the "BCSC") as the principal regulator of the Company issued a failure-to-file case trade order (the "FFCTO") to the Company under Multilateral Instrument 11-103 – Failure-To-File Cease Trade Orders In Multiple Jurisdictions, prohibiting the trading in or the purchasing of any securities of the Company by any person or company in Canada, including trades in the Company's common shares made through the TSX Venture Exchange, except in accordance with the following conditions for so long as the FFCTO order remains in effect: – a beneficial securityholder of the Company who is not, and was not at the date of the FFCTO an insider or control person of the Company, may sell securities of the Company acquired before the date of July 3, 2025 if both of the following apply: (a) the sale is made through a "foreign organized regulated market", as defined in section 1.1 of the Universal Market Integrity Rules of the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization; and (b) the sale is made through an investment dealer registered in a jurisdiction of Canada in accordance with applicable securities legislation. The FFCTO was issued as a result of the delay in the filing of the Company's annual audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, the related management's discussion and analysis and annual information form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and related filings (the "Required Annual Filings"), as well as the Company's interim financial statements for the three-month period ended March 31, 2025, the related management's discussion and analysis for the three-month period ended March 31, 2025, and related filings (the "Required Interim Filings", and together with the Required Annual Filings, the "Required Filings"). Under National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations, the Required Annual Filings were required to be made no later than April 30, 2025, and the Required Interim Filings were required to be made no later than May 30, 2025. The BCSC had previously granted, on April 30, 2025, a management cease trade order, which has been revoked and replaced by the FFCTO dated July 3, 2025. The Company is working diligently with its auditors to facilitate the completion of the Required Filings and expects to file the Required Annual Filings for 2024 in the coming weeks, and it will provide updates as further information relating to the Required Documents becomes available and as required. About HydroGreen HydroGreen's Automated Vertical Pastures™ technology utilizes a unique process to sprout grains, such as barley and wheat, in a controlled environment with minimal use of land, labour and water. HydroGreen's fully automated indoor growing technology performs all growing functions including seeding, watering, lighting, harvesting, and re-seeding-all with the push of a button-to deliver nutritious fresh forage for livestock without the typical investment in fertilizer, chemicals, fuel, field equipment, and transportation. Automated Vertical Pastures™ not only provide superior nutritious feed to benefit the animal but also enable significant environmental benefits to the farm. About CubicFarms CubicFarms is a leading local chain agricultural technology company developing and deploying technology to feed a changing world. Its proprietary ag-tech solutions enable growers to produce high quality, predictable produce and fresh livestock feed with HydroGreen Nutrition Technology, a division of CubicFarm Systems Corp. The CubicFarms™ system contains patented technology for growing leafy greens and other crops onsite, indoors, all year round. CubicFarms provides an efficient, localized food supply solution that benefits our people, planet, and economy. For more information, please visit Contact info@ for media or investors@ for investor inquiries. Forward looking and other cautionary statements Certain statements in this release constitute "forward-looking statements" or "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including, without limitation, statements with respect to: statements regarding the timing, review, completion and filing of the Required Filings. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors and assumptions which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of CubicFarm Systems Corp., or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or information including, without limitation, the risk of the Company not obtaining the Management CTO or file the Required Filing on time and the other factors disclosed under "Risk Factors" in the Company's annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2022, and those risks described in other documents incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference in the prospectus. Such statements can be identified by the use of words such as "intend", "expect", "believe", "plan", "anticipate", "estimate", "scheduled", "forecast", "predict", and other similar terminology, or state that certain actions, events, or results "may", "can", "could", "would", "might", or "will" be taken, occur, or be achieved. These statements reflect the Company's current expectations regarding future events, performance, and results and speak only as of the date of this news release. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Except as required by securities disclosure laws and regulations applicable to the Company, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if the Company's expectations regarding future events, performance, or results change. To view the source version of this press release, please visit
Business Insider
7 hours ago
- Business Insider
The billionaires making moves to buy or sell sports teams this year
Buyer: Mark Walter Guggenheim Partners CEO Mark Walter, who is already the primary owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers, reportedly bought the Los Angeles Lakers for a record $10 billion in June. Walter is also a primary owner of an F1 team and the WNBA's Los Angeles Sparks. Buyer: Bill Chisholm A Boston-area native, Bill Chisholm made his fortune in Silicon Valley as managing partner of STG Partners. In March, a group led by Chisholm bought the NBA's Boston Celtics for $6.1 billion, a record amount for a North American sports franchise before the Lakers' staggering sale price. Chisholm and Walker's agreements are still pending approval of the NBA's Board of Governors. Forbes estimates that Chisholm is worth $3.2 billion. Buyer: Marc Lore Wonder CEO Marc Lore and MLB great Alex Rodriguez teamed up to buy the NBA's Minnesota Timberwolves for $1.5 billion. The WNBA's Minnesota Lynx were also included in the sale. The deal dates back to 2021, but talks turned sour after then-owner Glen Taylor tried to nullify it. After four years of back and forth, Taylor decided not to challenge an April arbitration ruling that went in Lore's favor. The NBA approved the sale in June. Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg are also part of the ownership group. Lore made his fortune in e-commerce, co-founding parent company and which was later sold to Walmart for $3.3 billion in 2016. Buyer: Woody Johnson Jets owner Woody Johnson bought a 43% in Crystal Palace, an English Premier League team, for a reported $254 million in June. Johnson, a GOP megadonor and former US ambassador to the United Kingdom, is an heir to the Johnson & Johnson fortune. He bought the stake from John Textor, who is a former executive chairman of FuboTV. The deal is still pending league approval. Buyer: Tom Gores Tom Gores, who runs the Beverly Hills-based Platinum Equity, is among a handful of billionaires who will own one of the three WNBA expansion franchises. Each ownership group paid a $250 million expansion fee, a record amount for a new team in a women's league, according to Sportico. The WNBA has exploded in popularity, largely due to the arrival of Caitlin Clark. The WNBA announced the expansion teams in June. Gores, who is the sole owner of the NBA's Detroit Pistons, will run a team also based in Detroit. Buyer: Josh Harris Josh Harris, a cofounder of Apollo Global Management, will share in the ownership of a new Philadelphia WNBA team. Harris is a cofounder of Harris Blitzer Sports & Entertainment, which he created with Blackstone executive David Blitzer. Their group also owns the NBA's Philadelphia 76ers and the NHL's New Jersey Devils. Outside of the group, Harris is also the managing partner of the Washington Commanders. In 2023, Harris led a group that bought the NFL team for a then-record-breaking $6.05 billion. Buyer: Dan Gilbert Dan Gilbert, cofounder of what is now Quicken Loans, will own the future WNBA team in Cleveland, complementing his existing ownership of the NBA's Cleveland Cavaliers. Gilbert made headlines in 2010 for writing an open letter that mocked LeBron James after the Ohio native left the Cavaliers for the Miami Heat. James and Gilbert later made up and celebrated the 2016 NBA title, which capped James' return to Ohio. According to Forbes, Gilbert is worth an estimated $25.9 billion. He also founded StockX, a resale platform that reached unicorn status in 2019. Seller: Jeanie Buss and family Jeanie Buss, controlling owner of the Lakers, is selling the 17-time NBA champion to Walker for a reported $10 billion. Jerry Buss, Jeannie's father, purchased the team in 1979 for $67.5 million in a deal that included the Forum Arena and the NHL's Los Angeles Kings. Under the Buss family, the Lakers have become one of the world's most valuable sports franchises and won 11 NBA titles. Last year, Forbes valued the Lakers at $7.1 billion. (Buss herself is not on the billionaires list.) Buss took over the Lakers after her father died in 2013. In a statement announcing the sale in June, the Lakers said Jeannie Buss will remain the team's governor after the sale is completed. Seller: Wyc Grousbeck Wyc Grousbeck, who co-owns the Celtics with his father, Irving, is selling the team to Chisholm for a reported $6.1 billion. The deal was first announced in March. The Grousbecks led the purchase of the team in 2002. Since then, the Celtics have won two NBA championships. Their 2024 title was the franchise's 18th overall, the most in league history. Last year, Forbes estimated that the team was worth $6 billion and was the 19th-most valuable sports franchise in the world. Forbes estimates Irving Grousbeck and his family are worth $2.2 billion. Seller: Glen Taylor Glen Taylor, founder of a Minnesota-based printing firm, has agreed to sell the Timberwolves to a group led by fellow billionaire Marc Lore for $1.5 billion. Taylor's initial 2021 deal called for him to retain a 20% stake in the team. ESPN reported that Lore, Rodriguez, and the rest of their group are poised to buy Taylor out completely. Taylor bought the Timberwolves in 1994 for roughly $88 million, which also prevented the franchise from moving to New Orleans. Seller: Jody Allen and Paul Allen's estate The estate of Microsoft cofounder Paul Allen is selling the Trailblazers. After a lengthy dispute, the NBA confirmed in May that the team was available. Jody Allen, Paul's sister, has been acting as the team's top executive since Allen's death from cancer in 2018. The team was official put up for sale in May. In 2018, Forbes estimated that Allen was worth $20.3 billion. Possible future buyer: Justin Ishbia Justin Ishbia, the founder of Shore Capital Partners, a Chicago-based private equity firm. In June, the Chicago White Sox announced a deal that could lead to Ishbia becoming the future owner of the MLB franchise. Ishbia, who already owns a minority stake in the team, will make unspecified cash infusions into the club in 2025 and 2026. As early as 2029, Ishbia could take over the team from Jerry Reinsdorf. There is no guarantee that such a transaction will occur. Ishiba's brother, Mat, owns the NBA's Phoenix Suns and the WNBA's Phoenix Mercury, which Justin Ishiba also shares in. Possible future seller: Jerry Reinsdorf Jerry Reinsdorf, the longtime owner of the Chicago Bulls and White Sox, has reached an agreement to potentially sell control of the South Side MLB team as soon as 2029. If they reach an agreement, Reinsdorf could eventually turn over control of the White Sox to Justin Ishbia. Their agreement was first announced in June. Reinsdorf, who made his initial fortune in real estate, has also overseen a massive increase in the Bulls' value. He and his investment partners bought the NBA team one year after Michael Jordan was drafted.
Entrepreneur
7 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
How to Oust a Difficult Co-founder Legally and Smoothly
There are a number of reasons that a co-founder may want to part ways with another co-founder. There are also legal considerations to keep in mind when co-founders separate. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Imagine this. Jean and John, who met at a startup incubator, founded a company together. But as they grew, Jean realized that she and John weren't aligned on many things, including what the company's future should look like. Neither John's goals nor his behavior reflected the company's mission, so Jean ousts John from the business. Reasons for a co-founder's departure There are a number of reasons that a co-founder may want to part ways with another co-founder. 1. Lack of dedication A startup that wants to scale for a big exit typically requires founders who dedicate long hours for little pay (at least at the beginning). While some founders, like Jean, are willing to do that, some, like John, are not. Jean was willing to put in as many hours as it took to meet her responsibilities. John, on the other hand, arrived late and left early, demonstrating that he wasn't dedicated to his role — or the company. 2. Difficult to work with Some founders are simply difficult to work with. They're not collaborative, they're closed off to others' input or they belittle or micromanage their employees. While in the office, John's attitude was one of superiority. He felt that certain tasks were below him and that others should do the "heavy lifting." He criticized his employees at every opportunity, lowering morale and eventually pushing a very dedicated, key employee out of the company. 3. Lack of alignment with vision While a dream team of co-founders might be committed and great as colleagues, they might have different visions about the company's future. For example, they may disagree on a pivot other founders believe is necessary. Jean wanted to focus on R&D to ensure ongoing innovation, but John was focused on expanding the company. In addition to his behavior, this lack of alignment caused so much tension that Jean started the process of terminating her co-founder. Related: So Your Co-Founder is Threatening to Quit Unless You Give Them More Equity. What Should You Do? Legal considerations In addition to mistakes that can be made during the termination process, there are several legal considerations to keep in mind when co-founders separate. 1. Complying with employment law Founders are almost always employees by law. When terminating an employee, keep in mind — and meet — the legalities of termination, including filing certain paperwork and notices, and meeting deadlines for paying the final paycheck, for example. When the tension between Jean and John began, Jean documented each instance so she had relevant backup at the time of John's termination. 2. Is your relationship buttoned up? Make sure you are not giving an ousted co-founder leverage. Breaking promises or not protecting the company legally in its founding documents on IP assignments or confidentiality obligations means that they now have valuable IP the company needs. 3. Do you have the legal right? It's critical to ensure that a co-founder has the legal right to terminate another co-founder. If they do not, they should take the necessary steps to secure those rights; it might not be as simple as telling them they are fired. For example, the company's bylaws might allow a co-founder to be terminated only if the board votes to do so. The ousting founders need to make sure they can — and do — get board support. When John's performance began to decline, Jean consulted with the company's board to ensure the board was informed from the outset. More legal considerations: What NOT to do While there are considerations to make so as not to run into legal issues, there are also considerations for what NOT to do. 1. Don't think about a separation agreement A legally binding separation agreement can get you a release of claims, potentially non-disparagement terms and other benefits for the company, including agreements to not sue. Investors will want to see this if at all possible in diligence. It's worth some money to get this. As soon as John's performance started suffering and other employees began complaining about his behavior, Jean consulted an employment attorney to prepare the paperwork necessary for a separation agreement, enabling the process to be completed without worrying about a potential lawsuit. 2. Forget to cut off access to systems To prevent an ousted co-founder from accessing company information post-termination, ensure that they can no longer access the company's systems. Disgruntled employees with access to company data can cause major problems. Once John was officially "out," all access to company information was cut off; Jean knew that, if given the opportunity, John would have tried to access certain data once he exited the company. 3. Bash the ousted founder to employees, investors and other stakeholders Sometimes in trying to explain the ousted founder's departure, founders will resort to speaking negatively about them; this opens the company to defamation liability. It can also reflect badly on the company and the founding terms. Finally, it can lead to the ousted founder becoming more hostile toward the company. Despite their differences, Jean maintained reasonable levels of professionalism. Although the process was stressful for her, her team and ultimately the company, John's ouster and the reasons behind it remained within the executive leadership team. Related: 4 Sane Strategies for Maintaining Healthy Co-Founder Relationships Ramifications of skirting the law All of this advice hinges on the remaining founders meeting the requirements to legally terminate a co-founder. When they don't, there are ramifications. 1. Incurring penalties and legal claims First, by not complying with employment laws, penalties can be incurred, and legal claims are given to the ousted founder; these can add up. For example, in California, if all wages aren't paid on the final day of employment, the ousted founder is entitled to a penalty equal to one full day of wages for every day until they are fully paid (up to 30 days). Jean's diligence in consulting a startup attorney prepared her for the separation. In addition to the separation agreement, Jean presented John with his final paycheck at the termination meeting. 2. Post-termination negotiations If you don't button up your relationship with the founder prior to termination, you will be stuck post-termination negotiating for what you need. At this point, you are unlikely to have much leverage. 3. No separation agreement If you fail to get a separation agreement, investors may push on you in diligence to get one later; this is often difficult. Also, you may subject the company to claims that would have been released if money was offered as severance at the outset. Note that a founder may sign a separation agreement quickly if it's offered with a positive message and incentives. The absence of an up-front offer can result in litigation, and demands may increase. The bottom line While there are myriad factors that contribute to the ousting of a company founder, it behooves those on the company side to make appropriate preparations to avoid legal troubles. Ready to break through your revenue ceiling? Join us at Level Up, a conference for ambitious business leaders to unlock new growth opportunities.
